Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.            )
 
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [   ] 
 
Check the appropriate box:
 
[   ]      Preliminary Proxy Statement
[   ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[   ] Definitive Additional Materials
[   ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

 Citigroup Inc. 
 (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) 
 
     
 (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X]      No fee required.
[   ] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 
  1)       Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
     
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
 
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
 
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
5)Total fee paid:
 
[   ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 
[   ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 
  1) Amount Previously Paid:
     
 2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
     
 3) Filing Party:
     
 4) Date Filed:
 



Table of Contents



 
20172019Citigroup Inc.
Notice of Annual Meeting
and Proxy Statement
         



April 25, 201716, 2019


The Great Hall of The Cooper UnionAnnual Meeting Location:
7 East 7thCiti’s Headquarters
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10003
10013





Table of Contents




Citigroup Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

 

 

March 15, 20176, 2019

 

Dear Stockholder:Shareholder:

We cordially invite you to attend Citi’s 20172019 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 25, 2017,16, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. at The Great Hall of The Cooper Union inCiti’s Headquarters, 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York.York 10013. Directions to the Annual Meeting location are provided on page 119 of thisin the Proxy Statement.

At the Annual Meeting, stockholdersshareholders will vote on a number of important matters. Please take the time to carefully read each of the proposals described in the attached Proxy Statement.

Although I have served as a Citi Director for over a year, and represented the Board as independent counsel for the two prior years, the 2019 Annual Meeting will be my first as your Chair. I am deeply honored to assume this new role, and deeply grateful that my predecessor, Mike O’Neill, provided such a sterling example for me to emulate in the years ahead.

Thank you for your support of Citi.


Sincerely,
Michael E. O’NeillJohn C. Dugan
ChairmanChair of the Board




Table of Contents

4



 
Letter from the Board
of Directors to our Stockholders
Shareholders


The Board and our Risk Committee engage deeply in the oversight of risk management practices ….always recognizing that, while Citi is in the business of taking risk, these risks must be understood, measured, monitored, and controlled.

By most financial measures, 2018 for Citi was a year captured best by the phrase “steady progress.” Consistent with the goals set forth in our Investor Day presentation almost two years ago, and adjusting for the one-time impact of U.S. Tax Reform, the firm increased its net income by 14 percent; increased its earnings per share by 25 percent; reduced operating expenses by one percent, driving down the operating efficiency ratio to 57 percent; generated continued growth in loans and deposits; and perhaps most important, increased its return on tangible common equity (RoTCE) to 10.9 percent. While the lower effective tax rate resulting from U.S. Tax Reform contributed substantially to these results, Citi’s pre-tax earnings also increased modestly from the prior year.

Despite this positive operating performance, Citi’s Total Shareholder Return (TSR) for 2018 disappointed, both absolutely and relative to peers. This was partly due to a general decline in bank share prices, exacerbated by an especially sharp decrease in December for banks with substantial market-making operations. While Citi’s share price and relative TSR rebounded in the first part of this year, your Board remains very focused on Citi improving its TSR in 2019 and the years ahead – and we believe the best way for the firm to do this is to continue its steady progress, especially through improvement of its return on tangible common equity.

Management also made progress on the regulatory front last year, which we believe is critical to the firm’s success. Citi again achieved a successful result in the Federal Reserve’s annual Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) stress test, enabling the return of over $18 billion of capital to common shareholders during the calendar year, while maintaining levels of regulatory capital well in excess of minimum requirements. In addition, Citi made headway on a range of heightened regulatory requirements that all large banks have faced in the wake of the financial crisis. Nevertheless, your Board will continue to pay close attention to – and expect management to make continued progress on – regulatory matters in 2019 and beyond.

As it should be for a global firm like Citi, prudent risk management was top of mind for both management and the Board in 2018. Our three lines of defense – the business lines, the control functions, and internal audit – dove deeply and, where necessary, took proactive steps in critical risk areas such as Brexit, the potential fall-out from trade wars, evolving industry underwriting standards in leveraged lending, and the potential turn of the credit cycle. Cyber risk remains a crucial priority, and the firm has invested heavily to maintain state-of-the-art defenses and cyber resilience. The Board and our Risk Committee engage deeply in the oversight of risk management practices in these and other areas, always recognizing that, while Citi is in the business of taking risk, these risks must be understood, measured, monitored, and controlled.

Much has been written about the ethical lapses that have damaged the reputation of the banking industry, including Citi, both during and after the financial crisis. We continue to believe that strong ethical standards and practices are critically important, which is why Citi, alone in the banking industry, maintains an Ethics and Culture Committee of the Board as one means to keep management striving to achieve best practices – not just at senior levels but throughout the organization.

 


Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

5





Citi also took firm stands in 2018 on several issues of real importance. On diversity and inclusion, we became the first financial services company to voluntarily disclose adjusted pay gaps between women and men in the United States, the U.K., and Germany, and between minorities and non-minorities in the U.S. – and then took concrete steps to eliminate those gaps. In response to the epidemic of gun violence in the U.S., we were the first bank to announce a Commercial Firearms Policy, which requires our retail sector clients to establish such best practices as background checks and age restrictions. And in our Sustainable Progress Initiative, the firm recorded $38.4 billion in transactions toward our 10-year, $100 billion Environmental Finance goal. The Board fully supported each of these measures.

EngagingFinally, at our annual review of strategy, which we conduct each year at our July meeting, we will examine closely management’s plans to continue Citi’s path forward to achieve increased sustainable returns; address challenges from potential disruptors; improve our operations and technology; increase our efficiency; and continue to prudently manage risk. Our focus: continued steady progress toward Citi’s longer-term goal of a 16% RoTCE.

Thank you for your ongoing support of Citi. Dialogue with our stockholdersshareholders is a critical elementfundamental feature of good governance,a well governed organization, and we will continue to make it a priority.

Much was accomplished by our management team in 2016, but there is still work left to do to properly reward you, our investors, for your trust and patience.

Since the financial crisis our management team has shed over $800 billion in non-core assets while also improving and investing in the businesses we believe will provide solid risk-adjusted returns into the future. Over the past several years, the focus of management’s efforts has progressively moved to the latter task as the assets in Citi Holdings have been systematically wound down in an economically rational manner. At year-end 2016, Holdings’ assets were $54 billion and represented only about 3% of Citigroup’s total assets. As a result, beginning in 2017, Citi Holdings will no longer be separately reported, marking the end of what has arguably been the largest bank restructuring ever.

In April we received feedback on our 2015 Resolution and Recovery Plan and we commend management for the successful outcome. Among the plans submitted by the largest U.S. banks, Citi’s was the only one deemed to have no deficiencies by both the Federal Reserve Board and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. We are also pleased Please write with the progress made in resolving legacy issues and management’s continued strong emphasis on Risk Management, Controls, and Conduct.

Our 2016 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) results also demonstrated tangible progress. Not only did Citi pass, but the $12.2 billion in capital return approved by the Federal Reserve in this CCAR cycle was by far the largest amount approved for Citi to date. And even with the increase in our dividend and our stepped-up stock buyback activity, our Common Equity Tier 1 Ratio ended the year at 12.6%, 50 basis points higher than it was at the end of last year.

Despite the progress made on a number of important fronts, Citi’s operating performance in 2016 fell short of our expectations. Net income, at just under $15 billion, was more than 10% below 2015’s. The three traditional measures we and others in our industry use to gauge financial performance – Efficiency Ratio, Return on Assets (ROA), and Return on Tangible Common Equity (ROTCE) – all worsened. Our operating performance was constrained by the tepid global economic environment, particularly at the beginning of the year, and much of the profit shortfall in 2016 is explained by investments we continued to make throughout the year, as well as the absence of material gains contributed in 2015 by the shrinking Citi Holdings, and the costs associated with the acquisition of the large Costco card portfolio.



Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

5     








Management has recently announced updated financial targets, including a ROTCE of 10% in 2019, and has also indicated their belief that Citi is capable of generating a 14% ROTCE in the longer term. Accomplishing those objectives will require a combination of improved operating performance and optimized capital management.

Investing in areas we believe to be crucial to Citi’s future performance is a vital component of management’s plan to achieve its financial objectives. Areas of focus are our Cards, Treasury and Trade Solutions, Equities and Citibanamex businesses, as well as continued productivity-enhancing investments in technology.

Engaging with our stockholders is a critical element of good governance, and we will continue to make it a priority. You are encouraged to write your thoughts,any concerns or suggestions toto: Citigroup Inc. Board of Directors, c/o Rohan Weerasinghe, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, 388 Greenwich Street, New York, NY 10013.10013.

           
Michael L. Corbat
Ellen M. Costello
John C. Dugan
Duncan P. Hennes
Peter B. Henry
Franz B. Humer
Renée J. James
 S. Leslie Ireland
Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
Renée J. James
Eugene M. McQuade
Michael E. O’Neill
Gary M. Reiner
Judith Rodin
Anthony M. Santomero
Joan E. Spero
 Diana L. Taylor
William S. Thompson, Jr.
James S. Turley
Deborah C. Wright
Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon


 
A WORD OF APPRECIATION
  
We would like to thank Judith RodinMike O’Neill, who retired in January, was a director for 10 years and Joan Spero, who are retiring fromChairman of our Board havingfor seven years. He was an outstanding leader who provided wise and effective oversight, and he assembled a diverse and talented Board. In addition, Franz Humer and Tony Santomero have reached theour mandatory retirement age. We will miss their commitmentage; each provided many important contributions to the Board. Thank you – from all of us – for your valuable perspectives and valuable perspectives.years of service to Citi.


www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

6 
















(Intentionally Left Blank)



















Table of Contents

 7

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Citigroup Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013

Dear Stockholder:

Citi’s Annual Stockholders’ Meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 25, 2017,16, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. at The Great Hall of The Cooper Union inCiti’s Headquarters, 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York. Directions to the 20172019 Annual Meeting location are provided on page 119 126of this Proxy Statement. You will need an admission ticket or proof of ownership of Citi stock to enter the meeting. Live audio of the Annual Meeting will be webcast at www.citigroup.com.

At the meeting, stockholders will be asked to:

1.elect the directors listed in this proxy statement,
2.ratify the selection of Citi’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017,2019,
3.consider an advisory vote to approve Citi’s 20162018 executive compensation,
4.consider an advisory vote to approve the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation,Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan,
5.act on certain stockholder proposals, and
6.consider any other business properly brought before the meeting, or any adjournment or postponement thereof, by or at the direction of the Board of Directors.

Citi has utilized the Securities and Exchange Commission rule allowing companies to furnish proxy materials to its stockholders over the Internet. This process allows us to expedite our stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the costs of distribution, and reduce the environmental impact of our 20172019 Annual Meeting.

In accordance with this rule, on or about March 15, 2017,6, 2019, we sent to those current stockholders who were stockholders at the close of business on February 27, 2017,19, 2019, a notice of the 20172019 Annual Meeting containing aNotice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials(Notice). The Notice contains instructions on how to access our Proxy Statement and Annual Report and vote online. If you received a Notice and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials from us instead of downloading a printable version from the Internet, please follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice.

By order of the Board of Directors,


Rohan Weerasinghe
Corporate Secretary
March 15, 20176, 2019

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

8 
















(Intentionally Left Blank)


















Table of Contents

 9

Contents


Citi 2017 Proxy Statementwww.citigroup.com



Table of Contents


10 9

Proxy Statement Highlights


Voting Items
Proposal 1: Election of Directors (Page 40)(Pages 45-64)
The Board recommends you voteFOR voteFOReach nominee

Proposal 2: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm(Page 63)Pages 70-71)
The Board recommends you vote
FORthis proposal

Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Citi’s 20162018 Executive Compensation (Page 66)(Pages 72-109)
The Board recommends you vote
FORthis proposal

Proposal 4: Advisory Vote to Approve the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive CompensationCitigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan(Page 106)Pages 110-118)
The Board recommends you vote
FOR an ANNUAL advisory vote on executive compensationthis proposal

Stockholder Proposals 5-95-7(Pages 107-117)119-124)
The Board recommends you voteAGAINSTthe stockholder proposals


Meeting and
Voting Information
Date and Time
April 25, 2017,16, 2019, 9:00 a.m.
 

Place

The Great Hall of
The Cooper Union
7 East 7thCiti’s Headquarters 388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York
10003NY 10013

 

Record Date
February 27, 201719, 2019

 

Voting
Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each Director nominee and one vote for each of the other proposals to be voted on.

 

Admission
*New Procedures*
An admission ticket or proof of ownership of Citi’s stock is required to enter Citi’s Annual Meeting. To attend Citi’s 2019 Annual Meeting, go to the “Register for Meeting” link at www.proxyvote.com.

Board and Corporate Governance Highlights

Summary of Director Nominees
The nominees for the Board of Directors each have the qualifications and experience to approve and guide Citi’s strategy. The Board also oversees management’s execution of that strategic vision. Citi’s Board of Directors consists of individuals with the skills and backgrounds necessary to oversee Citi’s efforts on delivering sustainable, client-led revenue growth while operating within a complex financial and regulatory environment.

Board and Corporate Governance
Highlights

Summary of Director Nominees

The nominees for the Board of Directors each have the qualifications and experience to approve and guide Citi’s strategy and to oversee management’s execution of that strategic vision. Citi’s Board of Directors consists of individuals with the skills and backgrounds necessary to oversee Citi’s efforts toward becoming a simpler, smaller, safer, and stronger financial institution, while mitigating risk and operating within a complex financial and regulatory environment.

Independence

Independence

85%87%of our Board Nominees areIndependent.Independent

Tenure

 
Board Refreshment

The average board tenure of our sitting nominees is3.95 yearsand no sitting nominee has served formore than 10 years.There have been8 new Directorselected within the last5 yearsand this year’s slate includes a new nominee.

Diversity


 

Diversity

Citi’s Board is committed to ensuring that it is composed of individuals whose backgrounds reflect thediversity represented by our employees, customers, and stakeholders.



www.citigroup.com

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement




Table of Contents


10PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS

Director Nominees

Citi Committee Memberships
Name and
Primary Qualifications
AgeDirector
Since
Principal Occupation and Other Current
Public Company Directorships
AECENGPOTPCRM
Michael L. Corbat
562012Chief Executive Officer, Citigroup Inc.
Ellen M. Costello
622016Former President and CEO, BMO Financial Corporation, and Former U.S. Country Head, BMO Financial Group
Board:DH Corporation
Duncan P. Hennes
602013Co-Founder and Partner, Atrevida Partners, LLC
Peter B. Henry
472015Dean, New York University,
Leonard N. Stern School of Business
Board: General Electric Company
Franz B. Humer
702012Former Chairman, Roche Holdings Ltd.
Boards: Chugai Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Kite Pharmaceuticals, WISeKey SA
Renée J. James
522016Operating Executive, The Carlyle Group
Boards: Oracle Corporation, Sabre Corporation, Vodafone Group Plc

Eugene M. McQuade
682015Former Vice Chairman, Citigroup Inc. and Former CEO, Citibank, N.A.
Board: XL Group, Ltd. (Chairman)

Michael E. O’Neill
702009Chairman, Citigroup Inc.

Gary M. Reiner
622013Operating Partner, General Atlantic LLC
Boards: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Box Inc.

Anthony M. Santomero
702009Former President,
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
Boards: RenaissanceRe Holdings, Ltd., Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company

Diana L. Taylor
622009Vice Chair, Solera Capital LLC
Boards: Brookfield Asset Management, Sotheby’s

William S. Thompson, Jr.
712009Former CEO, Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO)

James S. Turley
612013Former Chairman and CEO, Ernst & Young
Boards: Emerson Electric Co., Intrexon Corporation, Northrop Grumman Corporation

Deborah C. Wright
592017Former Chairman Carver Bancorp, Inc.
Boards: Time Warner Inc., Voya Financial, Inc.

Ernesto Zedillo
Ponce de Leon
652010Director, Center for the Study of Globalization and Professor in the Field of International Economics and Politics, Yale University
Boards: Alcoa Corp., Procter & Gamble Company, Grupo Prisa

Qualifications committee member
committee chair
CompensationInternational Business or EconomicsAAudit
  Consumer Business and
Financial Services
   Legal MattersEC
E
Ethics and Culture
Executive
Corporate AffairsOperations and TechnologyNGP    Nomination, Governance
and Public Affairs
Corporate GovernanceRegulatory and ComplianceOT
PC
Operations and Technology
Personnel and Compensation
Financial ReportingRisk ManagementRMRisk Management
Institutional Business

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement




Table of Contents


PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS11

Director Nominees

Citi Committee Memberships*
Name and
Primary Qualifications
     Age     Director
Since
     Principal Occupation and Other Current
Public Company Directorships
     AECENGPOTPCRM
Michael L. Corbat
582012Chief Executive Officer, Citigroup Inc.
Ellen M. Costello
642016Former President and CEO, BMO Financial Corporation, and Former U. S. Country Head, BMO Financial Group
Board: Diebold Nixdorf, Inc.
Barbara J. Desoer
66CEO, Citibank, N. A.**
Board: DaVita Inc.
John C. Dugan
632017Chair, Citigroup Inc.
Duncan P. Hennes
622013Co-Founder and Partner, Atrevida Partners, LLC
Board: RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
Peter B. Henry
492015Dean Emeritus and W. R. Berkley Professor of Economics and Finance, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business
Board: Nike, Inc.
S. Leslie Ireland
592017Former Assistant Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis, U.S. Department of the Treasury, and National Intelligence Manager for Threat Finance, Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
482018Former President and Managing Director, Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (PIMCO)
Renée J. James
542016Chair and CEO, Ampere Computing, and Operating Executive, The Carlyle Group
Boards: Oracle Corporation, Sabre Corporation, and Vodafone Group Plc
Eugene M. McQuade
702015Former Vice Chairman, Citigroup Inc. and Former CEO, Citibank, N. A.
Gary M. Reiner
642013Operating Partner, General Atlantic LLC
Boards: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Box Inc.
Diana L. Taylor
642009Former Superintendent of Banks, State of New York
Boards: Brookfield Asset Management and Sotheby’s
James S. Turley
632013Former Chairman and CEO, Ernst & Young
Boards: Emerson Electric Co., Intrexon Corporation, and Northrop Grumman Corporation
Deborah C. Wright
612017Managing Director of U.S. Jobs and Economic Opportunity, Rockefeller Foundation
Ernesto Zedillo
  Ponce de Leon
672010Director, Center for the Study of Globalization and Professor in the Field of International Economics and Politics, Yale University
Boards: Alcoa Corp. and Procter & Gamble Company
*Mr. Santomero will be retiring from the Board on April 1, 2019 and Mr. Humer will be retiring from the Board on April 16, 2019, both having reached the mandatory retirement age. Mr. Humer currently serves as the Chair of the Ethics and Culture Committee and Mr. Santomero serves as the Chair of the Risk Management Committee. The Board will appoint new Chairs for these Committees effective upon their retirements.
**Ms. Desoer will retire as CEO of Citibank, N.A. before the Annual Meeting.

Qualifications
CompensationInternational Business or Economics
Consumer Business and Financial ServicesLegal Matters
Corporate AffairsOperations and Technology
Corporate GovernanceRegulatory and Compliance
Financial ReportingRisk Management
Institutional Business
committee member
committee chair
AAudit
ECEthics and Culture
EExecutive
NGP     Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs
OTOperations and Technology
PCPersonnel and Compensation
RMRisk Management


www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents


12PROXY STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS

Corporate Governance Highlights

Citi is active in ensuring its governance practices are at the leading edge of best practices. Highlights include:

Alignment with Stockholders     Compensation Governance     Adherence to Corporate

Governance Best Practices
The By-laws grantIn January 2019, the Board of Directors lowered the threshold for stockholders to call a Special Meeting from 25% to 20%
Citi adopted Proxy Access granting eligible stockholders the right to haveinclude stockholder nominees to the Board includednominees in the Company’s proxy materials
Stockholders have the right to act by written consent
Citi has an independent Chair
If there is no independent ChairmanChair of the Board, the Board will appoint a Lead Independent Director
Majority vote standard for uncontested Director elections
Stockholders have the right to call a special meeting and to act by written consent
No super-majority vote provisions in our governing instruments
Emphasize pay-for-performance alignment
Base a majorityMajority of total compensation based on performance
The Personnel and Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant
Expanded clawbackClawback policies for employees
Executive officers and Directors are required to retain at least 75% of the equity awarded to them as incentive compensation as long as they serve as executive officers or Directors, respectively; executive officers are required to retain 50% of such equity awards for one year following the termination of their employment
Citi was the first financial institution to publicly release the results of a pay equity review comparing compensation of women to men, and U.S. minorities to U.S. non-minorities
In 2019, Citi was the first financial institution to publicly disclose our unadjusted or “raw” pay gap for women and U.S. minorities; see page 76 of this Proxy Statement for further information
Formed an Ethics and Culture Committee of the Board in 2014
Published a meaningfulMeaningful Political Activities Statement and discloseddisclosure of Citi’s political contributions on Citi’s website
Posted the namesLinks on our website to federal and state government websites where Citi’s lobbying activities are reported
Names of significant trade and business associations, in which Citi is a participant, posted on Citi’s website
Members of Citi’s Board of Directors and Citi’s executive officers are not permitted to hedge their Citi securities or to pledge their Citi securities as collateral for a loan
Currently, Citi’s Board includesNominees for Director include six women and three minorities
NoOngoing Board refreshment, with new independent Directors added in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 and a new nominee hasincluded on the slate for the 2019 Annual Meeting
All of Citi’s nominees have served for morefewer than eight10 years

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents


ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) HIGHLIGHTS13

Our Investor Engagement ProgramProgram*

Summer
Members of the Board and senior management conduct follow-up calls with investors regarding votes at the Annual Meeting and other governance issues.
Fall
Management reviews the vote and feedback received from investors and analyzes governance and compensation trends.
Winter
Members of the Board and senior management conduct calls with investors for input on a variety of governance, compensation, and environmental and social matters, including climate risk.
Winter
Senior management continues to conduct engagement calls with investors regarding governance, compensation, matters under consideration.and environmental and social matters. The Board reviews shareholder feedback from these conversations.
Spring
Members of the Board and senior management conduct conversations with our institutional investors in advance of the Annual Meeting to provide an opportunity for discussion of compensation, management and stockholder proposals, and other governance and annual meeting issues.matters.

Annual Stockholders’ Meeting


*

In the period following the 2018 Annual Meeting and prior to the issuance of the 2019 Proxy Statement, Citi engaged with investors regarding, among other topics, the following: executive compensation, climate change risk and disclosure including our work in response to the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) Recommendations, gender pay equity, human and indigenous peoples’ rights, diversity and inclusion, board refreshment and governance, and certain stockholder proposals. For information about our engagement efforts in advance of the 2019 Annual Meeting, please see page 75 in this Proxy Statement.

Environmental, Social and
Governance (ESG) Highlights

Citizenship and Sustainability Governance at Citi

Three Board-level committees have oversight responsibility for citizenship and sustainability-related activities and report to the full Board on these topics. Management organizations provide strategic guidance and senior-level review on citizenship and sustainability topics.

Board of DirectorsSenior Management
Nomination,
Governance and Public
Affairs Committee
Ethics and Culture
 Committee
Risk Management
Committee
Environmental and Social Advisory Council
Citizenship, Corporate Sustainability, and Environmental and Social Risk Management teams
Business Practices Committees
Oversees citizenship and sustainability programs and company policies and procedures that impact citizenship and sustainability, including climate change, human rights and other issues; reviews engagement with major external stakeholders; and provides oversight of business practicesOversees senior management’s efforts to reinforce and enhance a culture of ethics throughout the firmReviews Citi’s risk appetite framework, including reputational risk appetite, and reviews and approves key risk policies, including those focused on environmental and social risk

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents


14ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) HIGHLIGHTS

Sustainability Framework

Our Sustainable Progress Strategy focuses on Climate Change, Sustainable Cities, and People and Communities, with our sustainability activities organized under three primary pillars:

Environmental
Finance
Environmental &
Social Risk
Management (ESRM)
Operations &
Supply Chain
$100 Billion Environmental Finance Goal focused on financing environmental and climate solutionsCollaborating with our clients to manage environmental and social risks and impacts associated with financed client activitiesManaging our global facilities and supply chain to minimize direct impact, reduce costs, and reflect best practices

Sustainable Progress Performance Highlights — 2018

Financed and facilitated
$38.4B
toward our$100 BILLION
ENVIRONMENTAL FINANCE
GOAL($95.3B from 2014-2018)

Formalized a newCOAL-FIRED
POWER POLICYto restrict
financing for the construction
or expansion of coal-fired power plants*

Reached62%of our
goal of
100% RENEWABLE
ENERGYfor our global
facilities by 2020

IssuedINAUGURAL
GREEN BOND
,
a€1 BILLION 3-year fixed rate
notes offering (2019)

InstitutedU.S. COMMERCIAL
FIREARMS POLICY
requiring
retail sector clients and partners
to adhere to responsible
sales practices*

Achieved2020 OPERATIONAL
FOOTPRINT GOALS
forENERGY,
WASTEandWATERreduction


Implementing the TCFD Recommendations
Citi continues to support the Paris Agreement and was an early supporter of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), which promotes greater understanding of climate-related risks and opportunities through better climate disclosures. Our adoption of the TCFD Recommendations builds on over two decades of work promoting sustainability. Climate change is a central focus of Citi’s Sustainable Progress Strategy and we take action through strong governance, environmental financing, integration of climate risks into environmental and social risk management, and transparent reporting on climate-related metrics and targets.

To pilot climate scenario analysis, Citi worked jointly with 15 other banks and the UN Environment Finance Initiative to develop new methodologies and tools for the assessment of transition and physical risks and opportunities within banks’ lending portfolios. Citi piloted the transition risk methodology on our North American oil and gas exploration and production portfolio and the transition and physical risk methodologies on our U.S. utilities portfolio. We shared our process and findings in our first climate disclosure report,Finance for a Climate-Resilient Future, published in November 2018. By voluntarily adopting the TCFD framework, Citi is working to better understand our own climate risks and help navigate the transition to a low-carbon economy.


ESG Ratings

CDP Climate score of A- (Leadership Band), Supply Chain score of A
Sustainalytics overall score of 69 (79th percentile), Environmental score 87 (Leader)
MSCI score of BB
Inclusion in DJSI World and North America indices since 2001

*

For more information about our environmental and social policies, please see Citi’s Environmental and Social Policy Framework at https://www.citigroup.com/citi/sustainability/data/Environmental-and-Social-Policy-Framework.pdf.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents


ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) HIGHLIGHTS15

Citizenship Approach

Executing a business model that adds value to society

Taking a stand on issues that matter and driving solutions

Reporting transparently and learning through dialogue

Maintaining a focus on ethical decision making and responsible business practices

Catalyzing innovation through strategic philanthropy and employee engagement


Citizenship Performance Highlights – 2018

Provided more than
$6 BILLIONin loans for
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
PROJECTSin the U.S.

CitiCHARITABLE GIVING
TOTALS $76 MILLION
in support of local communities
around the globe

First in the industry to
DISCLOSE A GENDER
PAY GAP
among global
workforce; see page 76 of this
Proxy Statement for further
information

Engaged100,000 CITI
VOLUNTEERS
in projects in
more than 450 cities across
90 countries as part of annual
day of service,
GLOBAL
COMMUNITY DAY

Citi Foundation invested
$78 MILLION, including
$49 MILLIONglobally to
tackle youth unemployment
through
PATHWAYS TO
PROGRESSinitiative

SetREPRESENTATION
GOALS
for Black talent in
the U.S. and female talent globally
to increase representation
ACROSS ALL LEVELS OF
THE FIRMby 2021


Recognition

World’s Best Bank for Corporate Responsibility - Euromoney Awards for Excellence 2018
Most Innovative Investment Bank for CSR - The Banker Investment Banking Awards 2018
Civic 50 - Recognized as one of the most community-minded companies in the U.S.
2018 Organizational Climate Leadership Award - Climate Leadership Conference
100% Score: Corporate Equality Index - Human Rights Campaign
2018 Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index

The UN Sustainable Development Goals: Citi Priorities

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a set of 17 global development goals for 2030. While our activities have an impact on all of the goals, Citi is focused on seven SDGs where our core business and key initiatives can have the greatest impact. We highlight those efforts in our external reporting, including in our annual Global Citizenship Report and in a standalone report, entitledBanking on 2030: Citi & the Sustainable Development Goals.


www.citigroup.com




Table of Contents

1216

About the 20172019 Annual Meeting

Q:

Who is soliciting my vote?

A:

The Board of Directors of Citigroup Inc. is soliciting your vote at the 20172019 Annual Meeting of Citi'sCiti’s stockholders.

 
Q:

Where and when will the 20172019 Annual Meeting take place?

A:

The Annual Meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:00 a.m. on April 25, 201716, 2019 at The Great Hall of The Cooper Union inCiti’s Headquarters, 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York. Directions to the 20172019 Annual Meeting location are provided on page 119126 of this Proxy Statement. Live audio of the 20172019 Annual Meeting will be webcast at www.citigroup.com.

 
Q:

Why did I receive a one-page Notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials this year instead of a full set of proxy materials?

A:

Pursuant to rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we have elected to mail to many of our stockholders aNotice of Internet Availability of the Proxy Materials (Notice) instead of a paper copy of the proxy materials. All stockholders receiving the Notice will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail on request. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy may be found in the Notice. In addition, the Notice contains instructions on how you may access proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically on an ongoing basis. This process has allowed us to expedite our stockholders'stockholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the costs of distribution, and reduce the environmental impact of our 20172019 Annual Meeting.

 
Q:

Why didn'tdidn’t I receive a Notice in the mail about the Internet availability of the proxy materials?

A:

We are providing some of our stockholders, including stockholders who have previously asked to receive paper copies of the proxy materials and some of our stockholders who are living outside of the United States, with paper copies of the proxy materials instead of a Notice. In addition, we are providing a Notice by e-mail to those stockholders who have previously elected delivery of the proxy materials electronically. Those stockholders should have received an e-mail containing a link to the website where those materials are available and a link to the proxy voting website.

  
Q:

How can I access Citi'sCiti’s proxy materials and Annual Report electronically?

A:

This Proxy Statement and the 20162018 Annual Report are available on Citi’s website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” and then “Corporate Governance.” Most stockholders can elect not to receive paper copies of future Proxy Statements and Annual Reports and can instead view those documents on the Internet. Information on or connected to our website (or the website of any third party) referenced in this Proxy Statement is in addition to and not a part of or incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

If you are a stockholder of record, you can choose this option and save Citi the cost of producing and mailing these documents by following the instructions provided when you vote over the Internet. If you hold your Citi stock through a bank, broker, or other holder of record, please refer to the information provided by that entity for instructions on how to elect not to receive paper copies of future Proxy Statements and Annual Reports.

If you choose not to receive paper copies of future Proxy Statements and Annual Reports, you will receive an e-mail message next year containing the Internet address to use to access Citi’s Proxy Statement and Annual Report. Your choice will remain in effect until you tell us otherwise or until your consent is deemed to be revoked under applicable law. You do not have to elect Internet access each year. To view, cancel, or change your enrollment profile, please go to www.InvestorDelivery.com.


Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

ABOUT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING1317

Q:

What will I be voting on?

A:

Election of Directors (see pages 40-61) 45-64).

Ratification of KPMG as Citi’s independent registered public accounting firm for 20172019 (see pages 63-65) 70-71).

An advisory vote to approve Citi’s 20162018 executive compensation (see pages 66-105) 72-109).

An advisory vote to approveApprove the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensationCitigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan (see pagepages106) 110-118).

FiveThree stockholder proposals (see pages107-117) 119-124).


An agenda will be distributed at the meeting.

Q:

How many votes do I have?

A:

You will have one vote for every share of Citi common stock you owned on February 27, 201719, 2019 (the record date).

Q:

How many votes can be cast by all stockholders?

A:

2,764,865,317,2,340,491,298, consisting of one vote for each of Citi’s shares of common stock that were outstanding on the record date. There is no cumulative voting.

Q:

How many votes must be present to hold the meeting?

A:

To constitute a quorum to transact business at the 20172019 Annual Meeting, the holders of a majority of the votes that can be cast, or 1,382,432,6601,170,245,650 shares, must be present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting. We urge you to vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, so that we will know as soon as possible that enough votes will be present for us to hold the Annual Meeting. Persons voting by proxy will be deemed present at the meeting even if they abstain from voting on any or all of the proposals presented for stockholder action. Shares held by brokers who vote such shares on any proposal will be counted as present for purposes of establishing a quorum, and shares treated as broker non-votes for one or more proposals will nevertheless be deemed present for purposes of constituting a quorum for the Annual Meeting.

Q:Does any single stockholder control 5% or more of any class of Citi’s voting stock?
A:

Yes, there are two stockholders that each control more than 5%. According to a Schedule 13G Information Statement filed by BlackRock, Inc. and certain subsidiaries (BlackRock) on January 19, 2017,February 11, 2019, BlackRock may be deemed to beneficially own 7.2%7.1% of Citi’s common stock. According to a Schedule 13G Information Statement filed by The Vanguard Group, Inc. (Vanguard) on February 9, 2017,11, 2019, Vanguard may be deemed to beneficially own 6.27%7.33% of Citi’s common stock.

For further information,see Stock Ownership — Owners of More than 5% of Citi Common Stock on page 3944 in this Proxy Statement.

Q:How do I vote?
A:You can vote by proxy whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting. To vote by proxy, stockholders have a choice of voting over the Internet, by mobile phone, by telephone, by QR code, by phone, or by using a traditional proxy card.card by mail or in person.

Vote by Internet
Go to www.proxyvote.com. You will need the 16-digit number included in your proxy card, voter instruction form, or Notice.
       Vote by QR code
You can scan this QR code to vote your proxy card. You will need the 16-digit numberincludednumber included in your proxy card, voter instruction form, or Notice.
       Vote by Phone
Call the number on your proxy card or the number on your voter instruction form. You will need the 16-digit number included in your proxy card, voterinstructionvoter instruction form, or Notice.
       Vote by Mail
Send the completed and signed proxy card or voter instruction form to the address on your proxy card or voter instruction form.
       Vote in Person
See the instructions below regarding attendance at the Annual Meeting.
       
     


www.citigroup.comcitigroup.com



Table of Contents

1418ABOUT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

To reduce our administrative and postage costs, we ask that you vote using the Internet, by telephone, by mobile phone, or by QR code, all of which are available 24 hours a day.To ensure that your vote is counted, please remember to submit your vote by 11:59 p.m. ET on April 24, 201715, 2019. If you hold your shares in a Citi employee benefit plan, please submit your vote by the date indicated on your proxy card.

If you are a record holder of Citi common stock, you may attend the 20172019 Annual Meeting and vote in person. If you want to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, and you hold your Citi common stock through a securities broker (that is, in “street name”), you must obtain a proxy from your broker and bring that proxy to the Annual Meeting.

 
Q:

How do I get a printed proxy card?

A:

ThereIf you received a Notice instead of the printed materials, there are three ways for stockholders to request a proxy card and a full set of materials at no charge if you received a Notice instead of the printed materials.charge. In all three examples you will need the 16-digit Control Number printed on the Notice.

Requesting a proxy card

By telephone: 1-800-579-1639;
By Internet: www.proxyvote.com; or
By e-mail: sendmaterial@proxyvote.com (send a blank e-mail with the 16-digit Control Number in the subject line).

Q:

Can I change my vote?

A:

Yes. Just send in a new proxy card or voter instruction form with a later date, cast a new vote by telephone or Internet, or send a written notice of revocation to Citi’s Corporate Secretary, Rohan Weerasinghe, at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013. If you attend the 20172019 Annual Meeting and want to vote in person, you can request that your previously submitted proxy not be used.

To ensure that your vote is counted, please remember to submit your vote by 11:59 p.m. ET on April 15, 2019.

Q:

What if I don’t vote for some of the matters listed on my proxy card?

A:

If you return a signed proxy card without indicating voting instructions, your shares will be votedin accordance with the Board’s recommendationforFOR the nominees listed on the card,forFOR KPMG as independent registered public accounting firm for 2017, for2019,FOR Citi’s 20162018 executive compensation,for an annual advisory vote on executive compensation,FOR the Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan, andagainstAGAINST the stockholder proposals. If you only vote for certain matters, the remaining matters will be voted as set forth above. See also “Could other matters be decided at the 20172019 Annual Meeting?”


Q:

Can my shares held in street name be voted if I don’t return my voter instruction card and don’t attend the 20172019 Annual Meeting?

A:

If you don’t vote your shares held in street name, your broker can vote your shares on matters that the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) has ruled discretionary.

Discretionary Items. KPMG’s appointment is a discretionary item. NYSE member brokers who do not receive instructions from beneficial owners may vote on this proposal as follows: (i) a Citi affiliated member is permitted to vote your shares in the same proportion as all other shares are voted with respect to this proposal;proposal, and (ii) all other NYSE member brokers are permitted to vote your shares at their discretion.

Non-discretionary Items. Brokers will not be able to vote your shares on the election of Directors, the advisory vote to approve Citi’s 20162018 executive compensation, the advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation,Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan, and the stockholder proposals if you fail to provide instructions. Generally, broker non-votes occur on a matter when a broker is not permitted to vote on that matter without instructions from the beneficial owner and instructions are not given.

If your shares are registered directly in your name, not in the name of a bank or broker, you must vote your shares or your vote will not be counted.Please vote your proxy so your vote can be countedcounted..


Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

ABOUT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING1519

Q:

If I hold shares through Citigroup’s employee benefit plans and do not provide voting instructions, how will my shares be voted?

A:

If you hold shares of common stock through Citigroup’s employee benefit plans or stock incentive plans and do not provide voting instructions to the plans’ trustees or administrators, your shares will be voted in the same proportion as the shares beneficially owned through such plans for which voting instructions are received, unless otherwise required by law.


Q:

What vote is required, and how will my votes be counted, to elect Directors and to adopt the other proposals?

A:

The following chart describes the proposals to be considered at the meeting, the vote required to elect Directors and to adopt each of the other proposals, and the manner in which votes will be counted:


ProposalVoting OptionsVote Required to Adopt
the Proposal
Effect of
Abstentions
Effect of
Abstentions

Effect of
“Broker
Non-Votes”
(1)

Election of Directors.

Directors

For, against, or abstain on each nominee.

nominee

A nominee for Director will be elected if the votes cast for such nominee exceed the votes cast against such nominee.

No effect

No effect.

No effect.

effect

Ratification of KPMG.

KPMG

For, against, or abstain.

abstain

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.

Treated as votes against.

against

Brokers have discretion to vote.

vote

Advisory vote to approve Citi’s 20162018 executive compensation.

compensation

For, against, or abstain.

abstain

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.

Treated as votes against.

against

No effect.

effect

Advisory vote to approve the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation.

The Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan

Stockholders may select whether such votes should occur every year, every two years or every three years, or stockholders may abstain from voting.

The Company will treat the voting option that receives the greatest number of affirmative votes of the shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon as the option that is approved by the stockholders.

No effect.

No effect.

Five stockholder proposals.

For, against, or abstain.

abstain

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.

Treated as votes against.

against
No effect

Three stockholder proposals

For, against, or abstainThe affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote thereon.Treated as votes againstNo effect.

effect

(1)A broker non-vote generally occurs when a broker is not permitted to vote on a matter without instructions from a customer having beneficial ownership in the securities and has not received such instructions. Broker non-votes will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on the relevant proposal.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

16ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

If a nominee for Director is not re-elected by the required vote, he or she will remain in office until a successor is elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. Citi’s By-laws provide that in the event a Director nominee is not re-elected, such Director shall offer to resign from his or her position as a Director. Unless the Board decides to reject the offer or to postpone the effective date of the offer, the resignation shall become effective 60 days after the date of the election.

The result of the votes on an advisory vote on Citi’s 20162018 executive compensation and on frequency of future advisory votes areis not binding on the Board, whether or not the resolution is passed under the voting standards described above. In evaluating the stockholder vote on the advisory resolution, the Board will consider the voting results in their entirety.


www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

20ABOUT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING

Q:

Is my vote confidential?

A:

In 2006, the Board adopted a confidential voting policy as part of its Corporate Governance Guidelines. Under the policy, except as necessary to meet applicable legal requirements or as otherwise described below, all votes, whether submitted by proxies, ballots, Internet voting, telephone voting, or otherwise are kept confidential for registered stockholders who request confidential treatment. If you are a registered stockholder and would like your vote kept confidential, please check the appropriate box on the proxy card or follow the instructions when submitting your vote by telephone, mobile phone, or by the Internet. If you hold your shares in “street name” or through an employee benefit plan or stock incentive plan, your vote already receives confidential treatment and you do not need to request confidential treatment in order to maintain the confidentiality of your vote.

The confidential voting policy will not apply in the event of a proxy contest or other solicitation based on an opposition Proxy Statement and in certain other limited circumstances. For further details regarding this policy, please see the Corporate Governance Guidelines, available on Citi’s website at www.citigroup.com.


Q:

Could other matters be decided at the 20172019 Annual Meeting?

A:

We don’t know of any matters that will be considered at the Annual Meeting other than those described above. If a stockholder proposal that was excluded from this Proxy Statement is brought before the meeting, the ChairmanChair will declare such proposal out of order, and it will be disregarded, or we will vote the proxiesagainstAGAINST the proposal. If any other matters arise at the Annual Meeting that are properly presented at the meeting, the proxies will be voted at the discretion of the proxy holders.


Q:

What happens if the meeting is postponed or adjourned?

A:

Your proxy will still be good and may be voted at the postponed or adjourned meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.


Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

ABOUT THE 2019 ANNUAL MEETING1721

Q:

Do I need a ticket to attend the 20172019 Annual Meeting?


NEW ADMISSION PROCEDURES
A:

Yes, you will need an admission ticket or proof of ownership of Citi common stock to enter the Annual Meeting. Starting this year, we have streamlined the admission process for entry into the 2019 Annual Meeting. To promote an efficient admission process, we encourage all of our stockholders attending the meeting to pre-register and bring an admission ticket with them. Tickets can be printed by accessing Shareholder Meeting Registration at www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided (you will need the 16-digit Control Number included on your proxy card, voter instruction form or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials). If you are unable to print your ticket, please call Shareholder Meeting Registration Phone Support (toll free) at 1-844-318-0137 or (international toll call) at 1-925-331-6070 for assistance.

When you arrive at the Annual Meeting, you maywill be asked to present photo identification, such as a driver’s license.

If you received aNotice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, you must bring the Notice to gain admission to the Annual Meeting.

If you did not receive a Notice but received a paper copylicense, and provide one of the proxy materials and your shares are held in your name, please bring the admission ticket printed on the top halfform(s) of the proxy card supplied with your materials.

If you did not receive a Notice but received a paper copy of the proxy materials and your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker, or other holder of record, please bring the admission ticket that was enclosed with your materials.

If you receive your proxy materials by e-mail, you will need proof of ownership to be admitted to the Annual Meeting. A recent brokerage statement or letter from a bank or broker is an example of proof of ownership.

alternative documentation listed below. If you arrive at the meeting without an admission ticket, we will admit you only if we are able to verify that you are a Citi stockholder. If you hold your shares in a joint account, both owners can be admitted to the Annual Meeting provided that proof of joint ownership is given. Due to space limitations, Citi will not be able to accommodate guests at the Annual Meeting. Any persons needing special assistance should contact Shareholder Relations by phone at 813-604-2778Tickets to the Annual Meeting are not transferable. A stockholder may appoint only one proxy to represent him or her at the following e-mail address: shareholderrelations@citi.com.Annual Meeting.

How We Have Done

Annual Report

If you received these materials by mail, you should have also received Citi’s Annual Report to Stockholders for 2016 with them. The 2016 Annual Report is also available on Citi’s website at www.citigroup.com. We urge you to read these documents carefully. In accordance with the SEC’s rules, the Five-Year Performance Graph appears in the 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Record
Stockholder
Street Name HolderProxy
for Record
Stockholder
Proxy
for Street
Name Holder
One of the following:
A printed admission ticket available online by clicking “Register for Meeting” link at www.proxyvote.com
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
Proxy Card
One of the following:
A printed admission ticket available online at www.proxyvote.com
Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
Voting Instruction form from your bank or broker
A recent brokerage statement or letter from a bank or broker
Valid, written legal proxy naming you, signed by a record stockholder
AND
Either

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
Or
Proxy Card
Valid and assignable written legal proxy naming you, signed by the street name holder’s bank or brokerage firm
AND
Either

Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
Voting Instruction form from the street name holder’s bank or broker
Or
A recent brokerage statement or letter from a bank or broker

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

1822 

Corporate Governance

Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup, Citi, or the Company) continually strives to maintain the highest standards of ethical conduct: reporting results with accuracy and transparency and maintaining full compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations that govern Citi’s businesses. Citi is active in ensuring its governance practices are at the leading edge of best practices. Below is a compilation of Citi’s Corporate Governance initiatives:

Good
Governance

     

Formed a

A standing Ethics and Culture Committee of the Board of Directors to overseeoversees management’s efforts to foster a culture of ethics within Citi;


EliminatedNo super-majority vote provisions previously contained in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation;


Amended our A declassified board structure;

By-laws after electing an independent Chair in 2009, to provide that if Citi does not have an independent ChairmanChair of the Board, the Board shallis required to elect a lead independent Director;


Amended our By-laws to include a majority87% of Citi’s Board Nominees are independent;

Majority vote standard for uncontested Director elections; and


In 2019, we were the first large U.S. company to disclose our unadjusted or “raw” pay gap for women and U.S. minorities, which measures median total compensation unadjusted for factors such as job function, level, and geography. See page 76 of this Proxy Statement for further information.
Stockholder Rights

Implemented a stock ownership commitment for

In 2019, the Board, and executive officers.

Stockholder
Rights

Adoptedtaking into account the result of the stockholder vote on a proxy access by-law;

Amended ourproposal presented at the 2018 Annual Meeting, amended Citi’s By-laws to giveprovide that stockholders ofholding at least 25%20% of the outstanding common stock have the right to call a special meeting;

Proxy access by-law; and


Permitted stockholders toStockholders may act by written consent.

Executive
Compensation

Adopted strong

Strong executive compensation governance practices, including expanded clawback policies and a requirement that executive officers must hold a substantial amount of vested Citi common stock for at least one year after they cease being executive officers;
Stock ownership commitment for the Board and

executive officers; and
Amended our Corporate Governance Guidelines to provide that membersMembers of Citi’s Board of Directors and Citi’s executive officers (i.e., Section 16 Insiders) are not permitted to hedge their Citi securities or to pledge their Citi securities as collateral for a loan.
Political
Activity

Amended our

Political Activities Statement (formerly Citi’s Political Contributions and Lobbying Statement) to increaseincludes significant disclosure about our lobbying practices and oversight.Theoversight. The Political Activities Statement provides meaningful disclosure about:

➢  

about our lobbying policies and procedures including grassroots lobbying;

payments made by Citi for direct lobbying;

trade and business association participation;

membership in any tax-exempt group that writes and endorses model legislation; and

the Board’s oversight of lobbying activities, trade and business association participation, and political contributions;

procedures;

Amended the charter of the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee to clarify that the Committee has oversight responsibility for trade association payments in addition to oversight responsibility for political contributions and lobbying activities; and


Provided more clarityTransparency on ourpractices around political contributions and trade and business associations disclosure by:

through:

creating a link on our website to federal and state government websites where our lobbying activities are reported;


initiating a process to requirerequiring trade and business associations to which Citi pays dues to attest that no portion of such payments areis used for independent expenditures; and


listing the names of our significant trade and business associations on Citi’s website.


Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE1923

Corporate Governance Materials Available on Citi’s Website

In addition to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, other information relating to corporate governance at Citi is available onin the Corporate Governance section of our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us” and then “Corporate Governance.”

www.citigroup.com/citi/
investor/corporate_
governance.html

Audit Committee Charter

Ethics and Culture Committee Charter

Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee Charter

Operations and Technology Committee Charter

Personnel and Compensation Committee Charter

Risk Management Committee Charter

Code of Conduct

Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals

Citi’s Compensation Philosophy

By-laws and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

Corporate Political Activities Statement

Global Citizenship Report

Banking on 2030: Citi & the Sustainable Development Goals

Environmental and Social Policy Framework
Finance for a Climate-Resilient Future: Citi’s TCFD Report
Statement on Human Rights
Citi’s U.K. Modern Slavery Act Statement
A list of our 20162018 Political Contributions and the names of Citi’s significant trade and business associations


Citi stockholders may obtain printed copies of these documents by writing to Citigroup Inc., Corporate Governance, 601 Lexington Avenue, 19th388 Greenwich Street, 17th Floor, New York, New York 10022.10013.

Annual Report

If you received these materials by mail, you should have also received Citi’s Annual Report to Stockholders for 2018 with them. The 2018 Annual Report is also available on Citi’s website at www.citigroup.com. We urge you to read these documents carefully. In accordance with the SEC’s rules, the Five-Year Performance Graph appears in the 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is included in Citi’s Annual Report to Stockholders for 2018.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Citi’s Corporate Governance Guidelines (the Guidelines) embody many of our long-standing practices, policies, and procedures, which are the foundation of our commitment to best practices. The Guidelines are reviewed at least annually, and revised as necessary, to continue to reflect best practices. The full text of the Guidelines, as approved by the Board, is set forth on Citi’s website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Corporate Governance Guidelines.” The Guidelines outline the responsibilities, operations, qualifications, and composition of the Board.

Director Independence

Our goal is that at least two-thirds of the members of the Board be independent. A descriptionDescriptions of our independence criteria and the results of the Board’s independence determinations are set forth below.

Board Committees

The Guidelines require that all members of the requiredfollowing committees of the Board (Audit;Board: Audit; Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs; and Personnel and Compensation)Compensation be independent. Committee members are appointed by the Board upon the recommendation of the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee. Committee membership and Chairs are rotated periodically. The Board and each Committee have the power to hire and fire independent legal, financial, or other advisors, as they may deem necessary, without consulting or obtaining the approval of management. Meetings

www.citigroup.com


Table of the non-management Directors are held as part of every regularly scheduledContents

24CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Additional Board meeting and are presided over by the independent Chairman.Service

The number of other for-profit public or non-public company boards on which a Director may serve is subject to a case-by-case review by the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee, in order to ensure that each Director is able to devote sufficient time to performing his or her duties as a Director. Interlocking directorates are prohibited (inside Directors and executive officers of Citi may not sit on boards of companies where a Citi outside Director is an executive officer).

Change in Status or Responsibilities

If a Director has a substantial change in professional responsibilities, occupation, or business association, he or she is required to notify the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee and to offer his or her resignation from the Board. The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee will evaluate the facts and

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

20CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

circumstances and make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept the resignation or request that the Director continue to serve on the Board. If a Director assumes a significant role in a not-for-profit entity, he or she is asked to notify the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee.

Attendance at Meetings

Directors are expected to attend Board meetings and meetings of the Committees on which they serve and the Annual Meeting of stockholders. All of the Directors then in office attended Citi’s 20162018 Annual Meeting (either in person or via audioconference), except for William S. Thompson, Jr. who was unable to attend due to a personal matter.Meeting.

Evaluation of Board Performance

The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee nominates one of the members of the Board to serve as ChairmanChair of the Board on an annual basis. The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee also conducts an annual review of Board performance in which the full Board participates, and each requiredstanding committee (except for the Executive Committee) conducts its own self-evaluation. As part of the self-evaluation, the Board engages in an examination of its own performance of its obligations onwith regards to such matters as regulatory requirements, strategic and financial oversight, oversight of risk management, executive compensation, succession planning, and governance matters, among many othertopics. The committees evaluate their performance against the requirements of their charters and other aspects of their responsibilities. The full Board and each committee then discuss the results of their respective self-evaluations in executive session, highlighting actions to be taken in response to the discussion. SeeBoard Self-Assessment Processon page 31 for further information.

Directors Access to Senior Management and Director Orientation

Directors have full and free access to senior management and other employees of Citi. New Directors are provided with an orientation program to familiarize themwith Citi’s businesses, regions, and functions as well as its legal, compliance, regulatory, and risk profile. Citi provides educational sessions on a variety of topics throughout the year for all members of the Board. These sessions are designed to allow Directors to, for example, develop a deeper understanding of a business issue or a complex financial product.

Succession Planning

The Board reviews the Personnel and Compensation Committee’s report on the performance of senior executives in order to ensure that they are providing the highest quality leadership for Citi. The Board also works with the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee and the Personnel and Compensation Committee to evaluate potential successors to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO). With respect to regular succession of the CEO and senior management, Citi’s Board evaluates internal, and, when appropriate, external candidates. To find external candidates, Citi seeks input from the members of the Board and senior management and/or from recruiting firms. To develop internal candidates, Citi engages in

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE25

a number of practices, formal and informal, designed to familiarize the Board with Citi’s talent pool. The formal process involves an annual talent review conducted by senior management at which the Board studies the most promising members of senior management. The Board learns about each person’s experience, skills, areas of expertise, accomplishments, and goals. This review is conducted at a regularly scheduled Board meeting on an annual basis. In addition, members of senior management are periodically asked to make presentations to the Board at Board meetings and at the Board strategy sessions. These presentations are made by senior managers atof the various business units as well as those who serve in corporate functions. The purpose of the formal review and other interaction is to ensure that Board members are familiar with the talent pool inside and outside Citi from which the Board would be able to choose successors to the CEO and evaluate succession for other senior managers as necessary from time to time.

Charitable Contributions

If a Director, or an immediate family member who shares the Director’s household, serves as a director, trustee, or executive officer of a foundation, university, or other not-for-profit organization, and such entity receives contributions from Citi and/or the Citi Foundation, such contributions must be reported to the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee at least annually.

Insider Investments and Transactions

Members of Citi’s Board of Directors and Citi’s executive officers (i.e., Section 16 Insiders) are not permitted to hedge their Citi securities or to pledge their Citi securities as collateral for a loan. The Guidelines restrict certain financial transactions between Citi and its subsidiaries on the one hand and Directors, senior management, and their immediate family members on the other. Personal loans from Citi or its subsidiaries to Citi’s Directors and its most senior executives, or immediate family members who share any such person’s household, are prohibited, except for mortgage loans, home equity loans, consumer loans, credit cards, overdraft checking privileges and margin loans to employees of a broker-dealer subsidiary of Citi, mortgage loans, home equity loans, consumer loans, credit cards, and overdraft checking privileges, all made on market terms in the ordinary course of business. SeeCertain Transactions and Relationships, Compensation Committee Interlocks, and Insider Participationon pages 32-3438-39 of this Proxy Statement.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE21     

The Guidelines prohibit investments or transactions by Citi or its executive officers and those immediate family members who share an executive officer’s household in a partnership or other privately held entity in which an outside Director is a principal, or in a publicly traded company in which an outside Director owns or controls more than a 10% interest. Directors and those immediate family members who share the Director’s household are not permitted to receive initial public offering allocations. Directors and their immediate family members may participate in Citi-sponsored investment activities, provided they are offered on the same terms as those offered to similarly situated non-affiliated persons. Under certain circumstances, or with the approval of the appropriate committee, members of senior management may participate in certain Citi-sponsored investment opportunities. Finally, there is a prohibition on certain investments by Directors and executive officers in third-party entities when the opportunity comes solely as a result of their position with Citi.

Director Independence

The Board has adopted categorical standards to assist the Board in evaluating the independence of each of its Directors. The categorical standards, which are set forth below, describe various types of relationships that could potentially exist between a Director or an immediate family member of a Director and Citi, and set thresholds at which such relationships would be deemed to be material. Provided that no relationship or transaction exists that would disqualify a Director under the categorical standards and no other relationships or transactions exist of a type not specifically mentioned in the categorical standards that, in the Board’s opinion, taking into account all facts and circumstances, would impair a Director’s ability to exercise his or her independent judgment, the Board will deem such person to be independent.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

26CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board and the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee reviewed certain information obtained from Directors’ responses to a questionnaire asking about their relationships with Citi, and those of their immediate family members and primary business or charitable affiliations and other potential conflicts of interest, as well as certain data collected by Citi’s businesses related to transactions, relationships, or arrangements between Citi on the one hand and a Director, immediate family member of a Director, oraor a primary business or charitable affiliation of a Director, on the other. The Board reviewed certain relationships or transactions between the Directors or immediate family members of the Directors or their primary business or charitable affiliations and Citi and determined that the relationships or transactions complied with the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the related categorical standards. The Board also determined that, applying the Guidelines and standards, which are intended to comply with the NYSE corporate governance rules, and all other applicable laws, rules, and regulations, each of the following Director nominees standing for re-election and current board members areis independent:



Ellen M. Costello
Duncan P. Hennes
Peter B. Henry
Franz B. Humer
Renée J. James
Michael E. O’Neill
 
Gary M. Reiner
Judith Rodin
Anthony M. Santomero
Joan E. Spero
Diana L. Taylor
William S. Thompson, Jr.Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
James S. Turley
John C. Dugan
Renée J. James
Deborah C. Wright
Duncan P. Hennes
Eugene M. McQuade
Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon
Peter B. Henry
Gary M. Reiner
S. Leslie Ireland
Diana L. Taylor

The Board has determined that Mr. McQuade is independent because he retired from employment in May 2015, over three years ago. The Board has determined that Michael L. Corbat and Eugene M. McQuadeBarbara Desoer are not independent. Mr. Corbat is our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. McQuade previously served asMs. Desoer is the Chief Executive Officer of Citibank, N.A., our largest banking subsidiary. Ms. Desoer is scheduled to retire as the Chief Executive Officer of Citibank, N.A. before Citi’s 2019 Annual Meeting.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

22CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Independence Standards

To be considered independent, a Director must meet the following categorical standards as adopted by our Board and reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, there are other independence standards under NYSE corporate governance rules that apply to all directors and certain independence standards under SEC, Internal Revenue Code (IRC), and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) rules that apply to specific committees.


Categorical Standards

Advisory, Consulting and Employment Arrangements

During any 12-month period within the last three years, neither a Director nor any immediate family memberImmediate Family Member of a Director shall have received from the Company, directly or indirectly, any compensation, fees or benefits in an amount greatermore than $120,000 in direct compensation from Citi, other than amounts paid (a) pursuant to the Company’sCiti’s Amended and Restated Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, (b) pursuant to a pension or (b)other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service) or (c) to an immediate family memberImmediate Family Member of a Director who is a non-executive employee of the CompanyCiti or one of its affiliated legal entities.subsidiaries.
In addition, no member of the Audit Committee normay accept a direct or indirect consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from Citi or one of its subsidiaries, other than (a) fees for service as a member of the Board of Directors of Citi or one of its subsidiaries (including committees thereof) or (b) receipt of fixed amounts of compensation under a Citi retirement plan, including deferred compensation, for prior service with Citi, provided that such compensation is not contingent in any immediate family member who shares such individual’s household, nor any entity in which an Audit Committee member is a partner, member or executive officer shall, within the last three years, have received any payment for accounting, consulting, legal, investment banking or financial advisory services provided to the Company.way on continued service.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE27

Business Relationships

All business relationships, lending relationships, deposit and other banking relationships between the Company and a Director’s primary business affiliation or the primary business affiliation of an immediate family member of a Director must be made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated persons.
In addition, the aggregate amount of payments for property or services in any of the last three fiscal years by the Company to, and to the Company from, any company of which a Director is an executive officer or employee or where an immediate family member of a Director is an executive officer, must not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues in any single fiscal year.
Loans may be made or maintained by the Company to a Director’s primary business affiliation or the primary business affiliation of an immediate family member of a Director, only if the loan:loan (i) is made in the ordinary course of business of the Company or one of its subsidiaries, is of a type that is generally made available to other customers, and is on market terms, or terms that are no more favorable than those offered to other customers; (ii) complies with applicable law, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley), Regulation O of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Guidelines; (iii) when made does not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features; and (iv) is not classified by the Company as Substandard (II) or worse, as defined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in its “Rating Credit Risk” Comptroller’s Handbook.

Charitable Contributions

Annual contributions in any of the last three calendar years from the Company and/or the Citi Foundation to a charitable organization of which a Director, or an immediate family member who shares the Director’s household, serves as a Director, trustee, or executive officer (other than the Citi Foundation and other charitable organizations sponsored by the Company) may not exceed the greater of $250,000 or 10% of the charitable organization’s annual consolidated gross revenue.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE23     

Employment/Affiliations

A Director shall not:

(i)be or have been an employee of the Company within the last three years;
(ii)be part of, or within the past three years have been part of, an interlocking directorate in which a current executive officer of the Company serves or has served on the compensation committee of a company that concurrently employs or employed the Director as an executive officer; or
(iii)be or have been affiliated with or employed by (a) the Company’sCiti’s present or former primary outside auditor or (b) any other outside auditor of the CompanyCiti and personally worked on the Company’sCiti’s audit, in each case within the three-year period following the auditing relationship.

A Director may not have an immediate family member who:

(i)is an executive officer of the Company or has been within the last three years;
(ii)is, or within the past three years has been, part of an interlocking directorate in which a current executive officer of the Company serves or has served on the compensation committee of a company that concurrently employs or employed such immediate family member as an executive officer; or
(iii)(a) is a current partner of the Company’sCiti’s primary outside auditor, or a current employee of the Company’sCiti’s primary outside auditor and personally works on the Company’sCiti’s audit, or (b) was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of or employed by the Company’s outsideCiti’s primary auditor and personally worked on the Company’sCiti’s audit within that time.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

28CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Immaterial Relationships and Transactions

The Board may determine that a Director is independent notwithstanding the existence of an immaterial relationship or transaction between the CompanyCiti and (i) the Director, (ii) an immediate family member of the Director or (iii) the Director’s or immediate family member’s business or charitable affiliations, provided the Company’sCiti’s Proxy Statement includes a specific description of such relationship as well as the basis for the Board’s determination that such relationship does not preclude a determination that the Director is independent. Relationships or transactions between the CompanyCiti and (i) the Director, (ii) an immediate family member of the Director or (iii) the Director’s or immediate family member’s business or charitable affiliations that comply with the Corporate Governance Guidelines, including, but not limited to, the Director Independence Standards that are part of the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the sections titled Financial Services, Personal Loans and Investments/Transactions, are deemed to be categorically immaterial and do not require disclosure in the Proxy Statement (unless such relationship or transaction is required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K).


Definitions

For purposes of thethese Corporate Governance Guidelines, (i) the term “immediate family member” means a Director’s or executive officer’s (designated as such pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)1934, as amended (“Exchange Act“)) spouse, parents, step-parents, children, step-children, siblings, mother- and father-in law, sons- and daughters-in-law, and brothers- and sisters-in-law and any person (other than a tenant or domestic employee) who shares the Director’s household; (ii) the term “primary business affiliation”“Primary Business Affiliation” means an entity of which the Director or executive officer, or an immediate family member of such a person, is an officer, partner or employee or in which the Director, executive officer or immediate family member owns directly or indirectly at least a 5% equity interest; and (iii) the term “related party transaction”“Related Party Transaction” means any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship in which (a) the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any fiscal year, (b) the CompanyCiti is a participant, and (c) any related personRelated Person (any Director, any executive officer of the Company,Citi, any nominee for Director, any stockholdershareholder owning in excess of 5% of the total equity of the Company,Citi, and any immediate family member of any such person) has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

www.citigroup.comCiti 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

24CORPORATE GOVERNANCE29

Meetings of the Board of Directors and Committees

The Board of Directors met 2120 times in 2016.2018. During 2016,2018, the Audit Committee met 1621 times, the Ethics and Culture Committee met 54 times, the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee met 810 times, the Operations and Technology Committee met 5 times, the Personnel and Compensation Committee met 1213 times, and the Risk Management Committee met 1413 times. In addition, a subcommittee of the Risk Management Committee met 79 times. The Executive Committee met oncedid not meet in 2016.2018.

During 2016,2018, substantially all of the members of the Board served on and/or chaired a number ofone or more ad hoc committees covering such topics as compliance and M&A matters andor served on an international subsidiary governance.board. In addition, during 2016,2018, Mses. Costello Spero and TaylorIreland and Messrs. Hennes, Henry, McQuade, Reiner, Santomero, and Turley, at one time or another, served on the Board of Directors of Citibank, N.A., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Citi.

Each incumbent directorDirector attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and of the standing committees of which he or she was a member during 2016.2018.

Meetings of Non-Management Directors

Citi’s non-management Directors meet in executive session without any management Directors in attendance each timewhenever the full Board convenes for a regularly scheduled meeting, which is usually six times each year, and, if the Board convenes a special meeting, the non-management Directors ordinarily meet in executive session.meeting. During 2016,2018, Mr. O’Neill presided at each executive session of the non-management Directors. In addition, the independent Directors met in executive session during 2016.2018.

Board Leadership Structure

Citi has had an independent Chairman since 2009.

Citi currently has an independent ChairmanChair separate from the CEO, a structure that has been in place since 2009. The Board believes it is important to maintain flexibility in its Board leadership structure and has had in place different leadership structures overin the past, years, depending on the Company’s needs at the time, but firmly supports having an independent Director in a Board leadership position at all times. Accordingly, Citi’s Board, on December 15, 2009, adopted a By-law amendment which provides that if Citi does not have an independent Chairman,Chair, the Board shallwill elect a lead independent Director having similar duties to an independent Chairman,Chair, including leading the executive sessions of the non-management Directors at Board meetings. Citi’s ChairmanChair provides independent leadership of the Board. Having an independent ChairmanChair or leadLead Director enables non-management Directors to raise issues and concerns for Board consideration without immediately involving management. The ChairmanChair or Lead Director also serves as a liaison between the Board and senior management. Citi’s Board has determined that the current structure, an independent Chairseparate from the CEO, is the most appropriate structure at this time, while ensuring that, at all times, there will be an independent Director in a Board leadership position. The Board believes its approach to risk oversight, including, importantly, having a standing Risk Management Committee and the reporting line of the Chief Risk Officer to the Risk Management Committee, ensures that the Board can choose many leadership structures without experiencing a material impact on its oversight of risk.

Citi has had an independent Chair since 2009. Following Michael O’Neill’s retirement as Chair on January 1, 2019, the Board appointed John Dugan as independent Chair to succeed him.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statementwww.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

30CORPORATE GOVERNANCE25     

Board Diversity

Diversity is among the critical factors that the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee considers when evaluating the composition of the Board. For a company like Citi, which operates in more than 100 countries around the globe, diversity includes race, ethnicity, and gender as well as the diversity of the communities and geographies in which Citi operates. Included in the qualifications for Directors listed in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines is “whether the candidate has special skills, expertise and background that would complement the attributes of the existing Directors, taking into consideration the diverse communities and geographies in which the Company operates.” Citi’s Board is committed to ensuring that it is composed of individuals whose backgrounds reflect the diversity represented by our employees, customers, and stakeholders. The candidates nominated for election at Citi’s 20172019 Annual Meeting exemplify that diversity: foursix nominees are women and three nominees are African-American or Hispanic. In addition, each Director candidate contributes to the Board’s overall diversity by providing a variety of perspectives, personal and professional experiences, and backgrounds, as well as othercharacteristics,other characteristics, such as global and international business experience. The Board believes that the current nominees reflect an appropriate diversity of gender, age, race, geographical background, and experience and is committed to continuing to consider diversity issues in evaluating the composition of the Board.

* Judith RodinDirector Education Program

Citi has a robust Director Education Program that begins with an orientation for newly appointed Directors, providing two days of in-depth training covering all aspects of our business, including coverage of Citi’s institutional and Joan Spero will be retiringconsumer businesses; financial reporting; an overview of the Company’s risk management, audit, compliance, and legal functions; and an overview of Citi’s primary banking subsidiary, Citibank, N.A. There is also a continuing education program, which includes presentations focusing on industry, regulatory and governance topics and presentations from the various lines of our business on emerging issues or strategic initiatives to provide our Directors with the opportunity to expand their insight into Citi’s business operations and activities. Directors also have access to external programming and seminars to supplement their Citi-provided education.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE31

Board on April 25, 2017.Self-Assessment Process

Annual Board Self-Evaluations*

The Board conducts annual evaluations through the use of a written questionnaire that covers a broad range of matters relating to governance, meetings, materials, and other agenda topics, including Strategic Planning, Corporate Oversight, Succession Planning, Conduct and Culture, Risk Management Oversight, Regulatory Requirements, and Management Compensation.

Summary of the Written Evaluations

Citi’s Corporate Governance Office aggregates and summarizes our Directors’ responses to the questionnaires, highlighting comments and high and low scores on various topics. Responses are not attributed to specific Board members to promote candor. The aggregated results, including all written comments, together with data analyzing trends or results over prior years, are shared with the Board.

Board Review

Using the aggregated results as a guide, our Chair leads a discussion with the full Board during an executive session. All Board members are encouraged to provide feedback on the results.

Actions

As an outcome of these discussions, the Board takes specific actions which may include providing guidance to management on specific Board-related initiatives.


*

Each standing committee conducts an annual self-assessment and reports the results to the Board, which include how each committee’s effectiveness may be enhanced.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board oversees Citi’s global risk management framework.

          
Risk Management Committee
approves Citi’s Risk Governance Framework
reviews and approves risk management policies on the establishment of risk limits and reviews risk management and compliance policies and programs for Citi and its subsidiaries
approves and adjusts risk limits
consults with management on the effectiveness of risk identification, measurement, and monitoring processes, and the adequacy of staffing and action plans
provides oversight of, among others, matters related to Citi’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) practices, Resolution and Recovery Planning, and Citi’s compliance with the Volcker Rule of the Dodd-Frank Actcybersecurity
 
Chief Risk Officer
delivers risk report at regularly scheduled Board meetings
responsible for Global Risk Management
responsible for an integrated effort to identify, assess, and manage risks
reports to the Chief Executive Officer and Risk Management Committee
reports at least twice annually to the Personnel and Compensation Committee on incentive compensation
Other
Board Committees:
Audit Committee
provides oversight of compliance risk, cybersecurity risk, fraud risk, financial reporting/internal control risk, and operational risk matters
Ethics and Culture Committee
provides oversight of Citi’s Conduct Risk Management Program
Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee
reviewsprovides oversight of reputational issues and legal and regulatory compliance risks as they relate to Corporate Governance matters

Operations and Technology Committee
provides oversight of cybersecurity as well as privacy and data security
Personnel and Compensation Committee
provides oversight of incentive compensation plans

Ethics and Culture Committee
provides oversight of Citi’s Conduct Risk Programrisk related to compensation


www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

2632CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

At each regularly scheduled Board meeting, the Board receives a risk report from the Chief Risk Officer with respect to the Company’s approach to management of major risks, including management’s risk mitigation efforts, where appropriate. Global Risk Management, led by the Chief Risk Officer, is a company-wide function that is responsible for an integrated effort to identify, assess, and manage risks that may affect Citi’s ability to execute on its corporate strategy and fulfill its business objectives. The Board’s role is to oversee this effort.

The Risk Management Committee enhances the Board’s oversight of risk management. The Committee’s role is one of oversight, recognizing that management is responsible for executing Citi’s risk management policies.

Board’s Role in Cybersecurity Oversight

The Board of Directors provides oversight of management’s efforts to address cybersecurity risk. The Board and various Committees receive periodic reports and engage in discussions throughout the year on the effectiveness of Citi’s overall cybersecurity program, exploring Citi’s inherent risks, the road map for addressing these risks, and Citi’s progress in doing so. Board members receive contemporaneous reporting on any significant cyber events that may occur—which includes efforts at response, discussions of legal obligations, and the status of outreach to regulators—and provides guidance to management as appropriate.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The following are the standing committees of the Board of Directors:

Audit Committee

Committee Roles and Responsibilities:

The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to

Members:

Ellen M. Costello
John C. Dugan
Peter B. Henry
Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
Anthony M. Santomero
James S. Turley (Chair)
Deborah C. Wright

Committee Meetings
in 2016:2018:

1621

Charter:

The Audit Committee Charter, as adopted by the Board, is available on our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Citigroup Board of Directors’ Committee Charters.”

(i)

Committee Roles and Responsibilities:

The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to:

the integrity of Citigroup’s consolidated financial statements, financial reporting process, and systems of internal accounting and financial controls;

(ii)

the performance of the internal audit function (“Internal Audit”);

(iii) 

the annual independent integrated audit of Citigroup’s consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of Citigroup’s internal control over financial reporting, the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm (“Independent Auditors”), and the evaluation of the Independent Auditors’ qualifications, independence and performance;

(iv)

policy standards and guidelines for risk assessment and risk management;

(v)

Citigroup’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including Citigroup’s disclosure controls and procedures; and

(vi)

the fulfillment of the other responsibilities set out in the Audit Committee’s charter. The report of the Committee required by the rules of the SEC is included in this Proxy Statement.

The Board has determined that each of Ms. Costelloand Messrs. Dugan, Jacobs, Santomero and Turley qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC and each such directorDirector as well as Ms. Wright and Mr. Henry areis considered “financially literate” under NYSE rules, and, in addition to being independent according to the Board’s independence standards as set out in its Corporate Governance Guidelines, each is independent within the meaning of applicable SEC rules, the corporate governance rules of the NYSE, and the FDIC guidelines.



Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE2733

Ethics and Culture
Committee

Members:

Peter B. Henry
Franz B. Humer (Chair)
Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
Deborah C. Wright
Ernesto Zedillo
     Ponce de Leon

Committee Meetings
in 2018:

4

Charter:

The Ethics and Culture Committee Charter, as adopted by the Board, is available on our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Citigroup Board of Directors’ Committee Charters.”

Committee Roles and Responsibilities:

The Ethics and Culture Committee oversees Management’smanagement’s efforts to foster a culture of ethics within the organization; oversees and helps shape the definition of Citi’s value proposition; oversees Management’smanagement’s efforts to enhance and communicate Citi’s value proposition, evaluates Management’smanagement’s progress, and provides feedback on these efforts; reviews and assesses the culture of the organization to determine if further enhancements are needed to foster ethical decision-making by employees; and oversees Management’smanagement’s efforts to support ethical decision-making in the organization, evaluates Management’smanagement’s progress, and provides feedback on these efforts. The Committee also reviews and assesses the adequacy of Citi’s Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals and approves any waivers to either Code. The Committee also provides oversight of Citi’s Conduct Risk Management Program, whose objective is to enhance Citi’s culture of compliance and control through the management, minimization, and mitigation of Citi’s conduct risks.


Executive Committee

Members:

John C. Dugan (Chair)
Duncan P. Hennes
Franz B. Humer
Gary M. Reiner
Anthony M. Santomero
Diana L. Taylor
James S. Turley

Committee Meetings
in 2018:

None

Committee Roles and Responsibilities:

The Executive Committee acts on behalf of the Board if a matter requires Board action before a meeting of the full Board can be held.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

34CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Nomination,
Governance and
Public Affairs
Committee

Members:

John C. Dugan
Peter B. Henry
Diana L. Taylor (Chair)
Michael E. O’Neill
Judith Rodin
Deborah C. Wright
Ernesto Zedillo
Ponce de Leon

Committee Meetings
in 2016:2018:

510

Charter:

The EthicsNomination, Governance and CulturePublic Affairs Committee Charter, as adopted by the Board, is available on our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Citigroup Board of Directors’ Committee Charters.”

Executive Committee

Committee Roles and Responsibilities:

The Executive Committeeacts on behalf of the Board if a matter requires Board action before a meeting of the full Board can be held.

Members:

Franz B. Humer
Michael E. O’Neill (Chair)
Anthony M. Santomero
Diana L. Taylor
William S. Thompson, Jr.
James S. Turley

Committee Meetings
in 2016:

1

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

28CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Nomination,
Governance and
Public Affairs
Committee

Committee Roles and Responsibilities:

The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committeeis responsible for identifying individuals qualified to become Board members and recommending to the Board the Director nominees for the next Annual Meeting of stockholders. It leads the Board in its annual review of the Board’s performance and makes recommendations as to the composition of the committees for appointment by the Board. The Committee takes a leadership role in shaping corporate governance policies and practices, including recommending to the Board the Corporate Governance Guidelines and monitoring Citi’s compliance with these policies and practices and the Guidelines. The Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving all related party transactions involving a Director or an immediate family member of a Director and any related party transaction involving an executive officer or immediate family member of an executive officer if the transaction is valued at $50 million or more, in each case, other than certain enumerated ordinary course transactions. SeeCertain Transactions and Relationships, Compensation Committee Interlocks, and Insider Participation on pages 32-3438-39 of this Proxy Statement for a complete description of the Policy on Related Party Transactions.

The Committee, as part of the Board’s executive succession planning process, in conjunction with the Personnel and Compensation Committee, evaluates and nominates potential successors to the CEO and provides an annual report to the Board on CEO succession. The Committee also reviews Director Compensation and Benefits. The Committee is also responsible for reviewing Citi’s policies and programs that relate to public issues of significance to Citi and the public at large and reviewing relationships with external constituencies and issues that impact Citi’s reputation. The Committee also has the responsibility for reviewing public policy and reputational issues facing Citi; reviewing political contributions and lobbying expenditures and payments to trade associations made by Citi, and charitable contributions made by Citi and the Citi Foundation; reviewing Citi’s policies and practices regarding supplier diversity; reviewing the work of Citi’s Business Practices Committees; and reviewing Citi’s Citizenship and Sustainability policies and programs, including environmental and human rights policies. The Committee’s focus is global, reflecting Citi’s global footprint. The Committee also makes recommendations to the Board regarding amendments tothe Company’s Major Expenditure Program Limits of Authority.

The Board has determined that, in addition to being independent according to the Board’s independence standards as set out in its Corporate Governance Guidelines, each of the members of the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee is independent according to the corporate governance rules of the NYSE.

Members:

Peter B. Henry
Michael E. O’Neill
Judith Rodin
Diana L. Taylor (Chair)
Ernesto Zedillo
Ponce de Leon

Committee Meetings in 2016:

8

Charter:

The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee Charter, as adopted by the Board, is available on our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Board of Directors’ Committee Charters.”



Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE2935

Operations and
Technology
Committee

Committee Roles and Responsibilities:

The Operations and Technology Committee oversees the scope, direction, quality and execution of Citi’s technology strategies formulated by management, andprovides guidance on technology as it may pertain to, among other things, Citi business products and technology platforms.

Members:

Ellen M. CostelloS. Leslie Ireland
Renée J. James
Gary M. Reiner (Chair)

Committee Meetings
in 2016:2018:

5

Charter:

The Operations and Technology Committee Charter, as adopted by the Board, is available on our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Board“Citigroup Board of Directors’ Committee Charters.”

Committee Roles and Responsibilities:

The Operations and Technology Committee oversees the scope, direction, quality, and execution of Citi’s technology strategies formulated by management, and provides guidance on technology as it may pertain to, among other things, Citi business products and technology platforms.


www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

3036CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Personnel and
Compensation
Committee

Members:

John C. Dugan
Duncan P. Hennes (Chair)
Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
Gary M. Reiner
Diana L. Taylor

Committee Meetings
in 2018:

13

Charter:

The Personnel and Compensation Committee Charter is available on our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Citigroup Board of Directors’ Committee Charters.”

Committee Roles and Responsibilities:

The Personnel and Compensation Committeehas been delegated broad authority to oversee compensation of employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The Committee regularly reviews Citi’s management resources and performance of senior management. The Committee is responsible for determining the compensation for the CEO and approving the compensation of other executive officers of the Company and members of Citi’s Operating Committee. The Committee is also responsible for approving the incentive compensation structure for other members of senior management and certain highly compensated employees (including discretionary incentive awards to covered employees as defined in applicable bank regulatory guidance), in accordance with guidelines established by the Committee from time to time. The Committee also has broad oversight of compliance with bank regulatory guidance governing Citi’s incentive compensation.

The Committee annually reviews and discusses the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required to be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement with management, and, if appropriate, recommends to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included. Additionally, the Committee reviews and approves the overall goals of Citi’s material incentive compensation programs, including as expressed through Citi’s Compensation Philosophy, and provides oversight for Citi’s incentive compensation programs so that they both (i) appropriately balance risk and financial results in a manner that does not encourage employees to expose Citi to imprudent risks, and (ii) are consistent with bank safety and soundness. Toward that end, the Committee meets periodically with Citi’s Chief Risk Officer to discuss the risk attributes of Citi’s incentive compensation programs.

The Committee has the power to hire and fire independent compensation consultants, legal counsel, or financial or other advisors as it may deem necessary to assist it in the performance of its duties and responsibilities, without consulting or obtaining the approval of senior management of the Company. The Committee has retained Frederic W. Cook & Co. (FW Cook) to provide the Committee with advice on Citi’s compensation programs for senior management. The amount paid to FW Cook in 20162018 for advice on executive compensation matters is disclosed in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis on page 9397 of this Proxy Statement.

The Board has determined that in addition to being independent according to the Board’s independence standards as set out in its Corporate Governance Guidelines, each of the members of the Personnel and Compensation Committee is independent according to the corporate governance rules of the NYSE. Each of such Directors is a “non-employee Director,” as defined in Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and is an “outside Director,” as defined by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE37

Risk Management
Committee

Members:

Ellen M. Costello
John C. Dugan
Duncan P. Hennes
Michael E. O’NeillFranz B. Humer
GaryRenée J. James
Eugene M. ReinerMcQuade
Judith RodinAnthony M.
Diana L. Taylor       Santomero (Chair)
WilliamJames S. Thompson, Jr.Turley
(Chair)Ernesto Zedillo
       Ponce de Leon

Committee Meetings
in 2016:2018:

1213

Charter:

The Personnel and CompensationRisk Management Committee Charter is available on our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Board“Citigroup Board of Directors’ Committee Charters.”


Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE31

Risk Management
Committee

Committee Roles and Responsibilities:

The Risk Management Committee has been delegated authority to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility with respect to (i) oversight of Citigroup’s risk management framework, including the significant policies and practices used in managing credit, market, operational, and certain other risks, (ii) oversight of Citigroup’s policies and practices relating to funding risk, liquidity risk, and price risk, which constitute significant components of market risk, and risks pertaining to capital management, and (iii) oversight of the performance of the Fundamental Credit Risk (“FCR”) credit review function. The Committee reports to the Board of Directors regarding Citigroup’s risk profile and its risk management framework, including the significant policies and practices employed to manage risks in Citigroup’s businesses, and the overall adequacy of the Risk Management function. The Committee providesoversight of Citi’s CCAR and Resolution and Recovery Planning Compliance efforts. The Committee also reviews risk related to information security and cybersecurity, including steps taken by management to control such risks, and coordinates with the Personnel and Compensation Committee in relation to that committee’s role with respect to risk matters related to compensation, which includes the approval of the Global Head of FCR’s base compensation, adjustments and incentive compensation.

The Risk Management Committee created a subcommittee in 2016 to provide oversight of data governance, data quality, and data integrity. Ms. James and Messrs. Santomero (Chair)and Turley are members of the Risk Subcommittee. The Risk Subcommittee met seven9 times in 2016.2018.

Members:

Duncan P. Hennes
Franz B. Humer
Renée J. James
Eugene M. McQuade
Michael E. O’Neill
Anthony M. Santomero
(Chair)
William S. Thompson, Jr.
James S. Turley
Ernesto Zedillo
Ponce de Leon

Committee Meetings in 2016:

14

Charter:

The Risk Management Committee Charter is available on our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Board of Directors’ Committee Charters.”


AuditAuditEthics and
Culture
ExecutiveExecutiveNomination,
Governance
and Public
Affairs
Operations
and
Technology
Personnel and
Compensation
Risk
Management
Michael L. Corbat
Ellen M. Costello
John C. Dugan
Duncan P. Hennes
Peter B. Henry
Franz B. Humer
S. Leslie Ireland
Duncan P. HennesLew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
Renée J. James
Peter B. HenryEugene M. McQuade
Franz B. Humer
Renée J. James
Eugene M. McQuade
Michael E. O’Neill
Gary M. Reiner
Judith Rodin
Anthony M. Santomero
Joan E. Spero*
Diana L. Taylor
William S. Thompson, Jr.Diana L. Taylor
James S. Turley
Deborah C. Wright
Ernesto Zedillo
       Ponce de Leon
committee member
committee chair
Ponce de Leon
 committee member
 committee chair

*

Ms. Spero serves on several ad hoc committees and on the Board of Directors of Citibank, N.A. Dr. Rodin and Ms. Spero will retire from the Board on April 25, 2017.


www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

3238CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

There are no legal proceedings to which any Director, officer, or principal stockholder,The Vanguard Group (which owns more than 5% of Citi’s common stock), or any affiliate thereof, is a party adverse to Citi or in which any such person has a material interest adverse to Citi. In lieu of participating in class action settlements of claims entered into by Citi and other banks relating to alleged manipulation of the foreign exchange market, and which received final court approval in 2018, numerous BlackRock funds and other plaintiffs filed a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on November 7, 2018 against Citi and 15 other banks. In this action, plaintiffs assert that defendants conspired to manipulate the foreign exchange market between 2003 and 2013. BlackRock, Inc. owns more than 5% of Citi’s common stock.

Certain Transactions and Relationships, Compensation Committee Interlocks, and Insider Participation

The Board has adopted a policy setting forth procedures for the review, approval, and monitoring of transactions involving Citi and related persons (Directors, Senior Managers, 5% stockholders, Immediate Family Memberor Primary Business Affiliations). A copy of Citi’s Policy on Related Party Transactions is available on our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Citi Policies.” Under the policy, the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving all related party transactions involving related persons. Directors may not participate in any discussion or approval of a related party transaction in which he or she or any member of his or her immediate family is a related person, except that the Director must provide all material information concerning the related party transaction to the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee. The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee is also responsible for reviewing and approving all related party transactions valued at more than $50 million involving an executive officer or an Immediate Family Member of an executive officer. The Transaction Review Committee, composed of Citi’s President, General Counsel, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Risk Officer, and Head of Human Resources, is responsible for reviewing and approving all related party transactions valued at less than $50 million involving an executive officer or an immediate family memberImmediate Family Member of an executive officer. The policy also contains a list of categories of transactions involving related persons that are pre-approved under the policy, and therefore need not be brought to the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee or the Transaction Review Committee for approval.

The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee and the Transaction Review Committee will review the following information when assessing a related party transaction:

the terms of such transaction;

the related person’s interest in the transaction;

the purpose and timing of the transaction;

whether Citi is a party to the transaction, and if not, the nature of Citi’s participation in the transaction;

if the transaction involves the sale of an asset, a description of the asset, including date acquired and cost basis;

information concerning potential counterparties in the transaction;

the approximate dollar value of the transaction and the approximate dollar value of the related person’s interest in the transaction;

a description of any provisions or limitations imposed as a result of entering into the proposed transaction;

whether the proposed transaction includes any potential reputational risk issues that may arise as a result of, or in connection with, the proposed transaction; and

any other relevant information regarding the transaction.

Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC, BlackRock and Vanguard reported that they beneficially owned 5% or more of the outstanding shares of Citi’s common stock as of December 31, 20162018 seeStock Ownership — Owners of More than 5% of Citi Common Stock in this Proxy Statement on page 39.44. During 2016,2018, our subsidiaries provided ordinary course lending, trading, and other financial services to BlackRock and Vanguard and their respective affiliates and clients. These transactions were entered into on an arm’s length

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE39

basis and contain customary terms and conditions and were on substantially the same terms as comparable transactions with unrelated third parties.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table Acciones y Valores Banamex, S.A. de C.V., Servicios Corporativos de Finanzas, S.A. de C.V., and Grupo Financiero Citibanamex, S.A. de C.V. (“Citibanamex”) entered into an agreement with BlackRock, Inc. and certain of Contentsits affiliates pursuant to which BlackRock would acquire the asset management business of Citibanamex in Mexico. The transaction includes the sale of Impulsora de Fondos Banamex, S.A. de C.V., (“Impulsora”) legal vehicle, and its advisory role for 52 mutual funds and certain managed account relationships, and certain intellectual property and vendor contracts required to operate the business. The closing for this transaction occurred in September 2018. Consideration for the sale consisted of $350 million and certain future payments if defined targets are met. In connection with the closing, Citibanamex and BlackRock also entered into a long-term distribution agreement to offer BlackRock asset management products to Citibanamex clients in Mexico. The agreement provides a framework under which Citibanamex would distribute BlackRock products in Mexico and includes terms relating to pricing, preferential access, and product support. The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee reviewed the terms of the sale and approved the transaction in accordance with the Related Party Transaction Policy. Based on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC, BlackRock reported that it beneficially owns more than 5% of Citi’s common stock.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE33

Citi has established funds in which employees have invested. In addition, certain of our executive officers have from time to time invested their personal funds directly, or directed that funds for which they act in a fiduciary capacity be invested, in funds arranged by Citi’s subsidiaries on the same terms and conditions as the other outside investors in these funds, who are not our executive officers, or employees. Other than certain “grandfathered” investments, in accordance with Sarbanes-Oxley and the Citi Corporate Governance Guidelines, executive officers may invest in certain Citi-sponsored investment opportunities only under certain circumstances and with the approval of the appropriate committee.

Citigroup Capital Partners II, L.P. is a fund In 2018, there were no distributions from the funds that was formed in 2006. The fund invests either directly or via a master fund in private equity investments. Citi matches each dollar invested by an employee with an additional two-dollar commitment to each fund, or feeder fund, in which an employee has invested. Citi’s match is made by a loan to the fund. Each eligible employee, subject to vesting, receives the benefit of any increase in the value of the fund attributable to the loan made by Citi, less the interest paid by the fund on the loan, as well as any increase in the value of the fund attributable to the employee’s own investment. In accordance with the fund’s offering memoranda, executive officers are not eligible to participate in the fundon a leveraged basis.require disclosure.

The following distributions exceeding $120,000 with respect to investments in Citigroup Capital Partners II, L.P. were made to executive officers in 2016.

Citigroup Capital
Partners II, L.P.
Cash Distributions
James Cowles$233,333
James Forese$184,413

In 2016,2018, Citi performed corporate banking and securities brokerage services in the ordinary course of our business for certain organizations in which some of our Directors are officers or directors. In addition, in the ordinary course of business, Citi may use the products or services of organizations in which some of our Directors are officers or directors.

The persons listed on page 9498 of this Proxy Statement are the current members of the Personnel and Compensation Committee. No current or former member of the Personnel and Compensation Committee was a part of a “compensation committee interlock” during fiscal year 20162018 as described under SEC rules. In addition, none of our executive officers served as a director or member of the compensation committee of another entity that would constitute a “compensation committee interlock.” No member of the Personnel and Compensation Committee had any material interest in a transaction with Citi or is a current or former officer of Citi, and no member of the Personnel and Compensation Committee is a current employee of Citi or any of its subsidiaries. In addition, no member of the Board, or any immediate family member of the Board, engaged FW Cookfor any compensation-related services in 2016.2018.

Mr. Corbat has entered into an Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement with Citigroup Inc. that allows him to reimburse Citi for the cost of his personal use of corporate aircraft based on the aggregate incremental cost of the flight to Citi. Aggregate incremental cost is calculated based on a cost-per-flight-hour charge developed by a nationally recognized and independent service or, if higher, the charge allowed under Federal Aviation Regulation 91.501(d). Mr. Corbat reimbursed Citi $167,468$223,132 related to his personal use of corporate aircraft during 2016.2018.

In 2017, certain previously awarded shares granted to Mr. McQuade when he was an employee of Citigroup vested; this included Performance Share Units and Capital Accumulation Program Awards. On February 18, 2014, Mr. McQuade received from Citi a target award of 44,398.36 Performance Share Units. Based on adjustments due to performance conditions described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, Mr. McQuade became entitled to receive 22,332.38 Performance Share Units on February 17, 2017, when the share units vested. Performance Share Units are paid in cash, and Mr. McQuade received a cash payment of $1,301,040 for the share units on February 17, 2017. During his employment at Citi, Mr. McQuade also received shares of Citi common stock awarded under the Capital Accumulation Program. Approximately 23,049 shares vested on

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

34CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

January 20, 2017, representing the deferred portion of Mr. McQuade’s annual incentive awards for 2012and 2013, which were awarded to him under the Capital Accumulation Program. These shares are reported in the Beneficial Ownership Table on page 38 of this Proxy Statement. Mr. McQuade has 11,099 unvested shares remaining from his Capital Accumulation Program awards. These unvested shares remain subject to fluctuations in Citi’s common stock price as well as the Citi clawbacks.

An adult child of Mr. Humer, a Director, has been employed by Citi since 2010 and is currently employed by Citi’s Institutional Clients Group. He received 2018 compensation of $951,239. A sibling of Sara Wechter, the Head of Human Resources, has been employed by Citi since 2008, first as an intern and then, beginning in 2010, as a full-time employee. She is employed by the Consumer Banking Group and received 20162018 compensation of $752,864.$479,139. An adult child of John Gerspach, Citi’s former CFO, has been employed by Citi since 2009 and is currently employed in Citi’s Compliance function andGroup. He received 20162018 compensation of $140,000.In addition, Mr. Gerspach’s son-in-law worked for Citi in 2016 and received compensation of $132,781. The son-in-law left Citi in February 2017.$154,765. The compensation for these employees was established by Citi in accordance with its employment and compensation practices applicable to employees with equivalent qualifications and responsibilities and holding similar positions. Mr. Humer and Mr. GerspachThese individuals do not have a materialan interest in the employment relationship of, nor do they share a household with, their respective family members who are or were employees of Citi.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

40CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Indebtedness

Other than certain “grandfathered” margin loans, in accordance with Sarbanes-Oxley and the Citi Corporate Governance Guidelines, no margin loans may be made to any executive officer unless such person is an employee of a broker-dealer subsidiary of Citi and such loan is made in the ordinary course of business.

Certain transactions in excess of $120,000 involving loans, deposits, credit cards, and sales of commercial paper, certificates of deposit, and other money market instruments and certain other banking transactions occurred during 20162018 between Citibank, N.A. and other Citi banking subsidiaries on the one hand, and certain Directors or executive officers of Citi, members of their immediate families, corporations or organizations of which any of them is an executive officer or partner or of which any of them is the beneficial owner of 10% or more of any class of securities, or associates of the Directors, the executive officers or their family members, on the other. The transactions were made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest ratesand collateral, that prevailed at the time for comparable transactions with other persons not related to the lender and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Personal loans made to any Director or an executive officer must comply with Sarbanes-Oxley, Regulation O, and the Corporate Governance Guidelines, and must be made in the ordinary course of business.

Business Practices Committees

The business practices committees for each of Citi’s businesses and regions review business activities, sales practices, product design, potential conflicts of interest, and other franchise or reputational risk issues escalated to these committees. The business practices committee at the corporate level reviews issues escalated by business practices committees at the business or regional level that may present franchise, reputational and/or systemic risks. All reviews by the business practices committees are conducted with due consideration of the context and facts presented to the committees.

The business practices committees, which are composed of our most senior executives, provide the guidance necessary for Citi’sCiti's business practices to meet the highest standards of professionalism, integrity, and ethical behavior consistent with Citi’s Mission and Value Proposition. OurThe business leaders, in additionpractices committees for the corporate level and each of Citi’s businesses and regions review business activities, transactions, sales practices, product design, potential conflicts of interest, and other franchise or reputational risk issues escalated to confirming our commitment to the principles of responsible finance and protecting Citi’s franchise, are responsible for establishing a framework for compliance with applicable laws and regulations, Citi policies, and ethical standards.these committees.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE35

Business practices concerns may be raised through a variety of sources, including business practices working groups, other in-business committees, or the control functions. Relevant issues from the business practices committees are reported on a regular basis to the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee of the Board.

ConductEthics and Culture

At Citi, our mission is to serve as a trusted partner to our clients by responsibly providing financial services that enable growth and economic progress.

We foster a culture of ethics through our governance framework, programs and efforts that embed our culture and expectations for behavior throughout the organization, and collaboration with key stakeholders outside Citi to improve Citi’s and the banking industry’s culture.

Governance over Conduct and Culture

The cornerstone of our approach to conduct and culture is our governance framework, which begins with a strong “tone from the top” starting with the Citigroup Board of Directors. In 2014, Citi’s Board established a standing Ethics and Culture Committee of the Board to oversee senior management’s ongoing efforts to foster a culture of ethics throughout Citi. The Chairman of the Citi Board is a member of the Ethics and Culture Committee. For more information, please see the Ethics and Culture Committee Charter, which is set forth on Citi’s website at www.citigroup.com.

Among its first actions taken in 2014, the Ethics and Culture Committee directed Citi senior management to undertake a review2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Citi’s culture. Since that time, withContents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE41

With oversight from the Ethics and Culture Committee, senior management has undertaken a number of efforts in support of Citi’s culture, including developing Citi’s Mission and Value Proposition and Leadership Standards. On an ongoing basis, the Ethics and Culture Committee remains responsible for overseeing senior management’s efforts to reinforce and enhance a culture of ethics within Citi, including by:which includes:

Overseeing efforts to enhance and communicate Citi’s Mission and Value Proposition, evaluating management’s progress, and providing feedback on these efforts;

Reviewing and assessing Citi’s culture to determine if further enhancements are needed to foster ethical decision-making by employees and overseeing efforts to support ethical decision-making by employees;

and

Reviewing Citi’s Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals; and

Reviewing Citi’s Conduct Risk Program.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

36CORPORATE GOVERNANCEProfessionals.

Programs and Efforts that Embed Culture

To promote ethical conduct and enhance Citi’s culture, Citi focuses on empowering individuals by establishing global policies, programs, and processes that embed our values throughout the organization and guide and support our employees in making ethical decisions and adhering to Citi’s standards of conduct. Under the oversight ofand with input and feedback fromthe Ethics and Culture Committee, senior management has prioritized a number of efforts to further embed our values and conduct expectations into the organization. The following are a few examples of our programs and associated efforts to set, reinforce, and embed our culture at Citi:

Communications and awareness efforts concerning our Mission and Value Proposition,including Citi-wide videos from senior management articulating our core principles and providing examples of these principles in action.

Embedding the Leadership Standards into key aspects of our employee lifecycle,life cycle,such as hiring and performance reviews.

Our global Conduct Risk Program, which we continue to implement across businesses and control functions to manage and mitigate conduct risk, or intentional or negligent actions of employees or agents that may lead to negative outcomes for customers, clients, and markets.

Communications and awareness efforts on the importance of escalation,which reinforce the principles embodied in Citi’s global Escalation Policy, including emphasizing employees’ obligation to escalate potentially significant risks.

Training of employees on key culture-related themes, including on our Code of Conduct, ethical decision-making, and the importance of leadership.

Collaboration with Key Stakeholders

At Citi, we partner with key stakeholders on ways to collectively enhance culture in the banking industry. In October2016, we, along with industry leaders and regulators, participated in The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s third workshop on culture and behavior in the financial services industry, which focused on the roles of supervisors, banks, other industry groups, and institutional investors in improving culture in the banking industry. Representatives from Citi’s Board, including the Chair of the Ethics and Culture Committee, and Citi senior management have participated in these workshops since their inception in 2014. Additionally, at the start of 2017, six leading financial institutions, including Citi, organized a one-day symposium to discuss the dynamics of culture at financial institutions. This symposium brought together a range of stakeholders, including senior leaders from across the industry, regulators, and thought leaders to share their insights on financial industry culture. The Chair of the Ethics and Culture Committee served as a panelist in this symposium.

Finally, Citi is also a member of the Banking Standards Board in the United Kingdom (“BSB”). Together with over 30 member firms, Citi supports the BSB’s independent role to help rebuild trust and confidence across the U.K. banking industry by promoting high ethical and professional standards for behaviorand competence. We remain engaged with the BSB directly through Citi’s U.K. senior management.

Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals

The Citi Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals applies to Citi’s Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and, Controller (Principal Accounting Officer), and all finance professionals and administrative staff in a finance role, including Controllers, CSS Finance & Risk Operations,Shared Services, Finance and Risk Infrastructure, Financial Planning & Analysis and Strategy, Treasury, Tax, Strategy and M&A, Investor Relations, and the Regional/Business teams. Citi expects all of its employees to act in accordance with the highest standards of personal and professional integrity in all aspects of their activities, to comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations, to deter wrongdoing, and abide by the Citi Code of Conductand other policiesand procedures adopted by Citi that govern the conduct of its employees. The Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals is intended to supplement the Citi Code of Conduct. A

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE37

copy of the Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals is available on our website at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals.” We will disclose amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics for Financial Professionals, if any, on our website.

Ethics Hotline

Citi expects employees to raise concerns or questions regarding ethics, discrimination or harassment matters, and to promptly report suspected violations of these and other applicable laws, regulations,law, regulation, rule, or breaches of Citi policies, procedurespolicy, procedure, standard, or standards.the Citi Code of Conduct. Citi offers several channels by which employees and others may report ethical concerns, includingconcerns about accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters. We provide a global Ethics Hotline, a toll-free number that is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year, and is staffed by live operatorswho can connect to translators to accommodate multiple languages.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

42CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Calls to the Ethics Hotline are received by a third-party vendor, located in the United States, which reports the calls to the Citi Ethics Office for handling. Ethical concerns may also be reported through a dedicated e-mail address, multilingual website submission, fax line, and conventional mailing address. Any individual may also raise a concern by accessing Citi’s public-facing corporate website. Individuals may choose to remain anonymous to the extent permitted by applicable laws and regulations. We prohibit retaliatory actions against anyone who raises concerns or questions in good faith, or who participates in a subsequent investigation of such concerns. The Ethics Office reports on analysis of reporting and trends onconcerns it receives via the Citi Ethics Hotline matters to the Audit CommitteeCommittees of the Board of Directors of Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A. on a quarterly basis.

Code of Conduct

The Board has adopted a Code of Conduct, which provides an overview of the laws, regulations, and Citi policies and procedures applicable to the activities of Citi, and sets forth Citi’s Mission and Value Proposition, as well as the standards of ethics and professional behavior expected of employees and representatives of Citi. The Code of Conduct applies to every Director,director, officer, and employee of Citi and its consolidated subsidiaries. All Citi employees, directors, and officers are required to read and comply with the Code of Conduct. In addition, other persons performing services for Citi may be subject to the Code of Conduct by contract or other agreement. The Code of Conduct is publicly available in multiple languages at www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” then “Corporate Governance,” and then “Code of Conduct.”

Communications with the Board

Stockholders or other interested parties who wish to communicate with a member or members of the Board, including the ChairmanChair or the non-management Directors as a group, may do so by addressing their correspondence to the Board member or members, c/o the Corporate Secretary, Rohan Weerasinghe, Citigroup Inc., 388 Greenwich Street, New York, NY 10013. The Board of Directors has approved a process pursuant to which the office of the Corporate Secretary will review and forward correspondence to the appropriate person or persons for response.

www.citigroup.comCiti 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

3843

Stock Ownership

Citi has long encouraged stock ownership by its Directors, officers, and employees to align their interests with the long-term interests of stockholders. The Board and executive officers are subject to a stock ownership commitment, which requires these individuals to maintain a minimum ownership level of Citigroup stock. Executive officers are required to retain at least 75% of the equity awarded to them as incentive compensation (net of amounts required to pay taxes and option exercise prices) as long as they are executive officers. In addition, a stock holding period applies after the executive officer leaves Citi, or is no longer an executive officer. He or she must retain, for one year after ending executive officer status, 50% of the shares previously subject to the stock ownership commitment. Directors are similarly required to retain at least 75% of the net equity awarded to them, further aligning their interests with stockholders. The Board may revise the terms of the stock ownership commitment from time to time to reflect legal and business developments warranting a change. In addition, Directors and executive officers may not enter into hedging transactions in respect of Citi’s common stock or other securities issued by Citi, including securities granted by the Company to the Director or executive officer as part of his or her compensation and securities purchased or acquired by the Director or executive officer in a non-compensatory transaction.

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of Citi common stock by our Directors, and certainnominee, named executive officers, current CFO, and Directors and executive officers as a group at February 27, 2017.23, 2019. For purposes of this table, “beneficial ownership” is determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, pursuant to which a person, or group of persons, is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of determination.

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP TABLE

Name       Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Excluding
Options
(1)       Options
Exercisable
Within
60 Days
       

Owned by
or Tenant in
Common with
Family Member,
Trust, Mutual
Fund or 401(K)

(2)       

Total
Beneficial
Ownership

       

Receipt
Deferred

(3)       

Total
Ownership

     Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Excluding
Options(1)
     Options
Exercisable
Within
60 days
     Owned by
or Tenant in
Common with
Family Member,
Trust, or
Mutual Fund(2)
     Total
Beneficial
Ownership(3)
Receipt
Deferred(4)
     Total
Ownership(5)
Stephen Bird119,38695,000214,386214,386170,67495,000265,674120,952386,626
Michael L. Corbat226,2141,781227,995227,995325,7781,781327,559273,968601,527
Ellen M. Costello6,6376,6372,5499,18615,88515,8852,40218,287
Barbara J. Desoer44,75444,75480,222124,976
John D. Dugan2,5162,5162,4024,918
James A. Forese271,76459,490331,254331,254361,856361,856221,764583,620
Jane Nind Fraser16,56716,56716,56737,68737,68799,297136,984
John Gerspach154,783111,799266,582266,582
John Gerspach*152,183125,601277,784125,878403,662
Duncan P. Hennes10,54610,5462,54913,09515,62415,6242,40218,026
Peter B. Henry9,0299,0292,54911,57818,28718,2872,40220,689
Franz B. Humer17,83617,8362,54920,38523,20623,20660023,806
S. Leslie Ireland2,5662,5662,4024,968
Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV1,0371,1792,2162,4024,618
Renée J. James4,0774,0772,5496,6268,9268,9262,40211,328
Mark Mason**27627660,92861,204
Eugene M. McQuade44,76172,802117,5632,549120,112126,2793,098129,3772,402131,779
Michael E. O’Neill100,66653,250153,916153,916
Gary M. Reiner19,33519,3352,54921,88428,54428,5442,40230,946
Judith Rodin35,82535,82563736,462
Anthony M. Santomero33,59533,5952,54936,14438,15938,15960038,759
Joan E. Spero29,60029,60063730,237
Diana L. Taylor25,94125,9412,54928,49031,61931,6192,40234,021
William S. Thompson, Jr.4,07797,633101,7102,549104,259
James S. Turley11,67211,6722,54914,22116,75016,7502,40219,152
Deborah C. Wright2,5492,5494,6934,6932,4027,095
Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon24,58224,5822,54927,13130,20930,2092,40232,611
Total (30 Directors and
Executive Officers as
a group)2,082,41698,472452,7382,633,62634,4112,668,037
Total (29 Directors and
Executive Officers
as a group)1,663,290422,5132,085,8031,424,8793,510,682

*Retired as Chief Financial Officer on February 22, 2019.
**Chief Financial Officer as of February 23, 2019.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statementwww.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

44STOCK OWNERSHIP39

(1)The stock reported for certain Directors in this column includes deferred common stock, which is fully vested and which the Director or Directors have the right to acquire within 60 days.
(2)Stock held as a tenant-in-common with a family member or trust, owned by a family member, held by a trust for which the Director or executive officer is a trustee but not a beneficiary, or held by a mutual fund which invests substantially all of its assets in Citi common stock.
(3)At February 23, 2019, no Director or executive officer beneficially owned more than 1% of Citi’s outstanding common stock. At February 23, 2019, all of the Directors and executive officers as a group beneficially owned approximately 0.09% of Citi’s common stock.
(4)Amounts represent Directors’ deferred common stock. The deferred common stock becomes distributable approximately on the second anniversary of the date of grant; however, if a Director retired or resigned from the Board during the year when the award was granted, the Director would forfeit a pro rata portion of the award. Amounts also represent, as applicable, unvested shares of executive officers.
(5)Total Ownership reflects the amount represented in the Section 16 filings of the relevant Director or executive officer.

At February 27, 2017, no Director or executive officer owned more than 1% of Citi’s common stock.

At February 27, 2017, all of the Directors and executive officers as a group beneficially owned approximately 0.10% of Citi’s common stock.

Mr. Reiner also owns 485 Depositary Sharesdepositary shares of Citi’s 5.9% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Noncumulative Preferred Stock, Series B, which represents 0.065% of such series of preferred stock.

Mr. Thompson also owns 18,768 Depositary Shares of Citi’s 6.875% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Noncumulative Preferred Stock, Series K, which represents 0.031% of such series of preferred stock.OWNERS OF MORE THAN 5% OF CITI COMMON STOCK

Mr. Don Callahan, an executive officer at Citi, also owns 4,170 Depositary Shares of Citi’s 6.3% Noncumulative Preferred Stock, Series S, which represents 0.010% of such series of preferred stock.

Mr. William Mills, an executive officer at Citi, also owns 1,000 Depositary Shares of Citi’s 5.95% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Noncumulative Preferred Stock, Series Q, which represents 0.080% of such series of preferred stock.

OWNERS OF MORE THAN 5% OF CITI COMMON STOCK     
Name and Address of Beneficial OwnerBeneficial OwnershipPercent of Class     Beneficial Ownership     Percent of Class
BlackRock, Inc.(a) 
55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055205,442,3017.2%172,569,7097.1%
The Vanguard Group, Inc.(b)
100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355178,807,5946.27%179,143,8587.33%

(a)Based on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 19, 2017February 11, 2019 by BlackRock, Inc. and certain subsidiaries, BlackRock reported that it had sole voting power over 178,681,324 shares; shared voting power over 126,632 shares;150,855,815 shares and had sole dispositive power over 205,315,669 shares; and shared dispositive power over 126,632172,569,709 shares. The Schedule 13G states that the shares are beneficially owned by funds and accounts managed by BlackRock and any economic interests of the securities covered are held by BlackRock for the benefitsbenefit of the funds and accounts and not for BlackRock’s own account.
(b)Based on the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 201711, 2019 by Vanguard and certain subsidiaries, Vanguard reported that it had sole voting power over 4,531,6542,870,416 shares; sole dispositive power over 173,789,583175,778,663 shares; shared voting power over 530,741558,273 shares; and shared dispositive power over 5,018,1113,365,195 shares. Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 3,703,9232,071,666 shares or .12%.08% of Citi’s common stock as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts. In addition, Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of 2,141,8192,062,626 shares or .07%.08% of Citi’s common stock as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings.

www.citigroup.comCiti 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

4045

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Citi’s Section 16 officers and Directors, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of Citi’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE, and to furnish Citi with copies of the forms. Based on its review of the forms it received, or written representations from reporting persons, Citi believes that, during 2016,2018, each of its Section 16 officers and Directors complied with all such filing requirements.

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

The Board has nominated all of the current Directors for re-election at the 20172019 Annual Meeting, except for Judith RodinMr. Humer and Joan Spero,Mr. Santomero, who will not stand for re-election to the Board having reached the retirement age under Citi’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. Directors are not eligible to stand for re-election after reaching the age of 72. Ms. Deborah WrightMr. O’Neill retired from the Board on January 1, 2019 having reached the retirement age. Mr. Santomero will retire from the Board on April 1, 2019 and Mr. Humer will retire from the Board on April 16, 2019. Mr. Jacobs was elected by the Board in December 2016 for a term commencing January 1, 2017. Ms. WrightJune 2018. Mr. Jacobs was identified as a potential Director by Egon Zehnder, the Board’s nominating consultant.consultant and by a retired Board member. In addition, the Board has nominated Ms. Desoer for election to the Board at the 2019 Annual Meeting. Ms. Desoer was recommended as a candidate for election to the Citigroup Board by her fellow directors on the Citibank Board, all of whom are members of Citi’s Board. If elected, each nominee will hold office until the 20182020 Annual Meeting or until his or her successor is elected and qualified.

The one-year term of all of Citi’s Directors expires at the 2017 Annual Meeting; Ms. Wright’s term, which commenced on January 1, 2017, will also expire at the 2017 Annual Meeting.

Director Criteria and Nomination Process

The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee considers all qualified candidates identified by members of the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee, by other members of the Board, by senior management, and by security holders. During 2016,2018, the Committee engaged Egon Zehnder to assist in identifying and evaluating potential nominees. Stockholders who would like to propose a Director candidate for consideration by the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee may do so by submitting the candidate’s name, résumé, and biographical information to the attention of the Corporate Secretary, Rohan Weerasinghe, Citigroup Inc., 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013. All proposals for nominations received by the Corporate Secretary will be presented to the Committee for its consideration.

In considering the composition of the Board of Directors, the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee inventories the categories of risks faced by Citi, given its size, business mix, and geographical presence, and seeks to identify candidates with the skills and experience necessary to enable the Board of Directors to provide proper oversight of those risks. The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee also takes Director tenure into consideration when making Director nomination decisions and believes that it is desirable to maintain a mix of longer-tenured, experienced Directors and newer Directors with fresh perspectives. The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee and the Board also believe that longer-tenured, experienced Directors are a significant strength of the Board, given the large size of our Company, the breadth of our product offerings, and the international scope of our organization. The Board’s composition, and the individuals nominated for consideration by stockholders, are the result of careful consideration by the Committee of the correspondence between the risk inventory and skills and experience of the Board members and candidates. In addition to the ability

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

46PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

to assist the Board in its oversight of a particular risk or risks, as more fully described in each nominee’s biography, the members of the Board are assessed based on a variety of factors, including the following criteria, which have been developed by the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee and approved by the Board:

Whether the candidate has exhibited behavior that indicates he or she is committed to the highest ethical standards;

Whether the candidate has had business, governmental, non-profit or professional experience at the chairman,chair, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, or equivalent policy-making and operational level of a large organization with significant international activities across many regulatory jurisdictions and regions that indicates that the candidate will be able to make a meaningful and immediate contribution to the Board’s discussion of and decision-making on the array of complex issues facing a large financial services business that operates on a global scale;

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS41

Whether the candidate has special skills, expertise and background that would complement the attributes of the existing Directors, taking into consideration the diverse communities and geographies in which the Company operates;

Whether the candidate has the financial expertise required to provide effective oversight of a diversified financial services business that operates on a global scale;

Whether the candidate has achieved prominence in his or her business, governmental, or professional activities and has built a reputation that demonstrates the ability to make the kind of important and sensitive judgments that the Board is called upon to make;

Whether the candidate will effectively, consistently, and appropriately take into account and balance the legitimate interests and concerns of all of the Company’s stockholders and other stakeholders in reaching decisions, rather than advancing the interests of a particular constituency;

Whether the candidate possesses a willingness to challenge management while working constructively as part of a team in an environment of collegiality and trust; and

Whether the candidate will be able to devote sufficient time and energy to the performance of his or her duties as a Director.

Application of these factors involves the exercise of judgment by the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee and the Board.

Based on its assessment of each candidate’s independence, skills and qualifications and the criteria described above, the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee will make recommendations regarding potential Director candidates to the Board.

The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee follows the same process and uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates proposed by stockholders, members of the Board of Directors, and members of senior management. For the 20172019 Annual Meeting, Citi did not receive notice from any stockholders regarding a nomination to the Board of Directors.

Director Qualifications

The nominees for the Board of Directors each have the qualifications and experience to approve and guide Citi’s strategy and to oversee management’s execution of that strategic vision. Citi’s Board of Directors consists of individuals with the skills, experience, and backgrounds necessary to oversee Citi’s efforts toward becoming a simpler, smaller, safer, and stronger financial institution, while mitigating risk and operating within a complex financial and regulatory environment.

The nominees listed below are leaders in business, the financial community, and academia because of their intellectual acumen and analytic skills, strategic vision, ability to lead and inspire others to work with them, and records of outstanding accomplishments over a period of decades. Each has been chosen to stand for election in part because of his or her ability and willingness to ask difficult questions, understand Citi’s unique challenges, and evaluate the strategies proposed by management, as well as their implementation.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS47

Each of the nominees has a long record of professional integrity, a dedication to his or her profession and community, a strong work ethic that includes a commitment to coming fully prepared to meetings and being willing to spend the time and effort needed to fulfill professional obligations and the ability to maintain a collegial environment, and the experience of having served as a Board member of a sophisticated global company.environment.

Many of our nominees are either current or former chief executive officers or chairmenchairs of other large international corporations or have experience operating large, complex academic governmental or philanthropic institutions orgovernmental departments. As such, they have a deep understanding of, and extensive experience in, many of the areas that are outlined below as being of critical importance to Citi’s proper operation and success. For the purposes of its analysis, the Board has determined that nominees who have served as a chief executive officer or a chairmanchair of a major corporation or large, complex institution have extensive experience with financial statement preparation, compensation determinations, regulatory compliance (if their businesses are or were regulated), corporate governance, public affairs, and legal matters.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

42PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

In evaluating the composition of the Board, the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee seeks to find and retain individuals who, in addition to having the qualifications set forth in Citi’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, have the skills, experience and abilities necessary to meet Citi’s unique needs as a highly regulated financial services company with operations in the corporate and consumer businessbusinesses within the United States and more than 100 countries around the globe. The Committee has determined it is critically important to Citi’s proper operation and success that its Board has, in addition to the qualities described above, expertise and experience in the following areas:


Compensation

Citi’s Personnel and Compensation Committee is responsible for determining the compensation of the CEO and approving the compensation of other executive officers of the Company and members of Citi’s Operating Committee. In order to properly carry out its responsibilities with respect to compensation, Citi’s Board must include members who have experience evaluating the structure of compensation for senior executives. They must understand the various forms of compensation that can be utilized, the purpose of each type and how various elements of compensation can be used to motivate and reward executives and drive performance, while not encouraging imprudent risk-taking or simply having short-term goals.

 
  


Consumer
Business and
Financial Services

With more than 200 million customer accounts, Citi provides services to its retail customers in connection with its retail banking, private banking, credit cards, consumer finance, real estate lending, personal loans, investment services, auto loans, small- and middle-market commercial banking, and other financial services. Citi looks to its Board members with extensive consumer experience to assist it in evaluating its business model and strategies for reaching and servicing its retail customers domestically and around the world. Citi is a global diversified bank whose businesses provide a broad range of financial services to consumer and institutional customers, making it critically important that its Board include members who have deep financial services backgrounds.

 
 


Corporate
Affairs

Citi’s reputation is a vital asset in building trust with its clients and other stakeholders, and Citi makes every effort to communicate its corporate values to its stockholders and clients, its achievements in the areas of corporate social responsibility, sustainability, and philanthropy, and its efforts to improve the communities in which we live and work. Members of the Board with experience in the areas of corporate affairs, philanthropy, community development, communications, and corporate social responsibility assist management by reviewing Citi’s policies and programs that relate to significant public issues, including environment,environmental, social and governance factors, as well as by reviewing Citi’s relationships with external stakeholders and issues that impact Citi’s reputation.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents


48
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

     


Corporate
Governance

Citi aspires to the highest standards of corporate governance and ethical conduct: doing what we say, reporting results with accuracy and transparency, and maintaining compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations that govern the Company’s businesses. The Board is responsible for shaping corporate governance policies and practices, including adopting the corporate governance guidelines applicable to the Company and monitoring the Company’s compliance with governance policies and the guidelines. To carry out these responsibilities, the Board must include experienced leaders in the area of corporate governance who must be familiar with governance issues, the constituencies most interested in those issues, and the impact that governance policies have on the functioning of a company.

 
 


Financial
Reporting

Citi’s internal controls over financial reporting are designed to ensure that Citi’s financial reporting and its financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. While the Board and its committees are not responsible for preparing our financial statements, they have oversight responsibility, including the selection of outside independent auditors, subject to stockholder ratification.ratification, and lead engagement partner. The Board must include members with direct or supervisory experience in the preparation of financial statements, as well as finance, audit, and accounting expertise.

 
 


Institutional
Business

Citi provides a wide variety of services to its corporate clients, including strategic and financial advisory services, such as mergers, acquisitions, financial restructurings, loans, foreign exchange, cash management, underwriting and distributing equity, and debt and equity derivative services;services, markets and global transactionsecurities services, includingretail structured products, liquidity management, treasury and trade solutions and securities and fund services. With a corporate business as extensive and complex as Citi’s, it is crucial that members of the Board have the depth of understanding and experience necessary to guide management’s conduct of these lines of business.

 

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS  43


International
Business or
Economics

As a company with a broad international reach, Citi’s Board values the perspectives of Directors with international business or governmental experience or expertise in global economics. Citi’s presence in markets outside the United States is an important competitive advantage for Citi, because it allows us to serve U.S. and foreign businesses and individual clients whose activities span the globe. Directors with international business experience can use the experience that they have developed through their own business dealings to assist Citi’s Board and management in understanding and successfully navigating the business, political, and regulatory environments in countries in which Citi does or seeks to do business. Directors with global economics expertise can help guide Citi management in understanding the challenges faced by other markets and in developing its global strategy.

 
  


Legal Matters

In addition to the regulatory supervision described below, Citi is subject to myriad laws and regulations and is party to legal actions and regulatory proceedings from time to time. Citi’s Board has an important oversight function with respect to compliance with applicable requirements, monitors the progress of legal proceedings, and evaluates major settlements. Citi’s Board must include members with experience in regulatory compliance, as well as an understanding of complex litigation and litigation strategies.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS49

     


Operations and
Technology

Citi has a long history as a technology innovator — innovator—Citibank, N.A. was one of the first banks to offer automatic teller machines for its customers during the 1970s. Since then, Citi has expandedcontinued to leverage new technologies to deliver enhanced products and services to its technology to includeclients and customers such products as online banking;banking, mobile and tablet banking;banking, and mobile check deposit; eBills;deposit. In addition, Citi deploys new technology and Popmoney®. Financial institutions rely on gathering, processing, analyzing,platform innovations to gather, process, analyze, and providingprovide information in order to execute transactions and meet the needs of their customers,its clients and for Citi, it is crucial to be at the forefront of technology innovations.customers. In this context, Citi must be able to use and protect its data and must be able to rely on the accuracy of itsaccess reliable data to ensure that it complies with regulatory requirements, including anti-money laundering and sanctions, and to meet other information security issues. In addition,and control objectives. Citi must ensure that its operations are efficient and there is a continuous focus on enhancing productivity to meet ourits operational and strategic goals. The Board must include members thatwho have knowledge and experience in technology, including such technology-driventechnology-centric issues as cybersecurity, data privacy and cybersecurity, data management, and the changing supervisory and regulatory technology landscape, as well as customer-friendly technology and operations.landscape. Members of the Board must be qualified to provide oversight of Citi’s technology initiatives to service its consumerthe development and institutional clients; the maintenance of Citi’s technology platforms; Citi’s compliance with regulatory requirements; Citi’s operational efficiency and productivity strategies; the operations and reliability of Citi’s systems; and the use and protection of Citi’s systemsclient andcustomer data.


 
 


Regulatory and
Compliance

Citi and its subsidiaries are regulated and supervised by numerous regulatory agencies, both domestically and internationally, including in the U.S. the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FDIC, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and state banking and insurance departments, as well as international financial services authorities. Having Directors with experience interacting with regulators or operating businesses subject to extensive regulation is important to furthering Citi’s continued compliance with its many regulatory requirements and fostering productive relationships with its regulators. Several of Citi’s Board members have experience with ethics and compliance and building an effective, values-based ethics and compliance program.

 
 


Risk Management

Risk management is a critical function of a complex global financial services company and its proper supervision requires Board members with sophisticated risk management skills and experience. Directors provide oversight of the Company’s risk management framework, including the significant policies, procedures, and practices used in managing credit, market, and certain other risks, including liquidity, capital, and balance sheet risks, as well as capital markets risks, and review recommendations by management regarding risk mitigation. Given increased cybersecurity threats, Citi’s Board must have members who have sufficient experience to enable them to oversee management’s efforts to monitor, detect and prevent cyber threats to Citi. Citi’s Board must include members with risk expertise to assist Citi in its efforts to properly identify, measure, monitor, report, analyze, and control or mitigate risk.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

4450PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Nominees

The following tables give information provided by the nominees about their principal occupation, business experience, and other matters.

Each nominee’s biography highlights his or her particular skills, qualifications, and experience that support the conclusion of the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee that the nominee is extremely qualified to serve on Citi’s Board.

Board Recommendation

The Board of Directors recommends that you voteFOReach of the following nominees.

   

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Michael L. Corbat
Age: 5658

Director of Citigroup

since 2012

Other Directorships:

None

Previous Directorships
within the last five years:

EMINone

Other Activities:
British/American Business, Inc. (Director)The Clearing House Association (Chairman of the Supervisory Board), Financial Services Forum (Vice Chairman), Bank Policy Institute (Permanent Board Member), The Partnership for New York City Partnership (Director)(Executive Committee Member), The Business Council (Member), Business Roundtable (Member), International Business Council of WEF (Member), and The U.S. Ski & Snowboard Team Foundation (Director), The Clearing House Association (Member of the Supervisory Board), Financial Services Forum (Member), Institute of International Finance (Board Member), and International Business Council of WEF (Member)(Trustee)

Chief Executive Officer
Citigroup Inc.

Chief Executive Officer, Citigroup Inc. October 2012 to Present
Chief Executive Officer, Europe, Middle East, and Africa December 2011 to October 2012
Chief Executive Officer, Citi Holdings January 2009 to December 2011
Chief Executive Officer, Citi’s Global Wealth Management September 2008 to January 2009
Head of Global Corporate Bank and Global Commercial Bank March 2008 to September 2008
Head of Global Corporate Bank April 2007 to March 2008
Head of Global Relationship Bank March 2004 to April 2007
Head of EM Sales & Trading and Capital Markets, FICC October 2001 to March 2004
Head of EM Sales & Fixed Income Origination March 1988 to October 2001


Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Corbat is an experienced financial services executive and finance professional, and has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his extensive experience and expertise in the areas of Financial Services, Risk Management, Financial Reporting, InternationalInstitutional Business, Corporate and Consumer Businesses, Regulatory and Compliance, and Corporate Affairs. In his role as Chief Executive Officer of Citigroup Inc., his prior experienceposition as Citi’s CEO of Europe, Middle East, and Africa, and his extensive career at Citi he has gained experience in all of Citi’s business operations, including consumer banking, corporate and investment banking, securities and trading, and private banking services. In these roles, Mr. Corbat has gained extensive financial services, financial reporting, corporate business, and risk management experience. Additionally, in his role as CEO of Citi Holdings, Citi’s portfolio of non-core businesses and assets, he oversaw the divestiture of more than 40 businesses, including the IPO and sale of Citi’s remaining stake in Primerica. Mr. Corbat also successfully oversaw the restructuring of Citi’s consumer finance and retail partner cards businesses and divested more than $500 billion in assets, reducing risk on the Company’s balance sheet and freeing up capital to invest in Citi’s core banking business.

Primary Qualifications

Consumer Business and Financial Services

Reporting

Financial Reporting

Institutional Business

Regulatory and Compliance

Risk Management


Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS4551

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Ellen M. Costello
Age: 6264

Director of Citigroup

since 2016

Director of Citibank, N.A.

since 2016

Other Directorships:

DH CorporationDiebold Nixdorf, Inc.

Previous Directorships
within the last five years:


BMO Financial
DH Corporation

Other Activities:

The United Way of Metropolitan Chicago (Chair of Board), Chicago Council on Global Affairs (Board), and The Economic Club of Chicago (Member)

Former President, Chief Executive Officer, BMO Financial Corporation and
Former
U.S. Country Head, BMO Financial Group

President and CEO, BMO Financial Corporation and U.S. Country Head, BMO Financial Group 2011 to July 2013
Group Head, Personal and Commercial Banking, U.S. and President and Chief Executive Officer, BMO Harris Bank N.A., BMO Financial Group 2006 to 2011
Vice Chairman and Head, Securitization and Credit Investment Management, Merchant Banking and Head of N.Y. Office, Capital Markets Group, BMO Financial Group 2000 to 2006
Executive Vice President, Strategic Initiatives, Capital Markets Group, BMO Financial Group 2000
Executive Vice President and Head, Global Treasury Group, BMO Financial Group — 1997–1997 to 1999
Senior Vice President and Deputy Treasurer, Global Treasury Group, BMO Financial Group 1995 to 1997
Managing Director and Regional Treasurer, Asia Pacific, Global Treasury Group, BMO Financial Group 1993 to 1994
Managing Director and Head, North American Financial Product Sales, Global Treasury Group, BMO Financial Group 1991 to 1993


Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Costello is an experiencedaccomplished financial services executive and has been nominated to serve on the Board because ofthrough her extensive skills and experienceprominent roles in the areas of Financial Services, Risk Management, Institutional and Consumer Businesses, Financial Reporting, Operations and Technology, and Regulatory Compliance.and Compliance, has been nominated to serve on the Board. Because Citi is an international financial services company with both consumer and institutional businesses, having former banking executives with extensive banking experience, like Ms. Costello, as Board members enables the Board to provide knowledgeable oversight to its business and regulatory activities. In her 30 years at BMO Financial Group, a global financial institution, Ms. Costello acquired extensive experience in personal and commercial banking, wealth management and capital markets businesses in Canada, Asia, and the U.S. In her roles in Global Treasury and Global Capital Markets, she gained experience in corporate, institutional and investment banking, securities, trading and asset management. As CEO of BMO Harris Bank N.A., Ms. Costello gained experience in personal and commercial banking, strategic planning, marketing, regulatory compliance, financial reporting, and personnel matters. Additionally, as CEO of BMO Financial Corporation and U.S. Country Head of BMO Financial Group, she gained further experience in regulatory compliance, including capital and resolution planning, risk management, and governance. Her prior board service at DH Corporation givesand her current board service at Diebold Nixdorf provide her with experience within global operations and financial technologies businesses. Ms. Costello’s extensive financial services background also adds significant value to Citi’s and Citibank’s relationships with various regulators and stakeholders.

Primary Qualifications

Consumer Business and Financial Services

Financial Reporting

Operations and Technology

Regulatory and Compliance

Risk Management

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

4652PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Barbara J. Desoer
Age: 66

New Nominee

Other Directorships:
DaVita Inc.

Previous Directorships within the last five years:
None

Other Activities:
Board of Visitors of the University of California, Berkeley (Member)

Chief Executive Officer, Citibank, N.A.*
Chief Executive Officer, Citibank, N.A. – April 2014 to April 2019
Chief Operating Officer, Citibank, N.A. – October 2013 to April 2014
President, Bank of America Home Loans, Bank of America – 2008 to 2012
Global Technology & Operations Executive, Bank of America – 2004 to 2008
Skills and Qualifications
Ms. Desoer has been nominated to serve on the Board because of her significant insight into the financial services industry, including client services, and extensive expertise in financial management, risk management and the management of regulatory issues at large financial institutions. She has over 40 years of large bank experience, as the CEO of Citibank, N.A. for five years and a 35-year career at Bank of America, serving in such roles as the President of Bank of America Home Loans and as a Global Technology & Operations Executive. Ms. Desoer’s knowledge of and experience in the financial services industries qualifies her to serve on Citi’s Board. Her primary qualifications are in the following areas: Consumer Business and Financial Services through her roles at Citibank, N.A. and Bank of America; Operations and Technology experience while serving as a Global Technology & Operations Executive at the Bank of America where she enabled growth and innovation through technology; Regulatory and Compliance through her service as the CEO of Citibank, N.A. and previously as the head of Citi’s Anti-Money Laundering Program; and Risk Management through her oversight of Citi’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review Process and serving on Citibank’s Risk Management Committee. Ms. Desoer will be a significant asset to Citi’s Board because of her expertise in financial regulation, leadership in the operations of a large global financial institution, and technology and management expertise.
Primary Qualifications
Consumer Business and Financial Services
Operations and Technology
Regulatory and Compliance
Risk Management

*Ms. Desoer will retire as CEO of Citibank, N.A. before the Annual Meeting.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS53

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

John C. Dugan
Age: 63

Director of Citigroup
since 2017

Other Directorships:
None

Previous Directorships within the last five years:
None

Other Activities:
University of Michigan, “Michigan in Washington” program (Advisory Board)

Chair
Citigroup Inc.
Chair, Citigroup Inc. – January 2019 to Present
Director, Citigroup Inc. – October 2017 to Present
Partner and Chair, Financial Institutions Group, Covington & Burling LLP – 2011 to 2017
Comptroller of the Currency – 2005 to 2010
Partner (1995 to 2005) and Of Counsel (1993 to 1995), Covington & Burling LLP
Assistant Secretary for Domestic Finance and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions Policy, U.S. Department of the Treasury – 1989 to 1993
Minority General Counsel and Counsel for the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs – 1985 to 1989
Skills and Qualifications
Mr. Dugan is an experienced former banking regulator and former law firm partner and has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his extensive skills and knowledge in the areas of Risk Management, Financial Services, Legal Matters, Corporate Governance, and Regulatory and Compliance. Because Citi operates in a highly regulated industry, having Board members like Mr. Dugan, with valuable expertise and perspective in regulatory, legal, and compliance matters, is vital to enhancing the Board’s oversight of the Company. During his tenure as Comptroller of the Currency, Mr. Dugan led the agency through the financial crisis and the ensuing recession that resulted in numerous regulatory, supervisory, and legislative actions for national banks. As a former partner at Covington & Burling LLP, Mr. Dugan advised financial institution clients, including boards of directors, on a range of issues arising from increased regulatory requirements resulting from the financial crisis, including the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act. In the international arena, Mr. Dugan developed important expertise and insights from serving on the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision as it formulated the “Basel III” regulatory standards; chairing the Joint Forum of banking, securities, and insurance supervisors; performing an active role at the Financial Stability Board; and serving as a member of the Global Advisory Board of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. Mr. Dugan also developed valuable perspective on accounting issues from his five years of service as Trustee of the Financial Accounting Foundation, which oversees the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Government Accounting Standards Board.
Primary Qualifications
Corporate Governance
Legal Matters
Regulatory and Compliance
Risk Management

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

54PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Duncan P. Hennes
Age: 6062

Director of Citigroup

since 2013

Director of Citibank, N.A.

since 2013

Other Directorships:

NoneRenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.

Previous Directorships
within the last five years:

Syncora Holdings, Ltd.

Other Activities:

Freeman & Co.
(Advisory Board)

Co-Founder and Partner
Atrevida Partners, LLC

Co-Founder and Partner, Atrevida Partners, LLC June 2007 to Present
Co-Founder and Partner, Promontory Financial Group 2000 to 2006
Chief Executive Officer, Soros Fund Management 1999 to 2000
Executive Vice President/Treasurer, Bankers Trust Corporation 1987 to 1999
Audit Manager, Arthur Andersen & Co. 1979 to 1987


Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Hennes is an experienced financial services professional and has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his extensive experience andconsiderable expertise in the areas of Compensation, Financial Services, Risk Management, Financial Reporting, Institutional Business, and Regulatory and Compliance. Because Citi is an international financial services company with a significant institutional business and a need to ensure proper risk management, having an executive, like Mr. Hennes, with extensive institutional and risk management experience, enables the Board to provide knowledgeable oversight of its institutional business and its risk management function. In his role as the Co-Founder of Atrevida Partners, LLC and his prior experience at Promontory Financial Group and Bankers Trust Corporation, Mr. Hennes has gained extensivedeveloped wide-ranging skills and experience in financial services, regulatory compliance, corporate and investment banking, and securities and trading. While at Bankers Trust Corporation, Mr. Hennes was Chairman of Oversight Partners I, the consortium of 14 firms that participated in the equity recapitalization of Long-Term Capital Management. As the Chairman of Oversight Partners I, Mr. Hennes gained experience in credit and risk management, and personnel matters. Additionally, inIn his rolecapacity as CEO of Soros Fund Management, Mr. Hennes gained experience in investing, operational infrastructure, and trading, including arbitrage activities. Mr. Hennes’s experience as a Certified Public Accountant has also given him audit, financial reporting, and risk management expertise.

Primary Qualifications

Compensation

Institutional Business

Regulatory and Compliance

Risk Management


Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS4755

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Peter B. Henry
Age: 4749

Director of Citigroup

since 2015

Other Directorships:

General Electric CompanyNike, Inc.

Previous Directorships
within the last five years:

General Electric Company, Kraft Foods Inc. and Kraft Foods Group, Inc. (split into two companies in October 2012)

Other Activities:

British-American Business Council, Council on Foreign Relations (Board), National Bureau of Economic Research (Board), and The Economic Club of New York (Board), and Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Economic Advisory Panel)

Dean Emeritus and W. R. Berkley Professor of Economics and Finance
New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business*Business

Dean Emeritus and W. R. Berkley Professor of Economics and Finance, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business – December 2017 to Present
Dean, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business – January 2010 to PresentDecember 2017
Faculty Member, Stanford University – 1997 to 2009
Fellow, National Science Foundation – 1993 to 1996


Skills and Qualifications

Dr.

Mr. Henry, a leading academic and seasoned international economist, has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his extensive expertise in the areas of International Business andor Economics, Financial Services, Risk Management, Financial Reporting, ConsumerInstitutional Business, and Corporate Affairs, and Governance. As a renowned international economist, he shares important perspectives with the Board on emerging markets, which is a focus of Citi’s strategy. The experience he has gained in his role as Dean of the Leonard N. Stern School of Business enables him to provide an important perspective to the Board’s discussions on public affairs, financial, and operational matters. As a former member of the Board of Kraft Foods Group,Nike, Inc. and its AuditCorporate Responsibility and Sustainability and Governance Committees, Dr.Mr. Henry has gained valuable insights about the consumer business environment, financial reporting,sustainability issues, and governance. Dr.Mr. Henry’s governmental advisory roles, including leadership of President Obama’s Transition Team’s review of international lending agencies and his service as an economic advisor to governments in developing and emerging markets, have given him valuable insights and perspectives on international business and financial services. Dr.Mr. Henry brings to the Board extensive experiencevaluable insight in executive leadership at a large private university, including a robust understanding of the issues facing companies and governments in both mature and emerging markets around the world.

Primary Qualifications

Consumer Business and Financial Services

Corporate Governance

Corporate Governance

Financial Reporting

Financial Reporting

Institutional Business

International Business or Economics

* Dr. Henry has announced his intention to step down as Dean of the Leonard N. Stern School of Business at the end of 2017.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

4856PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Franz B. HumerS. Leslie Ireland
Age: 7059

Director of Citigroup

since 20122017

Director of Citibank, N.A.
since 2017

Other Directorships:

Chugai Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Kite Pharmaceuticals, and WISeKey SANone

Previous Directorships within the last five years:

Diageo plc and Roche Holdings Ltd.None

Other Activities:

International Centre for MissingIntelligence and Exploited Children (Chairman), Humer Foundation, and Bial Pharmaceuticals (MemberNational Security Alliance (INSA) (Vice-Chair of the Board) Financial Threats Council) and The Stimson Center (Board)

Former ChairmanAssistant Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis, U.S. Department of
Roche Holdings Ltd.the Treasury, and National Intelligence Manager for Threat Finance, Office of the
Director of National Intelligence

Chairman, Roche Holdings Ltd.Head of the Office of Intelligence and Analysis, U.S. Department of the Treasury – 2010 to 2016
National Intelligence Manager for Threat Finance – 2010 to 2016
President’s Daily Intelligence Briefer – 2008 to March 20142010
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Roche GroupIran Mission Manager20012005 to 2008
Chief Executive Officer, Roche GroupAdvisor to the Director and Deputy Director on Central Intelligence, CIA – 2004 to 2005
Various Leadership, Staff and Analytical positions (classified), CIA – 1985 to 2003
Skills and Qualifications
Ms. Ireland, former Assistant Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis for the U.S. Department of the Treasury and National Intelligence Manager for Threat Finance, brings to Citi significant knowledge and expertise from her career in financial intelligence and cybersecurity, both in the U.S. and internationally. Ms. Ireland has been nominated to serve on the Board because of her experience in the areas of Institutional Business, International Business or Economics, Operations and Technology, Regulatory and Compliance, and Risk Management. During her service to the U.S. Government, Ms. Ireland provided global economic and financial intelligence, developed and strengthened infrastructure to protect U.S. national security, and advised and oversaw financial intelligence processes. Ms. Ireland is able to offer insight and perspective to Citi’s Board on financial threats faced by organizations in the public and private sectors, including cybersecurity and money laundering. Ms. Ireland’s expertise in protecting IT systems from internal and external cybersecurity threats, and setting and evaluating organizational risks, helps enhance the Board’s oversight of cybersecurity and risk management practices.
Primary Qualifications
Institutional Business
International Business or Economics
Operations and Technology
Risk Management

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS57

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
Age: 48

Director of Citigroup
since 2018

Other Directorships:
None

Previous Directorships within the last five years:
None

Other Activities:
The Peterson Institute for International Economics (Board Member), Commercial Trust Company (Board Member), Georgetown University (Fellow), and Washington University (Trustee)

Former President and Managing Director; Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (PIMCO)
President and Managing Director; Executive Committee Member, Compensation Committee Member, Global Risk Committee Chair, PIMCO – 2014 to 2017
President (non-executive), Commercial Trust Company – 1998 to 2001Present
Chief Operating Officer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Managing Director and Global Head of Human Resources, PIMCO19962008 to 19982014
Managing Director and Head of Pharmaceuticals, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Fixed Income1995Germany, PIMCO – 2006 to 19962008


Executive Vice President and Head of Fixed Income – Germany, PIMCO – 2003 to 2006
Executive Vice President (2003), Senior Vice President (2001 to 2003), Vice President (2000 to 2001), and Associate (1998 to 2000), Office of the CEO, PIMCO – 1998 to 2003

Skills and Qualifications

Mr. HumerJacobs is an experienced executivefinancial services professional and has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his extensive experienceconsiderable expertise in the areas of International and Consumer Businesses,Human Resources, Compensation, Financial Reporting, Institutional Business, and Risk Management, Compensation, Regulatory Compliance, Legal Matters,Management. Citi is an international financial services company with a significant institutional business and Corporate Governance.a large diverse workforce and Mr. Humer gainedJacobs, with extensive human resources experience, in internationalenhances the Board’s ability to provide knowledgeable oversight of one of its most important elements, its employees. He has been responsible for overseeing and consumer business, risk management, compensation, regulatory compliance,managing executive teams and a sizeable worldwide workforce, developing and marketing of fixed-income products, and aligning financial reporting, and corporate governance in his roles as CEO and Chair of Roche Holdings and other executive positions at Roche as well as in his service as Chair of Diageo plc. With his many years of experience leading large, complex global organizations in the U.S. and in Europe in an extensively regulated industry, Mr. Humer is able to offer insights on the implementation of business strategies in major global markets, advise on regulatory compliance, and provide strategic guidance on the development and expansion of important franchises and brands. Mr. Humer’s previous experience in addressing ethics issues that arose in the pharmaceutical industry is beneficial to Citi in providing guidance on our ethics and conduct initiatives. As a former memberresult of this experience, Mr. Jacobs brings to our Board an understanding of the International Advisory Boardglobal financial services industry; experience in providing insight and guidance in overseeing executive management, including executive compensation; and oversight of Allianz,the challenges and as a member of several philanthropic organizations, he is ablerisks facing large companies with complex global operations. Mr. Jacobs’ finance expertise enables him to provide important perspectivesa critical perspective on internationaloperational and consumer businessfinancial aspects of the Company, including accounting and corporate affairs.

finance matters.

Primary Qualifications

Consumer Business and Financial Services

Compensation

International Business or Economics

Financial Reporting

Legal Matters

Institutional Business

Regulatory and Compliance

Risk Management

Citi 2017 Proxy Statementwww.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

58PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS49

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Renée J. James
Age: 5254

Director of Citigroup

since 2016

Other Directorships:

Oracle Corporation, Sabre Corporation and Vodafone Group Plc

Previous Directorships within the last five years:
VMware, Inc.

Other Activities:

President’s National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (Chair) and University of Oregon (Trustee)

Chair and CEO, Ampere Computing, and Operating Executive,
The Carlyle Group

Chair and CEO, Ampere Computing – February 2018 to Present
Operating Executive, The Carlyle Group – February 2016 to Present
President, Intel Corporation – 2014 to 2016
Executive Vice President and Head, Group GM Intel Software and Services Business – 2004 to 2013
Group Vice President and Division General Manager, Sales and Marketing; Group and General Manager, Microsoft Program Office, Intel – 2001 to 2004
Division Chief Operating Officer, Intel Online Solutions – 1999 to 2001
Chief of Staff to Intel Chairman and CEO Andrew Grove – 1995 to 1999


Skills and Qualifications

Ms. James is an experienceda seasoned technology leader with large-scale, broad international operations experience. An accomplished operational executive, andMs. James has been nominated to serve on the Board because of her experienceexpertise in the areas of Technology, Risk Management, and International and Consumer Businesses. She is a seasonedan accomplished technology executive with broad,wide-ranging international experience managing large scale,large-scale, complex global operations. Through her 28-year career as a technology executive at Intel and in her current role as Chair and CEO of Ampere Computing, a private technology company, and her role as Operating Executive with the Media and Technology Practice at The Carlyle Group, as well as in her role as the Chair of the National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee to the President of the United States, Ms. James developed extensive expertise in cybersecurity and emerging technologies. These skills are particularly important to Citi as a member of an industry facing cyber threats and as a company embracing innovation and new technologies. Through her career at Intel and her service on the boards of other prominent international companies (Oracle Corporation, Sabre Corporation, and Vodafone Group Plc), Ms. James has had executive experience with consumer risk management and corporate governance issues.

Primary Qualifications

Consumer Business and Financial Services

International Business or Economics

Operations and Technology

Risk Management




www.citigroup.comCiti 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

50PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS59

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Eugene M. McQuade
Age: 6870

Director of Citigroup Inc.

since 2015

Director of Citibank, N.A.

since 2009

Other Directorships:

XL Group, Ltd. (Chairman)None

Previous Directorships within the last five years:

NoneXL Group, Ltd. (Chairman)

Other Activities:

Promontory Financial Group (Vice Chairman), a subsidiary of IBM, Boys and Girls Clubs of America (Governor), American Ireland Fund (Director), and Catholic Charities of New York (Director) (Chairman)

Former Vice Chairman, Citigroup Inc. and
Former Chief Executive Officer, Citibank, N.A.

Vice Chairman, Citigroup Inc. – 2014 to May 2015
Chief Executive Officer, Citibank, N.A. – July 2009 to April 2014
Vice Chairman and President, Merrill Lynch Bank – 2008 to 2009
President and Chief Operating Officer, FreddieMacFreddie Mac – 2004 to 2007
President, Bank of America – 2004
President and Chief Operating Officer, FleetBoston Financial – 2002 to 2004
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, FleetBoston Financial – 1997 to 2002


Skills and Qualifications

Mr. McQuade is an experienced financial services executive and has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his extensive skills and experience in the areas of Financial Services, Risk Management, Institutional and Consumer Businesses, Financial Reporting, Legal Matters, and Regulatory and Compliance. As the former Chief Executive Officer of Citibank, N.A., he has a deep understanding of all aspects of Citi’s institutional and consumer businesses and has managed Citibank’s capital structure, regulatory compliance, enterprise risk, and strategic planning. While a member of management, he provided oversight of Citi’s CCAR process, which enables him to significantly enhance the Board’sBoard and the Risk Management Committee’s oversight of this process. Mr. McQuade has extensiveacquired valuable financial services experienceknowledge and expertise through his service in management positions such as CEO, president, vice chairman, chief financial officer, and chief operating officer of several global, publicly traded financial institutions. He has gaineddeveloped broad experience in consumer banking and commercial banking through his previous experience at Bank of America, FleetBoston Financial, and Merrill Lynch. In addition, his prior board service at XL Group, Ltd. gives him experience withgreater insight into the oversight of global operations and regulated businesses. Mr. McQuade’s extensive financial services background also adds significant value to Citi’s and Citibank’s relationships with various regulators and stakeholders.

Primary Qualifications

Consumer Business and Financial Services

Legal Matters

Institutional Business

Regulatory and Compliance

Risk Management


Citi 2017 Proxy Statementwww.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS51

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Michael E. O’Neill
Age: 70

Director of Citigroup
since 2009

Other Directorships:
None

Previous Directorships within the last five years:
None

Other Activities:
University of Virginia, Darden Graduate School of Business Foundation (Trustee), The Economic Club of New York (Trustee), The National WWII Museum (Trustee), USO of Metropolitan New York (Trustee), and FTV Capital (Advisory Board)

Chairman
Citigroup Inc.

Chairman, Citigroup Inc. – April 2012 to Present
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director, Bank of Hawaii Corporation – 2000 to 2004
Elected Chief Executive Officer, Barclays PLC – 1999
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, Bank of America – 1995 to 1998
Chief Financial Officer, Continental Bank – 1993 to 1995


Skills and Qualifications

Mr. O’Neill is an experienced financial services executive and has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his extensive experience in the areas of Financial Services, International Business, Institutional and Consumer Businesses, Regulatory Compliance, Risk Management, Corporate Governance, Compensation, and Financial Reporting. Because Citi is a highly regulated financial services company engaged in both consumer and institutional businesses, and engaged in an extensive effort to restructure its business to focus those businesses critical to Citi’s strategy, Citi’s Board benefits from the leadership of its Chair, Mike O’Neill, who has extensive banking experience, has executed bank turnarounds and workouts at Bank of Hawaii and Continental Bank, and has significant regulatory experience. As the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Bank of Hawaii, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer at Bank of America, and Chief Financial Officer of Continental Bank, Mr. O’Neill has had extensive experience and developed his expertise in the areas of financial services, international, corporate and consumer businesses, regulatory compliance, risk management, corporate governance and financial reporting. Furthering his regulatory compliance expertise, while at the Bank of Hawaii, Mr. O’Neill served as the 12th District representative of the Federal Reserve Advisory Council. During his tenure at Continental Bank and while he was an independent financial consultant, Mr. O’Neill gained extensive international financial services experience.

Primary Qualifications

Compensation

Consumer Business and Financial Services

Corporate Governance

Regulatory and Compliance




www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

5260PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Gary M. Reiner
Age: 6264

Director of Citigroup

since 2013

Other Directorships:

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and Box Inc.

Previous Directorships within the last five years:

None

Other Activities:

Norwalk Hospital (Member)None

Operating Partner
General Atlantic LLC

Operating Partner, General Atlantic LLC – September 2010 to Present
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, General Electric Company – 1996 to 2010
Partner, Boston Consulting Group – 1986 to 1991


Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Reiner is an experienced executive and has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his experience in the areas of Operations and Technology, Financial Reporting, Compensation, Corporate Governance, and International and Consumer Businesses. In his current role as Operating Partner of General Atlantic LLC, he has continued to broaden his considerable expertise in technology and management. Through his tenure as Chief Information Officer at General Electric, Mr. Reiner gained extensive experience in the management of a large, complex, multinational operation, developing technology innovations, strategic planning, and marketing to an international consumer and institutional customer base. He also has significant experienceknowledge and insight in information technology through his many years of experienceservice as a partner of Boston Consulting Group, where he focused on strategic issues for technology businesses and in advising on cybersecurity issues. Mr. Reiner’s expertise as an innovative technology leader assists Citi in meeting the operational, technology, and cybersecurity challenges inherent in operating a financial services company in the 21st century. Through his service on the Hewlett Packard Board of Directors, Mr. Reiner has developed additional leadership and corporate governance expertise as the Chair of its Nominating, Governance and Social Responsibility Committee.

Primary Qualifications

Compensation

Consumer Business and Financial Services

International Business or Economics

Operations and Technology


Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS5361

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Anthony M. SantomeroDiana L. Taylor
Age: 7064

Director of Citigroup

since 2009

Director of Citibank, N.A.
since 2009

Other Directorships:

RenaissanceRe Holdings, Ltd.Brookfield Asset Management and Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company PreviousSotheby’s

Previous Directorships within the last five years:
NoneBrookfield Office Properties

Other Activities:
Columbia Funds Series Trust

Former President
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Senior Advisor, McKinsey & Company – 2006 to January 2008
President, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia – 2000 to 2006
Richard K. Mellon Professor, Finance, The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania – 1984 to 2002


Skills and Qualifications

Dr. Santomero is a seasoned economist and economic policy advisor and has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his extensive experience in the areas of Risk Management, Regulatory Compliance, Corporate Governance, and Financial Reporting. Because Citi is an institution engaged in a highly regulated industry with a focus on ensuring that risk management is embedded in company practices, having a Board member, like Dr. Santomero, with extensive regulatory management experience is critical to enhancing the Board’s oversight of these functions. Among many other distinguished positions at which he had wide-ranging risk and regulatory experience, Dr. Santomero was most recently a Senior Advisor at McKinsey & Company, served as the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia from 2000 to 2006, was Chair of the System’s Committee on Credit and Risk Management, and was a member of the Financial Services Policy Committee and the Payments System Policy Advisory Committee. As the Richard K. Mellon Professor of Finance at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and Deputy Dean of the School, Dr. Santomero’s particular focus was on issues related to managing risk at the firm level as well as ways to improve productivity and performance, while working closely with industry executives and practitioners to ensure that the research was informed by the operating realities and competitive demands facing industry participants as they pursue competitive excellence, further enhancing his risk management capabilities.

Primary Qualifications

Corporate Governance

Financial Reporting

Regulatory and Compliance

Risk Management




www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

54PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Diana L. Taylor
Age: 62

Director of Citigroup
since 2009

Other Directorships:
Brookfield Asset
Management and
Sotheby’s

Previous Directorships
within the last five years:
Brookfield Office
Properties

Other Activities:
Accion (Chair), AMFAR, Columbia Business School (Board of Overseers), Girls Educational & Mentoring Services (GEMS) (Member), Hudson River Park Trust (Chair), Friends of Hudson River Park, Ideas42, International Women’s Health Coalition, Mailman School of Public Health (Board of Overseers), Mayo Clinic (Member), The After School Corporation (Member), The Economic Club of New York, Council on Foreign Relations (Member), and Hot Bread Kitchen (Board Chair)

Vice Chair
Solera Capital LLCFormer Superintendent of Banks, State of New York

Vice Chair, Solera Capital LLC – July 2014 to Present2018
Managing Director, Wolfensohn Fund Management, L.P. – 2007 to 2014
Superintendent of Banks, State of New York – 2003 to 2007
Deputy Secretary, Governor Pataki, State of New York – 2002 to 2003
Chief Financial Officer, Long Island Power Authority – 2001 to 2002
Vice President, KeySpan Energy – 1999 to 2001
Assistant Secretary, Governor Pataki, State of New York – 1996 to 1999
Executive Vice President, Muriel Siebert & Company – 1993 to 1994
President, M.R. Beal & Company – 1988 to 1993 and 1995 to 1996


Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Taylor is an experienced financial services executive and regulator and has been nominated to serve on the Board because of her wide-ranging experience in the areas of Financial Services, Institutional Business, Regulatory and Compliance, Risk Management, Corporate Affairs, Compensation, Corporate Governance, and Legal Matters. Citi’s Board provides oversight of Citi’s banking businesses and regulatory relationship, areas where Ms. Taylor has extensive experience;is highly skilled; it also provides oversight of Citi’s compensation programs and governance, including public affairs matters, where Ms. Taylor is able to use her extensive experiencevaluable perspective to enhance the Board’s oversight. Ms. Taylor has extensivebroad bank regulatory and risk management experience, having served as the Superintendent of Banks for the New York State Banking Department. Her financial services and corporate business experience includes in-depth private equity, fund management, and investment banking experience as a Vice Chair at Solera Capital LLC and as a Managing Director of Wolfensohn Fund Management, L.P., a fund manager; and Founding Partner and President of M.R. Beal & Company, a full servicefull-service investment banking firm. Ms. Taylor also served as Chief Financial Officer of the Long Island Power Authority. In addition, through her work on the Sotheby’s Compensation Committee, the Brookfield Properties Governance Committee, as chair of Accion and the Hudson River Park Trust, and former chair of the New York Women’s Foundation and the YMCA of Greater New York, Ms. Taylor has gained additional experienceknowledge in corporate affairs, corporate governance, financial reporting, compensation, and legal matters.

Primary Qualifications

Compensation

Corporate Affairs

Corporate Governance

Regulatory and Compliance






Citi 2017 Proxy Statementwww.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS55

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
William S. Thompson, Jr.
Age: 71

Director of Citigroup
since 2009

Other Directorships:
None

Previous Directorships
within the last five years:
None

Other Activities:
Pacific Life Corporation, Pacific Symphony Orchestra (Life Director), Thompson Foundation for Autism (Chair), Thompson Family Foundation (President), University of Missouri (President’s Financial Advisory Council), and Orange County Community Foundation (Advisory Director)

Former Chief Executive Officer
Pacific Investment Management Company (PIMCO)

Chief Executive Officer, PIMCO – 1993 to January 2009
Chairman, Salomon Brothers Asia Ltd. – 1991 to 1993
Salomon Brothers Inc. – 1975 to 1993


Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Thompson is an experienced financial services executive and has been nominated to serve on the Board of Directors because of his extensive experience in the areas of Financial Services, Risk Management, Financial Reporting, Compensation, and International and Institutional Businesses. Citi, as a company with a significant institutional business, benefits from having Board members like Mr. Thompson, whose careers were focused extensively in the institutional business. In addition, Citi’s Board benefits from Mr. Thompson’s compensation experience in leading the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board. As Chief Executive Officer of PIMCO from 1993 to 2009, Chairman of Salomon Brothers Asia Ltd. in Tokyo from 1991 to 1993, and head of Corporate Finance, Western Region and Head of Institutional Sales, Western Region, at Salomon Brothers, Mr. Thompson gained extensive financial services, risk management and institutional and international business skills and experience. As a former Chief Executive Officer of PIMCO and Lead Director of Pacific Life Corporation, Mr. Thompson developed extensive skills and experience in corporate governance, financial reporting, compensation, and legal matters.

Primary Qualifications

Compensation

Consumer Business and Financial Services

Institutional Business

Risk Management






www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

5662PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
James S. Turley
Age: 6163

Director of Citigroup

since 2013

Director of Citibank, N.A.

since 2013

Other Directorships:

Emerson Electric Co.,
Intrexon Corporation
and Northrop Grumman
Corporation

Previous Directorships
within the last five years:

None

Other Activities:
Boy Scouts of America (Board Member)(Chairman), Boy Scouts of Greater St. Louis (President)(Board Member), World Scout Foundation (Board Member), Committee for Economic Development (Trustee), Theatre Forward (Chair)(Board Member), and Municipal Theatre Association of St. Louis (Board Member), and Forest Park Forever (Board Member)

Former Chairman and CEO
Ernst & Young

Chairman and CEO, Ernst & Young – 2001 to June 2013
Regional Managing Partner, Ernst & Young – 1994 to 2001


Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Turley, the retired Global Chair and CEO of Ernst & Young, brings to Citi his insights and expertise from his exceptional career in the accounting profession, both in the U.S. and internationally, as well as his executive experience from leading a major public accounting firm. Mr. Turley has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his extensive knowledge and expertise in the areas of Financial Reporting, Legal Matters, Corporate Affairs, International Business, Regulatory and Compliance, and Risk Management. As Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Risk Management Committee, Mr. Turley adds significant value to the Board’s oversight of financial reporting, regulatory matters, compliance, internal audit, legal issues, and risk. Having served as Chair and CEO of Ernst & Young, he has developed significant expertise in the areas of compensation, litigation, and corporate affairs. Mr. Turley, the former Chairman of the Board of Catalyst, is recognized as a champion of diversity, having received the prestigious Crystal Leadership Award for his support of equal marketplace access for women and the groundbreaking programs he oversaw at Ernst & Young that enable the strategic development of women-owned businesses, and provides guidance to Citi on diversity matters as well.

Primary Qualifications

Financial Reporting

International Business or Economics

Regulatory and Compliance

Risk Management











Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS5763

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Deborah C. Wright
Age: 5961

Director of Citigroup

since 2017

Other Directorships:
None

Previous Directorships within the last five years:
Carver Bancorp, Inc., Time Warner Inc. and
Voya Financial, Inc.

Previous Directorships
within the last five years:
Carver Bancorp, Inc.

Other Activities:
Director, chairman of the audit committee and member of the executive committee of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterNone

Former Chairman
Carver Bancorp, Inc.Managing Director of U.S. Jobs and Economic Opportunity Rockefeller Foundation

Managing Director, Rockefeller Foundation – 2018 to Present
Chairman, Carver Bancorp, Inc. – 2005 to 2016
President and Chief Executive Officer of Carver Bancorp, Inc. and Carver Federal Savings Bank – 1999 to 2014
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Upper Manhattan Empowerment Zone Development Corporation, a redevelopment fund – 1996 to 1999
Commissioner of the Department of Housing Preservation and Development – 1994 to 1996
Member of the New York City Housing Authority Board – 1992 to 1994, and served on the New York City Planning Commission – 1990 to 1992


Skills and Qualifications

Ms. Wright is an experienced financial services executive and has been nominated to serve on the Board because ofthrough her extensive experienceprominent roles in the areas of Financial Services, Consumer Business, Risk Management, Corporate Affairs, Financial Reporting, and Regulatory Compliance.and Compliance, has been nominated to serve on the Board. As a highly regulated financial services company with an extensive consumer business and a commitment to community development, Citi benefits from having Directors, like Ms. Wright, with distinguished careers in financial services and who are knowledgeable about, and committed to, community development. Ms. Wright’s experience as the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Carver Bancorp, Inc. and Carver Federal Savings Bank, where she gainedacquired significant experience in personal and commercial banking, strategic planning, marketing, regulatory compliance, financial reporting, and personnel matters, brings leadership qualities to Citi and demonstrates a practical understanding of organizations, processes, strategy, and risk management. She has valuable insight into corporate affairs experience through yearsher current role as a Managing Director of leadership rolesU.S. Jobs and Economic Opportunity at non-profit organizations and governmental bodies.The Rockefeller Foundation. Ms. Wright has also has extensivedeveloped financial reporting experience as former Chair of the Audit and Finance Committee at Time Warner Inc. As a former board member of Voya Financial, Inc., and through her prior long-term service as a director of Kraft Foods Inc., she also brings the perspective and experiencein-depth knowledge of overseeing firms that provide a wide variety of consumer products to customers.

Primary Qualifications

Consumer Business and Financial Services

Financial Reporting

Regulatory and Compliance

Risk Management


www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

5864PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Name and Age at
Record Date

Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships

Name and Age at
Record Date
Position, Principal Occupation, Business Experience and Directorships
Ernesto Zedillo
Ponce de Leon
Age: 6567

Director of Citigroup

since 2010

Other Directorships:

Alcoa Corp., and Procter &
Gamble Company and
Grupo Prisa

Previous Directorships
within the last five years:

NoneGrupo Prisa

Other Activities:
BP (Member of International Advisory Board), Credit Suisse Research Institute (Advisor), The Group of Thirty (Member), Inter-American Dialogue (Co-Chair of Board), Natural Resource Governance Institute (Chair of the Board), and Presidential Counselor of Laureate International Universities

Director, Center for the Study of Globalization and Professor in the Field of
International Economics and Politics, Yale University

Director, Center for the Study of Globalization and Professor in the Field of International Economics and Politics, Yale University – September 2002 to Present
President of Mexico – 1994 to 2000
Secretary of Education, Government of Mexico – 1992 to 1993
Secretary of Economic Programming and the Budget, Government of Mexico – 1988 to 1992
Undersecretary of the Budget, Government of Mexico – 1987 to 1988
Banco de México – Economist, Deputy Manager of Economic Research, Director General of FICORCA, Deputy Director – 1978 to 1987


Skills and Qualifications

Mr. Zedillo Ponce de Leon is the former President of Mexico, a seasoned economist, and an academic. He has been nominated to serve on the Board because of his extensive experience in the areas of International Business andor Economics, Regulatory Compliance, Corporate Affairs, Risk Management, and Corporate Governance. As a financial services company with a significant business in Mexico, Citi benefits from having Mr. Zedillo Ponce de Leon on its Board to provide a greater understanding of the business, governmental, regulatory, and economic environment in Mexico. Through his extensive governmental experience, including his service from 1978 to 1987 at the Central Bank of Mexico, as Undersecretary of the Budget for the Mexican government from 1987 to 1988, as Secretary of Economic Programming and the Budget from 1988 to 1992, and as President of Mexico from 1994 to 2000, as well as his academic experience, including his roles as the Director of the Center for the Study of Globalization, Professor of International Economics and Politics and Professor of International and Area Studies at Yale, he has had extensive experience in the areas of international business, regulatory compliance, and risk management. His service as Chair of the Global Development Network, Chair of the High Level Commission on Modernization of World Bank Group Governance, on the Group of Thirty, and on the International Advisory Boards of BP and the Coca-Cola Company, has given him extensive international business and corporate affairs experience. Mr. Zedillo Ponce de Leon has gained experience in risk management, corporate governance, and corporate affairs as a member of the Board of Alcoa Corp., serving on the Audit Committee and Public Issues Committee; at Procter & Gamble Company, as a member of the Governance and Public Responsibility Committee; as a member of the Innovation and Technology Committee, Grupo Prisa of Spain; as a past Director of the Union Pacific Corporation, where he served on the Audit and Finance Committees; and as a past Director of EDS, where he served on the Governance Committee; and as Director of Grupo Prisa of Spain until November 2017, where he served as Chair of the Governance Committee.

Primary Qualifications

Corporate Affairs

Corporate Governance

International Business or Economics

Risk Management


Citi 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS5965

Directors’ Compensation

The key objectives of our Director Compensation Program are to attract qualified talent, provide pay that is commensurate with the substantial time commitment associated with service, and to foster commonality of interest between Board members and our stockholders.

Directors’ compensation is determined by the Board.Board and the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee makes recommendations to the Board based on periodic benchmarking assessments and advice received from FW Cook, its independent advisor. In making recommendations to the Board, the Committee considers the competitive positioning of the aggregate and individual components of compensation, as well as the mix of pay and structure versus both direct competitors and other comparable organizations. The Committee also considers the unique skill set required to serve on our Board and the intense time commitment associated with preparation for and attendance at meetings of the Board and its committees as well as external commitments, such as engagement with our stockholders and regulators. Since itsour initial public offering in 1986, Citi has paid outside Directors all or a portion of their compensation in common stock to ensure that the Directors have an ownership interest in common with other stockholders. The Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee makes recommendations to the Board with respect to compensation of Directors. The Committee periodically reviews

In 2018, FW Cook provided benchmarking assessments in order to determineand advice on peer and broad market practices. After considering the level of compensation to attract qualified candidates for Board serviceassessments and to reinforce our practice of encouraging stock ownership by our Directors. In 2016,advice as well as the Committee received benchmarking assessments of peer company director compensation from outside expert advisors. After reviewing the current compensation program against the assessment and taking account of such factors as it considered relevant,described above, the Committee determined that a change to the Committee feecurrent Director Compensation Program payment structure was appropriate.

Key features of our non-employee Director Compensation Program:

Annual Cash Retainer and Deferred Stock Award

Non-employee Directorsreceive an annual cash retainer of $75,000 and a deferred stock award valued at $150,000, except for the Chairman who declines receipt of such compensation.$150,000. The deferred stock award is generally granted on the same date that annual incentives are granted to the senior executives. The deferred stock award generally becomes distributable on the second anniversary of the date of the grant, and Directors may elect to defer receipt of the award beyond that date. In the event a Director leaves the Board for personal reasonsvoluntarily prior to the conclusion of the two-year deferral period of aand before attaining age 72, the deferred stock award grant and before age 72,will be pro-rated based on the number of calendar quarters the Director will not forfeit the deferred stock and the award, prorated for the portion of the one-year period served by the Director, will be distributed as scheduled.served. Directors may elect to receive all or a portion of their cash retainer in the form of common stock, and Directors may elect to defer receipt of this common stock.


Fees for Service on Citi’s Board Committees, Citibank’s Board, and other Board Service

Directors who are employees ofA Citi or its subsidiaries do not receive any compensation for their services as Directors.

Citi’s Chairman receives annual compensation in the form of a $500,000 Chairman’s Fee, payable 75% in deferred shares of Citi common stock and 25% in cash or deferred shares of Citi common stock.

Beginning on April 1, 2016, a Director of Citi who serves as Chair of the Audit Committee, Personnel and Compensation Committee and/or Risk Management Committee is entitled to an annual $50,000 Committee Chair Fee.Fee per committee. A Director who serves as Chair of any other Committee is entitled to an annual $35,000 Committee Chair Fee.Fee per committee. A Citi Director who serves as a member of the Audit Committee, Personnel and Compensation Committee, and/or Risk Management Committee is entitled to an annual $30,000 Committee Fee.Fee per committee. A Citi Director who serves as a member of any other Committee (excluding the Executive Committee and the Preferred Stock Committee) is entitled to an annual $15,000 Committee Fee.Fee per committee. Directors are permitted to receive all or a part of their Committee Fee(s) and Committee Chair Fee(s) in common stock.*

Mses. Costelloand SperoIreland and Messrs. Hennes, McQuade, Santomero, and Turley serve on Citibank’s Board of Directors. Ms. Taylor and Messrs. Henry and Reiner served on Citibank’s Board for a portion of 2016. Each non-employee Director of Citibank is entitled to receive $25,000 as an annual cash retainer. The Chair of Citibank’s Board is entitled to an annual $50,000 Chair Fee.

All annual retainers and Chair Fees for Citi and Citibank are paid in four equal quarterly installments per annum. These fees are reported in the Non-Employee Director Compensation Table below.

Citi reimburses its Board members for expenses incurred in attending Board and Committee meetings or performing other services for Citi in their capacities as Directors. Such expenses include food, lodging, and transportation.


*

TheAll Annual Retainers, Committee Fee structure that wasFees, and Committee Chair Fees for Citi and Citibank are paid in place forfour equal quarterly installments per annum. These fees are reported in the period January 1, 2016 to April 1, 2016 is as described in Citi’s 2016 Proxy Statement.

Non-Employee Director Compensation Table on page 67.
Ms. Taylor serves on the Board of Citigroup Global Markets Limited, an international subsidiary Board of Citi.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

6066PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Chair Compensation

Citi’s Chair receives annual compensation in the form of a $500,000 Chair Fee, the amount of which was set by the Board in 2012 in recognition of the significant commitment of time and energy required to serve as Citi’s Chair. This Fee is in addition to the Retainer and the Deferred Stock Award payable to all Directors, as well as any relevant Committee Chair and/or Committee Fees. Throughout his term as Chair, Mr. O’Neill, our prior Chair, waived receipt of any compensation other than the Chair Fee, which was payable 75% in deferred shares of Citi common stock and 25% in cash or deferred shares of Citi common stock. The three elements of Chair compensation for our new Chair, Mr. Dugan – the Chair Fee, the Retainer and Deferred Stock Award, and Committee Fees – remain unchanged from prior practice except regarding the mix of cash and equity in the Chair Fee; specifically, beginning in 2019, the Chair Fee is payable 50% in deferred shares of Citi’s common stock and 50% in cash or deferred shares of Citi’s common stock. Mr. Dugan has agreed to accept the first two elements of Chair compensation, which consist of the Chair Fee of $500,000 and the Retainer and Deferred Stock Award of $225,000 that all Directors receive. However, while Mr. Dugan will actively participate in the four Board Committees of which he is a member – Audit; Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs; Personnel and Compensation; and Risk Management – and will attend as many meetings of Citi’s other Committees as is feasible, he has determined to waive the Committee Fees to which he is otherwise entitled. His total annual compensation therefore is $725,000, which the Board believes is appropriate in reflection of the evolving role of the Chair and the virtually full-time nature of the Chair’s responsibilities. In reaching this conclusion, the Board considered many factors including Mr. Dugan’s extensive experience and knowledge of the regulatory environment, the expected time commitment attributable to both internal and external responsibilities, and the compensation paid for similar roles among direct competitors, including U.S. and non-U.S. banks as well as other high-profile global organizations.


What We DoWhat We Don’t Do
Citi’s Director Compensation Program is primarily equity based.
Directors have a robust Stock Ownership Commitment.
Subject to approval by stockholders at the Annual Meeting, Citi’s 2019 Stock Incentive Plan provides that the maximum number of shares subject to awards to an individual Director in a calendar year, taken together with any cash fees paid during the calendar year to the Director for services as a member of the Board, may not exceed $1 million in value. While the Board may approve a higher limit for the non-Executive Chair, as noted above, amounts to be paid to the Chair are substantially below the $1 million cap.
Directors who are employees of Citi or its subsidiaries do not receive any compensation for their services as Directors.
Directors are not paid Meeting Fees.
Citi does not offer a Retirement Program for its Directors.
Directors are not permitted to hedge or pledge their Citi common stock.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS67

The following table provides information on 20162018 compensation for non-employee Directors.Directors:

20162018 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

NameFees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)(1)
Stock
Awards
($)(2)
All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
Total
($)
     Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)(1)
     Stock
Awards
($)(2)
     Total
($)
Ellen M. Costello$147,500           $150,000           $2,050             $299,550         $171,250 $150,000 $321,250
John C. Dugan$165,000$150,000$315,000
Duncan P. Hennes$245,000$150,000$4,033$399,033$260,000$150,000$410,000
Peter B. Henry$132,500$150,000$2,643$285,143$146,250$150,000$296,250
Franz B. Humer$155,000$150,000$7,252$312,252$170,000$150,000$320,000
S. Leslie Ireland$130,000$150,000$280,000
Lew W. Jacobs, IV$75,000$75,000$150,000
Renée J. James$126,250$150,000$1,502$277,752$135,000$150,000$285,000
Eugene M. McQuade(4)$175,000$150,000$2,135$327,135
Michael E. O’Neill(5)$500,000$28,077$528,077
Eugene M. McQuade$180,000$150,000$330,000
Michael E. O’Neill(3)$500,000$500,000
Gary M. Reiner$150,000$150,000$2,745$302,745$155,000$150,000$305,000
Judith Rodin$126,250$150,000$16,024$292,274
Anthony M. Santomero$251,250$150,000$13,912$415,162$260,000$150,000$410,000
Joan E. Spero$170,000$150,000$11,185$331,185
Diana L. Taylor$217,500 $150,000$10,639 $378,139$220,000$150,000$370,000
William S. Thompson, Jr.$183,750$150,000 $2,756$336,506
James S. Turley$253,750 $150,000$4,033$407,783$260,000$150,000$410,000
Deborah C. Wright$135,000$150,000$285,000
Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon$126,250$150,000$10,072$286,322$135,000$150,000$285,000
(1)Directors may elect to receive all or a portion of the cash retainer in the form of Citi common stock and may elect to defer receipt of Citi common stock. Certain Directors elected to defer receipt of the shares. Mses.Ms. Costello and Spero and Mr. Henry elected to receive all or a portion of their Citigroup 20162018 cash retainer and/or Chair Feeand Committee Fees in deferred stock as represented in the chart below. Mr. O’Neill elected to receive his entire ChairmanChair Fee in deferred stock as represented in the chart below. Messrs. ReinerJacobs and ThompsonReiner elected to receive their cash retainers in stock (100%), but did not elect to defer receipt of their retainers; therefore, their 2,9911,179 and 3,8192,310 shares, respectively, were distributed to them quarterly on January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1. The price used to determine the number of shares awarded was the average consolidated NYSE closing price of Citigroup common stock for the first ten10 days of the last month of the quarter.

Deferred Fees
To Be Paid in Stock
NameFees Paid
Currently in Cash
Number of
Units
Value of
Units
Ellen M. Costello$25,000           2,547           $122,500
Duncan P. Hennes$245,000
Peter B. Henry$6,2502,630$126,250
Franz B. Humer$155,000
Renée J. James$126,250
Eugene M. McQuade$175,000
Michael E. O’Neill10,517$500,000
Gary M. Reiner$6,250 
Judith Rodin$126,250  
Anthony M. Santomero$251,250
Joan E. Spero$25,0003,062$145,000
Diana L. Taylor$217,500
William S. Thompson, Jr.
James S. Turley$253,750
Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon$126,250

Name     Fees Paid
Currently in Cash
($)
     Deferred Fees
to Be Paid in Stock
Number of
Units
     Value of
Units
Ellen M. Costello             $25,0002,186 $146,250
John C. Dugan$165,000
Duncan P. Hennes$260,000
Peter B. Henry2,186$146,250
Franz B. Humer$170,000
S. Leslie Ireland$130,000
Lew W. Jacobs, IV
Renée J. James$135,000
Eugene M. McQuade$180,000
Michael E. O’Neill7,458$500,000
Gary M. Reiner
Anthony M. Santomero$260,000
Diana L. Taylor$220,000
James S. Turley$260,000
Deborah C. Wright$135,000
Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon$135,000

Citi 2017 Proxy Statementwww.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

68PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS61

(2)The values in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair values of the 2016 deferred stock awards.2018 Deferred Stock Awards. The grant date fair value is based on a grant date of February 16, 201615, 2018 and a grant price determined by the average NYSE closing prices of Citi’s common stock on the immediately preceding five trading days. The amounts in the chart below represent deferred stock awardsDeferred Stock Awards only and not shares awarded in lieu of the cash retainer and/or Chair or Committee Chair Fees. The grant date fair value of the deferred stock awardsDeferred Stock Awards is set forth below:

      NameDeferred Stock
Granted in 2016
(#)
Grant Date
Fair Value
($)
Ellen M. Costello4,048     $150,000
Duncan P. Hennes4,048$150,000
Peter B. Henry4,048$150,000
Franz B. Humer4,048 $150,000
 Renée J. James4,048$150,000
Eugene M. McQuade4,048$150,000
Michael E. O’Neill
Gary M. Reiner4,048$150,000
Judith Rodin4,048$150,000
Anthony M. Santomero4,048$150,000
Joan E. Spero4,048$150,000
Diana L. Taylor4,048$150,000
William S. Thompson, Jr.4,048$150,000
James S. Turley4,048$150,000
Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon4,048$150,000

Director     Deferred Stock
Granted in 2018
(#)
     Grant Date
Fair Value
($)
Ellen M. Costello2,015   $150,000
John C. Dugan2,015$150,000
Duncan P. Hennes2,015$150,000
Peter B. Henry2,015$150,000
Franz B. Humer2,015$150,000
S. Leslie Ireland2,015$150,000
Lew W. Jacobs, IV*1,028$75,000
Renée J. James2,015$150,000
Eugene M. McQuade2,015$150,000
Michael E. O’Neill
Gary M. Reiner2,015$150,000
Anthony M. Santomero2,015$150,000
Diana L. Taylor2,015$150,000
James S. Turley2,015$150,000
Deborah C. Wright2,015$150,000
Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon2,015$150,000
*The Deferred Stock Award granted to Mr. Jacobs was prorated based on the date he commenced service on Citi’s Board.
(3)The amounts shown in “All Other Compensation” are the amount of dividend equivalents and interest paid to the non-employee Directors in 2016 with respect to shares of Citi common stock held in their deferred stock accounts. Dividend equivalents are paid quarterly, in the same amount per share and at the same time as dividends are paid to stockholders. Interest accrues on the amount of the dividend equivalent from the payment date until the end of the quarter, at which time the dividend equivalent is either distributed to the Director in cash or reinvested in additional shares of deferred stock. The number of shares owned by each Director is reported on page 38 of this Proxy Statement.
(4)Mr. McQuade previously served as an executive at Citigroup. His fiscal year-end holdings of outstanding Performance Share Units and Capital Accumulation Program awards are reported under the Certain Transactions and Relationships section of this Proxy Statement on pages 33-34.
(5)Mr. O’Neill receives a Chairman’sreceived an annual Chair Fee of $500,000 annually for his service as Citi’s Chairman.Chair. He elected to waive all other fees in relation to his service as a Director or Committee member.

The aggregate number of shares of deferred stock outstanding for each Director at the end of 20162018 was:

Name     NameNumber of
Shares
Ellen M. Costello6,63715,884
John C. Dugan2,515
Duncan P. Hennes10,13415,212
Peter B. Henry8,07415,971
Franz B. Humer17,83623,206
S. Leslie Ireland2,565
Lew W. Jacobs, IV1,036
Renée J. James4,0778,925
Eugene M. McQuade5,5648,613
Michael E. O’Neill71,96689,987
Gary M. Reiner7,0144,564
Judith Rodin38,824
Anthony M. Santomero33,59538,159
Joan E. Spero28,600
Diana L. Taylor25,94131,618
William S. Thompson, Jr.7,077
James S. Turley10,13415,212
Deborah C. Wright4,692
Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon24,58230,208

www.citigroup.comCiti 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

6269

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee (“Committee”) operates under a charter that specifies the scope of the Committee’s responsibilities and how it carries out those responsibilities.

The Board of Directors has determined that all fiveseven members of the Committee are independent based upon the standards adopted by the Board, which incorporate the independence requirements under applicable laws, rules and regulations.

Management is responsible for the financial reporting process, the system of internal controls, including internal control over financial reporting, risk management and procedures designed to ensure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. KPMG LLP, Citigroup’s independent registered public accounting firm (“independent auditors”) is responsible for the integrated audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. The Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes and procedures. The members of the Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and are not professionals in these fields. The Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to us and on the representations made by management regarding the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, that the financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and that such financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Committee also relies on the opinions of the independent auditors on the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

The Committee’s meetings facilitate communication among the members of the Committee, management, the internal auditors, and Citigroup’s independent auditors. The Committee separately met with each of the internal and independent auditors with and without management, to discuss the results of their examinations and their observations and recommendations regarding Citigroup’s internal controls. The Committee also discussed with Citigroup’s independent auditors all communications required by PCAOB Auditing Standard Nos. 161301 and 18.2410.

The Committee reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements of Citigroup as of and for the year ended December 31, 20162018 with management, the internal auditors, and Citigroup’s independent auditors.

The Committee has received the written disclosures required by PCAOB Rule 3526 - “Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence.” The Committee discussed with the independent auditors any relationships that may have an impact on their objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to the auditors’ independence.

The Committee has reviewed and approved the amount of fees paid to the independent auditors for audit, audit related and tax compliance and other services. The Committee concluded that the provision of services by the independent auditors did not impair their independence.

Based on the above-mentioned review and discussions, and subject to the limitations on our role and responsibilities described above and in the Committee charter, the Committee recommended to the Board that Citigroup’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in Citigroup’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162018 for filing with the SEC.

The Audit Committee:

James S. Turley (Chair)
Ellen M. Costello
John C. Dugan
Peter B. Henry
Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
Anthony M. Santomero
Deborah C. Wright

Dated: February 23, 2017March 5, 2019

Citi 2017 Proxy Statementwww.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

70 63

Proposal 2: Ratification of Selection of
Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm

The Audit Committee has selected KPMG LLP (KPMG) as the independent registered public accounting firm of Citi for 2017.2019. KPMG has served as the independent registered public accounting firm of Citi and its predecessors since 1969.

Arrangements have been made for representatives of KPMG to attend the 20172019 Annual Meeting. The representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement, if they desire to do so, and will be available to respond to appropriate stockholder questions.

Disclosure of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

The following is a description of the fees earned by KPMG for services rendered to Citi for the years ended December 31, 20162018 and 2015:2017:

2016     201520182017
(in millions of dollars)(in millions of dollars)
Audit Fees$67.0$67.5           $64.2             $64.7
Audit-Related Fees$19.1$21.0$24.5$22.8
Tax Fees$9.3 $9.9$10.1$10.3
All Other Fees$0.0$—$0.0$0.0
Total Fees$95.4$98.4$98.8$97.8

Audit Fees

This includes fees earned by KPMG in connection with the annual integrated auditaudits of Citi’s consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404, audits of subsidiary financial statements, comfort letters and consents related to SEC registration statements and other capital-raising activities and certain reports relating to Citi’s regulatory filings, reports on internal-controlinternal control reviews required by regulators, evaluation of accounting advice onfor completed transactions, and reviews of Citi’s interim financial statements.

Audit-Related Fees

This includes fees for services performed by KPMG that are closely related to audits and in many cases could only be provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Such services may include accounting consultations, internal control reviews not required by regulators, securitization-related services, employee benefit plan audits, certain attestation servicesas well as certain agreed upon procedures, and due diligence services related to contemplated mergers and acquisitions.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

64PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Tax Fees

This includes preparation and review of corporate tax returns, expense allocation reports for tax purposes, and other tax compliance services.

All Other Fees

Citi engaged KPMG for servicesone service in 2016 related to conducting surveys on the Company’s operations.2018 classified under “All Other Fees.” The aggregate fee amount paid to KPMG was $10,000 and is represented as “All Other Fees.” This feeof $11,400 is included in the total fee amount, butamount; however, due to rounding, this fee is not represented in the “All Other Fees” column.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM71

Approval of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm Services and Fees

Citi’s Audit Committee has reviewed and approved all fees earned in 20162018 and 20152017 by Citi’s independent registered public accounting firm and actively monitored the relationship between audit and non-audit services provided. The Audit Committee has concluded that the fees earned by KPMG were consistent with the maintenance of the external auditors’ independence in the conduct of its auditing functions.

The Audit Committee must pre-approve all services provided and fees earned by Citi’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee annually considers the provision of audit services and, if appropriate, pre-approves certain defined audit fees, audit-related fees, and tax-compliance fees with specific dollar-value limits for each category of service. The Audit Committee also considers on a case-by-case basis specific engagements that are not otherwise pre-approved (e.g., internal control and certain tax compliance engagements) or that exceed pre-approved fee amounts. On an interim basis, any proposed engagement that does not fit within the definition of a pre-approved service may be presented to the Chair of the Audit Committee for approval and to the full Audit Committee at its next regular meeting.

The Accounting Firm Engagement Standard is the primary basis upon which management ensures the independence of its independent registered public accounting firm. Administration of the Standard is centralized in, and monitored by, Citi senior corporate financial management, which reports the engagements earned by KPMG throughout the year to the Audit Committee. The Standard also includes limitations on the hiring of KPMG partners and other professionals to ensure that Citi satisfies applicable auditor independence rules.

KPMG has served as the independent registered public accounting firm of Citi and its predecessors since 1969. As in prior years, Citi and its Audit Committee have engaged in a review of KPMG in connection with the Audit Committee’s consideration of whether to recommend that stockholders ratify the selection of KPMG as Citi’s independent auditor for the following year. In that review, the Audit Committee considers both the continued independence of KPMG and whether retaining KPMG is in the best interests of Citi and its stockholders. Citi’s management prepares an annual assessment of KPMG for the Audit Committee that includes (i) the results of a management survey of KPMG’s overall performance; (ii) an analysis of KPMG’s known legal risks and significant proceedings that may impair KPMG’s ability to perform Citi’s annual audit; and (iii) KPMG’s fees and services provided to Citi both on an absolute basis, noting, of course, that KPMG does not provide any non-audit services, other than those described in the Proxy Statement, to Citi, and compared to services provided by other auditing firms to peer institutions. In addition, KPMG reviews with the Audit Committee its analysis of its independence in accordance with the Accounting Firm Engagement Standard and PCAOB Rule 3526. In performing its analysis, the Audit Committee considered the length of time KPMG has been Citi’s independent auditor, the breadth and complexity of Citi’s business and its global footprint and the resulting demands placed on its auditing firm in terms of expertise in Citi’s businesses, the quantity and quality of staff, and global reach. The Audit Committee recognized the ability of KPMG to provide both the necessary expertise to audit Citi’s business and the matching

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

65

global footprint to audit Citi worldwide and other factors, including the policies that KPMG follows with respect to rotation of the key audit personnel, so that there is a new partner-in-charge at least every five years. Citi’s Audit Committee oversees the process for, and ultimately approves, the selection of the independent auditor’s lead engagement partner at the five-year mandatory rotation period. At the Audit Committee’s instruction, KPMG selects candidates to be considered for the lead engagement partner role, who are then interviewed by members of Citi’s senior management. After considering the candidates recommended by KPMG, senior management makes a recommendation to the Audit Committee regarding the new lead engagement partner. After discussing the qualifications of the proposed lead engagement partner with the current lead engagement partner and senior leadership of KPMG, the members of the Audit Committee, individually and/or as a group, interview the leading candidate. The Audit Committee then considers the appointment and votes as an Audit Committee on the selection. The Audit Committee also reviewed external data on audit quality and performance, including recent PCAOB reports on KPMG and its peer firms. Based on the results of its review this year, the Audit Committee concluded that KPMG is independent and that it is in the best interests of Citi and its investors to appoint KPMG to serve as Citi’s independent registered accounting firm for 2017.2019.

Board Recommendation



The Board recommends that youa voteFORratification of KPMG as Citi’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2019.


www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

6672 

Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Approve
Citi’s 20162018 Executive Compensation

We are seeking a nonbinding, advisory vote approving the compensation of Citi’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, as required by Section 14A and Rule 14a-21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We ask for this advisory vote annually. You are being asked to vote on the following nonbinding advisory resolution:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to Citi’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and narrative discussion, is herebyAPPROVED.

We have asked for this advisory vote on an annual basis, and we will continue to do so pending the outcome of Proposal 4, which is our advisory vote on the frequency of our say-on-pay votes.

Board Recommendation



The Board recommends that youa voteFORProposal 3, which is advisory approval of Citi’s executive compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. We strongly urge you to review our entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis before you vote.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Our Compensation Discussion and Analysis is organized into threefive sections:

Executive Summary2018 Company Performance (pages 66-75)72-74);

Citi’s 2016 Executive CompensationSummary of Pay Decisions (pages 76-92)75-80); and

Citi’s 2018 Executive Compensation Awards (pages 81-93);

Long-Term Incentives (pages 94-95); and
Additional Compensation Practices (pages 92-93)95-98).

The 20162018 Summary Compensation Table and Compensation Information follow on pages 95-105.99-107.

Executive Summary

2018 Company Performance

Our Stockholder Engagement2018 Company Performance – Solid Progress

The Board and management were disappointed with the outcome of last year’s say-on-pay vote, which was 63.6% favorable. In response, the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Citigroup Inc. Board of Directors (the Compensation Committee) and management undertook a year-long review of our entire compensation program with input fromrecognized the Board’s independent compensation consultant. This review included direct engagement with stockholders to ensure full understanding of their perspectives, and their feedback was incorporated into the Compensation Committee’s deliberations and decisions.

Mr. O’Neill, our Board Chairman, and Mr. Thompson, the Chairman of our Compensation Committee, led the stockholder outreach effort, joined by senior Citi human resources and legal executives. While we regularly engage with stockholders each spring on ourfollowing when awarding executive incentive pay program, we held additional meetings with stockholders after

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contentsfor 2018:

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION67Citi made solid progress in 2018 toward improving its profitability and returns, despite a more challenging revenue environment.

our 2016 annual meeting and before granting awards for 2016 performance. We reached out to stockholders representing about one-third of our outstanding shares; these investors were typically our larger stockholders and included some investors who voted in favor of our pay program last year and some who did not. We held meetings with each stockholder who accepted our invitation to engage, which culminated in conversations with stockholders representing approximately 20% of our outstanding shares. These discussions were in addition to conversations we held in the spring of 2016 with those stockholders and others, when we spoke with 34 stockholders representing at least 35% of our outstanding shares. We also spoke with proxy advisory firms that provide vote recommendations to gain insight into their views on our executive compensation programs and address their questions.

During our discussions with stockholders, we asked for their input on our compensation program and also sought feedback on potential changes under consideration by our Compensation Committee. The feedback from our outreach efforts was shared with the full Board and factored into the Compensation Committee’s thinking and final awards for 2016 performance. The Compensation Committee has been and remains committed to engaging with stockholders at least annually on executive compensation and making pay program changes that are directly responsive to stockholder feedback and that enhance the alignment of our program with Citi’s business strategy.

The following table summarizes the feedback we heard from our investors and the changes we made to our executive pay program in response.

What we heard…How we responded…For 2018, Citi reported net income of $18.0 billion on revenues of $72.9 billion, compared to a net loss of $6.8 billion on revenues of $72.4 billion in 2017.(1)Excluding the one-time impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Reform) in both periods, Citi’s net income increased 14% compared to the prior year.

On disclosure practices

Citi’s earnings per share were $6.65 for 2018, up 25% from the prior year, compared to $5.33 per share for 2017, excluding the one-time impact of Tax Reform in both periods.
Need for more detail on our performance targets to better understand management’s business plan and the basis for pay decisions.
Greater explanations of compensation decisions when use of judgment is involved.
Disclosed company performance targets as well as financial results used to assess executive performance.
Revamped scorecard disclosure providing more insight into the process for determining compensation.

On peer groups

The peer group we use to understand market levels of pay should focus on the companies with whom we compete for talent.
Eliminated three non-U.S. firms and added eight U.S. firms to the peer group used to develop market pay. Our new 13-firm peer group does not increase the market median pay for our roles.

On deferral percentages

Most compensation should vest over time and be dependent on future company performance.

Increased the percentage of the total CEO annual incentive that is awarded as deferred compensation and delivered in the form of equity-based awards from 60% to 70%.

On cash bonuses

Preference for maximum limits on annual cash bonuses.
Established a limit on executive officer cash bonuses.

On performance metrics used in executive pay plans

Preference for including at least two forward-looking operational metrics that are aligned with Citi’s business strategy and enable investors to track our progress.
Preference for metrics based on return on capital and return of capital.
Minimal support for retaining the total shareholder return metric.
Limited interest in a relative operational metric; we also heard a preference for company-specific targets.
Revised our Performance Share Unit program to include two performance metrics: return on tangible common equity and cumulative earnings per share.We use these returns-based metrics(2)improved to 10.9% in our regular discussions with analysts and investors, and they are metrics that we use2018, compared to measure our progress toward improved total shareholder returns.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

68PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The elements of our CEO’s 2016 compensation, which reflect the changes discussed above, are summarized in the tables below and discussed in greater detail on pages 89-92 of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Key changes from 2015 appear in bluetext.

2015 CEO Pay Elements2016 CEO Pay Elements
ElementFormElementForm

Base Salary

Cash

Base Salary

Cash

Annual
Incentive

Cash
(40%)

Annual
Incentive

Cash
(30%)

Deferred
Incentive

Deferred Stock
(30%)
Vests ratably over 4 years
subject to performance
conditions

Deferred
Incentive

Deferred Stock
(35%)
Vests ratably over 4 years
subject to performance
conditions

Performance Share Units
(30%)
Vest based on relative TSR
performance over 3 years

Performance Share Units
(35%)
Vest based on return on
tangible common equity and
cumulative earnings per share

performance over 3 years


Dark gray shading represents the total incentive award, which is determined through our executive compensation Framework.

Linking Pay to Performance Through Goals

The quantum8.1% in 2017, excluding the one-time impact of total incentive award for 2016 is based on the overall performance of Citi and each executive’s individual achievements against goals set at the beginning of the year. In addition, the portion of each executive’s total incentive award deliveredTax Reform in Performance Share Units is subject to additional conditions based on company performance over the three-year period beginning on January 1, 2017, and ending December 31, 2019.

both periods.

Why We Selected Our Performance Metrics
(1)
Results in 2018 included a one-time benefit of $94 million, or $0.03 per share, due to the finalization of the provisional component of the impact of Tax Reform based on Citi’s analysis as well as additional guidance received from the U.S. Treasury Department. Results in 2017 included a one-time, non-cash charge of $22.6 billion, or ($8.31) per share, related to the enactment of Tax Reform. As used throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Citi’s results of operations excluding the impact of Tax Reform are non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of all adjusted results to reported results, please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement.
(2)

Scorecard metrics used to determine total incentive awards. The total amount of each named executive officer’s incentive award is determined through our executive compensation Framework, which takes into account performance against a scorecard of financial and non-financial performance metrics that tie to our annual business plan.

Performance Share Unit metrics. As a direct result of feedback we received from stockholders, theCompensation Committee reviewed our Performance Share Unit program and chose new performance metrics that drive long-term stockholder value creation. The new metrics are return on tangible common equity and cumulative earnings per share. Together these metrics establish a strong link between our incentive awards and Citi’s financial objectives over the three-year performance period (2017-2019). Under our Performance Share Unit program, our return on tangible common equity target for 2019 is 10% and our cumulative earnings per share target for the three-year performance period is $17.70, as shown in the performance schedule on page 90.

Return on tangible common equity

We established a returns metric that aligns with our disclosed strategic long-term return on tangible common equity goal.

Return on tangible common equity, or RoTCE, is net income (less preferred dividends) divided by average tangible common equity for the year. Because return on tangible common equity is regularlya non-GAAP financial measure. For a reconciliation of all adjusted results to reported by all our peers and other banks, investors useresults, please see Annex A to this measure to compare earning power across the financial services industry generally.

Target return on tangible common equity achievement of 10% by 2019 is an important intermediate step toward our longer-term goal of 14%. Although the target is stated as a 2019 outcome, this goal incentivizes consistent improvement in returns throughout the three-year performance period. The cumulative earnings per share goal, as described below, mitigates potential risk associated with a single year-end target and drives balanced improvement in operational performance over the three-year performance period.

Proxy Statement.

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION6973

Citi’s revenues increased 1% in 2018, including 3% underlying revenue growth in Global Consumer Banking and Institutional Clients Group, excluding the impact of previously disclosed gains on sale in 2018 and 2017.(1)

Cumulative earnings per share

Citi reported revenue growth in all regions in Global Consumer Banking, reflecting continued loan and overall deposit growth, partially offset by the near-term impact of weak market sentiment on Asia wealth management revenues, as well as the impact from partnership renewal terms that went into effect in 2018 in Citi-branded cards in North America Global Consumer Banking.

This metric promotes both operational improvement (through netCiti had solid revenue growth across treasury and trade solutions, private bank, securities services, equity markets, and corporate lending in Institutional Clients Group, partially offset by weakness in fixed income growth)as well as softness in equity and increased return of capital to stockholders (through appropriate increases in share buybacks).

debt underwriting.

AsCiti demonstrated strong expense discipline, resulting in a matter1% decrease in expenses and an improved operating efficiency ratio of policy, our preference isapproximately 57%, even as Citi continued to redeploy earned capital within our businesses, provided that such investments are expected to produce returns above our cost of capital. To the extent that the capital we generate exceeds our ability to productively redeploy it in our businesses, we intend to return it to stockholders. With our shares trading below book value, we believe that share buybacks represent a particularly attractive use of excess capital at the present time.

make ongoing investments.
Citi’s positive operating leverage in 2018, combined with continued credit discipline, resulted in an improvement in pretax earnings.
We continued to optimize our capital base while maintaining a strong capital and liquidity position.

We have several mechanisms in place to ensure that our earnings per share measure drives appropriate long-term decision making. Buyback levels are subject to oversight by both the Citigroup Board andreceived a non-objection from the Federal Reserve Board (throughfor the CCAR process),capital plan submitted as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and they are calibrated against a range of considerations, including current capital levels, alternative uses for excess capital, and safety and soundness.

Review (CCAR).
In 2018, Citi returned $18.4 billion of capital to common stockholders through share repurchases and dividends. Citi repurchased over 200 million shares during the last year, resulting in an 8% reduction in outstanding common shares.
Notwithstanding the substantial capital return in 2018, we ended the year with capital ratios well above regulatory minimum requirements.

Summary of 2018 Business Performance

The following graphs demonstrate our achievements and progress against key metrics.



Although last year’s Performance Share Units were based solely on relative(1)Efficiency ratio is total shareholder return, we moved away from the metric this year because, during our stockholder outreach efforts, we heard little support for retainingoperating expenses divided by total revenues (net of interest expense). As a standalone performancemetric based on total shareholder return. Nearly all investors said that they preferred operational metrics in an incentive pay program because operational results are more directly influenced by management’s decisionsresult, a lower efficiency ratio is generally better than total shareholder returns.Stockholders preferred metrics that drive total shareholder returns, not just measure them.a higher efficiency ratio.

(2)

In addition,Results are presented excluding the impact of Tax Reform in both periods. For a reconciliation of all adjusted results to reported results, please see Annex A to this year’s Performance Share Units retain total shareholder return as a performance modifier that caps the award at target, regardless of how well we perform on the two operational metrics, if Citi’s total shareholder return is negative over the three-year performance period. Our performance modifier can only reduce (and not increase) the value of awards.

Proxy Statement.
(3)Return on assets is net income divided by average assets.
Setting Targets that Align with Our Financial Goals
(4)

The Compensation Committee selected the target levels described above because they constitute meaningful increases over current returnReturn on tangible common equity and earnings per share levels.is net income available to common stockholders (net income less preferred dividends) divided by average tangible common equity.

(5)

Our returnDistributions include buybacks of Citi common stock and dividends on tangibleCiti common equity target, which is meaningfully higher than our 2016 return on tangible common equity, reflects management’s and the Board’s judgment that a period of rebuilding in underinvested businesses is expected to continue to impact returns in the near term in order to generate higher growth and improved returns in the longer term.

stock.
(6)

Our cumulative earnings per share targetThe payout ratio is reflective of double-digit earnings per share growth over the three-year performance period. Achieving the cumulative earnings per share target will require managementdistributions to execute a balanced approach of revenue growth, expense discipline, and capital management, each of which is an important factor in delivering valuecommon stockholders divided by net income available to our clients and ourcommon stockholders.

____________________
(1)Citi's reported revenues reflected the impact of foreign currency translation into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes (FX translation) as well as previously disclosed gains on sale in 2018 and 2017. Citi's results of operations excluding the impact of FX translation and gains on sale are non-GAAP financial measures.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

7074PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2018 Financial Objectives

During our outreach to stockholders, we heard that they wanted disclosure of performance against goals used in our executive scorecards to better understand company performance. Accordingly, the chart to the right shows how Citi performed in 2018 against the principal goals we set for our executives in their scorecards. We set each 2018 goal at a level that exceeded the achievement in 2017, reflecting the challenging nature of our goals.

EFFICIENCY RATIORETURN ON TANGIBLE
COMMON EQUITY(1)
RETURN ON ASSETS(1)

(1)Results are presented excluding the impact of Tax Reform. For a reconciliation of all adjusted results to reported results, please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement.

Relative Total Shareholder Return

The group of companies shown in the following graphs is our compensation peer group. As explained on page 83, we believe this group reflects the competitive market for talent in certain key roles, including the CEO role. While our relative total shareholder returns declined from 2017 to 2018, primarily as a result of deterioration in December 2018, one- and three-year relative stock performance through November 2018 and more recent performance in 2019 are more aligned with the stronger returns for periods ending on December 31, 2017.

2018 ONE-YEAR TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN(1)2018 THREE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN(1)
2017 ONE-YEAR TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN(1)2017 THREE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN(1)

(1)Increase in share price plus reinvested dividends over one- and three-year periods ending on December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, expressed as a percentage of the share price at the beginning of such periods. Source: third-party public databases and company websites.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION75

Summary of Pay Decisions

Our Stockholder Engagement

Our current executive compensation program reflects extensive stockholder engagement over the past three years. Throughout this period, the Compensation Committee and management undertook a comprehensive review of our executive compensation program, and as part of this process, we held meetings with each stockholder who accepted our invitation to engage.

In 2018, we held two sets of stockholder outreach meetings with holders of meaningful percentages of our outstanding shares, given the size of our shareholder base.

Spring 2018:Following the awards for 2017 performance but in advance of our 2018 Annual Meeting, Mr. O’Neill, then our Board Chair, and Mr. Hennes, the Chair of our Compensation Committee, led a stockholder outreach effort seeking feedback on last year’s executive compensation awards. In this round of engagement, we spoke to stockholders representing about 27.5% of our outstanding shares. The feedback we received on our executive pay program was broadly favorable, reflecting the numerous changes made in previous years in direct response to stockholder comments.
Fall 2018/Winter 2019:In addition, in the fall of 2018 and into early 2019, we engaged with stockholders representing about 31% of our outstanding shares in a series of meetings that focused on sustainability issues, including climate change and human capital management. In the area of human capital management, the topics we addressed with stockholders included executive compensation practices, diverse representation in senior roles at Citi, talent development and succession planning, and identifying unintended biases in Citi’s people processes, including gender pay equity.

We were pleased with the positive feedback from our stockholders and their endorsement of our executive compensation program, which resulted in a 94.58% favorable Say on Pay vote at our 2018 Annual Meeting. In response to this favorable result, we kept the core structure of our pay program and our disclosure consistent with last year. We also increased the performance targets in the Performance Share Units awarded for 2018 performance over prior-year targets and prior-year performance to reflect our improving performance and to further align the program with stockholder interests.

OUR STOCKHOLDER-RESPONSIVE EXECUTIVE PAY PROGRAM

As set forth below, all the material features of our executive compensation program are designed to be aligned with stockholder interests and in most cases are directly responsive to stockholder feedback we have received during the past three years.

Transparent disclosure of annual goals.Each executive’s total incentive award (including the annual cash bonus component of the total incentive award) is based on the overall achievements of Citi and individual executive performance against predetermined goals set at the beginning of each year. We disclose three key goals — efficiency ratio, return on tangible common equity, and return on assets — after the end of the year so stockholders can directly assess executive performance.
Extensive disclosure of pay rationales.Our extensive scorecard disclosure clarifies the rigorous process we use for determining compensation.
Equity-based compensation.Seventy percent of the total CEO incentive opportunity is awarded as equity-based, deferred long-term incentive compensation.
Operational performance metrics.Our Performance Share Unit program includes two performance metrics: return on tangible common equity and cumulative earnings per share, which are forward-looking operational metrics used by investors to assess our performance over time. We disclose the metric targets at the start of the performance period to enable stockholders to assess the challenging nature of our goals.
Rigorous targets.Our Performance Share Unit metrics require substantial operational improvements for target payout and exceptional performance for maximum payout. Targets have been set at higher levels each year.
Robust clawbacks.Incentive compensation is subject to broad clawbacks, as described on page 97.
U.S. peer group.Our 13-firm compensation peer group is a reasonable representation of the market for executive talent in which we compete.
Limit on cash bonuses.We have a $20 million limit on individual executive officer cash bonuses.
Governance.We have strong compensation governance practices, including an executive stock ownership commitment. Additional details on practices we employ and avoid in support of our performance-oriented culture are set forth in the table on page 80.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

76PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Philosophy and Framework

We seek to design our executive pay program to motivate balanced behaviors, consistent with our focus on balanced long-term strategic goals. Our Compensation Philosophy, as summarized as a set of objectives below, is designed to encourage prudent risk-taking while attracting the world-class talent necessary to Citi’s success.

Citi’s Compensation Philosophy
OUR COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY
Reinforce a business culture based on the highest ethical standards
Manage risks to Citi by encouraging prudent decision-making

Reflect regulatory guidance in compensation programs

Attract and retain the best talent to lead Citi to success
Align compensation programs, structures, and decisions with stockholder and other stakeholder interests

Reinforce a business culture based on the highest ethical standards

Manage risks to Citi by encouraging prudent decision-making

Reflect regulatory guidance in compensation programs

Attract and retain the best talent to lead Citi to success


OUR LEADERSHIP ON PAY EQUITY

We applycontinue to align our compensation programs with stakeholder interests through our pay equity disclosures, related changes to pay, and announced representation goals. In 2017, Citi was the first large U.S. financial institution to publicly release the results of a pay equity review. Our 2017 review compared compensation of women to men in the U.S., the U.K., and Germany, and, in the U.S., minorities to non-minorities. Our review adjusted pay to account for a number of factors to make the comparisons meaningful, including job function, level, and geography, and we modified pay in response to the results. In 2018, we extended our pay equity review to include employees globally, and we found that in 2018 women globally were paid on average 99% of what men are paid at Citi and that there is no statistically significant difference between what U.S. minorities and non-minorities are paid at Citi. As in 2017, we modified pay in 2018 in response to the findings.

Earlier this year, we were the first large U.S. company to disclose our unadjusted or “raw” pay gap for women and U.S. minorities, which measures median total compensation unadjusted for factors such as job function, level, and geography. The analysis shows that the median pay at Citi for women globally is 71% of the median for men, and the median pay at Citi for U.S. minorities is 93% of the median for non-minorities. We are committing to reduce the raw pay gap numbers over time by increasing the representation of women and U.S. minorities in senior and higher-paying roles. As a starting point, our goal is to increase the representation in mid- and senior-level roles to at least 40% for women globally and 8% for Black employees in the U.S. by the end of 2021.


OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK

Our Compensation Philosophy throughis reflected in our executive compensation Framework, which is explained below.enables incentive compensation awards to closely reflect business and individual performance, consistent with our pay-for-performance approach. Full information on our executive compensation Framework appears on pages 76-77.page 82.

Our Executive Compensation Framework

Early in the year, the Compensation Committee establishes and approves objective financial and non-financial goals used in our executive scorecards shown on pages 78-87 as well as the relative weightings of those scorecard goals. The metrics used in the financial goals are those we use in our annual business plan, which is based on anticipated operating performance; the non-financial scorecard goals cover strategic priorities, including those relating to risk and controls.

After year-end, the Compensation Committee assesses each named executive officer’s performance using a scorecard and develops a performance rating.

We then comparethat performance rating to market median (i.e., the 50th percentile within the range of pay at our peers for a given role). In general, a stronger performance rating for an executive points toward preliminary compensation above market median, while a weaker rating points toward preliminary compensation below market median.

The Compensation Committee then reviews the results of the previous steps and finalizes the award, applying discretion.


CITI’S EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK AT-A-GLANCE


Through the application of our Framework, our incentive compensation awards closely reflect business performance, consistent with our longstanding commitment to pay for performance.

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION7177

2016 Company Performance2018 CEO Compensation

We believe that our executive compensation decisions should be viewed inAs it has done the context of Citi’spast several years, the Compensation Committee evaluated 2018 CEO performance both on an absolute basis and as compared to peers. The group shown in the following graphs represents our principal global business competitors across multiple financial services markets, and we have used this group as the peer group for the relative total shareholder return metric in our outstanding Performance Share Unit awards. In contrast, we adopted our new U.S.-only peer group for estimating market pay ranges underusing our executive compensation Framework because that group canmeasures results against quantitative and qualitative goals set at the beginning of the year. As explained in more closely representour competitorsdetail on page 81, we use a rating system of 1 to 5 to assess performance against each goal, with 1 being the highest (Significant Outperform) and 5 being the lowest (Significant Underperform). The green color coding signifies that a quantitative goal set for top executive talent. During our most recent stockholder outreach, we learned that investors generally understood and supported our use of different peer groups for these two different purposes.

The following graphs represent specified performance measures for 2016.2018 was met or exceeded.

EFFICIENCY RATIO(1)SUMMARY OF CEO SCORECARD RESULTS
Quantitative Goal (Glossary on Page 127) 2018 Result(1)(2)     Rating(2)
Citigroup Income from Continuing
Operations Before Taxes$23.4 billion3
Citigroup Efficiency Ratio57.4%3
Citigroup Return on Tangible
Common Equity10.9%2
Citigroup Return on Assets0.93%3
Risk
Citigroup Risk Appetite Ratio151%
Citigroup Risk Appetite Surplus$7.61 billion1
Qualitative Goal   NET INCOME TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERSRating(2)
Protect and enhance
our reputation3
Develop client-relevant
value propositions2

RETURN ON ASSETS(3)

Produce extraordinary

RETURN ON COMMON EQUITY(4)

client experiences2
Deliver our financial
commitments3


(1)Efficiency ratio is total operating expenses divided by total revenues (net of interest expense). As a result, a lower efficiency ratio is generally better than a higher efficiency ratio. Consistent with our executive scorecards, Citicorp efficiency ratio is presented. Citigroup efficiency ratio for 2016 was 59%.
(2)Amounts shown are in USD billions. Barclays and Deutsche Bank results are converted to U.S. dollars at the 2016 average exchange rate. Preferred dividends are excluded from net income for this purpose.
(3)Return on assets is net income divided by average total assets. Return on assets calculations are not included for the international peer group companies that report utilizing International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Reported assets on financial institutions’ balance sheets prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP standards are not comparable to the reported assets on financial institutions’ balance sheets prepared in accordance with IFRS. Therefore, the return on assets calculations are not comparable.
(4)Return on common equity is net income available to common shareholders divided by average common equity.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

72PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ONE-YEAR TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN(1)

THREE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER RETURN(1)


(1)Source: Third-party public databases and company websites reflecting home stock exchange listings (London Stock Exchange for Barclays and HSBC; Frankfurt Börse for Deutsche Bank; New York Stock Exchange for all others). Total shareholder return is the increase in share price over one-year and three-year periods ending December 31, 2016, including the impact of dividend reinvestment, expressed as a percentage of the share price at the beginning of such periods.

2016 Financial Objectives

We disclose our financial results against key metrics in our executive scorecards, and we also compare those results to their goals, disclosing performance within ranges using color coding on the scorecards. During our most recent outreach to stockholders, we heard that they also wanted disclosure of our actual goals after year-end to provide a better understanding of company performance. Accordingly, the principal metrics we use in our executive scorecards and the applicable goals are set forth below:

Financial Goal (Glossary on Page 120)     2016 Goal     2016 Result
Citicorp Efficiency Ratio 57.2%��57.9%
Citigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity(1) 8.2% 7.6%
Citigroup Return on Assets 0.90% 0.82%

(1)As used throughout the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Return on Tangible Common Equity is a non-U.S. GAAPand Return on Assets exclude the impact of Tax Reform in 2018. In addition, as used throughout this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Risk Appetite Ratio and Risk Appetite Surplus are non-GAAP financial measure.measures. For a reconciliation of this resultall adjusted results to reported results, please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement.
(2)Explanations of the colors and ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 81.

Scorecard goalsPages 84-85 present a detailed overview of the CEO’s scorecard and the performance evaluation process, which resulted in the Compensation Committee awarding Mr. Corbat $24 million in total annual compensation for 2016 were generally set2018. His total annual compensation consisted of his base salary of $1.5 million (unchanged since 2013) and a total annual incentive award of $22.5 million, representing a 4% increase over his 2017 total annual compensation of $23 million. Using Citi’s balanced scorecard approach to determining pay, the Compensation Committee favorably assessed Mr. Corbat’s leadership in multiple critical areas, including enhancing our reputation, delivering value to clients, and continued progress toward Citi’s longer-term targets. In addition to Citi’s positive operating results, the Compensation Committee also considered market levels of pay for the CEO role at levels lower than 2015 achievements primarily due to:peer institutions.

LINKING 2018 CEO PAY ELEMENTS TO PERFORMANCE

Over 90% variable pay for 2018.
70% of variable pay is deferred long-term incentives subject to multi-year vesting and clawbacks.
70% of variable pay is equity-based to align stockholder and executive interests.
Total incentive award and annual bonus are based on the continued wind-downoverall achievements of Citi Holdings (thereby reducing its contributionand individual performance against goals set at the beginning of the year.
PSUs are earned only to earnings from 2015 levels),

the extent Citi performs against two forward-looking metrics: RoTCE in 2021 and cumulative EPS over the 2019-2021 performance period.
PSU metrics require substantial operational improvements for target payout and exceptional performance for maximum payout.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

78

planned investments in our businesses that entailed incurring expenses before expected revenues were generated, and

anticipated higher credit costs in 2016 due to expected reductions in loan loss reserve releases as compared to 2015.

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2018 Pay Elements

Citi’s incentive awards delivered to the CEO and the other named executive officers (NEOs) are a mix of cash bonus, Performance Share Units, and Deferred Stock Awards. This incentive structure establishes a balance between annual and long-term compensation, with the majority of incentive compensation delivered in Performance Share Units and Deferred Stock Awards that vest over multiple years. In determining the percentages to award as cash bonuses, Performance Share Units, and Deferred Stock Awards, the Compensation Committee considered applicable regulatory requirements and guidelines for deferral as well as market practices.

% OF
VARIABLE PAY
COMPENSATION
ELEMENT     CEO        NEOs     AWARD TYPE     PERFORMANCE LINK AND VESTING     TYPE
Fixed
SalaryN/AN/ABase Pay
Fixed portion of total pay at a competitive level that enables Citi to attract and retain talent
Cash
Variable
Annual
Incentive
30%40%Annual Bonus
Scorecard assessment determines value
Plan limits on executive officer cash bonuses
Cash

Deferred/
Long-Term
Incentives
(LTI)

70%

60%

Performance
Share Units
(50% of LTI)

Scorecard assessment determines target number of units
Earned units based 50% on return on tangible common equity in 2021 and 50% on cumulative earnings per share over 2019-2021
Ultimate value of earned units linked to Citi total shareholder returns
Award capped at 100% of target if Citi’s total shareholder return is negative over 2019-2021
Subject to clawbacks
Other than increases in targets, no change in award terms as compared to last year

Equity-based,
but settled in
cash to limit
dilution to
stockholders

Deferred Stock
Awards
(50% of LTI)

Scorecard assessment determines number of shares granted
Ultimate value based on Citi total shareholder returns
Vest ratably over a four-year period
Subject to reduction in the event of pretax losses in any year of the deferral period
Subject to clawbacks
No change in award terms as compared to prior years

Equity

Performance Share Unit Targets

We have consistently set challenging targets for our Performance Share Units. For the Performance Share Units awarded for 2018 performance:

We have set a target return on tangible common equity achievement of 14% by 2021, which is meaningfully higher than the 10.9% we achieved in 2018 (excluding the impact of Tax Reform). Although this metric is stated as a 2021 target, it also incentivizes consistent improvement in returns throughout the performance period.
We have set a cumulative earnings per share target for the three-year performance period 2019 through 2021 of $26.25, which is reflective of significant earnings per share growth over the period. Cumulative earnings per share mitigates potential risk associated with a single year-end target and drives balanced improvement in operational performance over the performance period.

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION7379

As a matter of policy, our preference is to redeploy earned capital within our businesses, provided that such investments are expected to produce returns above our cost of capital. To the extent that the capital we generate exceeds our ability to productively redeploy it in our businesses, we intend to return it to stockholders.
We have several mechanisms in place to ensure that our earnings per share measure drives appropriate long-term decision-making. Buyback levels are subject to oversight by both the Citigroup Board and the Federal Reserve Board (through the CCAR process), and they are calibrated against a range of considerations, including current capital levels, alternative uses for excess capital, and safety and soundness.
To reflect and focus on our improving performance, we set the targets at levels that are more challenging than the targets for last year’s awards, which were a return on tangible common equity of 13% by 2020 and cumulative earnings per share of $22.50 for the three-year performance period 2018 through 2020.

Full details on our Performance Share Units for performance in 2018 appear on page 94.

Performance Share Unit Payouts

The variability of the value of our Performance Share Unit awards demonstrates the strong link between Citi’s executive pay and Citi’s performance. As an example, the following chart compares the grant date value of Mr. Corbat’s recent Performance Share Units to the value ultimately earned.

Summary of 2016 Business Performance - Shifting to Growth

The Compensation Committee recognized the following when awarding incentive pay for 2016:

CEO PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT PAYOUTS
 

2016 financial results reflected solid overall performance and underlying momentum across the franchise, although they did not attain the challenging targets set at the beginning of the year.

The results reflected strong expense discipline, resulting in a Citicorp operating efficiency ratio of 58% in 2016 while we invested in the business and again increased our loans and deposits. In Citicorp, end-of-period loans increased 4% and deposits increased 3%. Credit quality remained broadly favorable in every region.

In Global Consumer Banking, in North America we are seeing the early benefits from the acquisition of the Costco card portfolio, and our investments in other cards products also delivered results, with growth in loans and purchase sales for full year 2016 and a return to revenue growth in the second half of 2016.Internationally, we generated revenue growth and positive operating leverage in Mexico for full year 2016, and in Asia we returned to revenue growth and positive operating leverage in the second half of 2016 (each excluding the impact of foreign currency translation into U.S. dollars for reporting purposes).

In Institutional Clients Group, Citi generated year-over-year revenue and net income growth, despite challenging market conditions and the volatility in the energy sector in early 2016.

We invested resources strategically in areas we believe to be crucial to our future growth.

In Global Consumer Banking, we invested in our North America credit card businesses through the acquisition of the Costco portfolio, the renewal and extensions of key co-brand partnerships, and continued marketing spend to support new account acquisitions.

In Institutional Clients Group, we continued to invest in industry-leading franchises, including our treasury and trade solutions business, as well as areas where we believe we have a significant opportunity to gain revenue share, particularly in our equities business.

We announced a $1 billion investment, to be completed by 2020, to support growth and improve operating efficiency in Mexico, where we believe we have the opportunity to build upon our strong brand position and scale to achieve improved returns.

Management’s focus on regulatory indicators has demonstrated results.

Following our 2016 CCAR result, we returned nearly $11 billion of capital to common stockholders in 2016 in the form of dividends and share repurchases while at the same time increasing our key regulatory capital metrics.

While Citi has more work to do, we achieved a significant milestone during 2016 when we received feedback from the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC that neither agency had found deficiencies in our 2015 resolution plan.


2016 CEO Compensation

Based on the results of the Framework and our business performance, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Corbat $15.5 million in total annual compensation for 2016, consisting of his previously approved base salary of $1.5 million and a total annual incentive award of $14 million. Mr. Corbat’s total annual compensation for 2016 represents a 6% reduction from his total annual compensation for 2015 of $16.5 million.

In making the decision on CEO pay, the Compensation Committee considered several factors, including another positive outcome from the 2016 CCAR process which led to the most meaningful capital return since before the financial crisis, objective feedback from regulators on Citi’s resolution plan, and the continued wind-down of Citi Holdings. However, the Compensation Committee believed that it was appropriate to reflect the firm’s performance relative to its financial targets in the compensation for Mr. Corbat. Overall, the Board continues to be very pleased with the progress Citi is making under Mr. Corbat’s leadership and is confident that the plan Citi’s senior management is executing will improve returns for stockholders.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

7480PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The mix of the total direct compensation elements for our CEO is shown below. The chart outlines the size, in percentage terms, of each element of total direct compensation at the date of grant. As illustrated in the chart, 90% of CEO pay is variable or “at risk” and 70% of variable pay is deferred and subject to multi-year vesting.

CEO COMPENSATION

Performance Share Unit Payouts Demonstrate Pay for Performance

Payouts under and values of prior Performance Share Unit awards have declined by up to 65% as compared to grant date value, as shown below. The current values of outstanding Performance Share Units granted in each of the last three years are closely linked to Citi’s performance, as they have varied with Citi’s common stock price, Citi’s relative total shareholder return as compared to peers, and, in the case of awards granted in 2014 and 2015, Citi’s average return on assets as compared to target. This variability in award values demonstrates the strong link between pay and the longer-term performance of Citi. As an example, the following chart shows the value of Mr. Corbat’s outstanding Performance Share Units at January 19, 2017, assuming that the awards’ performance metrics and the price of Citi common stock at January 19, 2017, remain unchanged through the end of the applicable award performance periods:

CEO PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS - DECREASE IN VALUE(1)

(1)For the award granted in 2014, the value shown is the final amount earned. For the awards granted in 2015 and 2016, the value shown assumes that average return on assets at December 31, 2016, relative total shareholder return at January 19, 2017, and Citi common stock price at January 19, 2017 ($56.66) remain unchanged through the end of the applicable award performance periods.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION75     

Compensation Governance Practices

In addition to our performance-sensitive direct compensation structure, Citi has strong compensation governance practices. Over the past several years, we have refined many of our governance practices as a result of feedback obtained through our ongoing engagement with stockholders and proxy advisory firms.stockholders.

Our PracticesPRACTICES WE EMPLOY     Practices We AvoidPRACTICES WE AVOID
InvestorOngoing investor outreach.Regular stockholder engagement to solicit feedback on compensation and governance.
Performance-based compensation.VariableFor 2018, variable performance-based incentive compensation ofwas at least 90%94% of named executive officer annual compensation. The deferred variable award is further at risk based on the value of Citi common stock over multi-year vesting periods.
Limit on cash bonus.Limit of $20 million on the portion of each executive officer’s annual incentive award that may be paid in cash.
Clawbacks.SubjectingSubjected Performance Share Units and deferred stock awardsDeferred Stock Awards to clawbacks, as described on page 91.97.
Independent advice.Independent compensation consultant input into the Compensation Committee’s decisions, as described on page 93.
Stock ownership commitment.Executive officers are required to hold at least 75% of the net after-tax shares acquired through our incentive compensation programs as long as they are executive officers.
Post-employment stock holding requirement.Effective January 1, 2013, each executive officer must retain at least 50% of the shares subject to the stock ownership commitment for one year after ceasing to be an executive officer, even if he or she is no longer employed by Citi.
Peer group review.Annual evaluation of peer group to ensure ongoing relevance of each member.
Risk management.Strong risk and control policies and consideration of risk management factors in making compensation decisions, as described on pages 92-93.95-97.
Independent advice.Independent compensation consultant input into the Compensation Committee’s decisions, as described on page 97.
No excessive perks.We do not provide personal perquisites such as free personal use of private aircraft or special executive medical benefits to the executive officers.benefits.
No executive pensions.Executive officers are not eligible for additional benefit accruals under nonqualified executive retirement programs.
No hedging or pledging of Citi stock.We have a blanket prohibition against hedging or pledging Citi common stock by executive officers.
No tax gross-ups.Citi does not allow tax gross-ups except through its tax equalization program for expatriates, which is broadly available to all salaried employees.
No multi-year compensation guarantees.We avoid features that could incentivize imprudent risk-taking, such as multi-year guarantees.
No “single trigger” upon a change of control.Our stock incentive plan has a “double trigger” change-of-control feature, meaning that both a change of control of Citigroup and an involuntary termination of employment not for gross misconduct must occur for awards to vest.
No change-of-control or other “golden parachute” agreements.Executive officers do not have special agreements covering their compensation in the event of a change of control and are not entitled to severance pay upon termination of employment in excess of broad-based benefits.
No unearned dividends paid.We do not pay dividend equivalents on unearned Performance Share Units or unvested executive deferred stock awards.Deferred Stock Awards. Dividend equivalents are paid on earned awards commence payment at the time of vesting, and the dividend rate is the same for the executive officers as for other stockholders.
No extensive use of employment agreements.None of the named executive officers has an employment agreement with Citi. We make limited use of employment agreements, and their terms are subject to controls under our policies. Under a policy adopted by the Board, employment agreements with executive officers may not provide for post-retirement personal benefits of a kind not generally available to employees or retirees.

www.citigroup.comCiti 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

76PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION81

Citi’s 20162018 Executive Compensation Awards

20162018 Named Executive Officer Compensation

The Compensation Committee approved the following compensation for performance in 2016:2018:

1234123

4
Annual
Compensation
for 2018
(Sum of
Columns 1-4)
Name     
Base Salary
(Reported in
the Summary
Compensation
Table for 2016)
     Cash Bonus
(Reported in
the Summary
Compensation
Table for 2016)
     Deferred Stock
(Reportable in
the Summary
Compensation
Table for 2017)
     Performance
Share Units
(Reportable in
the Summary
Compensation
Table for 2017)
     Annual
Compensation
for 2016
(Sum of
Columns 1-4)
     Base Salary(1)     Cash Bonus(1)     Performance
Share Units(2)
     Deferred Stock
Awards(2)
     
Michael Corbat$1,500,000$4,200,000$4,900,000$4,900,000$15,500,000$1,500,000$6,750,000$7,875,000$7,875,000    $24,000,000
John Gerspach$500,000$3,400,000$2,550,000$2,550,000$9,000,000$500,000$4,600,000$3,450,000$3,450,000$12,000,000
James Forese$500,000$5,920,000$4,440,000$4,440,000$15,300,000$500,000$7,800,000$5,850,000$5,850,000$20,000,000
Stephen Bird$499,623(1)$3,400,151$2,550,113$2,550,113$9,000,000$500,000$4,400,000$3,300,000$3,300,000$11,500,000
Jane Fraser$500,000$2,960,000$2,220,000$2,220,000$7,900,000$500,000$3,500,000$2,625,000$2,625,000$9,250,000

(1)    Mr. Bird’s salary in the above column reflects the impact of currency exchange rates.

(1)Reported in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table.
(2)In accordance with SEC rules, these awards are not reportable in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table because they were not awarded during 2018. They will be reportable next year in the 2019 Summary Compensation Table.

The above table is not intended to be a substitute for the reporting of compensation in accordance with SEC rules as shown in the 20162018 Summary Compensation Table.

Mr. Forese’s annualRoadmap for the Scorecards on Pages 84-93

The scorecards on pages 84-93 illustrate how our executive compensation has been comparableFramework is used by the Compensation Committee to Mr. Corbat’smake compensation decisions.

The scorecards:

Show how the Compensation Committee assessed each named executive officer’s performance against quantitative and qualitative goals established early in the year.
Explain the size and scope of each named executive officer role to provide context for the Compensation Committee’s decision and level of pay.
Explain how the Compensation Committee arrived at its decision on each named executive officer’s compensation.

The colors in 2016the Quantitative Goal section of the scorecards are intended to visually signify relative performance against operational and prior years. risk-related quantitative goals, as follows:

Signifies that an operational goal result achieved the 2018 goal or exceeded the 2018 goal by up to 10%.(1)Signifies that a risk goal result was achieved.

Signifies that an operational goal result was below the 2018 goal by 10% or less. Signifies that a risk goal had a positive but below-target result.

Signifies that an operational goal result was below the 2018 goal by more than 10%. Signifies that a risk goal had a negative result.


(1)Additional colors or definitions would be provided if any achievements are greater than 10% of a goal.

The Compensation Committee has recognized Mr. Forese’sassesses performance in his franchise-wide role as Citi President in 2015against each quantitative and 2016 as well as his role as CEOqualitative goal according to the following scale:

Score     1     2     3     4     5
RatingSignificant
Outperform
OutperformMeets
Expectations
UnderperformSignificant
Underperform

www.citigroup.com


Table of Institutional Clients Group, with its broad range of complex products and services and its exceptional global scale. The Compensation Committee has also considered market levels of pay for the roles.Contents

82PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Citi’s Executive Compensation Framework

Our Compensation Committee uses a five-step process to determine incentive compensation for our named executive officers.officer incentive compensation.

Step 1 – Goal Setting and Goal Weightings for Scorecards

Step 1 – Goal Setting and Goal Weightings for Scorecards

The Compensation Committee sets scorecard goals for each named executive officer early in each year. GoalsPerformance goals fall into two categories, financialquantitative and non-financial,qualitative, and vary by named executive officer:

Quantitative goals

Financial performance goalsinclude:
o

Company-wide goals for all named executive officers that reflect our annual business plan, and

oBusiness-unit specific

Business unit-specific goals for named executive officers who are business unit leaders that reflect annual plans for our individual business units.

Qualitative goalsfocus on:

Non-financial performance goals include:
oStrategic goals tailored

Enhancing Citi’s reputation,

Delivering value to each named executive officer based on his or her roleclients, and the goals of Citi or the applicable business unit, and

oUniform expectations of all named executive officers to deliver leadership effectiveness and strong risk management and control practices.

Continued progress toward Citi’s longer-term targets.

When we set the goals, we also assign weightings to the goals. For 20162018 and consistent with prior years, financial performancequantitative goals were weighted 70% and non-financialqualitative goals were weighted 30% in the calculation of the year-end overall scorecard rating for each named executive officer.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement


Step 2 – Scorecard Assessment

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION77     

Step 2 – Scorecard Assessment

After the end of each year, a named executive officer’s performance against each financialquantitative and non-financial scorecardqualitative goal is assessed on a qualitative basis.
assessed.

A performance rating is assigned for each goal on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being “significant outperformance”outperform” and 5 being “significant underperformance,underperform,” reflecting a subjective assessment of the executive’s performance against the goal.

In accordance with the relative weightings established early in 2016, financial2018, quantitative goal ratings were averaged and weighted 70% and non-financialqualitative goals were averaged and weighted 30% in arriving at an overall scorecard rating for each named executive officer.

The Compensation Committee rates the CEO’s performance, and the Compensation Committee and the CEO rate the performance of the other named executive officers.

Step 3 – Evaluation of Market Payofficers.

Step 3 – Evaluation of Market Pay

The Compensation Committee developsreviews an estimated market pay range for each named executive officer role.

Ranges are developed by reviewingbased on public information and third-party market surveys of compensation for the same or comparable roles at peer firms. For 2016, we changed the peer group used for this purpose(see pages 87-88).

This practice ensures that our named executive officer pay appropriately reflects market pay, based on varying levels of performance.

Step 4 – Linking Performance to Compensation

Step 4 – Linking Performance to Compensation

The Compensation Committee then evaluates each named executive officer’s overall scorecard rating relative to the estimated market-based pay range for each named executive officer role.

The overall scorecard rating determines whether compensation should be preliminarily targeted at, above, or below the estimated market median pay for the role. An overall scorecard rating of 3 would generally correspond to market median pay levels, with an overall 2 rating generally corresponding to above market median and an overall 4 rating generally corresponding to below market median.

The Compensation Committee believes that the simultaneous evaluation of scorecard performance and market pay is the most effective approach to aligning pay and performance in an industry where market levels of pay can change dynamically.

Step 5 – Committee Determination

Step 5 – Committee Determination

Based on the evaluation of the scorecard ratings and market pay described in Step 4, the Compensation Committee, exercising its discretion, determines the final award amount for each named executive officer. The objective, non-formulaic factors (such as risk behaviors) that inform the decision are explained in detail within each named executive officer’s scorecard.

Reading the Scorecards

We use scorecards in our discussion of the performance of the named executive officers to illustrate how our results compare to the goals established by the Compensation Committee early in the year, based on our business plan for the year.The colors in the Financial Goal section of the scorecards are intended to visually signify relative performance against operational and risk-related financial goals, as follows:

Signifies that an operational goal result achieved the 2016 goal or exceeded the 2016 goal by up to 10%. Signifies that a risk goal result was achieved.Signifies that an operational goal result was below the 2016 goal by less than 10%. Signifies that a risk goal had a positive but below-target result.Signifies that an operational goal result was below the 2016 goal by 10% or more. Signifies that a risk goal had a negative result.

The Compensation Committee assesses each financial and non-financial goal on a qualitative scale, as follows:

Score    Rating    Score    Rating
1Significant Outperformance4Underperformance
2 Outperformance 5 Significant Underperformance
3Meets Expectations

www.citigroup.comCiti 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

78PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION83

Our Compensation Peer Group

The Compensation Committee believes that market compensation levels must frame compensation decisions in order to retain the executive talent necessary to execute the Company’s business strategy. Accordingly, a critical step in our executive compensation Framework is the Compensation Committee’s understanding of market pay, which it develops through consideration of surveys of historic peer firm compensation for each named executive officer role.

In 2016, the Compensation Committee, with input from its independent compensation consultant, established the compensation peer group Citi currently uses to determine market pay ranges. The Compensation Committee evaluates the compensation peer group on an annual basis to ensure that the group continues to be appropriate. The Compensation Committee continues to believe that a U.S.-based peer group reflects the relevant market for executive talent and the relevant regulatory environment for Citi’s executive compensation.

Our peers were chosen because they operate in one or more lines of business that are similar to Citi’s and compete in similar labor markets, although many do not have global scale that is comparable to Citi.

2018 COMPENSATION PEER GROUP

AIG (AIG)
American Express (AXP)
Bank of America (BAC)
BNY Mellon (BK)
Capital One (COF)

Goldman Sachs (GS)
JPMorgan Chase (JPM)
MetLife (MET)
Morgan Stanley (MS)
PNC (PNC)

Prudential (PRU)
U.S. Bancorp (USB)
Wells Fargo (WFC)

All compensation peer group firms were included in preparing the market data for the CEO and CFO roles. Not all compensation peer group firms have roles comparable to Citi’s named executive officer roles other than the CEO and CFO roles (e.g., the Institutional Clients Group role), so not all of the compensation peer group firms were represented in the market data for each of the other named executive officer roles. In evaluating the market for named executive officer compensation, the Compensation Committee additionally focused on compensation for comparable roles at the U.S.-based global banks with lines of business similar to Citi’s. That group includes Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, and Wells Fargo.

In selecting the compensation peer group, the Compensation Committee used size-based metrics as primary screening criteria among financial services firms. Due to the absence of a sufficient number of comparably sized direct peers, the result is a peer group where Citi is above the 75th percentile in size, meaning that the market for target compensation prior to consideration of performance could be the upper quartile. Where Citi pays executives above median, the size and scope of their responsibilities and their performance tend to be critical factors in determining pay ranges.

2018 CITI POSITIONING RELATIVE TO PEER COMPANIES

(1)AIG employees as of 12/31/2017; MET employees as of 10/1/2017; PRU employees as of 12/31/2017.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

84PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

CEO Scorecard and Pay Explanation

Mr. Corbat has been CEO of Citi since October 2012. He joined Citi in 1983 and has held various management positions throughout Citi in multiple businesses and geographies.

QUANTITATIVE SCORECARD
Category     Quantitative Goal (Glossary on Page 127)     2018 Result(1)(2)     Rating(2)
Profitability Citigroup Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes $23.4 billion 3
Expense Management Citigroup Efficiency Ratio 57.4% 3
Use of Capital   Citigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity 10.9% 2
   Citigroup Return on Assets 0.93% 3
Risk Citigroup Risk Appetite Ratio 151% 1
  Citigroup Risk Appetite Surplus $7.61 billion 

QUALITATIVE SCORECARD

Qualitative Goal

Result Highlights (Glossary on Page 127)

Rating(2)

Protect and enhance our reputation

Mr. Corbat continues to provide prominent and clear messaging across the company around the firm’s culture of ethics and conduct.
Under Mr. Corbat’s sponsorship, Citi received no objection from regulators to its capital plan submitted as part of the 2018 CCAR process, enabling the return of $18.4 billion of capital to common stockholders during 2018. Citi repurchased over 200 million shares during 2018, resulting in an 8% reduction in outstanding common shares.
Notwithstanding the continued progress in returning capital to shareholders, each of Citi’s key regulatory capital metrics remained strong.
Control metrics generally improved year-over-year across Citi, and as measured by objective risk metrics, Citi’s risk profile was stable in 2018. Many outstanding regulatory issues were resolved, while others remain as focus areas.
Mr. Corbat championed Citi’s leadership in disclosing gender and U.S. minority pay gaps and making related adjustments to compensation globally. We have published our goals to improve representation of women and U.S. minorities in senior roles throughout Citi.
Mr. Corbat continued his outreach to external stakeholders globally, including investors, regulators, and government officials.
He led investor outreach by conducting 36 investor meetings in 2018.
In addition to regular bank supervisory meetings, he participated in 56 meetings in 2018 with regulators, central bankers, and government officials from the U.S. and other countries.

3

Develop client-relevant value propositions

Mr. Corbat maintained regular client contact by holding, on average, approximately 40 client meetings per month in cities around the world.
Mr. Corbat drove continued focus on key investments in Global Consumer Banking and Institutional Clients Group that are already showing results, such as digital and mobile innovations in consumer banking and investments in our equities business.

2

Produce extraordinary client experiences

Innovations sponsored by Mr. Corbat have led to improved client satisfaction scores on objective surveys in Global Consumer Banking and Institutional Clients Group.
Key digital user metrics improved substantially year-over-year, and in Institutional Clients Group, we have significantly improved the client onboarding experience.

2

Deliver our financial commitments

Key financial metrics, including Citi’s 2018 return on tangible common equity, exceeded 2017 results (excluding the impact of Tax Reform in both periods) and our 2018 business plan.

3


(1)Return on Tangible Common Equity and Return on Assets exclude the impact of Tax Reform in 2018. For a reconciliation of all adjusted results to reported results, please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement.
(2)Explanations of the colors and ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 81.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION85

SIZE AND SCOPE OF ROLE

As CEO, Mr. Corbat is responsible for Citi’s global business operations. Citi operatesCiti’s Global Consumer Banking (which consists of consumer banking businesses operate in North America, Mexico, and Asia)Asia and provide traditional banking services to retail customers through retail banking, including commercial banking, and Citi-branded cards and retail services. Citi’s Institutional Clients Group which provides corporate, institutional, public sector, and high-net-worth clients around the world with a full range of wholesale banking products and services, including fixed incomeservices.

Citi has approximately 200 million customer accounts and equity sales and trading, foreign exchange, prime brokerage, derivative services, equity and fixed income research, corporate lending, investment banking and advisory services, private banking, cash management, trade finance, and securities services.

Citi is physically present in 97 countries and jurisdictions, many for over 100 years, and offers servicesdoes business in over 160 countries and jurisdictions. Citi believes this global network provides a strong foundation for servicing the broad financial services needs of its large multinational clients and for meeting the needs of retail, private banking, commercial, public sector, and institutional clients around the world.

At

As of December 31, 2016,2018, Citi reported:

had:

revenues of $69.9$72.9 billion

for full year 2018,

total

assets of $1,792 billion,

approximately $1.92 trillion,

market capitalization of $165$123 billion,

approximately 219,000204,000 employees, and

$929 billion of deposits.

Financial Scorecard (weighted 70%)

CategoryFinancial Goal (Glossary on Page 120)2016 Result(1)Rating(2)
Profitability    Citigroup Income from Continuing Operations Before$21.5billion    4
Taxes 
Expense ManagementCiticorp Efficiency Ratio57.9%4
Use of CapitalCitigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity7.6%4
 Citigroup Return on Assets0.82%4
RiskCiticorp Risk Appetite Ratio131% 2
Citicorp Risk Appetite Surplus$4.60billion

(1)As used throughout the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Return on Tangible Common Equity, Risk Appetite Ratio, and Risk Appetite Surplus are non-U.S. GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of these results to reported results, please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement.
(2)Explanations

deposits of the colors and ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 77.

Non-Financial Scorecard (weighted 30%)approximately $1.01 trillion.

Non-Financial GoalResult Highlights (Glossary on Page 120)Rating(1)
Set strategic direction
UnderMr. Corbat’s sponsorship, Citi received no objection to its capital plan submitted as part of the 2016 CCAR process, enabling the return of nearly $11 billion of capital to stockholders during 2016.
CitiHoldings was eliminated as a separately reported business segment at the end of 2016, marking the end of Citi’s restructuring after the financial crisis. At its peak, Citi Holdings had over $800 billion in assets, while at year-end 2016, it had only $54 billion of assets, constituting just 3% of Citi’s GAAP assets.
Mr.Corbat has sponsored a program of investing in several key businesses crucial to Citi’s future growth, including credit cards, Mexico, treasury and trade solutions, and the equities business.
1

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION79     

Non-Financial GoalResult Highlights (Glossary on Page 120)Rating(1)
Strong risk and controls management
While Citi has more work to do, Citi achieved a significant milestone during 2016 when it received feedback from the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC that neither agency had found deficiencies in Citi’s 2015 resolution plan.
Citihad no new headline control issues in 2016, similar to 2015. The company’s risk profile was stable in 2016.
2
Strong personnel management
Mr.Corbat has focused on encouraging diverse slates of candidates for senior roles. At the managing director level and above, the percentage of roles with diverse interviewing panels was 81% in 2016.
Mr.Corbat continued to strengthen our multi-year focus on Ethics and Culture, which is our broad and innovative effort to further emphasize ethical decision-making across Citi. In 2016, we provided training on transforming typical management situations into powerful leadership moments to approximately 20,000 managers and reinforced the importance of escalation through a range of communications from Citi leadership.
2
Enhance relations with external stakeholders, including stockholders
Mr.Corbat continued his outreach to external stakeholders globally, including clients, investors, regulators, and government officials.
He maintained regular client contact by holding, on average, 39 client meetings per month in cities around the world.
He also led investor outreach by conducting numerous investor meetings and presenting at an investor conference.
In 2016, he participated in 89 meetings with regulators, central bankers, and government officials from the U.S. and other countries.
1

(1)    Explanations of the ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 77.

SUMMARY OF FRAMEWORK CONCLUSIONS AND FINALCOMMITTEE’S PAY DECISIONRATIONALE

Scorecard Assessment Summary

Company-wide financial results reflected solid overall performance, especiallyprogress toward improving Citi’s profitability and returns, including return on tangible common equity, in Institutional Clients Group, but did not attaina more challenging revenue environment. Citi attained the challenging targets set at the beginning of 2016, most notably due to the size of investments in key businesses, including in North America credit cards, as well as a more challenging2018 and demonstrated improved operating environment than anticipated in early 2016. Across several key metrics, company-wide performance was better in 2015 than in 2016.

over 2017.

The Compensation Committee considered Mr. Corbat’s notable 2016 non-financial2018 qualitative goal achievements, such as the 2016leadership demonstrated in the 2018 favorable CCAR result, which enabled the return of nearly $11$18.4 billion in capital to stockholders during 2016, and the continued wind-down of Citi Holdings.2018.


Linking Performance to Compensation

Company business performance belowat or above targets combined with Mr. Corbat’s strong performance against non-financialqualitative goals resulted in an overall scorecard rating of 2.97,2.43, which points toward compensation within the range ofabove market median pay for the CEO role within our new 13-firm compensation peer group. The overall scorecard rating was determined by averaging the financialquantitative goal ratings and weighting the result 70%, averaging the non-financialqualitative goal ratings and weighting the result 30%, then adding the two amounts ([3.62.4 x 0.7] + [1.5[2.5 x 0.3] = 2.97)2.43).


Final Award

The Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Corbat $15.5$24 million in total annual compensation for 2016,2018, consisting of a base salary of $1.5 million and a total annual incentive award of $14 million. Mr. Corbat’s total annual compensation for 2016 represents a 6% reduction from$22.5 million, an increase of 4% over his total annual compensation for 20152017 of $16.5 million and is below the$23 million. Mr. Corbat’s compensation was above market median for the role.CEO role based on a comparison to CEO pay in our 13-firm compensation peer group, consistent with the results produced by our executive compensation Framework, while at the same time was below the median of CEO pay at other U.S.-based global banks. In determining the final award amount in the exercise of its discretion, the Compensation Committee was influenced by Citi’s overall 2016 business performance as compared to targets and the prior year, althoughrelied on the results produced by ourof the executive compensation Framework would have justified total compensation within the rangeand considered Citi’s solid progress toward its financial goals, market levels of market median.pay at other U.S.-based global banks, and Mr. Corbat’s qualitative results.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

8086PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

CFO Scorecard and Pay Explanation

John Gerspach has been CFO of Citi since July 2009 and has served in various executive financial management roles globally since joining Citi in 1990. He retired from the CFO role on February 22, 2019.

SIZE AND SCOPE OF ROLEQUANTITATIVE SCORECARD

Category     Quantitative Goal (Glossary on Page 127)     2018 Result(1)(2)     Rating(2)
ProfitabilityCitigroup Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$23.4 billion3
Expense ManagementCitigroup Efficiency Ratio57.4%3
Use of CapitalCitigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity10.9%2
Citigroup Return on Assets0.93%3
RiskCitigroup Risk Appetite Ratio151%1
Citigroup Risk Appetite Surplus$7.61 billion

QUALITATIVE SCORECARD
Qualitative GoalResult Highlights (Glossary on Page 127)Rating(2)
Protect and enhance
our reputation
AsUnder Mr. Gerspach’s leadership, Citi CFO, Mr. Gerspach is responsible for managing Citi’s balance sheet and Citi’s financial reporting processes. At December 31, 2016, Citi had approximately $1.79 trillionreceived no objection from regulators to its capital plan submitted as part of assets and $929the 2018 CCAR process, enabling the return of $18.4 billion of deposits.capital to common stockholders during 2018. Citi repurchased over 200 million shares during 2018, resulting in an 8% reduction in outstanding common shares.
AmongNotwithstanding the disciplinescontinued progress in returning capital to shareholders, each of Citi’s key regulatory capital metrics remained strong.
Control metrics generally improved year-over-year across the Finance function, while areas of focus remain.
Succession planning efforts in Finance resulted in the orderly succession process pursuant to which Mark Mason was promoted to Citi CFO.

3

Develop client-
relevant value
propositions

Under Mr. Gerspach’s leadership, Citi Ventures continued to build a successful investment portfolio, resulting in substantial cost savings and incremental revenue to Citi.
The Finance function has continued to make productivity and process improvements that have lowered cost, improved the quality of financial reporting to Mr. Gerspach is Citi’s treasury function. Treasury managesand analysis, and improved the effectiveness of our capital, funding, and liquidity, and manages corporate oversight of liquidity risk, interest rate risk, and currency translation risk.control environment.

3

Produce extraordinary
client experiences

Mr. Gerspach leadshas sponsored multiple initiatives to deliver better insights to clients and faster execution.

3

Deliver our financial
commitments

Key financial metrics, including Citi’s 2018 return on tangible common equity, exceeded 2017 results (excluding the teams coordinating Citi’s firm-wide responses to global financial regulatory reform, including Dodd-Frank,impact of Tax Reform in both periods) and Citi’s comprehensive approach to resolution planning. The Finance function also plays a central role in our CCAR capital planning process.2018 business plan.
In addition, Mr. Gerspach is responsible for Citi Ventures, which accelerates innovation and growth at Citi through strategic investmentsFinance function efforts resulted in new technology solutionsand through facilitating idea generation within Citi.a reduction of Citi’s effective tax rate.

2

Financial Scorecard (weighted 70%)

Category     Financial Goal (Glossary on Page 120)2016 Result(1)     Rating(2)
ProfitabilityCitigroup Income from Continuing Operations$21.5billion4
Before Taxes  
Expense ManagementCiticorp Efficiency Ratio57.9%3(3)
Use of Capital Citigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity7.6%4
Citigroup Return on Assets0.82% 4
RiskCiticorp Risk Appetite Ratio131%2
Citicorp Risk Appetite Surplus$4.60billion

(1)Return on Tangible Common Equity and Return on Assets exclude the impact of Tax Reform in 2018. For a reconciliation of theseall adjusted results to reported results, please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement.
(2)Explanations of the colors and ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 77.81.
(3)Overall expense management rating reflects strong management of Finance function expense.

Non-Financial Scorecard (weighted 30%)

Non-Financial GoalResult Highlights (Glossary on Page 120)Rating(1)
Strong risk and controls management
WhileCiti has more work to do, Citi achieved a significant milestone during 2016 when it received feedback from the Federal Reserve Board and FDIC that neither agency had found deficiencies in Citi’s 2015 resolution plan. Mr. Gerspach led Citi’s comprehensive resolution plan submission and our ongoing integrated approach to resolution planning.
2
Achieve satisfactory CCAR result
Citireceived no objection to its capital plan submitted as part of the 2016 CCAR process, enabling the return of nearly $11 billion of capital to stockholders during 2016. This critical result was achieved under Mr. Gerspach’s leadership.
1
Manage Deferred Tax Assets and foreign tax credits
Mr.Gerspach leads Citi’s strategic use of our Deferred Tax Assets and related foreign tax credit carry forwards.
Citiutilized $1.2 billion of its Deferred Tax Assets in 2016; the utilization was negatively impacted by earnings that were lower than targets. Reductions in Deferred Tax Assets are important because they have the effect of making additional capital available for use either in Citi’s businesses or for return to Citi’s stockholders.
3

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION81     87

Non-Financial GoalSIZE AND SCOPE OF ROLE
Result Highlights (Glossary on Page 120)Rating(1)

Mr. Gerspach was Citi CFO throughout 2018 and until February 22, 2019. The Citi CFO is responsible for managing Citi’s balance sheet and Citi’s financial reporting processes. At December 31, 2018, Citi had approximately $1.92 trillion of assets and $1.01 trillion of deposits.

Leadership effectiveness
Mr.Gerspach continues

Among the disciplines reporting to lead efforts in Financethe Citi CFO is Citi’s treasury function, which manages our capital, funding, and liquidity. In addition, the treasury function manages corporate oversight of risks related to work more efficiently with a streamlined organizational structure.

2liquidity, interest rates, and currency translation.

Enhance operational efficiency
Inpartnership with

The Citi CFO leads the teams coordinating Citi’s Chief Risk Officer, Mr. Gerspach has led the effortresponses to continuously improve our standardizedglobal financial reporting systems through better integration with Citi’s Risk Management function and systems that monitor risk.

regulatory reform. The Finance function continues to achieve its goals regarding enhanced data quality, standardized reporting processes, and automated reporting.
2

(1)    Explanations of the ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 77.

SUMMARY OF FRAMEWORK CONCLUSIONS AND FINAL PAY DECISIONalso plays a central role in our CCAR capital planning process.

The Citi CFO leads many of Citi’s expense management initiatives and Finance also leads or participates in a range of financial control activities throughout the businesses.


Scorecard Assessment SummaryCOMMITTEE’S PAY RATIONALE

Scorecard Assessment Summary

Company-wide financial results reflected solid overall performance, especiallyprogress toward improving Citi’s profitability and returns, including return on tangible common equity, in Institutional Clients Group, but did not attaina more challenging revenue environment. Citi attained the challenging targets set at the beginning of 2016, most notably due to the size of investments in key businesses, including in North America credit cards, as well as a more challenging2018 and demonstrated improved operating environment than anticipated in early 2016.

performance over 2017.

The Compensation Committee considered Mr. Gerspach’s notable 2016 non-financial2018 qualitative goal achievements, such as the 2016leadership demonstrated in the 2018 favorable CCAR resultand feedback received on Citi’s 2015 resolution plan, along with his leadership in developing successful firm-wide expense management initiatives.company-wide productivity improvements.


Linking Performance to Compensation

Linking Performance to Compensation

Company business performance belowat or above targets combined with Mr. Gerspach’s strong performance against non-financialqualitative goals resulted in an overall scorecard rating of 2.98,2.505, which points toward compensation within the range ofabove market median for the CFO role.role within our 13-firm compensation peer group. The overall scorecard rating was determined by averaging the financialquantitative goal ratings and weighting the result 70%, averaging the non-financialqualitative goal ratings and weighting the result 30%, then adding the two amounts ([3.42.4 x 0.7] + [2.0[2.75 x 0.3] = 2.98)2.505).


Final Award

Final Award

The Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Gerspach $9$12 million in annual compensation for 2016, the same2018, a 9% increase over his 2017 annual compensation of $11 million, in recognition of a gap to market levels of compensation for similar roles at U.S.-based global banks as well as Mr. Gerspach’s 2015 pay. In prior years,performance. Mr. Gerspach’s compensation was compared to a peer group that was dominated by our five most comparable U.S. peer firms, and his 2016 compensation is below market median for the CFO role within that group. Mr. Gerspach’s compensation remained above market median for the CFO role based on a comparison against theto CFO rolepay in our new 13-firm compensation peer group.group, consistent with the results produced by our executive compensation Framework, while at the same time was below the median of CFO pay at other U.S.-based global banks. In determining the final award amount in the exercise of its discretion, the Compensation Committee determined not to make a downward adjustment from 2015relied on the results of the executive compensation Framework and considered Citi’s solid progress toward its financial goals, market levels of pay even thoughat other U.S.-based global banks, and Mr. Gerspach’s compensation was above market median for the new peer group. In making this judgment, the Compensation Committee was influenced primarily by the firm’s result in the 2016 CCAR process and feedback received on the 2015 resolution plan.
qualitative results.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

8288PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Citi President and Institutional Clients Group CEO Scorecard and Pay Explanation

James Forese is President of Citi and CEO of Institutional Clients Group (ICG). He assumed expanded duties as President of Citi in June 2015 after serving as Co-President of Citi and CEO of ICG since January 2013. Mr. Forese joined Citi in 1985 and has held various executive positions in multiple geographies throughout the businesses comprising ICG.

QUANTITATIVE SCORECARD
Mr. Forese’s performance on most quantitative metrics was evaluated on the basis of both company-wide and ICG results, consistent with his roles as President of Citi and as CEO of ICG.

Category     Quantitative Goal (Glossary on Page 127)     2018 Result(1)(2)     Rating(2)
ProfitabilityCitigroup Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes     $23.4 billion3
ICG Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$15.8 billion
Expense ManagementCitigroup Efficiency Ratio57.4%3
ICG Efficiency Ratio56.7%
Use of CapitalCitigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity10.9%3
ICG Return on Tangible Common Equity14.3%
Citigroup Return on Assets0.93%3
ICG Return on Assets0.87%
RiskICG Risk Appetite Ratio219%2
ICG Risk Appetite Surplus$8.15 billion

QUALITATIVE SCORECARD
Qualitative GoalResult HighlightsRating(2)
Protect and enhance
our reputation
As Citi President, Mr. Forese continues to provide prominent and clear messaging across the company around the firm’s culture of ethics and conduct.
Control metrics generally improved year-over-year across ICG. Many outstanding regulatory issues were resolved, while others remain as focus areas.
Led by Mr. Forese, ICG demonstrated improvement in key diversity metrics and ethical culture scores and implemented new approaches to entry-level hiring that have already increased diversity.
3

Develop client-
relevant value
propositions

Earnings in three priority areas – equities, investor services, and treasury and trade solutions – exceeded 2017 results and the 2018 business plan. Private bank revenues continued to grow.
Led by Mr. Forese, ICG continued to enhance controls while simplifying client-facing processes.
2

Produce extraordinary
client experiences

ICG greatly simplified and streamlined the client onboarding experience through use of technology in multiple areas, including trading platforms.
ICG continued to improve client satisfaction significantly, as measured in objective surveys.
1

Deliver our financial
commitments

Although ICG 2018 financial results fell short of its business plan, ICG’s underlying results in 2018 showed solid growth over 2017 levels. Led by Mr. Forese, ICG productivity improvements exceeded targets.

 2


(1)Citigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity and Citigroup Return on Assets exclude the impact of Tax Reform in 2018. For a reconciliation of all adjusted results to reported results, please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement.
(2)Explanations of the colors and ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 81.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION89

SIZE AND SCOPE OF ROLESROLE

As President of Citi, Mr. Forese leads enterprise-wide initiatives, including our initiativesthose designed to improve Citi’s execution of its business strategy and our efforts to shape Citi’s culture through our common mission and value proposition statements.

Mr. Forese is also CEO of ICG, which provides corporate, institutional, public sector, and high-net-worth clients around the world with a full range of wholesale banking products and services, including fixed income and equity sales and trading, foreign exchange, prime brokerage, derivative services, equity and fixed income research, corporate lending, investment banking and advisory services, private banking, cash management, trade finance, and securities services.

ICG’s international presence is supported by trading floors in approximately 80 countries and a proprietary network in 9798 countries and jurisdictions. At December 31, 2016,2018, ICG had approximately $1.3$1.4 trillion of assets and $610$690 billion of deposits, while two of its businesses, securities services and issuer services, managed approximately $15.2$17.5 trillion of assets under custody.


Financial Scorecard (weighted 70%)

Mr. Forese’s performance on most financial metrics was evaluated on the basis of both company-wide and ICG results, consistent with his roles as President of Citi and as CEO of ICG.

CategoryFinancial Goal (Glossary on Page 120)2016 Result(1)       Rating(2)
ProfitabilityCitigroup Income from Continuing Operations Before
Taxes
$21.5billion3
 ICG Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$14.4billion
Expense ManagementCiticorp Efficiency Ratio57.9%4
 ICG Efficiency Ratio55.9%
Use of CapitalCitigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity7.6%4
 ICG Return on Tangible Common Equity12.3%
 Citigroup Return on Assets0.82%3
 ICG Return on Assets0.76%
RiskICG Risk Appetite Ratio218%1
 ICG Risk Appetite Surplus$7.41billion

(1)For a reconciliation of these results to reported results, please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement.
(2)Explanations of the colors and ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 77.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION83

Non-Financial Scorecard (weighted 30%)

Non-Financial Goal

Result Highlights (Glossary on Page 120)

Rating(1)
Strong risk and
controls management
Efforts led by Mr. Forese to improve the controls environment in ICG continue to show results as demonstrated through continued reductions in operational losses.
ICG’s risk metrics demonstrate that risk discipline was maintained in 2016 despite the challenging market conditions in the first quarter. No new headline control issues emerged in 2016.

2

Leadership
and strategy
effectiveness
Despite the challenging first quarter, Mr. Forese’s initiatives resulted in 2016 ICG business performance that was close to plan and exceeded 2015 ICG performance in many areas.
As Citi President, Mr. Forese has taken visible public roles supporting our “Leadership Matters” initiative and other global franchise initiatives.
He has taken a leadership role in our relations with regulators globally, particularly in connection with Citi’s ongoing efforts to enhance our culture of ethical business conduct.
He has reinforced our global commitment to diversity through his support of diverse slates and diverse interview panels for senior roles.

2

Improve ICG business
optimization
Mr. Forese continued the drive toward a more streamlined and integrated ICG by continuing to direct resources toward opportunities for growth and performance, such as treasury and trade solutions.
Certain of ICG’s businesses (such as the private bank) continued to improve their ability to deliver Citi’s full range of products to clients in innovative ways, as demonstrated by improved revenues and market share, while other businesses had less consistent results.

3

Enhance ICG
operational efficiency
ICG maintained expense discipline in 2016, which, when combined with revenues essentially in line with 2015, resulted in a modest improvement in this metric as compared to 2015.

2


(1)Explanations of the ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 77.

SUMMARY OF FRAMEWORK CONCLUSIONS AND FINALCOMMITTEE’S PAY DECISIONRATIONALE

Scorecard Assessment Summary

Scorecard Assessment Summary

Company-wide financial results reflected solid overall performance, especiallyprogress toward improving Citi’s profitability and returns, including return on tangible common equity, in ICG, but did not attaina more challenging revenue environment. Citi attained the challenging targets set at the beginning of 2016, most notably due to the size of investments2018 and demonstrated improved operating performance over 2017. ICG had solid revenue growth across treasury and trade solutions, private bank, securities services, equity markets, and corporate lending, partially offset by weakness in key businesses, including in North America credit cards,fixed income as well as a more challenging operating environment than anticipatedsoftness in early 2016. ICG 2016 financial results were largely improved over 2015 results.equity and debt underwriting.

The Compensation Committee considered Mr. Forese’s notable 2016 non-financial2018 qualitative goal achievements, including improvementsthe success of investments in controls and leadership on regulatory matters.targeted ICG businesses.

Linking Performance to Compensation


Linking Performance to Compensation

Company business performance belowat or above targets and better ICG business performance above or near targets combined with Mr. Forese’s strong performance against non-financialqualitative goals resulted in an overall scorecard rating of 2.775, pointing2.635, which points toward compensation within the range of market median for Mr. Forese’s role as CEO of ICG. The overall scorecard rating was determined by averaging the financialquantitative goal ratings and weighting the result 70%, averaging the non-financialqualitative goal ratings and weighting the result 30%, then adding the two amounts ([3.02.8 x 0.7] + [2.25 x 0.3] = 2.775)2.635).

Final Award


Final Award

The Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Forese $15.3$20 million in annual compensation for 2016, a 4% reduction from2018, the same as his 20152017 annual compensation of $16$20 million. Mr. Forese’s 20162018 compensation was belowwithin the range of market median for his ICG role.role considering compensation at U.S.-based global banks, consistent with the results produced by our executive compensation Framework. In determining the final award amount in the exercise of its discretion, the Compensation Committee this year gave considerable weight to Citi’s 2016 overallrelied on the results of the executive compensation Framework, which reflect market levels of compensation, ICG’s 2018 business performance, as compared to targets and the prior year, given Mr. Forese’s franchise-wide role as Citi President.qualitative results.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

8490PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Global Consumer Banking CEO Scorecard and Pay Explanation

Stephen Bird became CEO of Global Consumer Banking (GCB) in June 2015. Previously, Mr. Bird was CEO of Citi’s Asia Pacific region, responsible for Citi’s business lines across the region. He joined Citi in 1998 and has held regional executive roles in Operations & Technology in the Asia Pacific and Latin America regions as well as business executive roles in GCB.

SIZE AND SCOPE OF ROLEQUANTITATIVE SCORECARD

As CEO of GCB, Mr. Bird’s global responsibilities include all consumer and commercial banking businesses in 19 countries, including retail banking and wealth management, credit cards, mortgages, and operations and technology supporting GCB.

GCB provides traditional banking services to retail customers through retail banking, including commercial banking, Citi branded cards, and Citi retail services. GCB is focused on its priority markets in the U.S., Mexico, and Asia with 2,649 branches as of December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2016, GCB had approximately $413 billion of assets and $301 billion of deposits.

Citi is the world’s largest credit card issuer, with more than 142 million accounts and $420 billion in annual purchase sales across Citi branded cards and Citi retail services.


Financial Scorecard (weighted 70%)

Mr. Bird’s performance on most financialquantitative metrics was evaluated on the basis of both company-wide and GCB results, consistent with his roles as an executive officer of Citi and as CEO of GCB.

CategoryFinancial Goal (Glossary on Page 120)2016 Result(1)       Rating(2)
ProfitabilityCitigroup Income from Continuing Operations Before
Taxes
$21.5billion4
GCB Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$7.8billion
Expense ManagementCiticorp Efficiency Ratio57.9%4
GCB Efficiency Ratio55.1%
Use of CapitalCitigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity7.6%4
GCB Return on Tangible Common Equity14.2%
Citigroup Return on Assets0.82%4
GCB Return on Assets1.28%
RiskGCB Risk Appetite Ratio139%2
GCB Risk Appetite Surplus$1.95billion

Category     Quantitative Goal (Glossary on Page 127)     2018 Result(1)(2)     Rating(2)
ProfitabilityCitigroup Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$23.4billion4
GCB Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$7.6billion
Expense ManagementCitigroup Efficiency Ratio57.4%4
GCB Efficiency Ratio55.0%
Use of CapitalCitigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity10.9%4
GCB Return on Tangible Common Equity16.4%
Citigroup Return on Assets0.93%4
GCB Return on Assets1.36%
RiskGCB Risk Appetite Ratio173%2
GCB Risk Appetite Surplus$3.46billion

QUALITATIVE SCORECARD
Qualitative GoalResult HighlightsRating(2)

Protect and enhance
our reputation

Control metrics generally improved year-over-year across GCB, and many outstanding regulatory issues were resolved.
Led by Mr. Bird, GCB demonstrated improvement in key diversity metrics and ethical culture scores.
Mr. Bird demonstrated leadership in revising his organizational structure, and the changes are already resulting in improved business performance.
3

Develop client-
relevant value
propositions

GCB delivered solid performance on its strategic mobile initiatives, with digital and mobile usage above 2018 targets.
In 2018, investments in Citibanamex resulted in significant progress toward 2020 targets.
2

Produce extraordinary
client experiences

Key digital user metrics improved substantially year-over-year, and we are winning industry awards for exceptional digital and mobile experiences.
The GCB client experience is rapidly improving, as indicated by client survey results.
2

Deliver our financial
commitments

Led by Mr. Bird, GCB financial performance for 2018 generally showed improvement over 2017 and was near its business plan.

3


(1)Citigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity and Citigroup Return on Assets exclude the impact of Tax Reform in 2018. For a reconciliation of theseall adjusted results to reported results, please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement.
(2)Explanations of the colors and ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 77.81.

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION85

Non-Financial Scorecard (weighted 30%)

Non-Financial Goal

Result Highlights (Glossary on Page 120)

Rating(1)
Strong risk
and controls
management
Led by Mr. Bird, GCB made significant progress during 2016 in strengthening its control environment, while proactively resolving outstanding regulatory issues.
Net credit loss metrics improved over 2015, while operating loss metrics were less favorable.

3

Leadership
effectiveness
No new headline control issues emerged in GCB in 2016, despite ongoing global scrutiny of sales practices throughout the financial services industry.
Mr. Bird focused on filling critical talent gaps with a mix of internal and external candidates, infusing new talent to support the GCB Digital & Technology objectives and capabilities. He also streamlined and simplified his management organization.

2

Digitize and simplify
customer platforms
Numerous promising mobile and digital initiatives are underway globally.
GCB increased digital users and introduced a significantly enhanced Citigold mobile platform in the U.S.
Mr. Bird continued to drive progress on the multi-year rollout of a common global technology platform.

1

Improve market
share in core
markets
Under Mr. Bird’s leadership, GCB integrated the Costco portfolio and renewed and extended several key credit card partnerships.
Market share continues to grow in Mexico and Asia, and New York branch upgrades were completed, while we are reorganizing Wealth Management’s client offerings and revamping its value proposition.
Net promoter scores continued to improve.

2

Enhance productivity
in GCB
Mr. Bird continued to drive efficiencies by winding down non-core consumer businesses throughout the world (including through agreements to sell the consumer businesses in Argentina and Brazil) and making corresponding changes in leadership and organizational structures.

2

91

(1)SIZE AND SCOPE OF ROLE

ExplanationsAs CEO of the ratings usedGCB, Mr. Bird’s global responsibilities include all consumer and commercial banking businesses in 19 countries and jurisdictions.

GCB provides traditional banking services to retail customers through retail banking, including commercial banking, and Citi-branded cards and Citi retail services. GCB is focused on its priority markets in the scorecards appear on page 77.U.S., Mexico, and Asia with 2,410 branches as of December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2018, GCB had approximately $432 billion of assets and $308 billion of deposits.

At December 31, 2018, North America GCB had 689 retail bank branches, approximately 9.1 million retail banking customer accounts, $56.8 billion in retail banking loans, and $181.2 billion in deposits. In addition, North America GCB had approximately 121 million Citi-branded and Citi retail services card accounts with $144.5 billion in outstanding loan balances.

At December 31, 2018, Latin America GCB had 1,463 retail branches in Mexico, approximately 29.4 million retail banking customer accounts, $19.7 billion in retail banking loans, and $27.7 billion in deposits. In addition, Latin America GCB had approximately 5.6 million Citi-branded card accounts with $5.7 billion in outstanding loan balances.

At December 31, 2018, Asia GCB had 258 retail branches, approximately 16.0 million retail banking customer accounts, $69.2 billion in retail banking loans, and $99.2 billion in deposits. In addition, Asia GCB had approximately 15.3 million Citi-branded card accounts with $19.3 billion in outstanding loan balances.


SUMMARY OF FRAMEWORK CONCLUSIONS AND FINALCOMMITTEE’S PAY DECISIONRATIONALE

Scorecard Assessment Summary

Scorecard Assessment Summary

Company-wide financial results reflected solid overall performance, but did not attainprogress toward improving Citi’s profitability and returns, including return on tangible common equity, in a more challenging revenue environment. Citi attained the challenging targets set at the beginning of 2016, most notably due to2018 and demonstrated improved operating performance over 2017. GCB reported revenue growth in all regions, reflecting continued loan and overall deposit growth, partially offset by the sizenear-term impact of investmentsweak market sentiment on Asia wealth management revenues, as well as the impact from partnership renewal terms that went into effect in key businesses, including2018 in Citi-branded cards in North America credit cards, as well as a more challenging operating environment than anticipated in early 2016.GCB results were also impacted by these planned investments in our businesses that entailed incurring expenses before expected revenues were generated.GCB.

The Compensation Committee considered Mr. Bird’s notable 2016 non-financial2018 qualitative goal achievements, such as the gains in the digital space, along with key achievements in important markets. No new GCB headline control issues surfaced in 2016.

Linking Performance to Compensation


Linking Performance to Compensation

BusinessCompany performance belowat or above targets and GCB business performance generally near targets plus Mr. Bird’s strong performance against non-financialqualitative goals resulted in an overall scorecard rating of 3.12,3.27, which points toward compensation within the range of market median for Mr. Bird’s role. The overall scorecard rating was determined by averaging the financialquantitative goal ratings and weighting the result 70%, averaging the non-financialqualitative goal ratings and weighting the result 30%, then adding the two amounts ([3.6 x 0.7] + [2.0[2.5 x 0.3] = 3.12)3.27).

Final Award


Final Award

The Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Bird $9$11.5 million in 20162018 annual compensation, a 6%9.5% increase over his 20152017 pay of $8.5 million.$10.5 million, in recognition of a gap to market levels of compensation for similar roles at U.S.-based global banks as well as Mr. Bird’s performance. Mr. Bird’s 2018 compensation was within the range of market median for his role considering compensation at U.S.-based global banks, consistent with the results produced by our executive compensation Framework. In determining the final award amount in the exercise of its discretion, the Compensation Committee reflectedrelied on the results of the executive compensation Framework, which reflect market levels of compensation, and GCB’s progress toward strategic goals, although in recognition of2018 business results,performance, and Mr. Bird’s 2016 compensation was below market median for his role.qualitative results.


www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

8692PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Latin America CEO Scorecard and Pay Explanation

In June 2015, Jane Fraser became CEO of Citi’s Latin America (LatAm) region. Previously, she was CEO of Citi’s U.S. Consumer and Commercial Banking and CitiMortgage, responsible for retail banking, commercial banking, small business banking, and wealth management in the U.S. and Citi’s residential home mortgage lending business globally.CitiMortgage. From 2009 to 2013, Ms. Fraser served as CEO of Citi’s Private Bank, and before then, she held key strategy roles. She joined Citi in 2004.

SIZE AND SCOPE OF ROLEQUANTITATIVE SCORECARD

The CEO of LatAm is responsible for LatAm GCB in Mexico and ICG’s businesses in the 23 countries where Citi is present in this region.

LatAm GCB includes Citibanamex (previously known as Banco Nacional de Mexico, or Banamex), one of Mexico’s largest banks. At December 31, 2016, LatAm GCB had 1,494 retail branches in Mexico, with approximately 27.4 million retail banking customer accounts, $18.3 billion in retail banking loans and $26.4 billion in deposits.

In addition, LatAm GCB had approximately 5.8 million Citi-branded card accounts with $4.8 billion in outstanding loan balances.


Financial Scorecard (weighted 70%)

Ms. Fraser’s performance on most financialquantitative metrics was evaluated on the basis of both company-wide and LatAm results, consistent with her roles as an executive officer of Citi and as CEO of LatAm.

CategoryFinancial Goal (Glossary on Page 120)2016 Result(1)       Rating(2)
ProfitabilityCitigroup Income from Continuing Operations Before
Taxes
$21.5billion3
LatAm Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$3.2billion
Expense ManagementCiticorp Efficiency Ratio57.9%4
LatAm Efficiency Ratio50.6%
Use of CapitalCitigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity7.6%4
LatAm Return on Tangible Common Equity17.8%
Citigroup Return on Assets0.82%3
LatAm Return on Assets1.57%
RiskLatAm Risk Appetite Ratio230%2
LatAm Risk Appetite Surplus$1.91billion

Category     Quantitative Goal (Glossary on Page 127)     2018 Result(1)(2)     Rating(2)
ProfitabilityCitigroup Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$23.4billion2
LatAm Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxes$3.8billion
Expense ManagementCitigroup Efficiency Ratio57.4%2
LatAm Efficiency Ratio49.4%
Use of CapitalCitigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity10.9%1
LatAm Return on Tangible Common Equity23.3%
Citigroup Return on Assets0.93%1
LatAm Return on Assets2.23%
RiskLatAm Risk Appetite Ratio305%2
LatAm Risk Appetite Surplus$2.78billion

QUALITATIVE SCORECARD
Qualitative GoalResult HighlightsRating(2)

Protect and enhance
our reputation

Control metrics generally improved year-over-year across the LatAm region, and many outstanding regulatory issues were resolved.
The control and governance environment has strengthened considerably under Ms. Fraser’s stewardship, as we continue to focus on further improvements.
Led by Ms. Fraser, the LatAm region demonstrated improvement in key diversity metrics and ethical culture scores.
3

Develop client-
relevant value
propositions

Citi continued to execute on its investment plan for Citibanamex (totaling more than $1 billion through 2020). Ms. Fraser is leading the transformation of Citi’s consumer banking platform in Mexico, which demonstrated significant progress in 2018.
In 2018, Citibanamex made progress toward a market leadership position through development of new strategic business combinations and partnerships.
2

Produce extraordinary
client experiences

Under Ms. Fraser’s leadership, digital and mobile users in Mexico have increased significantly.
Targeted businesses in LatAm ICG improved wallet share and revenues compared to 2017, while the region’s operating efficiency improved year-over-year.
2

Deliver our financial
commitments

Overall the region delivered results that exceeded the business plan in addition to demonstrating year-over-year improvement in financial results.
1

(1)Citigroup Return on Tangible Common Equity and Citigroup Return on Assets exclude the impact of Tax Reform in 2018. For a reconciliation of theseall adjusted results to reported results, please see Annex A to this Proxy Statement.
(2)Explanations of the colors and ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 77.81.

Non-Financial Scorecard (weighted 30%)

Non-Financial GoalResult Highlights (Glossary on Page 120)Rating(1)
Strong risk and
controls management

Ms.Fraser is managing the effort to simplify Citi in Latin America through the sales of consumer businesses in the region.2
Shehas championed the upgrade of our governance and control framework in Mexico, and regional operational control metrics continued to improve or remained stable in 2016.

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION8793

Non-Financial GoalSIZE AND SCOPE OF ROLE
Result Highlights (Glossary on Page 120)Rating(1)

The CEO of LatAm is responsible for LatAm GCB in Mexico and ICG’s businesses in the 23 countries and jurisdictions where Citi is present in this region.

Leadership
effectiveness
Ms.Fraser is leading the transformation of Citi’s consumer

LatAm GCB provides traditional retail banking, platformincluding commercial banking, and its Citi-branded cards products to retail customers and small to mid-sized businesses in Mexico through utilizationCitibanamex, one of Citi’s $1Mexico’s largest banks. At December 31, 2018, LatAm GCB had 1,463 retail branches in Mexico, with approximately 29.4 million retail banking customer accounts, $19.7 billion investment in Citibanamex.

1retail banking loans, and $27.7 billion in deposits.

In addition, LatAm GCB had approximately 5.6 million Citi-branded card accounts with $5.7 billion in outstanding loan balances at December 31, 2018.

Ms.Fraser is upgrading talent in key roles, especially in operational and controls functions.
Initiatives in MexicoMs.Fraser is responsible for managing the investment in Citibanamex announced in 2016, which will enhance the digital banking experience, improve technology platforms, upgrade branch banking and ATMs, and provide specialized services to underserved markets.2
Productivity and
growth in

LatAm

Ms.Fraser continues to reduce the expense base ICG has a long-standing institutional presence in the region and streamline the organizational structure, particularlyleverages Citi’s global network, digital capabilities, and deep local market expertise. In 2018, LatAm ICG had $4.5 billion in ICG Operations & Technology.3
Accelerate
transformation of ICG
in LatAm
UnderMs. Fraser’s leadership, ICG revenue and investment banking market share grew in Latin America in 2016.2
CertainICG businesses, such as treasury and trade solutions, demonstrated strong growth in the region in 2016.

(1)Explanations of the ratings used in the scorecards appear on page 77.revenue.


SUMMARY OF FRAMEWORK CONCLUSIONS AND FINALCOMMITTEE’S PAY DECISIONRATIONALE

Scorecard Assessment Summary

Scorecard Assessment Summary

Company-wide financial results reflected solid overall performance, especiallyprogress toward improving Citi’s profitability and returns, including return on tangible common equity, in ICG, but did not attaina more challenging revenue environment. Citi attained the challenging targets set at the beginning of 2016, most notably due to the size of investments2018 and demonstrated improved operating performance over 2017. The LatAm region performed well, with financial performance above or in key businesses, including in North America credit cards, as well as a more challenging operating environment than anticipated in early 2016. LatAm financial results were closer to plan.line with targets.

The Compensation Committee considered Ms. Fraser’s notable 2016 non-financial2018 qualitative goal achievements, including the improved ICG resultssuccess of new client initiatives in the LatAm region.

Linking Performance to Compensation


Linking Performance to Compensation

Company performance at or above targets and LatAm business performance belowabove targets and better LatAm regional performance combined with Ms. Fraser’s strong performance against non-financialqualitative goals resulted in an overall scorecard rating of 2.84,1.72, which points toward compensation within the range ofabove market median for Ms. Fraser’s role. The overall scorecard rating was determined by averaging the financialquantitative goal ratings and weighting the result 70%, averaging the non-financialqualitative goal ratings and weighting the result 30%, then adding the two amounts ([3.21.6 x 0.7] + [2.0 x 0.3] = 2.84)1.72).

Final Award


Final Award

The Compensation Committee awarded Ms. Fraser $7.9$9.25 million in 2018 annual compensation, for 2016, which isa 9% increase over her 2017 annual compensation of $8.5 million. Ms. Fraser’s 2018 compensation was within the range of market median for the role.her role, considering compensation at U.S.-based global banks. In determining the final award amount in the exercise of its discretion, the Compensation Committee notedrelied on the greater sizeresults of the executive compensation Framework, focusing on the overall performance of Citi while recognizing the strong performance of the LatAm region and complexity of Ms. Fraser’s role as compared to the same role at our peer firms and the importance of the region to Citi’s financial goals.qualitative results.


Our New Compensation Peer Group

The Compensation Committee believes that market compensation levels must frame compensation decisions in order to retain the executive talent necessary to execute the company’s business strategy. Accordingly, a critical step in our compensation Framework is the Compensation Committee’s understanding of market pay, which it develops through consideration of surveys of historic peer firm compensation for each named executive officer role.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

8894PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Long-Term Incentives

The Compensation Committee evaluates the peer group on an annual basis to ensure that the group continues to be appropriate. Following its most recent evaluation in 2016, the Compensation Committee, with input from its independent compensation consultant, changed the peer group used to determine marketPerformance Share Units

Thirty-five percent of CEO variable pay ranges due to the increasing challenges associated with comparing executive compensation at U.S. financial services firms to pay at firms headquartered outside the U.S. that are subject to different regulatory environments. This change was the first modification in Citi’s peer group since 2012.

As a resultand 30% of the peer group review, three non-U.S. companies (Barclays, Deutsche Bank, and HSBC) were removed, and eight U.S. financial services firms (AIG, American Express, BNY Mellon, Capital One, MetLife, PNC, Prudential, and U.S. Bancorp) were added to create a peer group of 13 U.S. companies. The new peers operate in one or more lines of business that are similar to Citi’s and compete in similar labor markets, although many do not have global scale that is comparable to Citi. The Compensation Committee believes that the new peer group can provide improved comparability of data across Citi’s key competitors for executive talent. The new peer group is composed of the following companies:

2016 COMPENSATION PEER GROUP

AIGGoldman SachsPrudential
American ExpressJPMorgan ChaseU.S. Bancorp
Bank of AmericaMetLifeWells Fargo
BNY MellonMorgan Stanley
Capital OnePNC

Blue shading indicates new peer for 2016.

All peer firms were included in preparing the market data for the CEO and CFO roles. Not all peer firms have roles comparable to Citi’s named executive officer roles other than the CEO and CFO roles (e.g., the Institutional Clients Group role), so not all of the peer firms were represented in the market data for each of the other named executive officer roles. Information from comparable non-U.S. firms was included if insufficient comparable market data was availablevariable pay are awarded as Performance Share Units, which represent half of Citi’s long-term incentive awards for these executives. The performance target levels for this year’s awards were updated, but there were no other changes to the other named executive officer roles.

In selecting peers, the Compensation Committee used size-based metrics as primary screening criteria among financial services firms. The result was a peer group where Citi is in or near the top quartile in size yet typically compensates executive officers below the top quartile. The Compensation Committee also considered the impactterms of the peer group changes on median pay ranges where the 13-firm group was used and concluded that those changes reduced market median pay for the roles.Performance Share Units as compared to last year.

CITI POSITIONING RELATIVE TO PEER COMPANIES


(1)MetLife employees as of 12/31/2015.

AWARD FEATURE     PERFORMANCE YEAR 2018 PSU DESCRIPTION
Performance PeriodJanuary 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021
Target Number
of PSUs
Portion of total incentive award allocated to PSU program divided by the average of the closing prices of Citi common stock for the five trading days immediately preceding the February 14, 2019 grant date ($62.428)
Performance Metrics
and Targets
RoTCE for 2021Cumulative EPS over 2019-2021

RoTCE is net income (less preferred dividends) divided by average tangible common equity for the year.

Half of units earned on RoTCE performance based on the following performance grid:

Cumulative EPS is determined by adding the diluted earnings per share based on net income allocated to common stockholders from our quarterly earnings reports for the 12 quarters ending in 2019 through 2021.

Half of units earned on cumulative EPS based on the following performance grid:

RoTCE for 2021Percent of Target
PSUs Earned
Cumulative EPS,
2019-2021
Percent of Target
PSUs Earned
Less than 10%0%Less than $22.500%
10%50%$22.5050%
14%100%$26.25100%
16% or more150%$29.00 or more150%

Performance between the thresholds in the table will be determined by straight-line interpolation to avoid encouraging imprudent risk-taking through artificial cliffs in the design of the PSUs.

Example: If Citi has RoTCE for 2021 of 14% and cumulative EPS of $22.50 over the performance period, the executives will receive 75% of the target PSUs, which assigns equal weight to performance against the RoTCE metric (100% performance) and the cumulative EPS metric (50% performance).

Rationale for
Performance Metrics
and Target Levels
The rationale for our performance metrics and target levels appears on pages 78-79.
Award DeliveryAfter the end of the performance period, the number of earned PSUs will be multiplied by the average Citi common stock price over the 20 trading days preceding the final vesting date, and the resulting value will be paid in cash. This practice links the payout to changes in the price of Citi common stock while limiting stockholder dilution.
TSR FactorThe number of PSUs that may be earned is capped at 100% of target if Citi’s total shareholder return is negative over the three-year performance period, regardless of the outcome of the performance metrics.
Dividend EquivalentsDividend equivalents will be accrued and paid on the number of earned PSUs after the end of the performance period; dividend equivalents on PSUs that are not earned will be forfeited.
ClawbacksSubject to clawbacks in a range of circumstances, including misconduct and failure to supervise others.

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION8995

StructureDeferred Stock Awards

Thirty-five percent of Incentive Awards

Overview. Citi’s incentive awards are delivered as a mix of cash bonus, Performance Share Units, and deferred stock awarded under our Capital Accumulation Program. This incentive structure establishes a balance between annual and long-term compensation, with the majority of incentive compensation delivered in Performance Share Units and deferred stock that vest over multiple years. In determining the percentages to award as cash bonuses, Performance Share Units, and deferred stock, the Compensation Committee considered applicable regulatory requirements and guidelines for deferral as well as market practices.

CEO
Incentive
Mix
Other NEO
Incentive
Mix
Award TypePerformance Link and VestingCompensation
Type

Annual
Incentive

30%

40%

Annual Bonus

Scorecard assessment determines value

Cash

Deferred/
Long-term
Incentives

70%

60%

Performance
Share Units
(35% for CEO;
30% for other
NEOs)

Scorecard assessment determines target number of units
Earned units based 50% on return on tangible common equity in 2019 and 50% on cumulative earnings per share over 2017-2019
Ultimate value of earned units linked to Citi total shareholder returns
Award capped at 100% of target if Citi’s total shareholder return is negative over 2017-2019
Subject to clawbacks

Equity-based
but settled in
cash to limit
dilution to
stockholders

Deferred Stock
granted under
our Capital
Accumulation
Program
(35% for
CEO; 30% for
other NEOs)

Scorecard assessment determines number of shares granted
Ultimate value based on Citi total shareholder returns
Vests ratably over a four-year period
Subject to reduction in the event of pre-tax losses in any year of the deferral period
Subject to clawbacks

Equity


Performance Share Unit awards. Performance Share Units represent 35% of the CEO’s total incentive awardCEO variable pay and 30% of the other named executive officers’ total incentive award for 2016, and constituteofficer variable pay are awarded as Deferred Stock Awards, which represent half of each named executive officer’s deferredCiti’s long-term incentive award. The target number of Performance Share Units awardedawards for these executives. There have been no changes to the executives is the amountterms of their total incentive award allocated to the Performance Share Unit program divided by the average of the closing Citi stock prices for the five trading days immediately preceding the February 16, 2017, grant date ($58.8340).our Deferred Stock Awards since 2013.

www.citigroup.com


AWARD FEATURE     DEFERRED STOCK AWARD (DSA) DESCRIPTION

Vesting Period

Vests 25% each year over a four-year period

Number of Shares

Portion of total incentive award allocated to DSAs divided by the average of the closing prices of Citi common stock for the five trading days immediately preceding the February 14, 2019 grant date ($62.428)

Performance-Based Vesting Condition

If Citigroup has pretax losses in any year of the deferral period, the portion of the DSA that is scheduled to vest in the year following the loss year will be reduced by a fraction:

the amount of the pretax loss
the highest level of annual pretax profit for Citigroup in the three years
immediately preceding the loss year

If that fraction would result in a cancellation of 20% or less of the shares, the shares scheduled to vest will be reduced by 20% (i.e., there is a minimum cancellation level in the event of pretax losses).
This provision cannot result in an increase in award value; the feature can only result in the cancellation of unvested shares.

Example

This example shows how the portion of a DSA granted in February 2019 of 20,000 shares that is scheduled to vest in January 2020 — 5,000 shares — would be affected, assuming the following pretax profit (loss) history for Citigroup.

Pretax profit (loss) for Citigroup (in millions)
Scheduled vesting date2019201820172016
January 2020($500)$23,445$22,761$21,477

The profit amounts for 2016, 2017, and 2018 in the example are derived from current publicly reported financial information. The pretax loss amount for 2019 in the example is a hypothetical assumption for illustrative purposes only.

The reduction produced by the formula (500 divided by 23,445) is 2.13%. Due to the minimum cancellation level, 20% of shares scheduled to vest in January 2020 would be cancelled. Therefore, 1,000 shares of the 5,000 that were scheduled to vest would be cancelled (1,000 = 20% of 5,000).

Dividend Equivalents

Dividend equivalents will be accrued and paid on vested shares after the end of the vesting period; dividend equivalents on DSAs that are not earned will be forfeited.

Clawbacks

Subject to clawbacks.


Table of Contents

90PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Half of the target units will be earned based on return on tangible common equity performance and the remaining half will be earned based on cumulative earnings per share. The Performance Share Units will be earned at the end of 2019 according to the following performance schedule:

PERFORMANCE SHARE UNIT SCHEDULE

Percent of Target
Performance Share
Units Earned (applies
separately to each
metric)

0%50%100%150%

Metric: Return on
Tangible Common
Equity for 2019

Less than 5%5%10%14% or more

Metric: Cumulative
Earnings per Share,
2017-2019

Less than $16.00$16.00$17.70$19.00 or more

Cumulative earnings per share is determined by adding the diluted earnings per share based on net income allocated to common shareholders from our quarterly earnings reports for the 12 quarters ending in 2017 through 2019. Performance between the thresholds in the table above will be determined by straight-line interpolationto avoid encouraging imprudent risk-taking through artificial cliffs in the design of the Performance Share Units.

Example: If Citi has return on tangible common equity in 2019 of 10% and cumulative earnings per share of $16.00 over the performance period, the executives will receive 75% of the target Performance Share Units, which assigns equal weight to performance against the return on tangible common equity metric (100% performance) and the cumulative earnings per share metric (50% performance).

Consistent with a provision we added last year as a stockholder protection, the number of Performance Share Units that may be earned is capped at 100% of target if Citi’s total shareholder return is negative over the three-year performance period, regardless of the outcome of the performance metrics.

To the extent earned, the award will be delivered in cash based on the value of Citi common stock. After the end of the performance period, the number of earned Performance Share Units will be multiplied by the average Citi common stock price over the 20 trading days preceding the final vesting date, and the resulting value will be paid in cash. This feature has the effect of linking the amount that executives receive to changes in the price of Citi common stock while limiting stockholder dilution.

Dividend equivalents will be accrued and paid on the number of earned Performance Share Units after the end of the performance period; dividend equivalents on Performance Share Units that are not earned will be forfeited.

Deferred stock awards. Deferred stock granted under our Capital Accumulation Program represents 35% of the CEO’s total incentive award and 30% of the other named executive officers’ total incentive award for 2016, and constitutes half of each named executive officer’s deferred incentive award. No changes were made in the Capital Accumulation Program for awards granted for 2016 performance as compared to the prior year.

The awards vest ratably over a four-year period based on continued service, and an additional performance-based vesting condition applies to these awards that allows for cancellation of future vesting of awards in the event of losses. If Citigroup has pre-tax losses in any year of the deferral period, the portion of the deferred stock award that is scheduled to vest in the year following the loss year will be reduced by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of the pre-tax loss, and the denominator of which is the highest level of annual pre-tax profit for Citigroup in the three years immediately preceding the loss year. However, if that fraction would result in a cancellation of 20% or less of the shares, the shares scheduled to vest will be reduced by 20% (i.e., there is a minimum cancellation level in the event of pre-tax losses).

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION91

Example:The following example illustrates a deferred stock award made in February 2017 of 20,000 shares to a named executive officer. The example shows how the portion of this award that is scheduled to vest in January 2018 – 5,000 shares – would be affected, assuming the following pre-tax profit (loss) history for Citigroup.

Pre-tax profit (loss) for Citigroup (in millions)

Scheduled vesting date     2017
(hypothetical)
     2016     2015     2014     Highest pre-tax
profit in
prior three
years
January 2018($500)$21,477$24,826$14,701$24,826

Please note:The profit amounts for 2014, 2015, and 2016 in the example are derived from current publicly reported financial information. The pre-tax loss amount for 2017 in the example is a hypothetical assumption for illustrative purposes only.

The reduction produced by the formula (500 divided by 24,826) is 2.01%. Due to the minimum cancellation level, 20% of shares scheduled to vest in January 2018 would be cancelled. Therefore, 1,000 shares of the 5,000 that were scheduled to vest would be cancelled (1,000 = 20% of 5,000).

This performance-based vesting feature cannot result in an increase in award value; the feature can only result in the cancellation of unvested shares. Dividend equivalents will be accrued and paid on deferred stock only if and when the stock vests; dividend equivalents will not be paid on cancelled shares.

Clawbacks applicable to Performance Share Units and deferred stock.Citi’s robust clawback policies are applicable to incentive awards to the named executive officers and all other eligible employees. The clawback provisions provide Citi with the right to cancel unvested deferred incentive compensation under a range of adverse outcomes, and not just misconduct, and are summarized in the table below:

Applicable
Clawback Policy
Potential TriggerPerformance
Share
Units
Deferred
Stock

General

Misconduct or materially imprudent judgment that caused harm to any of Citi’s business operations, or that resulted or could result in regulatory sanctions, including either failure to supervise employees who engaged in such behavior or failure to escalate such behavior

MAO

Significant responsibility for a material adverse outcome (MAO), which is defined as serious financial or reputational harm to Citi

Citi

Award received based on materially inaccurate publicly reported financial statements

Citi

Employee knowingly engaged in providing materially inaccurate information relating to publicly reported financial statements

Citi

Material violation of any risk limits established or revised by senior management and/or risk management

Citi

Gross misconduct

Sarbanes-Oxley

Intentional misconduct or fraud that requires a financial restatement


www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

92PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

At a minimum Citi will consider whether a material adverse outcome has occurred and potential impact on Performance Share Units if there is an annual pre-tax loss at any of the following three reportable financial segments: Citigroup (the entire company), Global Consumer Banking, and Institutional Clients Group. Citi will also consider making public disclosures whenever a decision has been made to cancel deferred compensation payable to an executive officer because he or she had significant responsibility for a material adverse outcome or otherwise.

Citi’s Additional Compensation Practices

Risk and Citi’s Incentive Compensation Programs

Our compensation programs are designed in accordance with our responsibility to assume only risks that are prudent and well-understood and to effectively manage those risks to protect the franchise. Our programs have the following important elements:

Our Compensation Philosophyrequires us to consider risk management when making discretionary incentive compensation awards. Our Compensation Philosophy is available on our public website.

(continued on next page)

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

96PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Chief Risk Officer reports at least twice annually to the Compensation Committeeon risk levels and trends across Citi, as well as incentive compensation frameworks at the senior executive level and throughout Citi. The Chief Risk Officer reviewshas reviewed our executive compensation Framework to help ensure that compensation is aligned with long-term performance in a manner that does not encourage imprudent or excessive risk-taking.

Citi’s executive compensation Framework explicitly and implicitly adjusts incentive awards for risk.risk. Citi’s executive compensation Framework takes risk into account in a number of ways, including:

Using financial metrics intended to assess risk levels as an element of each executive’s financial goals.quantitative goals;

Evaluating risk management performance, including effectiveness of the control environment, as part of the non-financial goals.qualitative goals; and

Taking adverse risk outcomes into account when determining incentive compensation.

Annual incentive awards to covered employees, including the named executive officers, have clawbacks and other provisions intended to discourage imprudent or excessive risk-taking.Through a systematic annual process, Citi identifies the inherent material risks to the firm and its material business units, and then identifies employees with influence over those risks as “covered employees,” as defined in applicable bank regulatory guidance. The compensation structure for covered employees, including the named executive officers, includes substantial deferrals and clawbacks intended to cover a range of behaviors, as described on page 91. Furthermore, performance-based vesting criteria are a part of all deferred incentive compensation awarded to covered employees.

An assessment of risk management behaviors is taken into account in determining the aggregate amount of annualindividual incentive compensation.awards.For individual covered employees (several hundred of the most senior employees at Citi), Citi has established an annual control function review process in which reviewers from the control functions provide an evaluation of each covered employee’s risk behaviors. The control functions are Finance, Independent Compliance Finance,Risk Management, Internal Audit, Legal, and Risk Management. The process is designed to evaluate current behavior and attitudes toward risk. The rating from the control function review process informs and influences the covered employee’s performance review conducted by the employee’s manager, and the results of the process are reported to the Compensation Committee. We believe this process has improved awareness of the importance of risk management behaviors and has resulted in the strengthening of Citi’s risk culture. The named executive officers other than Mr. Corbat were evaluated on risk behaviors by Citi’s control functions through this annual control function review process, and Mr. Corbat was assessed on risk behaviors by the Compensation Committee with input from the control functions. These reviews resulted in positive ratings or assessments on risk behaviors for the named executive officers. The positive ratings were not determinative of the size of the annual incentive awards for 2016,2018, as a positive rating on risk behaviors is an expected element of job performance in all covered employee roles. A negative risk rating on risk behaviors would have resulted in the reduction or elimination of incentive compensation awarded for 2016.2018.


Citi’s control functions provide direct feedback on a senior manager’s risk behaviors as part of the annual performance assessment process.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION  
93

Annual incentive awards to covered employees, including the named executive officers, have design features intended to discourage imprudent or excessive risk-taking.Through a systematic annual process, Citi identifies the inherent material risks to the firm and then identifies employees with influence over those risks as covered employees. The compensation structure for covered employees, including the named executive officers, includes substantial deferrals and clawbacks intended to cover a range of behaviors. Furthermore, performance-based vesting criteria are a part of all deferred incentive compensation awarded to covered employees.


Citi has a strong global governance process covering all of Citi’s incentive compensation plans.Citi’s formulaic incentive compensation plans, including its sales incentive plans, provide variable compensation to a broad-based population of employees predominantly in Global Consumer Banking. The plans are administered through a global governance process that is designed to eliminate incentives to engage in illegal or imprudent conduct or take imprudent or excessive risks. As part of this governance process, all of Citi’s incentive compensation plans throughout the world are analyzed through a central risk management model developed and administered by a third-party consultant with input from Citi. Six potential sources of risk are assessed: incentive program design, misalignment with Citi’s strategy and goals, pay opportunity offered by the plan, payout approval process, extent of monitoring as part of plan governance, and risks associated with plan administration.Plansadministration. Plans are remediated based on the results of the risk assessment, if appropriate. This global governance model ensures that best practices are communicated and shared throughout Citi.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION97

Clawbacks applicable to Performance Share Units and Deferred Stock Awards.Citi’s robust clawback policies are applicable to incentive awards to the named executive officers and all other eligible employees. The clawback provisions provide Citi with the right to cancel unvested deferred incentive compensation under a range of adverse outcomes and are summarized in the table below:


APPLICABLE
CLAWBACK POLICY
POTENTIAL TRIGGERPERFORMANCE
SHARE UNITS
DEFERRED
STOCK AWARDS
GeneralMisconduct or materially imprudent judgment that caused harm to any of Citi’s business operations, or that resulted or could result in regulatory sanctions, including either failure to supervise employees who engaged in such behavior or failure to escalate such behavior.
Material Adverse OutcomeSignificant responsibility for a Material Adverse Outcome (MAO), which is defined as serious financial or reputational harm to Citi.
CitiAward received based on materially inaccurate publicly reported financial statements.
CitiEmployee knowingly engaged in providing materially inaccurate information relating to publicly reported financial statements.
CitiMaterial violation of any risk limits established or revised by senior management and/or risk management.
CitiGross misconduct.
Sarbanes-OxleyIntentional misconduct or fraud that requires a financial restatement.

At a minimum, Citi will consider whether a Material Adverse Outcome has occurred and potential impact on Performance Share Units if there is an annual pretax loss at any of the following three reportable financial segments: Citigroup (the entire company), Global Consumer Banking, and Institutional Clients Group. Citi will also consider making public disclosures whenever a decision has been made to cancel deferred compensation payable to an executive officer because he or she had significant responsibility for a Material Adverse Outcome or otherwise.

Our Independent Compensation Consultant

The Board’s compensation consultant does no work for Citi other than advising the Board.

FW Cook has been the Compensation Committee’s independent advisor since 2012. FW Cook provides no services to Citi other than its services to the Board, has no other ties to management that could jeopardize its fully independent status, and has strong internalgovernanceinternal governance policies that help ensure that it maintains its independence. Representatives of FW Cook attended all Compensation Committee meetings during 2016,2018, including executive sessions as requested, and consultedengaged with Compensation Committee members between meetings. FW Cook advised the Compensation Committee regarding the compensation awarded to the CEO and other executive officers. FW Cook also provided extensive guidance and analysis regarding the Compensation Committee’s and the Board’s responses to Citi’s advisory say-on-pay votes, offered market insights, and provided advice to the Compensation Committee on Citi’s executive compensation plan design and the presentation of its programs to stockholders. FW Cook also provided advice to the Board on non-executive director compensation. In 2018, FW Cook was paid fees of $350,497 in 2016.$282,428 for advice regarding executive compensation. Pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules, the Compensation Committee assessed the independence of FW Cook most recently in January 20172019 and determined that FW Cook is independent from Citi management and that its work for the Compensation Committee has not raised any conflicts of interest.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

98PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Tax Deductibility of and Limits on Incentive Compensation

Annual incentive awards for 20162018 were awarded to named executive officers under the 2011 Executive Performance Plan (the EPP), a performance plan intended. The EPP was originally adopted to preserve the deductibility of incentive compensation paid to the named executive officers that might otherwise not be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, Tax Reform amended Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code by removing the exception for qualified performance-based compensation and expanding it to cover the CFO, thereby reducing the potential for deductible executive compensation for 2018 and later years. While Citi has sought to preserve deductibility of compensation paid to the named executive officers to the extent permitted by law, Citi has retained the flexibility to provide nondeductible compensation arrangements it believes are necessary to recruit, incentivize, and retain its executives.

Citi does not intend to change its pay-for-performance approach to awarding executive pay even though Tax Reform eliminated the tax benefits of awarding qualified performance-based compensation. Accordingly, the Committee awarded named executive officer incentive compensation for 2018 performance under the EPP and subject to its limits on executive compensation. The EPP specifies a maximum amount that can be awarded to a participant for any year based on Citigroup’s income from continuing operations before income taxes. The amount of annual incentive actually awarded for the year, however, is determined by the Compensation Committee, applying the executive compensation Framework described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis and subject to the condition that Citi may pay less (but not more) than the maximum. For 2016,2018, the Compensation Committee certified the maximum amount payable under the EPP as $43$46.8 million per executive (0.2% of Citigroup pretax earnings) and exercised its negative discretion to award lesser amounts under the plan. In addition to this limit on total incentive pay, the EPP was amended in February 2017 to limitlimits the annual cash bonus portion of individual executive officer incentive pay to $20 million. While Citi seeks to preserve deductibility of compensation paid to the named executive officers to the extent permitted by law, Citi retains the flexibility to provide nondeductible compensation arrangements it believes are necessary to recruit, incentivize, and retain its executives, and individuals may in some circumstances receive nondeductible payments resulting from awards made prior to becoming an executive officer. Mr. Corbat’s annual base salary is not deductible to the extent it exceeds $1 million.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

94PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Personnel and Compensation Committee Report

The Personnel and Compensation Committee has evaluated the performance of and determined the compensation for the CEO, approved the compensation of executive officers, and approved the compensation structure for other members of senior management and other highly compensated employees. The Personnel and Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis with members of senior management and, based on this review, the Personnel and Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of Citigroup Inc. that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Citi’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the SEC.

The Personnel and Compensation Committee:

William S. Thompson, Jr. (Chair)
Duncan P. Hennes (Chair)
Michael E. O’NeillJohn C. Dugan
Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
Gary M. Reiner
Judith Rodin
Diana L. Taylor

Dated: March 8, 20175, 2019

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION9599

20162018 Summary Compensation Table and
Compensation Information

20162018 Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows the compensation for 20162018, 2017, and as applicable, 2015 and 2014,2016 for any person serving as Citi’s CEO or CFO during 20162018 and Citi’s three other most highly compensated executive officers, with their titles on December 31, 2016.officers. These individuals are referred to as Citi’s named executive officers.

Name and
Principal
Position(1)
     Year(2)     Salary(3)
($)
     Bonus(4)
($)
     Stock
Awards(5)
($)
     Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(6)
($)
     Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(7)
($)
     All Other
Compensation(8)
($)
     Total
($)
   Year   Salary
($)
   Bonus(3)
($)
   Stock
Awards(4)
($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation(5)
($)
   Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(6)
($)
   All Other
Compensation(7)
($)
   Total
($)
Michael Corbat2016$1,500,000$4,200,000$7,645,356$1,848$4,271$30,283$13,381,7582018$1,500,000$6,750,000$15,912,666$0$4,548$16,500$24,183,714
CEO2015$1,500,000$6,000,000$6,493,169$586,393$2,961$15,900$14,598,4232017$1,500,000$6,450,000$9,831,752$0$3,731$16,200$17,801,683
2014$1,500,000$4,600,000$7,727,757$606,924$6,918$15,600$14,457,1992016$1,500,000$4,200,000$7,645,356$1,848$4,271$30,283$13,381,758
John Gerspach2016$500,000$3,400,000$4,332,368$1,355$48,949$15,900$8,298,5722018$500,000$4,600,000$6,661,116$0$0$16,500$11,777,616
CFO(2)2015$500,000$3,400,000$3,952,364$430,021$18,937$15,900$8,317,2222017$500,000$4,200,000$5,116,524$0$79,241$16,200$9,911,965
2014$500,000$2,800,000$4,161,100$445,078$85,580$15,600$8,007,3582016$500,000$3,400,000$4,332,368$1,355$48,949$15,900$8,298,572
James Forese2016$500,000$5,920,000$7,901,877$1,056,412$4,342$15,900$15,398,531(9)2018$500,000$7,800,000$12,370,644$0$4,151$16,500$20,691,295(8) 
President,2015$496,712$6,201,315$7,354,220$2,082,700$4,074$15,900$16,154,9212017$500,000$7,800,000$8,908,771$2,611$1,524$16,200$17,229,106
Citi; CEO,2014$475,000$5,210,000$8,039,839$2,145,487$6,294$15,600$15,892,2202016$500,000$5,920,000$7,901,877$1,056,412$4,342$15,900$15,398,531
Institutional
Clients Group
Stephen Bird2016$499,623$3,400,151$3,766,294$509,673$0$5,122,985$13,298,7262018$500,000$4,400,000$6,343,920$0$0$16,500$11,260,420
CEO, Global2015$500,273$3,199,891$3,880,827$974,873$0$742,590$9,298,4542017$500,000$4,000,000$5,116,751$1,250$0$3,143,844$12,761,845
Consumer2016$499,623$3,400,151$3,766,294$509,673$0$5,122,985$13,298,726
Banking
Jane Fraser2016$500,000$2,960,000$3,302,904$895,061$0$18,730$7,676,6952018$500,000$3,500,000$5,075,136$398,854$0$16,500$9,490,490
CEO, Latin2017$500,000$3,200,000$4,454,386$452,764$0$20,265$8,627,415
America2016$500,000$2,960,000$3,302,904$895,061$0$18,730$7,676,695
Region

(1)The principal position for each named executive officer is the position he or she held on December 31, 2016.2018.
(2)In accordance with SEC rules,Mr. Gerspach retired as Citi CFO effective February 22, 2019, and from Citi employment on March 1, 2019. Mr. Gerspach did not receive any special compensation for Mr. Bird is not presented for 2014 and compensation for Ms. Fraser is not presented for 2015 and 2014 because each was notas a named executive officer for those years.result of his retirement.
(3)Pursuant to his expatriate assignment, Mr. Bird’s salary was denominated in Hong Kong dollars. The salary shown in this table is Mr. Bird’s total annual salary converted to U.S. dollars at an average annual exchange rate (for 2016, 0.12883791 U.S. dollars = 1 Hong Kong dollar).
(4)Amounts in this column show cash bonuses for service in the listed year.
(5)(4)The 2016In accordance with SEC rules, the amounts in this column for 20162018 are the aggregate grant date fair values of Performance Share Units and shares of deferred stockDeferred Stock Awards awarded under the Capital Accumulation Program,2014 Stock Incentive Plan, in each case granted in February 20162018 for performance in 2015.2017. SEC rules require the presentation of awards granted during calendar year 2018, not awards made in respect of performance in 2018. The separate grant date value of each award is disclosed in the 20162018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table. The aggregate grant date fair values of the awards are computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The assumptions made, if any, when calculating the amounts in this column are found in Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup Inc. and its subsidiaries, as filed with the SEC on Form 10-K for 2016.2018. The amounts reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the Performance Share Units are the values at the grant date under applicable accounting principles, which take into account the probable outcome of the performance conditions. Consequently, these values differ from the nominal amount of the awards made by the Compensation Committee, which is divided by the Citi common stock price as determined on the grant date to yield a target number of Performance Share Units. The

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

96PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

values of the Performance Share Units at the 20162018 grant date shown in the 20162018 Summary Compensation Table, assuming that the highest levels of performance conditions are achieved, are: Mr. Corbat, $6,750,000;$11,287,500; Mr. Gerspach, $3,825,000;$4,725,000; Mr. Forese, $6,976,479;$8,775,000; Mr. Bird, $3,599,877;$4,500,000; and Ms. Fraser, $3,156,962.$3,600,000.

(continued on next page)

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

100PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(6)(5)Set forth below is a breakdown ofThe amounts shown in the amount reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation for each named executive officer for 2016. For each executive, the total amount shown in the 2016 Summary Compensation Table representscolumn represent the amount of each Deferred Cash Award considered earned in 2016the applicable year even though the awards were granted in prior years in respect of prior year service. Deferred Cash Awards were granted to senior executives before the creation of our Performance Share Unit program and are also granted to executives who are not eligible for Performance Share Units, which are awarded only to the CEO and executives who report directly to him. Like our Performance Share Units, Deferred Cash Awards represent 50% of each executive’s deferred incentive award for the applicable performance year with deferred stock awarded under the Capital Accumulation ProgramDeferred Stock Awards representing the other 50%. Deferred Cash Awards earn notional interest at a fixed market rate and vest over a period of four years, and the portion of the award (including notional interest) that vests for a year is included in the Summary Compensation Table for the year of vesting. The amount shown in the 20162018 Summary Compensation Table for Ms. Fraser for 2018 therefore includes the portions of outstanding awards that vested and were deemed earned in 2016 and notional interest earned in 2016 on all outstanding awards.

     Name     Reportable
Portion of
February 2013
Deferred Cash
Award
     Reportable
Portion of
February 2014
Deferred Cash
Award
     Reportable
Portion of
February 2015
Deferred Cash
Award
     Aggregate
2016 Earnings on
Outstanding
Deferred Cash
Awards
     Total
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Amount Shown
in 2016
Summary
Compensation
Table
Michael Corbat$1,848$1,848
John Gerspach$1,355$1,355
James Forese$1,014,375$42,037$1,056,412
Stephen Bird$489,484$20,189$509,673
Jane Fraser$437,896$371,741$85,424$895,061

The table includes$382,988 for a portion of the Deferred Cash Award granted in February 20132016 for performance in 2012, a portion of the Deferred Cash Award granted2015 and $15,866 in February 2014 for performance in 2013, a portion of the Deferred Cash Award granted in February 2015 for performance in 2014, and notional interest earned in 2016 on all outstanding awards. Mr. Corbat and Mr. Gerspach received small amounts2018, for a total of notional interest in connection with the January 20, 2016, vesting of the last tranche of their Deferred Cash Awards granted in January 2012 for performance in 2011.
Mr. Bird’s Deferred Cash Awards are denominated in Hong Kong dollars as they were awarded for years in which Mr. Bird was employed in Hong Kong. The amounts presented above for Mr. Bird are shown as converted from Hong Kong dollars to U.S. dollars at the December 31, 2016, conversion rate used to prepare Citi’s financial statements (0.12895904 U.S. dollars = 1 Hong Kong dollar).$398,854. Ms. Fraser’s Deferred Cash Awards are denominated in British pounds as they were awarded for years in which Ms. Fraser was employed in London. The amounts presented above for Ms. Fraser are shown as converted from British pounds to U.S. dollars at the December 31, 2016,2018, conversion rate used to prepare Citi’s financial statements (1.2362(1.2736 U.S. dollars = 1 British pound).
(7)(6)These amounts represent the increases in the present value of pension benefits for Mr. Corbat, Mr. Gerspach, and Mr. Forese, as more fully described in the 20162018 Pension Benefits Table. (TheThe value of Mr. Gerspach’s benefit under The Citigroup Pension Plan increaseddecreased by $28,543,($15,058), and the value of his benefit under the Supplemental ERISA Compensation Plan of Citibank, N.A. and Affiliates increaseddecreased by $20,406.)($11,824). The decreases in value of Mr. Gerspach’s pension benefits were primarily attributable to increases in the discount rate assumptions applicable to the plans. The amount of each named executive officer’s above-market or preferential earnings on compensation that was deferred on a basis that was not tax-qualified was $0. Mr. Bird and Ms. Fraser have never been eligible to participate in a defined benefit pension plan under the terms of Citi’s broad-based retirement programs in effect in their employment countries; they have participated only in defined contribution retirement plans since the commencement of their employment.
(7)Set forth below is a breakdown of All Other Compensation for 2018 (including personal benefits):

     Name     Employer
Retirement Plan
Contribution
($)
     Tax
Reimbursement
Costs
($)
     Temporary
Living and
Home Leave
Costs
($)
     Housing
and Cost
of Living
Differential
($)
     Relocation
Expenses
($)
     Total
($)
Michael Corbat$16,500$0$0$0$0$16,500
John Gerspach$16,500$0$0$0$0$16,500
James Forese$16,500$0$0$0$0$16,500
Stephen Bird$16,500$0$0$0$0$16,500
Jane Fraser$16,500$0$0$0$0$16,500

All named executive officers received 401(k) plan matching contributions pursuant to the formula applicable to all eligible U.S. employees.
Mr. Bird had no expatriate benefits for 2018 but had significant tax equalization benefits for 2016 and 2017. He moved from Hong Kong to New York on an expatriate assignment effective July 1, 2015, with benefits provided under the general terms of Citi’s Expatriate Program. Mr. Bird’s expatriate assignment ended on December 31, 2016, at which time he became a U.S. local employee. Mr. Bird is not eligible for expatriate benefits for service after 2016. The benefits made available to Mr. Bird were fully in accordance with Citi’s Expatriate Program and are generally available to similarly situated employees who accept assignments outside their home countries. The Expatriate Program enables Citi to quickly fill specific business needs through relocating employees for a transitional period and neutralizing the tax and other personal financial consequences of the move. The tax equalization benefits were intended to limit Mr. Bird’s tax liabilities and related expenses to what they would have been had he remained employed in Hong Kong in 2016 and, as such, are not additional incentive compensation.
Mr. Corbat has reimbursed Citi for his personal use of corporate aircraft pursuant to an Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement with Citigroup Inc. For additional disclosure regarding the use of corporate aircraft, see page 39 of this Proxy Statement.

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION97101

(8)Set forth below is a breakdown of All Other Compensation for 2016 (including personal benefits):

     Name     Employer
Retirement Plan
Contribution
($)
     Tax
Reimbursement
Costs
($)
     Temporary
Living and
Home Leave
Costs
($)
     Housing
and Cost
of Living
Differential
($)
     Relocation
Expenses
($)
     Total
($)
Michael Corbat$15,900$14,383$0$0$0$30,283
John Gerspach$15,900$0$0$0$0$15,900
James Forese$15,900$0$0$0$0$15,900
Stephen Bird$24,141$4,780,613$39,559$145,581$133,091$5,122,985
Jane Fraser$15,900$0$0$2,830$0$18,730

Mr. Bird moved from Hong Kong to New York on an expatriate assignment effective July 1, 2015, with benefits provided under the general terms of Citi’s Expatriate Program. Mr. Bird’s expatriate assignment ended on December 31, 2016, at which time he became a U.S. local employee. Mr. Bird is not eligible for expatriate benefits for service after 2016. The benefits made available to Mr. Bird are fully in accordance with Citi’s Expatriate Program and are generally available to similarly situated employees who accept assignments outside their home countries. The Expatriate Program enables Citi to quickly fill specific business needs through relocating employees for a transitional period and neutralizing the tax and other personal financial consequences of the move. The tax equalization benefits shown above in the Tax Reimbursement Costs column are intended to limit Mr. Bird’s tax liabilities and related expenses to what they would have been had he remained employed in Hong Kong and, as such, are not additional incentive compensation. The disclosed amounts are based on the estimated tax equalization benefits accrued in respect of compensation paid in 2016, although the tax equalization payments may be made in later years and will not again appear in the Summary Compensation Table.
The tax reimbursement costs for Mr. Corbat and the housing costs for Ms. Fraser relate to assignments under Citi’s Expatriate Program that ended before 2016.
Mr. Corbat, Mr. Gerspach, Mr. Forese, and Ms. Fraser received 401(k) plan matching contributions pursuant to the formula applicable to all eligible U.S. employees. Mr. Bird received an employer contribution under the general terms of the Citi Hong Kong Retirement Plan, a broad-based defined contribution retirement plan.
Mr. Corbat has entered into an Aircraft Time Sharing Agreement with Citiflight, Inc. (a subsidiary of Citigroup Inc.) that permits him to reimburse Citi for the cost of his personal use of corporate aircraft in accordance with limits set forth in Federal Aviation Regulation 91.501(d). Mr. Corbat has reimbursed Citi for the flights in an amount equal to or exceeding the aggregate incremental cost of such flights during 2016.
(9)Mr. Forese’s reported compensation exceedsexceeded Mr. Corbat’s reported compensation forin 2016 and prior years in part because Mr. Forese was awarded Deferred Cash Awards in prior years when Mr. Corbat was awarded Performance Share Units;Units. Deferred Cash Awards are reported as Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation over time as they vest while Performance Share Units are reported in full as Stock Awards for the year of grant. Therefore, Mr. Forese has had significant amounts of prior year compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table that has not appearedwhile parallel compensation for Mr. Corbat.Corbat appeared in the Summary Compensation Table for earlier years. In addition, the 2016 Bonus column shows a significantly lower amount for Mr. Corbat than for Mr. Forese for 2016 in part because the Compensation Committee increased the percentage of Mr. Corbat’s deferral percentagecompensation deferred in the form of Deferred Stock Awards and Performance Share Units, both of which are reported in the Summary Compensation Table for awards granted for2017 rather than 2016, performance but did not increase the deferral percentage for any other named executive officer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Mr. Forese’s annual compensation has been comparable to Mr. Corbat’s in 2016 and prior years.Corbat’s. The Compensation Committee has recognized Mr. Forese’s performance in his franchise-wide role as Citi President in 2015 and 2016 as well as his role as CEO of Institutional Clients Group, with its broad range of complex products and services and its exceptional global scale. The Compensation Committee has also considered market levels of pay for the roles.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

98PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

20162018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The table below provides information regarding awards granted by the Compensation Committee to the named executive officers in 2016.2018. The values shown are each equity award’s grant date fair value as determined under applicable accounting standards.

Name  Grant Date       

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
       Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option Awards
($)(1)



Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards

Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option Awards
($)(1)
Name  Grant Date       Threshold
(#)
       Target
(#)
       Maximum
(#)
       Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Option Awards
($)(1)
     Grant Date     Threshold
(#)
     Target
(#)
     Maximum
(#)
     
0121,457(2)121,4572/15/20180101,088(2) 101,088$7,525,000
2/16/20160121,457(3)182,186$3,145,3562/15/20180101,088(3) 151,632$8,387,666
John Gerspach2/16/2016068,825(2)68,825$2,550,0002/15/2018042,315(2) 42,315$3,150,000
2/16/2016068,825(3)103,238$1,782,3682/15/2018042,315(3) 63,472$3,511,116
James Forese2/16/20160125,532(2)125,532$4,650,9862/15/2018078,586(2) 78,586$5,850,000
2/16/20160125,532(3)188,299$3,250,8912/15/2018078,586(3) 117,879$6,520,644
Stephen Bird2/16/2016064,775(2)64,775$2,399,9182/15/2018040,300(2) 40,300$3,000,000
2/16/2016064,775(3)97,162$1,366,3762/15/2018040,300(3) 60,450$3,343,920
Jane Fraser2/16/2016056,805(2)56,805$2,104,6412/15/2018032,240(2) 32,240$2,400,000
2/16/2016056,805(3)85,208$1,198,2632/15/2018032,240(3) 48,360$2,675,136

(1)The assumptions used in determining grant date fair value are the same as those set forth in footnote 54 to the 2018 Summary Compensation Table. These amounts do not necessarily represent the actual value that may be realized by the named executive officer. The amounts reported in the 2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for the Performance Share Units are the values at the grant date under applicable accounting principles, which take into account the probable outcome of the performance conditions. Consequently, these values differ from the nominal amount of the awards made by the Compensation Committee, which is divided by the Citi common stock price as determined on the grant date to yield a target number of Performance Share Units.
(2)These deferred stock awards granted under the Capital Accumulation ProgramDeferred Stock Awards were granted under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan for performance in 2015.2017. More detailed information about the terms of these awards appears on pages 90-91.page 95.
(3)These awards are Performance Share Units for performance in 2015.2017. More detailed information about the terms of these awards appears on page 68 and pages 89-90.94, except that the performance metrics for these awards are as follows:

     RoTCE for 2020Percent of Target
PSUs Earned
Cumulative EPS,
2018-2020
Percent of Target
PSUs Earned
Less than 9%0%Less than $19.000%
9%50%$19.0050%
13%100%$22.50100%
15% or more150%$25.00 or more150%

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

102PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20162018 Fiscal Year End

The market values in this tablebelow were computed using the closing price of a share of Citi common stock on December 31, 2016,2018, which was $59.43.$52.06.

Name    Option AwardsStock Awards
Option AwardsStock Awards
Name   Grant
Date
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
   Option
Exercise
Price
($)
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
    Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
    Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)
   Grant
Date
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
   Option
Exercise
Price
($)
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
   Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)
2/19/201317,841(1)td,060,2912/18/201517,055(1) $887,883
2/18/201439,263(2)$2,333,4002/16/201660,728(2) $3,161,500
2/18/2014    39,500(3)$2,347,4852/16/2016100,858(3) $5,250,667
2/18/201551,166(4)$3,040,7952/16/201762,463(4) $3,251,824
2/18/201550,996(5)$3,030,6922/16/201783,285(5) $4,335,817
2/16/2016        121,457(6)$7,218,1902/15/2018101,088(6) $5,262,641
2/16/201639,352(7)$2,338,6892/15/2018101,088(7) $5,262,641
John Gerspach2/18/201510,381(1) $540,435
2/16/201634,412(2)  $1,791,489
2/16/201657,153(3) $2,975,385
2/16/201732,506(4) $1,692,262
2/16/201743,342(5) $2,256,385
2/15/201842,315(6) $2,202,919
2/15/201842,315(7) $2,202,919
James Forese1/14/200929,745(8) $106.101/14/2019
1/14/200929,745(8) $178.501/14/2019
2/18/201519,317(1) $1,005,643
2/16/201662,766(2) $3,267,598
2/16/2016104,242(3) $5,426,839
2/16/201756,599(4) $2,946,544
2/16/201775,466(5) $3,928,760
2/15/201878,586(6) $4,091,187
2/15/201878,586(7) $4,091,187
Stephen Bird2/18/201511,160(1) $580,990
2/16/201632,387(2) $1,686,067
2/16/201653,789(3) $2,800,255
2/16/201732,508(4) $1,692,366
2/16/201743,344(5) $2,256,489
2/15/201840,300(6) $2,098,018
2/15/201840,300(7) $2,098,018
Jane Fraser2/18/20159,099(1) $473,694
2/16/201628,402(2) $1,478,608
2/16/201647,171(3) $2,455,722
2/16/201728,299(4) $1,473,246
2/16/201737,733(5) $1,964,380
2/15/201832,240(6) $1,678,414
2/15/201832,240(7) $1,678,414

(1)This Deferred Stock Award granted on February 18, 2015, vested in four equal annual installments beginning on January 20, 2016, subject to a performance-based vesting condition described on page 95.

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 20162018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION99103

Name               Option AwardsStock Awards
Grant
Date
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable
(#)
    Option
Exercise
Price
($)
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number
of Shares
or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
    Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
    Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)
John Gerspach2/19/201311,096(1)$659,435
2/18/201421,142(2)$1,256,469
2/18/201421,269(3)$1,264,017
2/18/201531,144(4)$1,850,888
2/18/201531,041(5)$1,844,767
2/16/201668,825(6)$4,090,270
2/16/201622,300(7)$1,325,289
James Forese1/14/2009        29,745(8)$106.101/14/2019
1/14/200929,745(8)$178.501/14/2019
2/19/201323,089(1)$1,372,179
2/18/201440,849(2)$2,427,656
2/18/201441,094(3)$2,442,216
2/18/201557,951(4)$3,444,028
2/18/201557,759(5)$3,432,617
2/16/2016       125,532(6)$7,460,367
2/16/201640,673(7)$2,417,196
Stephen Bird2/19/201311,145(1)$662,347
2/18/201420,476(2)$1,216,889
2/18/201420,600(3)$1,224,258
2/18/201533,481(4)$1,989,776
2/18/201533,370(5)$1,983,179
2/16/201664,775(6)$3,849,578
2/16/201620,987(7)$1,247,257
Jane Fraser2/18/2014     11,728(2)$696,995
2/16/201527,299(4)$1,622,380
2/16/201656,805(6)$3,375,921
2/16/201618,405(7)$1,093,809

(1)(2)This deferred stock awardDeferred Stock Award granted under the Capital Accumulation Program on February 19, 2013,16, 2016, vests in four equal annual installments beginning on January 20, 2014, subject to a performance-based vesting condition.
(2)This deferred stock award granted under the Capital Accumulation Program on February 18, 2014, vests in four equal annual installments beginning on January 20, 2015,2017, subject to a performance-based vesting condition except that Ms. Fraser’s award vested in three equal annual installments beginningdescribed on February 20, 2015.page 95.
(3)This Performance Share Unit award granted on February 18, 2014,16, 2016, vested in three equal annual installments beginning on January 20, 2014.2017, subject to performance conditions based on relative total shareholder return. The value of earned Performance Share Units is delivered in full after the end of the three-year performance period. Based on attainment of the performance metricsmetric of the award, approximately 50.3%83.0% of the target number of units was delivered to each executive. The performance period for the award ended on December 31, 2016. In accordance with SEC rules, the2018. The table presents the award values at December 31, 2016;2018; the values of the awards on the 20172019 delivery date are different and were determined using thean average Citi common stock price onas of the delivery dates,final vesting date (January 20, 2019), such that the realized values of the awards were as follows: Mr. Corbat, $2,331,968;$5,931,274; Mr. Gerspach, $1,255,675;$3,361,056; Mr. Forese, $2,426,144; and$6,130,284; Mr. Bird, $1,216,146.$3,163,239; and Ms. Fraser, $2,774,046.
(4)This deferred stock awardDeferred Stock Award granted under the Capital Accumulation Program on February 16, 2015, or February 18, 2015,2017, vests in four equal annual installments beginning on January 20, 2016,2018, subject to a performance-based vesting condition.condition described on page 95.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

100PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

(5)This Performance Share Unit award granted on February 18, 2015,16, 2017, vests in three equal annual installments beginning on January 20, 2016,2018, subject to performance conditions based on relative total shareholder return and average return on assets.tangible common equity and cumulative earnings per share. The value of earned Performance Share Units is delivered in full after the end of the three-year performance period. The table includes the entire value of Performance Share Units assuming that relative total shareholder return, average return on assets,100% of target for both performance metrics is achieved and the Citi common stock price at December 31, 2016, remain constant2018, remains unchanged through the end of the performance period in 2017.2019.
(6)This deferred stock awardDeferred Stock Award granted under the Capital Accumulation Program on February 16, 2016,15, 2018, vests in four equal annual installments beginning on January 20, 2017,2019, subject to a performance-based vesting condition.condition described on page 95.
(7)This Performance Share Unit award granted on February 16, 2016,15, 2018, vests in three equal annual installments beginning on January 20, 2017,2019, subject to performance conditions based on relative total shareholder return.return on tangible common equity and cumulative earnings per share. The value of earned Performance Share Units is delivered in full after the end of the three-year performance period. The table includes the entire value of Performance Share Units assuming that relative total shareholder return100% of target for both performance metrics is achieved and the Citi common stock price at December 31, 2016, remain constant2018, remains unchanged through the end of the performance period in 2018.2020.
(8)This stock option granted on January 14, 2009, vested in four equal annual installments beginning on January 14, 2010. The numbers of options and exercise prices have been adjusted for the 10-for-1 reverse stock split effective May 6, 2011.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 20162018

Name       Option Awards       Stock Awards
Option AwardsStock Awards
Name       Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
       Value Realized
on Exercise(1)
($)
       Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
       Value
Realized
on Vesting(2)
($)
     Number of
Shares Acquired
on Exercise
(#)
     Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
     Number of
Shares Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
     Value
Realized
on Vesting(1)
($)
17,392$966,000102,985$4,088,453152,752td1,893,893
John Gerspach17,392$966,00062,187$2,502,04188,485$6,888,431
James Forese18,108$997,75062,831$2,527,938163,473$12,725,657
Stephen Bird11,451$635,00046,770$1,881,74490,882$7,073,569
Jane Fraser32,009$1,261,81932,734$2,559,510

(1)The values in the Option Awards column reflect the exercise of options granted on February 14, 2011, under the one-time Executive Option Grant program.
(2)The values in the Stock Awards column reflect shares of deferred stock under the Capital Accumulation ProgramDeferred Stock Awards and Performance Share Units that were delivered to the named executive officers in 2016.2018.

www.citigroup.com


2016Table of Contents

104PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2018 Pension Benefits

Name       Plan Name       Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)
       Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit(1)
($)
Plan NameNumber of Years
Credited Service
(#)
     Present Value
of Accumulated
Benefit(1)
($)
Michael CorbatThe Citigroup Pension Plan24.4$114,598The Citigroup Pension Plan24.4$122,877
John Gerspach(2)The Citigroup Pension Plan17.7$491,323The Citigroup Pension Plan17.7$524,489
Supplemental ERISA Compensation Plan of Citibank, N.A. andSupplemental ERISA Compensation Plan of Citibank, N.A. and
Affiliates (Pay Cap Plan)
11.7$345,193
       Affiliates (Pay Cap Plan)11.7$326,000
James ForeseThe Citigroup Pension Plan24.5$106,036The Citigroup Pension Plan24.5$111,711
Stephen Bird
Jane Fraser

(1)The mortality table, plan discount rate, and payment form assumptions used in determining the present value of The Citigroup Pension Plan and Pay Cap Plan benefits are the same as the year-end 20162018 assumptions used to prepare Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup Inc. and its subsidiaries, as filed with the SEC on Form 10-K for 2016.2018. An interest crediting rate on cash balance plan benefits of 3.10%3.25% is also an assumption used in determining these present values. The interest crediting rate assumption is not required to be stated in that Note 8. Benefits in the 20162018 Pension Benefits Table have been calculated using a normal retirement age of 65, as defined in the plans.
(2)Mr. Gerspach has more years of credited service under The Citigroup Pension Plan than under the Pay Cap Plan because benefit accruals under the Pay Cap Plan ceased before benefit accruals under The Citigroup Pension Plan ceased.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION101

Citi’s policy is that executives should accrue retirement benefits on the same basis generally available to Citi employees under Citi’s broad-based, tax-qualified retirement plans. Citi has not granted extra years of credited service under any retirement plan to any of the named executive officers. Mr. Bird and Ms. Fraser have never been eligible to participate in a defined benefit pension plan under the terms of Citi’s broad-based retirement programs in effect in their employment countries; they have participated only in defined contribution retirement plans since the commencement of their employment at Citi.

The following describes the pension plans listed in the 20162018 Pension Benefits Table.

The Citigroup Pension Plan.The purpose of this broad-based, tax-qualified retirement plan is to provide retirement income on a tax-deferred basis to all eligible U.S. employees. Effective December 31, 2006, The Citigroup Pension Plan was closed to new members and generally ceased benefit accruals effective December 31, 2007. Mr. Corbat, Mr. Gerspach, and Mr. Forese are eligible for benefits under this plan. Mr. Corbat’s and Mr. Forese’s entire benefits are cash balance benefits, and Mr. Gerspach accrued a cash balance benefit from 2000 through 2007.

The Citigroup Pension Plan cash balance benefit is expressed as a hypothetical account balance. Prior to January 1, 2008, the plan generally provided for the annual accrual of benefit credits for most of the covered population, including the covered named executive officers, at a rate between 1.5% and 6% of eligible compensation; the benefit credit rate increased with age and service. Eligible compensation generally included base salary and incentive awards, but excluded compensation payable after termination of employment, certain non-recurring payments, and other benefits. Annual eligible compensation was limited by the Internal Revenue Code to $225,000 for 2007 (the final year of cash balance benefit accrual). Interest credits continue to be applied annually to each participant’s account balance; these credits are based on the yield on 30-year Treasury bonds (as published by the Internal Revenue Service).

Prior to 2000, Mr. Gerspach accrued a benefit under the Citibank Retirement Plan formula, which is a component of The Citigroup Pension Plan. That formula generally provided for an annual benefit of 2% of annual average compensation per year of service for up to 30 years of credited service plus 0.75% of average annual compensation for up to an additional five years of credited service, reduced by an offset based on an estimated Social Security benefit. Annual compensation included base salary and excluded bonus and incentive pay, and average annual compensation was the average of the five highest years of annual compensation out of the final 10 annual computation periods. Annual compensation was also subject to limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION105

Benefits under The Citigroup Pension Plan are payable in annuity form or in other optional forms. The benefits of Mr. Corbat, Mr. Gerspach, and Mr. Forese are payable in lump sum form after termination of employment; however, a portion of Mr. Forese’s benefit is not available asforms, including a lump sum, unless his employment with Citi terminates after he attains age 55 with at least 10 yearsupon termination of service.

employment. The Citigroup Pension Plan’s normal retirement age is 65. The portion of an eligible participant’s benefit determined under the Citibank Retirement Plan formula may be paid upon early retirement, which is defined for this purpose as the first day of the month after the later of the participant’s 55th birthday or the date on which the participant completes a year of service (as defined in the plan). Mr. Gerspach has attained eligibility for early retirement, and there would be no reduction in his benefits attributable to early retirement under the terms of the plan because he attained age 60 while employed.

Supplemental ERISA Compensation Plan of Citibank, N.A. and Affiliates (Pay Cap Plan).The Pay Cap Plan is an unfunded, nonqualified deferred compensation plan. The Pay Cap Plan provided benefits not otherwise provided under The Citigroup Pension Plan because of limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code on eligible pay and benefits. To the extent that a participant’s benefit was determined under the cash balance formula in The Citigroup Pension Plan, eligible compensation under the Pay Cap Plan was limited to $500,000 beginning January 1, 2000. Future benefit accruals under the Pay Cap Plan ceased effective January 1, 2002, for most participants in the plan, including Mr. Gerspach. Benefits under the Pay Cap Plan are payable at the same time as benefits are payable under The Citigroup Pension Plan; accordingly, Mr. Gerspach is eligible for early retirement and immediate commencement under the Pay Cap Plan.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

102PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

20162018 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Name and Plan     Executive
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year
($)
       Registrant
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year
($)
       Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal
Year(1)
($)
       Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions(2)
($)
       Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End(3)
($)
Michael Corbat
       Capital Accumulation Program$0$0($212,145)$741,136$0
John Gerspach
       Capital Accumulation Program$0$0($155,573)$543,499$0
       Citicorp Deferred Compensation Plan$0$0$214,389$0$1,633,522
James Forese
       Capital Accumulation Program$0$0($362,766)$1,267,343$0
Stephen Bird
       Capital Accumulation Program$0$0$0$0$0
Jane Fraser
       Capital Accumulation Program$0$0$0$0$0
Name and Plan     Executive
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year
($)
     Registrant
Contributions
in Last Fiscal
Year
($)
     Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal
Year(1)
($)
     Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
     Aggregate
Balance at
Last Fiscal
Year End(2)
($)
Michael Corbat
John Gerspach
Citicorp Deferred Compensation Plan
$0$0($129,480)$0$1,819,039
James Forese
Stephen Bird
Jane Fraser

(1)None of the amountsThe amount reported as “Aggregate Earnings in Last Fiscal Year” arewas not required to be reported in the 20162018 Summary Compensation Table. The table shows the aggregate realized or unrealized gains and losses on applicable Capital Accumulation Program shares held by the applicable named executive officer in the “Aggregate Earnings” column.
(2)The “Aggregate Withdrawals/Distributions” column shows the value of Capital Accumulation Program shares that were delivered to the applicable named executive officer during 2016.
(3)None of the amountsamount in the “Aggregate Balance at Last Fiscal Year End” column werewas not required to be reported in any prior year Summary Compensation Table.

The following is additional information on awardsthe plan shown in the 20162018 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.

Capital Accumulation Program.For many years, Citi has provided that a percentage of annual incentive awards must be made in the form of deferred stock under the Capital Accumulation Program. Under Capital Accumulation Program rules in effect before 2013, the shares were delivered in four equal annual installments beginning on January 20 of the year following the year of grant, but had no performance-based vesting provisions. Because of the absence of performance-based vesting conditions, employees who meet certain age and service requirements under the Rule of 60 as described on page 104 are considered to be vested in these Capital Accumulation Program awards for purposes of the 2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table even though the awards are delivered over a period of four years. Because the awards are considered to be vested for this purpose, those Capital Accumulation Program awards are reported in the above table as “nonqualified deferred compensation.” Mr. Bird and Ms. Fraser had not attained the Rule of 60 as of December 31, 2016, so their Capital Accumulation Program awards granted before 2013 are not considered to be “nonqualified deferred compensation” in the above table and are not shown there.

Citicorp Deferred Compensation Plan.Mr. Gerspach participates in the Citicorp Deferred Compensation Plan, which was closed in 2001 and provided for mandatory and voluntary deferrals of compensation from 1996 through 2000 for employees of Citicorp. All mandatory deferrals under the Citicorp Deferred Compensation Plan have been distributed to participants, but voluntary deferrals are notionally invested at the participant’s election in one of six pre-determined investment alternatives. Participants may change investment elections up to four times per year. All amounts deferred under the Citicorp Deferred Compensation Plan are fully vested and are distributed in a lump sum or installments at the participant’s election upon termination at or after the attainment of age 55.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change of Control

Mr. Gerspach’s Retirement.Mr. Gerspach retired as Citi CFO effective February 22, 2019, immediately following the filing of Citi’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. He retired from Citi employment effective March 1, 2019. Mr. Gerspach did not receive any special compensation as a result of his retirement.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

106PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

General Policies.Citi does not provide guaranteed executive severance or change of control agreements, and none of the named executive officers has an individually negotiated employment or separation agreement.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION103

Potential Payments Table.Set forth below is a table showing the estimated value of outstanding awards that would have been delivered over time to each named executive officer, had the applicable employment termination or other event occurred on December 31, 20162018 and assuming that all award vesting and performance conditions are satisfied. Unless the awards are forfeited, the awards shown in the Potential Payments Table vest on schedule following termination of employment and do not accelerate by their terms except in the case of death.

The closing price of Citi’s common stock on December 31, 20162018 ($59.43)52.06) was used in developing the estimates shown in the Potential Payments Table. The Potential Payments Table includes the value of outstanding Performance Share Units assuming that relative total shareholder return, average return on assets, and the Citi common stock price at December 31, 2016, remain constant through the end of the applicable performance periods.

Name     Change of
Control of
Citigroup
     Termination for
Gross Misconduct
     Involuntary
Termination
not for Gross
Misconduct
     Voluntary
Resignation or
Retirement, if
Not Forfeited
(1)
     Death or
Disability
Michael Corbat
       Capital Accumulation Program$0$0$13,652,676$13,652,676$13,652,676
       Performance Share Units$0$0$7,716,866$7,716,866$7,716,866
       Deferred Cash Awards$0$0$0$0$0
John Gerspach
       Capital Accumulation Program$0$0$7,857,062$7,857,062$7,857,062
       Performance Share Units$0$0$4,434,073$4,434,073$4,434,073
       Deferred Cash Awards$0 $0$0$0$0
James Forese   
       Capital Accumulation Program$0$0$14,704,230$14,704,230$14,704,230
       Performance Share Units$0$0$8,292,029$8,292,029$8,292,029
       Deferred Cash Awards$0$0$1,131,999$1,131,999$1,131,999
Stephen Bird
       Capital Accumulation Program$0$0$7,718,590$7,718,590$7,718,590
       Performance Share Units$0$0$4,454,694$4,454,694$4,454,694
       Deferred Cash Awards(2)$0$0$546,243$546,243$546,243
Jane Fraser
       Capital Accumulation Program$0$0$5,695,296$5,695,296$5,695,296
       Performance Share Units$0$0$1,093,809$1,093,809$1,093,809
       Deferred Cash Awards(3)$0$0$1,682,724$1,682,724$1,682,724
Name     Change of
Control of
Citigroup
($)
     Termination for
Gross Misconduct
($)
     Involuntary
Termination
not for Gross
Misconduct
($)
     Voluntary
Resignation or
Retirement
($)
     Death or
Disability
($)
Michael Corbat
Deferred Stock Awards$0$0$12,563,848$12,563,848$12,563,848
Performance Share Units(1)$0$0$14,849,125$14,849,125$14,849,125
Deferred Cash Awards$0$0$0$0$0
John Gerspach
Deferred Stock Awards$0$0$6,227,105$6,227,105$6,227,105
Performance Share Units(1)$0$0$7,434,741$7,434,741$7,434,741
Deferred Cash Awards$0$0$0$0$0
James Forese
Deferred Stock Awards$0$0$11,310,972$11,310,972$11,310,972
Performance Share Units(1)$0$0$13,446,838$13,446,838$13,446,838
Deferred Cash Awards$0$0$0$0$0
Stephen Bird
Deferred Stock Awards$0$0$6,057,441$6,057,441$6,057,441
Performance Share Units(1)$0$0$7,154,814$7,154,814$7,154,814
Deferred Cash Awards$0$0$0$0$0
Jane Fraser
Deferred Stock Awards$0$0$5,103,962$5,103,962$5,103,962
Performance Share Units(1)$0$0$6,098,568$6,098,568$6,098,568
Deferred Cash Awards(2)$0$0$437,751$437,751$437,751

(1)

Mr. Corbat, Mr. Gerspach, and Mr. Forese have attained years of age and service sufficient to satisfy the Rule of 60 as described on page 104. As a result, their awards disclosed in theThe Potential Payments Table may vest on schedule after voluntary resignation or retirement ifincludes (a) the executive is not employed by a “significant competitor;”value of the executive forfeitsPerformance Share Units granted in February 2016 assuming that relative total shareholder return and the awards if he is employed by a “significant competitor.” Mr. Bird and Ms. Fraser had not attained years of age and service sufficient to satisfy the Rule of 60 as of December 31, 2016. Therefore, if Mr. Bird or Ms. Fraser had resigned voluntarilyCiti common stock price at December 31, 2016, he or she would have forfeited his or her unvested deferred awards, unless he or she became employed2018, remained unchanged through the final vesting date; and (b) the value of the Performance Share Units granted in an “alternative career.” UnderFebruary 2017 and February 2018 assuming that Performance Share Units are earned at 100% of target levels and that the “alternative career” provisions of Citi’s incentive compensation programs available to over 7,900 employees globally, employees may continue to vest in their deferred awards if they resign from Citi to work full-time in government orcommon stock price at a charitable organization or to teach full-time at an educational institution.December 31, 2018, remains unchanged through the final vesting date.

(2)Mr. Bird’s Deferred Cash Awards are denominated in Hong Kong dollars as they were awarded for years in which he was employed in Hong Kong. The amounts presented above for Mr. Bird are shown as converted from Hong Kong dollars to U.S. dollars at the December 31, 2016, conversion rate used to prepare Citi’s financial statements (0.12895904 U.S. dollars = 1 Hong Kong dollar).
(3)

Ms. Fraser’s Deferred Cash Awards are denominated in British pounds as they were awarded for years in which she was employed in London. The amounts presented above for Ms. Fraser are shown as converted from British pounds to U.S. dollars at the December 31, 2016,2018, conversion rate used to prepare Citi’s financial statements (1.2362(1.2736 U.S. dollars = 1 British pound).

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

104PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Capital Accumulation Program;Deferred Stock Awards; Rule of 60.Deferred stock awardedStock Awards granted to the named executive officers under the Capital Accumulation Program vests2014 Stock Incentive Plan vest over a period of four years subject to performance conditions. Capital Accumulation Program awardsDeferred Stock Awards provide for accelerated vesting if a participant dies but provide for vesting on schedule in all other circumstances in which vesting occurs after termination of employment. If a participant’s combined years of age and service meet the Rule of 60 at the time he or she voluntarily resigns, the participant’s Capital Accumulation Program sharesDeferred Stock Awards will continue to vest on schedule over the four-year period, provided he or she does not work for a “significant competitor” during the vesting period. A participant meets the Rule of 60 if his or her age plus full years of service equalequals at least 60 and he or she either: (i) is at least age 50 with at least five full years of service; or (ii) is under age 50 with at least 20 full years of service. Partial years of age and service are each rounded down to the nearest whole number. In contrast, if a participant does not meet the Rule of 60 and voluntarily resigns, any unvested Capital Accumulation ProgramDeferred Stock Awards shares are forfeited, unless the participant becomes employed in an “alternative career.”

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION107

Under the “alternative career” provisions of Citi’s Capital Accumulation Program,Deferred Stock Awards, employees may continue to vest in their deferred awards if they resign from Citi to work full-time in government or at a charitable organization or to teach full-time at an educational institution. As of December 31, 2016, allAll of the named executive officers except Mr. Bird and Ms. Fraser had attained the Rule of 60.60 prior to 2018, so none of them are eligible for the “alternative career” provisions, and each of them would be eligible for continued vesting following resignation without regard to whether they pursued an “alternative career.”

Performance Share Units.Performance Share Units have the same vesting provisions covering termination of employment as those applicable to Citi’s Capital Accumulation Program,Deferred Stock Awards, including the Rule of 60. Any named executive officer who meets the Rule of 60 will receive his or her earned Performance Share Units unless: (i) he or she voluntarily resigns during the performance period and performs services for a competitor, or (ii) he or she is terminated for gross misconduct (in which case the undelivered award is cancelled). If a named executive officer who meets the Rule of 60 resigns and competes, at the end of the performance period, he or she will forfeit a prorated Performance Share Unit award, based on his or her service during the performance period. For example, if such a named executive officer resigns after the first year of the performance period to work for a competitor, he or she will receive one-third of the earned Performance Share Units after the end of the three-year performance period and the other two-thirds will be forfeited. A named executive officer who does not meet the Rule of 60 will also receive this pro rata vesting if he or she resigns.

Deferred Cash Awards.Deferred Cash Awards were granted to senior executives before the creation of our Performance Share Unit program and are also granted to executives who are not eligible for Performance Share Units, which are awarded only to the CEO and executives who report directly to him. Like our Performance Share Units, Deferred Cash Awards represent 50% of each executive’s deferred incentive award for the applicable performance year with deferred stock awarded under the Capital Accumulation ProgramDeferred Stock Awards representing the other 50%. Deferred Cash Awards are a fixed amount that earns notional interest at a fixed market rate and vests over a period of four years. The treatment of Deferred Cash Award Plan awardsAwards upon termination of employment is the same as Capital Accumulation Program awards.the treatment of Deferred Stock Awards.

“Double Trigger” Change of Control Requirement.Citi’s 2014 Stock Incentive Plan has a “double trigger” requirement, which provides that an involuntary termination of employment not for gross misconduct must occur as a result of a “change of control” of Citi before any vesting of equity awards may occur in connection with the change of control. The 2019 Stock Incentive Plan, which is subject to stockholder approval at the 2019 Annual Meeting pursuant to Proposal 4 of this Proxy Statement, has the same provision. In addition, the Compensation Committee has a policy that equity awards granted to executive officers will not be accelerated solely by reason of a change of control of Citigroup Inc. The intent of the policy is for such a change of control to have no impact on the applicable awards. The same change of control provisions apply to Citi’s Performance Share Units and Deferred Cash Awards.

Under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, a “change of control” means: (i) a person acquiring direct or indirect beneficial ownership of Citigroup Inc. securities representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of then outstanding securities of Citigroup Inc.; (ii) specified changes in the majority of the Board (not including the election of Directors whose election or nomination was approved by a majority of the then incumbent Board); (iii) a sale, transfer, or distribution of all or substantially all of the assets of Citigroup Inc. or a dissolution or liquidation of Citigroup Inc.; or (iv) consummation of a reorganization, merger, consolidation, or other corporate transaction that results in stockholders of Citigroup Inc. not owning more than 50% of the combined voting power of Citigroup Inc. or other corporation resulting from the transaction.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION105

Equity Compensation Plan Information

All of Citi’s outstanding equity awards have been granted under stockholder approved plans, principally the 2014 The 2019 Stock Incentive Plan andhas the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan. There are no awards outstanding under plans for which stockholder approval was not required or sought. The information below is as of December 31, 2016.same provision.

Plan Category     (a)
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(in millions)
     (b)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
     (c)
Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(in millions)
Equity compensation plans approved by 
       security holders44.31(1) $131.7852.11
Equity compensation plans not
       approved by security holders0N/A0
Total44.31$131.7852.11

(1)Includes 42.78 million shares issuable upon the vesting of deferred stock awards. As such, these awards do not have an exercise price; only the 1.53 million outstanding options are considered when determining the weighted-average exercise price in column (b).

Management Analysis of Potential Adverse Effects of Compensation Plans

Citi has adopted multiple coordinated strategies to manage the risk of material adverse effects to the franchise through the design and administration of its incentive compensation programs, including those applicable to the named executive officers. During 2016,2018, Citi continued its efforts to align its processes with the U.S. Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies and the Financial Stability Board’s Principles for Sound Compensation Practices. Citi’s approach to risk and incentive compensation plans is detailed on pages 92-9395-97 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.this Proxy Statement. On the basis of the foregoing analysis, management has concluded that Citi’s compensation plans are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Citi.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

106108PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees to the annual total compensation of our CEO. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

For 2018, the median annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than the CEO) was $49,766, and the annual total compensation of our CEO was $24,195,749.(1)
Based on this information, for 2018, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median annual total compensation of all employees was estimated to be 486 to 1.

CEO Pay Ratio Supplemental Information

Citi aims to provide competitive pay and benefits for each employee’s role in every business and geography. Market levels of pay are therefore important factors in determining pay for every role at Citi, including senior executive roles. In addition, Citi’s business mix and global footprint drive the median pay level at Citi. Over 65% of our workforce is employed outside the U.S., and 52% of our workforce is employed in Global Consumer Banking.

HEADCOUNT AT DECEMBER 31, 2018
By Business or Function      By Region

(2)

Includes Finance, Human Resources, Independent Compliance Risk Management, Legal, Risk Management, and headcount attributable to legacy assets and operations. Additional Compliance and Risk Management staff are included in business headcounts.

How We Calculated the Ratio

The “median annual total compensation of all employees” is the annual total compensation of a single employee who is at the midpoint of employees ranked in order of compensation amounts. When determining our midpoint, we considered compensation of 204,147 Citi employees (other than the CEO) who were employed by Citi on December 31, 2018, in about 100 countries. We did not exclude any countries and we did not make any adjustments for the cost of living.

(1)

This number is the sum of the 2018 total compensation reported in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table and the value of employer contributions to broad-based employee benefit plans not already included in the Summary Compensation Table.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE CITI’S 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION109

SEC regulations allow employers to identify the midpoint based on a “consistently applied compensation measure” (CACM). We used 2018 base pay and cash payments under our incentive compensation plans as our CACM to determine the midpoint of our employee population. We chose this CACM because these two pay elements were consistently available across all countries in which we have employees.
Where full year information from our formulaic incentive compensation plans was not available, we estimated such amounts using third quarter payments as a proxy for fourth quarter payments, consistent with the design of the plans and our experience with the data. The incentive compensation plans for Citi employees with compensation in the range of our midpoint generally have quarterly payment schedules.
Compensation paid in foreign currency was converted to U.S. dollars using a monthly average.
We did not consider discretionary cash incentives, equity awards, or deferred cash awards as part of the analysis because all employees eligible for discretionary incentives, equity awards, or deferred cash awards are paid well above our midpoint, and therefore, including or excluding such compensation would not affect our midpoint.
As permitted by SEC regulations, we then calculated the “annual total compensation” for a group of representative employees with compensation at or very near our midpoint (our “midpoint group”). We used the annual total compensation of the employee with annual total compensation at approximately the median of our midpoint group to determine our CEO pay ratio.
In determining the “annual total compensation” for each employee in our midpoint group, we followed the methodology required under SEC regulations for calculating the total compensation of our named executive officers as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, and, as permitted under the SEC regulations, added the value of employer contributions to broad-based employee benefit plans not already included in the Summary Compensation Table.
The SEC rules for identifying the median-paid employee and calculating the CEO pay ratio allow companies to apply various methodologies and assumptions and, as a result, the CEO pay ratio reported by Citi may not be comparable to the CEO pay ratio reported by other companies.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

110 

Proposal 4: Advisory Vote to ApproveApproval of the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive CompensationCitigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan

Pursuant to Section 14AOn the recommendation of the Exchange Act,Compensation Committee, the Board has unanimously approved the Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2019 Plan), which will become effective on April 16, 2019, if approved by stockholders at our Annual Meeting. Upon approval, the 2019 Plan will become the only equity compensation plan under which we are asking our stockholderswill grant shares. Currently, we grant equity awards exclusively under the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2014 Plan), and the 2014 Plan will expire by its terms on April 16, 2019. The 2019 Plan is proposed to vote on whether future advisory votes on executive compensationreplace the 2014 Plan. The discussion and description of the nature reflected2019 Plan that follows is qualified in Proposal 3 should occur every year, every two years, or every three years.

After careful consideration, our Board recommends that future advisory votes on executive compensation occur every year (annually). We believe that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation isits entirety by the most appropriate option for us because it will allow our stockholders to provide more frequent, direct input on our compensation policies and practices, and the resulting compensation for our named executive officers. Stockholders will have the opportunity to consider our most recent compensation decisions and focus on increasing long-term stockholder value, and to provide feedback to us in a timely way. The Board also believes an annual advisory stockholder vote promotes corporate transparency and accountability for the Personnel and Compensation Committee.

Making this recommendation, the Board took into account that a majoritytext of the votes cast at our 2011 Annual Meeting voted in favor of holding an annual advisory vote on executive compensation. In addition, we are aware of the significant interest in executive compensation matters by investors and the general public, and value and encourage constructive dialogue with our stockholders on these matters. We understand2019 Plan that our stockholders may have different viewsis included as to what is the best approach for the Board of Directors, and we look forward to hearing from our stockholders on this proposal.

This advisory resolution is non-binding on our Board. Although we currently believe that holding an advisory vote on executive compensation every year would reflect the right balance of considerations in the normal course, we will continue to periodically reassess that view and can provide for an advisory vote on executive compensation on a less frequent basis if long-term stability in our compensation program or other circumstances suggest that such a vote frequency would be more appropriate.Annex B.

Board Recommendation



The Board recommends that you voteFORapproval of anANNUALthe Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan, as described in Proposal 4.

Executive Summary

30 million shares requested.
Key facts:
42.40 million shares reserved for issuance and available for grant under the 2014 Plan as of December 31, 2018,
33.00 million shares subject to outstanding awards under the 2014 Plan and its predecessor plan as of December 31, 2018, and
2,340.5 million total shares of Citi common stock outstanding as of the record date.
We have strong equity award practices, including limiting the percentage of deferred incentive pay awarded in stock, stock ownership requirements for executive officers, and clawbacks.
Important terms of the 2019 Plan are aligned with stockholder advisory vote regardinginterests, including a minimum one-year vesting requirement applicable to at least 95% of the shares granted under the plan, stringent change of control provisions, an annual limit on the number of shares and stock options and SARs that may be granted to employees, and prohibitions on option repricings, reload options, and discounted stock options. The 2019 Plan has a fixed number of shares available for grant and limits on dividends and dividend equivalent payments.
Significant changes from the terms of the 2014 Plan:
We changed our limit on Director pay. The 2014 Plan limited Director equity awards to $900,000 annually; the 2019 Plan limits each Director’s compensation (whether in the form of cash or equity) to $1 million annually, except where the Board of Directors approves a higher limit for a non-executive Board chair.
We changed our minimum vesting provision from three years applicable to 90% of plan shares to one year applicable to 95% of plan shares.
Although we eliminated language relating to qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, we retained annual limits on stock and option/SAR grants to any individual.
We added explicit authority to adopt sub-plans, and we intend to adopt a sub-plan to offer tax-qualified awards in France.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE CITIGROUP 2019 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN111

Shares Requested

The initial share authorization of the 2019 Plan will be 30 million shares, which is estimated to be approximately equal to the shares that would no longer be available for grant upon the expiration of the 2014 Plan. This initial share authorization is intended to support grant activity for at least one to two years, and we expect to continue our practice of asking stockholders to approve additional share authorizations under the 2019 Plan, as frequently as annually, thereafter. The 2019 Plan will expire by its terms on the date of the annual general meeting of stockholders in 2024.

Our Equity Award Practices Are Aligned with Stockholder Interests

Equity compensation aligns employee and stockholder interests.Citi’s equity awards are a key component of annual incentive awards for thousands of employees worldwide, thereby aligning the interests of stockholders and a broader group of Citi employees (not just senior executives). In 2018, approximately 7,350 employees in 63 countries received equity awards under the 2014 Plan as part of their annual incentive awards.

Citi has prudent equity award practices.
Our equity pay mix minimizes dilution from our executive compensation programs.Under our current executive compensation practices, 50% of the deferred portion of named executive officer incentive compensation is payable in deferred stock awards with performance-based vesting features, and 50% is payable in performance share units that are paid in cash with a value linked to the value of Citi common stock.This practice links all named executive officer deferred compensation to the value of Citi common stock, yet will limit the use of shares under the 2019 Plan.
All deferred equity awards have clawbacks.Citi’s equity awards are subject to one or more clawbacks that provide for cancellation in a range of circumstances, as set forth on page 97.
Stock ownership requirements.Executive officers are generally required to hold at least 75% of the net after-tax shares acquired through Citi’s incentive compensation programs as long as they are executive officers. In addition to that stock ownership commitment, effective January 1, 2013, executive officers are required to retain at least 50% of the shares subject to the stock ownership commitment for one year after ceasing to be an executive officer, as a result of leaving Citi employment or otherwise.
Share buybacks have the incidental effect of offsetting dilution from equity compensation programs.In 2018, Citi continued the meaningful return of capital to stockholders through common stock repurchases and dividends, following common stock repurchase programs in each of the prior four years.
Equity compensation helps Citi to comply with its regulatory obligations.Regulatory guidance in the U.S. and in other countries in which Citi does business provides that a substantial portion of variable compensation awarded to Citigroup’s named executive officers.senior executives and other employees whose actions have a material impact on the risk exposure of Citi should be awarded in shares.

Run Rate Table

Our run rate is the number of shares subject to equity awards granted during a year stated as a percentage of common shares outstanding for such year, based on annual grant data and the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding as reported in Citigroup’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for such year.

2016    2017    2018    Three-year
average
Run rates for 12-month periods ending December 310.81%0.52%0.52%0.62%

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

112PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE CITIGROUP 2019 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Overhang Table

“Overhang” refers to the potential stockholder dilution represented by outstanding employee equity awards and shares available for future grants.

     December 31, 2018(1)     April 16, 2019
(estimated)(2)
Simple overhang(3)3.18%2.69%
Fully diluted overhang(4)3.09%2.62%

(1)The following data as of December 31, 2018, was used in the calculation of overhang percentages: outstanding equity awards under the 2014 Plan and its predecessor (unvested stock awards of 32.24 million and unexercised stock options of 0.76 million, totaling 33.00 million shares); shares available for grant under the 2014 Plan (42.40 million); and common shares outstanding (2,368.5 million).
(2)Our overhang estimates at April 16, 2019, are based on the assumptions that the number of shares subject to outstanding awards on that date is the same as the number outstanding on December 31, 2018, and Proposal 4 is approved by stockholders such that 30 million shares will be available for future grants under the 2019 Plan. For purpose of this estimate, we have used the common shares outstanding as of the record date, which was 2,340.5 million.
(3)Simple overhang is the sum of outstanding equity awards and shares available for grant under the applicable plan stated as a percentage of common shares outstanding.
(4)Fully diluted overhang is the sum of outstanding equity awards and shares available for grant under the plan or plans stated as a percentage of fully diluted common shares (i.e., common shares outstanding plus outstanding equity awards and shares available for grant under the applicable plan).

The preceding Run Rate Table and the Overhang Table demonstrate our prudent use of shares.

Our Plan Terms Are Aligned with Stockholder Interests

The following features of the 2019 Plan protect the interests of our stockholders:

No “evergreen” feature.The 2019 Plan has a fixed number of shares available for grant that will not automatically increase because of an “evergreen” feature.
Minimum one-year vesting requirement.Our one-year minimum vesting requirement will generally apply to at least 95% of the shares that may be granted pursuant to any type of award.
A limit on total annual compensation for Directors.The maximum number of shares subject to awards to an individual Director in a calendar year, taken together with any cash fees paid during the calendar year to the Director for services as a member of the Board, may not exceed $1 million in value, except where the Board of Directors approves a higher limit for a non-executive Board chair.
Retention of annual limits on shares and options or SARs that can be granted to employees.Although no longer required to meet the performance-based compensation exception to the $1 million deduction limitation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, the one million share limit on shares subject to stock options and SARs that may be granted in a calendar year, and the one million share limit on stock awards that may be granted in a calendar year, that had been included in the 2014 Plan, are retained in the 2019 Plan.
No discounted options or SARs.Option or SAR exercise prices must be at least 100% of fair market value on the date an option or SAR is granted.
No repricings or cash buyouts.The 2019 Plan prohibits any “repricing” of any outstanding option or SAR, except with the approval of the stockholders of the Company. The 2019 Plan defines “repricing” to mean (i) any action that constitutes a “repricing” under GAAP or the rules of the NYSE (including any modification or amendment to an outstanding option or SAR that has the effect of reducing its exercise price); (ii) any cancellation of an outstanding option or SAR when its exercise price exceeds its fair market value in exchange for cash; (iii) any cancellation of an option or SAR in exchange for a new option or SAR with a lower exercise price; or (iv) a substitution of a stock award for an option or SAR when its exercise price exceeds fair market value; in each case other than a permitted equitable adjustment.

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE CITIGROUP 2019 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN113

No reload option grants.Reload options are additional options that are granted automatically upon the exercise of previously granted options; options granted under the 2019 Plan may not include a reload feature.
No liberal share “recycling.”If an award under the 2019 Plan, or, after April 16, 2019, the 2014 Plan and the 2009 Plan, is forfeited, cancelled, or expires or is settled without the issuance of shares, the shares subject to such award will be available for future grants under the 2019 Plan. However, the 2019 Plan prohibits re-granting shares withheld or tendered to pay option exercise prices, repurchased by the Company with option exercise proceeds, or withheld or tendered to satisfy tax withholding obligations on any award. Also, shares of stock subject to SARs that are not issued on settlement may not be re-granted.
No dividend or dividend equivalent payments on unvested shares subject to a performance vesting condition.The 2019 Plan permits payment of dividends or dividend equivalents on shares of restricted or deferred stock subject to a performance vesting condition only if and when the underlying shares vest. The 2019 Plan also prohibits the payment of dividends and dividend equivalents on shares subject to outstanding options and SARs.
A “double trigger” change of control provision.The 2019 Plan requires that participants must experience an involuntary termination of employment for an award to vest as a result of a change of control of Citigroup Inc. (a “double trigger”). The Compensation Committee has also adopted a policy affirming that no deferred incentive awards to executive officers will vest solely by reason of a change of control of Citigroup Inc.
No excise tax gross-ups.The 2019 Plan does not provide for excise tax gross-ups in the event of a change of control of Citigroup Inc., nor do any executive agreements.
No liberal definition of change of control.Our definition of “change of control” of Citigroup Inc. requires the consummation, and not merely the approval, of a reorganization, merger, consolidation, or other corporate transaction that results in stockholders of Citigroup Inc. not owning more than 50% of the combined voting power of Citigroup Inc. or other corporation resulting from such transaction. Additionally, the 2019 Plan defines a “change of control” of Citigroup Inc. to mean (i) a person acquiring direct or indirect beneficial ownership of Citigroup Inc. securities representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of then outstanding securities of Citigroup Inc.; (ii) specified changes in the majority of the Board (not including the election of Directors whose election or nomination was approved by a majority of the then incumbent Board); or (iii) a sale, transfer, or distribution of all or substantially all of the assets of Citigroup Inc., or a dissolution or liquidation of Citigroup Inc.
Ability to adopt sub-plans that facilitate participation by employees located outside the United States.Any special terms or conditions that the Compensation Committee considers necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in non-U.S. law, tax policy, or custom may be included in a sub-plan that forms a part of the 2019 Plan. We intend to adopt a sub-plan that will permit awards that qualify for special tax benefits in France.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

All of Citi’s outstanding equity awards have been granted under two stockholder-approved plans—the 2014 Plan and its predecessor, the 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2009 Plan). There are no equity awards outstanding under plans for which stockholder approval was not required or sought. The information below is as of December 31, 2018.

Plan Category     (a)
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants, and rights
(in millions)
     (b)
Weighted-average
exercise price
of outstanding
options, warrants,
and rights
($)
     (c)
Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(in millions)
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders33.00(1)$101.8442.40
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders0N/A0
Total33.00$101.8442.40

(1)Includes 32.24 million shares issuable upon the vesting of deferred stock awards. As such, these awards do not have an exercise price; only the 0.76 million outstanding options are considered when determining the weighted-average exercise price in column (b).

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

114PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE CITIGROUP 2019 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

New Plan Benefits

Awards under the 2019 Plan will be granted by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. Therefore, the benefits or amounts that will be received by any particular employee or group of employees in the future is not determinable at this time.

Description of the Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan

This summary description of the 2019 Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the 2019 Plan document, which is included as Annex B to this Proxy Statement. If Proposal 4 is approved by stockholders at our Annual Meeting, we intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8, pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to register the shares authorized for grant under the 2019 Plan.

General.If Proposal 4 is approved by stockholders, the 2019 Plan will become effective on April 16, 2019 and will expire on the date of the annual general meeting of stockholders to be held in 2024. The 2019 Plan provides for various types of awards denominated in shares of Citi common stock to Citi employees, officers, and non-employee Directors. The NYSE closing price of a share of Citi common stock on February 26, 2019 was $64.12.

Administration.The 2019 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee. All members of such Committee or a sub-committee thereof must satisfy the requirements for independence of SEC Rule 16b-3. With respect to participants who are outside Directors, the 2019 Plan is administered by the Board. The Compensation Committee may delegate some or all of its authority over administration of the 2019 Plan to one or more officers, directors, employees, or another plan administrator except with respect to persons who are Section 16(a) officers. In addition, any special terms or conditions that the Compensation Committee considers necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in non-U.S. law, tax policy or custom may be included a sub-plan that forms a part of the 2019 Plan.

Eligibility.All “employees” of Citi—within the broad definition set forth in the instructions to the SEC Form S-8 registration statement, as in effect on April 16, 2019, but expressly excluding consultants and advisors who are not members of the Board—generally are eligible to receive awards under the 2019 Plan. Based on worldwide employment at December 31, 2018, approximately 204,000 persons could be eligible to participate in the 2019 Plan. However, participation is discretionary—awards are subject to approval by the Compensation Committee. In general, employees with discretionary annual incentive awards of at least $100,000 are eligible to receive at least 25% of that annual award in deferred stock. In 2019 through February 26, 2019, awards were made under the 2014 Plan to 16 non-employee Directors, 17 executive officers, and approximately 7,350 employees worldwide. Former “employees” are eligible to participate in the 2019 Plan, but only with respect to their last year of service or substitute awards to replace awards granted by a prior employer acquired by the Company.

Shares subject to the 2019 Plan.Shares of Citi common stock issued in connection with awards under the 2019 Plan may be shares that are authorized but unissued, or previously issued shares that have been reacquired, or both. The initial share authorization under the 2019 Plan is 30 million shares. (The shares authorized under the 2019 Plan is estimated to be approximately equal to number of shares that would no longer be available for grant upon expiration of the 2014 Plan.)

“Recycling” provisions.If an award under the 2019 Plan, or, after April 16, 2019, the 2014 Plan and the 2009 Plan, is forfeited, cancelled, or expires or is settled without the issuance of shares, the shares subject to such award will be available for future grants under the 2019 Plan. However, shares tendered by a participant or withheld by Citi to pay an option exercise price, withheld or tendered to satisfy tax withholding obligations relating to any award, repurchased by Citi with option exercise proceeds, covered by a stock-settled SAR (without regard to the number of shares actually issued upon exercise) or withheld to satisfy any debt or other obligation owed to Citi, and cancelled fractional shares will be considered issued and shall not be added to the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the 2019 Plan.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE CITIGROUP 2019 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN115

Limits on awards.The maximum number of shares subject to awards to an individual Director in a calendar year (including awards made at the election of a Director in lieu of his or her cash retainer), taken together with any cash fees paid during the calendar year to the Director, in respect of the Director’s service as a member of the Board during such year (including service as a member or chair of any committees of the Board), may not exceed $1,000,000 in value, as determined as of the date of each award. However, the independent members of the Board may make exceptions to this limit for a non-executive chair of the Board, provided that the Director receiving any additional compensation may not participate in the decision to award such compensation. For all other eligible “employees,” the number of shares subject to stock options or SARs granted during a calendar year may not exceed one million shares, and the number of shares that may be subject to stock awards granted in a calendar year may not exceed one million shares, unless granted subject to substitute awards that replace awards of a former employer acquired by the Company.

Types of awards.The following types of awards may be made under the 2019 Plan:

Stock options. An award of a stock option under the 2019 Plan grants a participant the right to purchase a specified number of shares of Citi common stock during a specified term in the future at an exercise price equal to at least 100% of the “fair market value” (see below) of Citi common stock on the grant date. The term of a stock option may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant.
Stock appreciation rights (SARs). A SAR, upon exercise, entitles the participant to receive an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of Citi common stock on the exercise date and the exercise price of the SAR (which may not be less than 100% of fair market value of a share of Citi common stock on the grant date) times the number of shares subject to the SAR. Payment to a participant upon the exercise of a SAR may be in cash and/or shares of Citi common stock.
Definition of “fair market value.” For purposes of setting the exercise price of any option or SAR granted under the 2019 Plan, “fair market value” means the closing price on the NYSE (or on the principal national securities exchange on which the common stock is traded or quoted, if not the NYSE) on the date on which the stock option or SAR is granted. For all other purposes under the 2019 Plan, “fair market value” will be as determined by the Compensation Committee.
Stock payment. The Compensation Committee may grant vested shares of Citi common stock as a stock payment.
Restricted stock. A restricted stock award is an award of outstanding shares of Citi common stock that does not vest until vesting conditions are satisfied and which will be forfeited if conditions to vesting are not met. Unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, participants who receive awards of restricted stock are also generally entitled to direct the voting of the unvested shares underlying their awards on matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. All shares underlying outstanding (unvested) restricted stock awards as to which no voting instructions are received are voted proportionately, based on the voting instructions received with respect to all other restricted shares. Participants may receive dividends on the shares subject to their awards during the vesting period, unless the awards are subject to one or more performance conditions, in which case the dividends, if any, shall be paid only if and when, and only to the extent that, the underlying shares vest.
Deferred stock. A deferred stock award is an unfunded, unsecured promise to deliver shares of Citi common stock to the participant in the future, if the participant satisfies the conditions to vesting. Participants do not have voting rights (their rights are no greater than a general unsecured creditor of the Company), but may receive dividend equivalent payments during the vesting period, unless the awards are subject to one or more performance conditions, in which case the dividend equivalents, if any, shall be paid to participants only if and when, and only to the extent that, the underlying shares vest.
Other stock-based awards. The Compensation Committee may grant any other award that is denominated in shares of Citi common stock and that may be settled by the delivery of shares and/or cash. For the avoidance of doubt, awards that by their terms shall be settled only in cash shall not be considered to have been granted under the 2019 Plan.
Performance-based awards. Subject to the terms of the 2019 Plan, the Compensation Committee may grant awards that are subject to one or more performance conditions related to a performance period of not less than one year.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

116PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE CITIGROUP 2019 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Minimum vesting requirement.Awards granted under the 2019 Plan may not vest earlier than the first anniversary of the date on which the award is granted, except that the Compensation Committee may grant awards that vest in less than a year (i) as a “substitute award” to replace awards of a former employer acquired by the Company, (ii) awards to Directors that vest on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the next annual meeting of stockholders which is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting, and (iii) any additional awards the Compensation Committee may grant, up to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the available share reserve authorized for issuance under the 2019 Plan. This restriction does not apply to the Compensation Committee’s discretion to provide for accelerated exercisability or vesting of any award, including in cases of retirement, death, disability, leave of absence, termination of employment, change of control, or upon the sale or other disposition of the subsidiary employing a participant or other similar event.

Performance conditions.In the case of an award subject to a performance condition, the applicable performance condition may include one or more of the following performance conditions and be expressed in either, or a combination of, absolute or relative values or a percentage of: revenue, revenue or product growth, net income (pre-or after-tax), earnings, earnings per share, stockholders’ equity or return on stockholders’ equity, assets or return on assets, return on risk-adjusted assets, capital or return on capital, return on risk capital, book value or book value per share, economic value-added models or equivalent metrics, operating income, pre- or after-tax income, expenses or reengineering savings, margins, cash flow or cash flow per share, stock price, total shareholder return, market share, debt reduction, net promoter scores, operating efficiency ratios, expense ratios, liquidity ratios, regulatory achievements, or any objective or subjective performance conditions selected by the Compensation Committee.

Prohibition against repricing.The 2019 Plan prohibits any action under the 2019 Plan that would constitute a ”repricing” of any outstanding option or SAR granted under the 2019 Plan, the 2014 Plan, the 2009 Plan or any other plan of the Company or of any acquired company, except with the approval of the stockholders of the Company. The 2019 Plan defines “repricing” to mean (i) any action that constitutes a “repricing” under GAAP or the rules of the NYSE (including any modification or amendment to an outstanding option or SAR that has the effect of reducing its exercise price); (ii) any cancellation of an outstanding option or SAR when its exercise price exceeds its fair market value in exchange for cash; (iii) any cancellation of an option or SAR in exchange for a new option or SAR with a lower exercise price; or (iv) a substitution of a stock award for an option or SAR when its exercise price exceeds fair market value; in each case other than a permitted equitable adjustment.

Prohibition of reload options.The 2019 Plan does not permit the grant of “reload” options.

Repayment obligation; right of set-off.If the Compensation Committee subsequently determines that all conditions to vesting and payment of an award, or the vesting and exercisability of an option or SAR, were not satisfied in full, the Compensation Committee may cancel such vesting or exercise and refuse to issue shares and immediately terminate the participant’s rights with respect to such award (or improperly vested portion thereof). If the vesting or exercise of any such award (or portion thereof) has already been settled by delivery of shares or cash, the participant shall be obligated, upon demand, to return the shares or cash (or higher value received at vesting or exercise), to Citi, without reduction for any shares or cash withheld to satisfy withholding tax or other obligations. Consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, the 2019 Plan also provides for the set-off of vested awards against obligations a participant may owe to Citi, including but not limited to the obligation to repay improperly vested or exercised awards. Any failure to timely pay tax-related obligations owing to Citi in connection with an award may result in its cancellation.

Non-transferability.During the vesting period, awards and sale-restricted shares generally are not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

Adjustments.The 2019 Plan provides that the Compensation Committee shall make appropriate equitable adjustments to the maximum number of shares available for grant under the 2019 Plan and to the annual individual award limits expressed in numbers of shares in the event of any changes to the Company’s capital structure,

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE CITIGROUP 2019 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN117

including a change in the number of shares outstanding on account of any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, spinoff or any similar equity restructuring, or any combination or exchange of equity securities, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reorganization, or similar transaction. In the event of any such transaction, or any extraordinary dividend, divestiture, or other distribution (other than ordinary cash dividends) of assets to stockholders, the Compensation Committee shall make appropriate equitable adjustments to the number or kind of shares subject to outstanding awards, the exercise prices of outstanding options and SARs, and performance conditions, to the extent necessary to prevent the enlargement or diminution of participants’ rights.

Change of control.The Compensation Committee may, when an award is made, or at any time prior to, at, or after the time of a “change of control” (as defined below), provide for the adjustment of performance conditions to reflect the change of control, provide for the cancellation of outstanding awards if the surviving entity or acquiring entity (or the surviving or acquiring entity’s parent company) replaces the awards with new rights of substantially equivalent value, provide for the acceleration of any time periods or the waiver of any other conditions to vesting, exercise, payment, or distribution of an award upon an involuntary termination of a participant’s employment as a result of a change of control, or provide for the purchase of any award. The vesting, payment, purchase, or distribution of an award, however, may not be accelerated by reason of a change of control for any participant unless the participant’s employment is involuntarily terminated as a result of the change of control. For these purposes, a termination of employment as a result of a change of control means involuntary termination of employment other than for “gross misconduct” (as defined in the 2019 Plan) upon, or on or prior to the first anniversary of, the change of control.

The 2019 Plan defines a “change of control” to mean (i) a person acquiring direct or indirect beneficial ownership of Citigroup Inc. securities representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of then outstanding securities of Citigroup Inc.; (ii) specified changes in the majority of the Board (not including the election of Directors whose election or nomination was approved by a majority of the then incumbent Board); (iii) a sale, transfer, or distribution of all or substantially all of the assets of Citigroup Inc. or a dissolution or liquidation of Citigroup Inc.; or (iv) consummation of a reorganization, merger, consolidation, or other corporate transaction that results in stockholders of Citigroup Inc. not owning more than 50% of the combined voting power of Citigroup Inc. or other corporation resulting from the transaction.

Tax withholding.Citi retains the right to deduct or withhold, or require the participant to remit to his or her employer, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state, local, and foreign taxes (including hypothetical taxes owed to Citi by tax-equalized expatriates) required by law or regulation to be withheld with respect to any taxable event as a result of the 2019 Plan.

Amendment and termination.The 2019 Plan may be amended, suspended, or terminated by the Compensation Committee at any time, provided that no amendment shall be made without stockholder approval if it would materially increase the number of shares available under the 2019 Plan (other than in connection with an equitable adjustment), materially expand the types of awards available under the 2019 Plan or the class of persons eligible to participate in the 2019 Plan, materially extend the term of the 2019 Plan, materially change the method of determining the exercise price of an option or SAR granted under the 2019 Plan, delete or limit the prohibition against “repricing,” or otherwise require approval by stockholders in order to comply with applicable law or the rules of the NYSE (or principal national securities exchange upon which Citi’s common stock is traded or quoted).

Award modification.The Compensation Committee retains the right to modify outstanding awards without a participant’s prior consent if it determines that the modification is required to comply with applicable law, regulation, or regulatory guidance (including applicable tax law). Subject to certain exceptions, any other modifications, if adverse to a participant, shall not be effective without the participant’s written consent.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

118PROPOSAL 4: APPROVAL OF THE CITIGROUP 2019 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a brief summary of the principal U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to stock options granted under the 2019 Plan, based on current U.S. federal income tax laws. This summary does not constitute tax advice and, among other things, does not describe state, local, or foreign tax consequences, which may be substantially different.

Generally, a participant will not recognize taxable income on the grant of a stock option. Upon the exercise of a stock option, a participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the difference between the fair market value of the Citi common stock received on the date of exercise and the option cost (number of shares purchased multiplied by the exercise price per share). The participant will recognize ordinary income upon the exercise of the option even though the shares acquired may be subject to further restrictions on sale or transferability. Citi will ordinarily be entitled to a deduction on the exercise date in an amount equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant upon exercise, except as may be specified under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Generally, upon a subsequent sale of shares acquired in an option exercise, the difference between the sale proceeds and the cost basis of the shares sold will be taxable as a capital gain or loss, including any sale of shares freed from sale restrictions to fund the payment of taxes incurred at exercise. The 2019 Plan does not provide for awards of “incentive stock options,” which have different tax consequences under the Internal Revenue Code.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

 107119

Stockholder Proposals

Citi makes every effort to be responsive to concerns expressed by our stockholders by engaging in dialogues, participating in issuer/investor working groups, and adopting policies or initiatives we believe to be in the best interests of all stockholders. In 2016, Citi commenced listing our significant trade and business associations on our website in order to provide greater transparency. In 2015, Citi adopted changes to the charter of its Business Practices Committee in response to a stockholder proposal that was then withdrawn. Citi also amended its By-laws to adopt Proxy Access in 2015. In addition, in 2013, the Personnel and Compensation Committee adopted changes to certain of the Company’s compensation practices in response to stockholder proposals: the Committee formalized its practice not to accelerate the vesting of equity awards in the event of a change of control and adopted a post-termination holding period for executive officers, requiring them to hold 50% of the shares previously subject to the Stock Ownership Commitment (SOC) for one year once they cease being executive officers of the Company. Over the years, Citi has met with several proponents and other interested parties regarding such issues as gender pay equity, proxy access, human rights, the Company’s response to regulation (Dodd-Frank, credit cards), derivatives, risk management, auditor rotation, and trade association payments, among others.others, and has, on certain occasions, as appropriate, taken action in response to these engagements and/ or shareholder votes. We encourage our stockholders to communicate with management and the Board. Any stockholder wishing to communicate with management, the Board, or an individual Director, or obtain the addresses of any of the stockholder proponents or their Citi stock ownership information, should send a request to the Corporate Secretary, as described on page 37 in this Proxy Statement.Rohan Weerasinghe, at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013.

Proposal 5

Arjuna Capital c/o Adam D. Seitchik, 49 Union Street, Manchester, MA 01944,John Chevedden has submitted the following proposal for consideration at the 20172019 Annual Meeting:

Gender Pay EquityProposal 5 – Shareholder Proxy Access Enhancement

Whereas:RESOLVED: Stockholders ask the board of directors to amend its proxy access bylaw provisions and any associated documents, to include the following change for the purpose of decreasing the average amount of Company common stock the average member of a nominating group would be required to hold for 3-years to satisfy the aggregate ownership requirements to form a nominating group and to increase the possible number of proxy access director candidates:

The median incomeNo limitation shall be placed on the number of stockholders that can aggregate their shares to achieve the 3% of common stock required to nominate directors under our Company’s proxy access provisions.

Proxy access for women working full timeshareholders enables shareholders to put competing director candidates on the company ballot to see if they can get more votes than some of management’s director candidates. A competitive election is good for everyone. This proposal can help ensure that our management will nominate directors with outstanding qualifications in order to avoid giving shareholders a reason to exercise their right to use proxy access.

Even if the 20 largest public pension funds were able to aggregate their shares, they would not meet the current 3% criteria for a continuous 3-years at most companies according to the Council of Institutional Investors. This proposal addresses the situation that our company now has with proxy access potentially for only the largest shareholders who are the least unlikely shareholders to make use of it.

Since no group of shareholders at any U.S. company has yet to make use of proxy access, it is important to make sure that the current limitation of 20 shareholders is not a deterrent to shareholders using proxy access.

A more practical proxy access right would put shareholders in a better position to ask for improvement in our stock price performance of a decline from $71 to $63 in the United States is reported to be 79 percent of that of their male counterparts, a 10,800 dollar disparity that can addyear leading up to nearly half a million dollars over the coursesubmittal of a career. The gap for African America and Latina women is wider at 60 percent and 55 percent respectively. At the current rate, women will not reach pay parity until 2059.this proposal.

A 2016Glassdoorstudy finds an unexplained 6.4 percent gender pay gap in the financial industry after statistical controls, among the highest of industries examined. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, reveals female financial advisors faced a 61.3 percent pay gap in 2014, the widest of occupations reviewed.Please vote yes:

Women make up over half of entry level positions in finance, yet a 2016Shareholder Proxy Access Enhancement – Proposal 5Oliver Wymanstudy finds it will take until 2048 to reach 30 percent female executive committee representation. Mercer finds female executives are 20 to 30 percent more likely to leave financial services careers than in any other industry.

At Citigroup, approximately 51 percent of our employees are women, but women account for only 24 percent of leadership.

A large body of evidence suggests diversity in leadership leads to better performance. McKinsey & Company states, “the business case for the advancement and promotion of women is compelling” and has found companies with highly diverse executive teams boasted higher returns on equity, earnings performance, and stock price growth. Best practices to address this underleveraged opportunity include “tracking and eliminating gender pay gaps.”

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

108120STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Mercer finds actively managing pay equity “is associatedManagement Comment

Summary

Citi implemented a progressive proxy access by-law provision for our stockholders in 2015 that is aligned with higher current female representation atbest practices, providing stockholders with meaningful and appropriate proxy access rights while taking into account the professional through executive levelsneed to balance enhancing stockholder rights with protecting the interests of all our stockholders. The Board adopted the proxy access by-law provision after careful consideration and engagement with a faster trajectory to improved representation.”

Regulatory risk existsnumber of our stockholders. Since our adoption of proxy access, we have had further discussions regarding proxy access with stockholders. Based on their feedback as the Paycheck Fairness Act pends before Congress. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has proposed rules requiring wage gap reporting. California, Massachusetts, New York and Maryland have passed some of the strongest equal pay legislation to date.

TheWall Street Journalreports, “Academic research attributes salary inequalities to several factors–from outright bias to women failing to ask for raises.” A Harvard University economist concluded the gap stems from women making less in the same jobs. As much as 40 percent of the wage gap may be attributed to discrimination.

S&P 500 companies including Intel, Apple, Expedia, and eBay have publically reported and committed to gender pay equity.

Resolved:Shareholders request Citigroup prepare a report by October 2017, omitting proprietary information and prepared at reasonable cost, on the Company’s policies and goals to reduce the gender pay gap.

The gender pay gap is defined as the difference between male and female earnings expressedwell as a percentagebenchmarking review of male earnings (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).

Supporting Statement:A report adequate for investors to assess Citigroup’s strategy and performance would include the percentage pay gap between male and female employees, including base, bonus and equity compensation, policies to address that gap, and quantitative reduction targets.

Management Comment

Summary

We are proud of Citi’s diversity and the fact thatproxy access rights adopted by other companies, we have employees from over 100 countries with very different backgrounds and perspectives. We promote an inclusive environment where diversity is embraced and where our employees’ differences are respected and valued. Gender equality is a critical component of supporting our inclusive environment. We must continue to attractbelieve that our current proxy access structure is the most appropriate for the Company and retain the best talent to lead Citi. In 2016we combined the talent and diversity teams to further embed a diversity lens into all of our talent decisions and processes. We benchmark our progress regularly by participating in external studies and the Citi Board of Directors evaluates our progress on diversity and inclusion annually. Jim Cowles, CEO of EMEA, and Tracey Warson, Head of the US Private Bank, co-chair our global women’s affinity. The affinity chairs along with other members of senior management and the Board spend time with our employees all over the globe to better understand their experiences firsthand. We use the feedback we receive to continuously assess and refine our diversity and inclusion practices to yield stronger outcomes.

Important Points to Considerits stockholders at this time.

Theinformation disclosedCiti’s Proxy Access By-law is within the mainstream of other significant U.S. public companies with proxy access rights. Specifically, our By-laws permit a stockholder, or a group of up to twenty stockholders, owning at least three percent of Citi’s outstanding shares of common stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in our annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting twenty percent of the Board (but no fewer than two nominees), subject to the other procedural requirements specified in our By-laws. In fact, all of the provisions sought by the Proponent, except for the provision permitting an unlimited number of stockholders to aggregate their holdings to nominate candidates, are already included in Citi’s Annual Diversity ReportProxy Access By-law. A recent study published by Sidley Austin LLP summarizes proxy access provisions adopted since January 1, 2015 and, after analyzing 565 provisions, concluded that a nominating group size limit of 20 was by far the most common limit, averaging 93% of the companies surveyed.1 Citi’s Proxy Access provisions, including its group aggregation limit, are in line with best practices among U.S. corporations.
The proponent acted as a proxy for the proponent (the “Original Proponent”) of a Proxy Access Stockholder Proposal (the “Original Proposal”) voted on by stockholders at the 2015 annual meeting. The Board supported the Original Proposal after negotiating and agreeing on the terms with the proponent and the Original Proponent and, after stockholders expressed support for the Original Proposal, subsequently amended the By-laws to grant stockholders the right to have stockholder nominees to the Board included in the Company’s proxy materials. The proponent now seeks to change the terms agreed to in 2015. The Proposal requests the following change to Citi’s Proxy Access By-law: no limitation on the number of stockholders that can aggregate their shares to achieve the 3% of common stock required to nominate directors. Management believes that the change put forth in the Proposal is not in the best interests of Citi’s stockholders.
Allowing a limited number of holders, who own a meaningful interest in the Company for a reasonable period of time, to act as a group strengthens the principle that we believe is shared by most of our stockholders–the right to nominate a director using the Company’s proxy statement should be available only forthose who have a sufficient financial stake in the Company to cause their interests to be aligned with the interests of our stockholders.
The existing limit on an annual basis includes detailed informationthe number of holders who can aggregate their shares creates a reasonable limitation that will control the administrative costs for Citi. In the absence of a reasonable limitation, or as the proposal requests–no limitation, on our workforce demographicsthe number of stockholders in a group, Citi could be required to make burdensome and provides additional information on our comprehensive diversitytime-consuming inquiries into the nature and inclusion efforts. The Annual Diversity Report provides information that is more meaningful for stockholders than the analysis requested in this Proposal. For copiesduration of the current and previous annual reports and for more information about Citi’s diversity initiatives, please visit our website at http://www.citigroup.com/citi/diversity/.share ownership of a large number of individuals

Board Recommendation

Because Citi has adopted progressive proxy access by-law provisions that serve the best interests of the Company and our stockholders and is in line with best practices among Citi’s peers and the vast majority of large cap companies, adoption of the stockholder proposal is not necessary or appropriate; therefore the Board recommends a voteAGAINST this Proposal 5.


1Sidley Austin LLP,Proxy Access – The Latest on Proxy Access, January 11, 2019. https://www.sidley.com/-/media/update-pdfs/2019/01/20190111-corporate-governance-update.pdf

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS109

Citi’s published Compensation Philosophy shows that the objectives of our compensation programs are designed to address the risks mentioned by the proponent. Please visit our website http://www.citigroup.com/citi/investor/ corporate_governance.html to review the policy. Through our compensation programs, we strive to: attract and retain the best talent to lead Citi to success; align compensation programs, structures, and decisions with stockholder and other stakeholder interests; reinforce a business culture based on the highest ethical standards; manage risks to Citi by encouraging prudent decision-making; and reflect regulatory guidance in compensation programs.

One of the initiatives developed by Citi is the CEO scorecard, applicable to more than 500 senior managers, which measures critical performance initiatives including financial controls and other top priorities such as diversity and culture. The diversity indicator measures how we are filling our senior opportunities at the Director level and above. Each quarter we track how many opportunities existed, whether there were multiple candidates considered, and whether women, and in the US, racial/ethnic minorities, were candidates on the slate. Since we started this practice in 2013, the percentage of diverse candidate slates has increased significantly from 58% of the opportunities in 2013 to 70% in 2016.

Beginning in 2016, we began to expand the practice of creating diverse interview panels, currently performed in some lines of business, to be applicable to all Managing Director roles. Diverse interview panels are a group of individuals, including a diverse member (women globally; racial/ethnic minorities in the US), designed to foster a broader range of perspectives and mitigate potential biases when interviewing and confirming appointments for senior-level roles. We are hopeful that fostering a common approach to implementing diverse interview panels across Citi will further build our capability in candidate selection and increase our diverse outcomes.

Along with our focus on recruitment and selection, through the Citi Women affinity, we also offer two flagship women’s development programs–Citi Women’s Leadership Development Program and Women Leading Citi, focused on high performing Director level women and Managing Directors respectively. We’ve had approximately 1,000 women participate in the combined programs to date and we plan to increase the number of women that participate on an annual basis. In addition, we are in the process of redesigning the programs to reflect our Mission and Value Proposition and our updated Leadership Standards, as well as to allow for greater exposure to our senior leaders, who will help to facilitate the sessions.

Citi is also committed to diversity on its Board of Directors. We recently added another woman to our Board bringing total representation to 6 women of 17 directors, or 35%, as of the date this proxy statement was filed.


Board Recommendation

We remain committed to our on-going efforts to promote diversity in the workplace and believe we are making demonstrable progress in building a diverse company and compensating our employees based on performance. The Proposal calls for a report on the Company’s policies and goals to reduce the gender pay gap, which would be costly and time-consuming, and in light of our many efforts in this area, would not offer stockholders meaningful additional information. As such, the Proposal would not enhance the Company’s existing commitment to an inclusive culture or meaningfully further its goal and efforts in support of workplace diversity; therefore the Board recommends that you voteAGAINST this Proposal 5.

121

Proposal 6

Bartlett Collins Naylor, 215 Pennsylvania Avenue, S.E., Washington D.C. 20003,AFL–CIO Reserve Fund has submitted the following proposal for consideration at the 2017 Annual Meeting:

Resolved, that stockholders of Citigroup Corporation urge that:

1.The Board of Directors should appoint a committee (the ‘Stockholder Value Committee’) composed exclusively of independent directors to address whether the divestiture of all non-core banking business segments would enhance shareholder value.
2.The Stockholder Value Committee should publicly report on its analysis to stockholders no later than 300 days after the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, although confidential information may be withheld.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

110STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

3.     In carrying out its evaluation, the Stockholder Value Committee should avail itself at reasonable cost of such independent legal, investment banking and other third party advisers as the Stockholder Value Committee determines is necessary or appropriate in its sole discretion.
For purposes of this proposal, “non-core banking operations” means operations that are conducted by affiliates other than the affiliate the corporation identifies as Citibank, N.A. which holds FDIC Certificate No 7213.

Supporting Statement

The financial crisis that began in 2008 underscored potentially significant weaknesses in the practices of large, inter-connected financial institutions such as Citigroup. Since the financial crash, Citi stock fell from $544 on April 30, 2007, to less than $50 by February 2009. It has remained there—90 percent below pre-crash levels—for six years now. The value of Citi’s assets less liabilities is $220 billion; its stock market value is $162 million. In accounting terms, the firm is worth more liquidated.

The crisis prompted questions about how to regulate “too big to fail” institutions such as Citigroup and about whether it made sense to allow financial institutions to engage in both traditional banking and investment banking activities, which had previously been barred by the Glass-Steagall Act.

Congress sought to address these concerns with the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010, which reformed regulation of financial institutions.

We are concerned that current law may not do enough to avert another financial crisis. Our concern too is that a mega-bank such as Citigroup may not simply be “to big to fail,” but also “too big to manage” effectively so as to contain risks that can spread across Citi’s business segments. Frauds resulting in more than $7 billion in shareholder-paid fines suggest management imperfection. Many smaller banks have proven far better investments. Just as in the 2008 crash, shareholders will suffer in the next crash at Citi.

Citigroup founders John Reed and Sanford Weil agree that the largest banks should be broken up.

We therefore recommend that the board act to explore options to split the firm into two or more companies, with one performing basic business and consumer lending with FDIC-guaranteed deposit liabilities, and the other businesses focused on investment banking such as underwriting, trading and market-making.

We believe that such a separation will reduce the risk of another financial meltdown that harms depositors, shareholders and taxpayers alike; in addition, given the differing levels of risk in Citi’s primary business segments, divestiture will give investors more choice and control about investment risks.

Management Comment

Summary

As part of its fiduciary obligation to shareholders, Citi’s Board of Directors engages with management in a formal annual review of the Company’s strategy and its execution. In these three-day sessions, management and the Board consider alternative strategic options for the Company. Over the past several years, the Board has hired several subject matter experts to assist it in determining if the firm’s chosen strategy was the most likely one to create the best long-term outcomes for our shareholders. Pursuant to its most recent review, and having taken into account changes in the operating environment, the Board remains confident that the current strategy being executed by the existing management team will yield the best long-term results.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS111   

Important Points to Consider

Management and the Board’s willingness to take on difficult tasks to further the interest of shareholders should not be in doubt as evidenced by the massive reduction in the assets of Citi Holdings. Originally under the supervision of the disbanded Citi Holdings Oversight Committee and then under the auspices of the Citibank, N.A. Board, the Company has exited Citi Holdings’ businesses and assets as quickly as practicable in an economically rational manner. Over the course of this extensive process, the Company reduced its Citi Holdings assets from over $800 billion at its peak to $54 billion by the end of fourth quarter 2016, or approximately 3% of the Company’s total GAAP assets. Given this reduction, as of the first quarter of 2017, Citi Holdings will no longer be reported as a separate segment and oversight of the remaining assets will be provided by the Citigroup Board. The massive reduction in Holdings’ assets has been accomplished through more than sixty M&A transactions, portfolio sales, portfolio runoff and repayments. As the Company’s Chief Executive Officer has aptly stated, the wind-down of Citi Holdings is “one of the most significant transformations ever executed in [the banking] industry.”

Citi already provides extensive disclosures regarding its strategy and divestitures in its public filings, as well as in discussions with investors. Making public the Company’s business information and plans – as called for by this Proposal – would result in our surrender of vital proprietary information. Such disclosure would likely strengthen our competitors’ knowledge of Citi’s businesses and potentially cause great harm to our shareholders.


Board Recommendation

Citi and its Board regularly review strategic alternatives for maximizing shareholder value. Management, with Board oversight, has continued to divest unproductive assets and to improve the efficiency of its core businesses. The main concerns identified by the Proposal are being addressed and the specific process envisioned by the Proposal would be duplicative and result in the publication of highly confidential information that would put the Company at a competitive disadvantage. As such, the Boardrecommends that you voteAGAINSTProposal 6.

Proposal 7

CtW Investment Group, 1900 L Street, N.W., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036, has submitted the following proposal for consideration at the 2017 Annual Meeting:

Whereas,we believe in full disclosure of Citigroup’s direct and indirect lobbying activities and expenditures to assess whether Citigroup’s lobbying is consistent with its expressed goals and in the best interests of stockholders.

Resolved,the stockholders Citigroup request the preparation of a report, updated annually, disclosing:

1.     Company policy and procedures governing lobbying, both direct and indirect, and grassroots lobbying communications.
2.Payments by Citigroup used for (a) direct or indirect lobbying or (b) grassroots lobbying communications, in each case including the amount of the payment and the recipient.
3.Description of management’s and the Board’s decision making process and oversight for making payments described in section 2 above.

For purposes of this proposal, a “grassroots lobbying communication” is a communication directed to the general public that (a) refers to specific legislation or regulation, (b) reflects a view on the legislation or regulation and (c) encourages the recipient of the communication to take action with respect to the legislation or regulation. “Indirect lobbying” is lobbying engaged in by a trade association or other organization of which Citigroup is a member.

Both “direct and indirect lobbying” and “grassroots lobbying communications” include efforts at the local, state and federal levels.

The report shall be presented to the Audit Committee or other relevant oversight committees and posted on Citigroup’s website.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

112STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Supporting Statement

As stockholders, we encourage transparency and accountability in our company’s use of corporate funds to influence legislation and regulation. Citigroup spent $10.67 million in 2014 and 2015 on federal lobbying (opensecrets.org). This figure does not include lobbying expenditures to influence legislation in states, where Citigroup also lobbies in 42 states (“Amid Federal Gridlock, Lobbying Rises in the States,”Center for Public Integrity, February 11, 2016), but disclosure is uneven or absent. Citigroup’s lobbying on derivatives has attracted media scrutiny (“Why Citi May Soon Regret Its Big Victory on Capitol Hill,”American Banker, December 11, 2014).

Citigroup is a member of the Chamber of Commerce, which has spent over $1.2 billion on lobbying since 1998. Citigroup is also a member of the Business Roundtable, Financial Services Roundtable, and Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, which together spent $32.14 million on lobbying in 2015. Citigroup prohibits its payments to trade associations from being used for political contributions, but this does not cover payments used for lobbying. This leaves a serious disclosure gap, as trade associations generally spend far more on lobbying than on political contributions. Citigroup does not disclose its trade association payments or the portions used for lobbying on its website. We are concerned that Citigroup’s current lack of trade association lobbying disclosure presents reputational risks.

We also question if Citigroup’s membership in the Chamber is consistent with Citigroup’s values. For example, combating climate change is a strategic priority for Citigroup, yet the Chamber has sued the EPA to block the Clean Power Plan. Transparent reporting would reveal whether company assets are being used for objectives contrary to Citigroup’s long-term interests.

Management Comment

Summary

Citi has a comprehensive system of reporting on Citi’s lobbying activities and political contributions. Citi discloses its lobbying activities as required by law in the more than 30 states in which it is actively engaged in lobbying, and at the federal level. Citi provides access to this information on its website. Moreover, shareholders can access Citi’s filings under the Lobbying Disclosure Act to view the issues and campaigns that Citi supports through its lobbying efforts. Citi also publishes annually on its website its political contributions made by the Citi Political Action Committees. Finally, Citi lists the names of the significant trade and business associations in which it participates. The proposal would be substantively duplicative and technically prohibitive to actually implement.

Important Points to Consider

Citi already has in place measures to promote transparency in and oversight of its lobbying and political activity.

First, as required by its Charter, the Nomination, Governance and Public Affairs Committee of Citi’s Board of Directors provides oversight over the Company’s political contributions, trade association activities, and lobbying strategy.

Second, Citi has links on its website to state government websites where its lobbying activities are reported.

Third, Citi discloses U.S. federal lobbying activity quarterly, as required by the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA). LDA requires disclosure of the issues and costs of its lobbying efforts.

Fourth, Citi posts on its website a list, updated annually, of all corporate political contributions made by Citi as well as contributions made by Citi’s Political Action Committees (PAC) (www.citigroup.com. Click on “About Us,” and then “Corporate Governance.”).

Fifth, Citi posts the names of its significant trade and business associations on Citi’s website.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS113   

Citi’s Political Activities Statement, which can be found at www.citigroup.com, provides, in addition to the information above, meaningful disclosure about:

Citi’s lobbying policies and procedures including grassroots lobbying – we commit to disclose any grassroots lobbying efforts or any state ballot initiative in which we engage

membership in any tax-exempt group that writes and endorses model legislation

the Board’s oversight of lobbying activities, and political contributions.

Citi will not directly or indirectly make payments to independent expenditure campaigns and has procedures in place to prevent such payments from being made.

First, Citi policy prohibits contributions for independent expenditures which means it cannot make such payments directly. “Independent expenditures” are expenditures by an entity other than the political candidate or his or her campaign that support the candidate (or criticize his/her opponent) and are generally made by SuperPACs.

Second, to prevent any indirect funding of SuperPACs, Citi requires, before Citi pays its dues, that trade and business associations attest that they have a process that assures that no funds provided by any Citi entity (whether by way of dues or otherwise) will be used for independent expenditures.

Citi engages in lobbying activities on its own behalf and determines on which issues to lobby based on careful consideration of political and legislative matters that may have an impact on Citi. Citi’s lobbying efforts are necessarily focused on issues and positions favored by Citi. While trade and business associations may lobby on behalf of the financial industry, this “indirect” lobbying does not necessarily represent Citi’s positions. Attributing these lobbying efforts to Citi’s decision-making would be misleading to shareholders.

The report requested by the proposal would be duplicative and is not an effective use of Citi’s resources.

Citi’s current public disclosures, including its political contributions disclosure, the links on its website to disclosures of its state lobbying activities, its disclosures of federal lobbying under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, and the disclosure of its Political Activities Statement provide stockholders with extensive information of the kind in substance requested in the Proposal.

Citi has also successfully passed regular audits by regulatory authorities with lobbying and political contributions oversight, as well as those performed by Citi’s Internal Audit function. In addition, Citi participates in the European Union’s voluntary lobbying disclosure registry.

Board Recommendation

Because it already has extensive disclosure practices pertaining to its political contributions and lobbying activities, disclosures of its political contributions and lobbying expenditures, disclosure of its trade association participation, and a Political Activities Statement outlining its policies and procedures surrounding political and lobbying activities, Citi does not believe the additional disclosure requested by the stockholder proposal would be useful to shareholders. In addition, disclosure of indirect lobbying activities by outside trade associations in itself would not offer shareholders a useful nor clear window into Citi’s approach to lobbying and political activity. The disclosure requested by the Proposal would thus not be an effective use of Citi’s resources or management’s time, nor would it provide shareholders with additional meaningful disclosures; therefore the Board recommends that you voteAGAINST this Proposal 7.

Proposal 8

John Chevedden, 2215 Nelson Avenue, No. 205, Redondo Beach, CA 90278, has submitted the following proposal for consideration at the 2017 Annual Meeting:

Proposal 8 — Clawback Amendment

RESOLVED, that shareholders of Citigroup Inc. urge the Board of Directors to amend the General Clawback policy to provide that a substantial portion of annual total compensation of Executive Officers, identified by the board, shall be deferred and be forfeited in part or in whole, at the discretion of Board, to help satisfy any monetary penalty associated with any violation of law regardless of any determined responsibility by any individual officer;

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

114STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

and that this annual deferred compensation be paid to the officers no sooner than 10 years after the absence of any monetary penalty; and that any forfeiture and relevant circumstances be reported to shareholders. These amendments should operate prospectively and be implemented in a way that does not violate any contract, compensation plan, law or regulation.

On July 14, 2014, the Department of Justice “announced a $7 billion settlement with Citigroup Inc. to resolve . . . claims related to Citigroup’s conduct in the . . . issuance of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) prior to Jan. 1, 2009. The resolution includes a $4 billion civil penalty – the largest penalty to date under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) . . . Citigroup acknowledged it made serious misrepresentations to the public.” This monetary penalty was borne by Citi shareholders who were not responsible for this unlawful conduct. Citi employees committed these unlawful acts. They did not contribute to this penalty payment, but instead undoubtedly received bonuses.

In 2014, Citi refined its clawback policies. In addition to recouping incentive compensation for employees who violate the law, the Compensation Committee “may also cancel awards if an employee failed to supervise individuals who engaged in such behavior.”

This refinement is welcome. It reflects that the Board agrees that compensation serves as an appropriate tool for deterrence and that restrictions should apply more broadly than simply to those determined to have violated the law. The further refinement here in this resolution can help strengthen Citi’s policy by making compliance with the law a group concern.

President William Dudley of the New York Federal Reserve outlined the utility of what he called a performance bond. “In the case of a large fine, the senior management . . . would forfeit their performance bond. . . . Each individual’s ability to realize their deferred debt compensation would depend not only on their own behavior, but also on the behavior of their colleagues. This would create a strong incentive for individuals to monitor the actions of their colleagues, and to call attention to any issues. . . . Importantly, individuals would not be able to “opt out” of the firm as a way of escaping the problem. If a person knew that something is amiss and decided to leave the firm, their deferred debt compensation would still be at risk.”

The statute of limitations under the FIRREA is 10 years, meaning that annual deferral period should be 10 years.

Please vote to protect shareholder value:

Clawback Amendment — Proposal 8

Management Comment

Summary

Citi’s existing clawback policies address the objectives sought by the Proponent and are in fact broader than the changes called for by the proposal. For example, the proposal would impose clawbacks only for “monetary penalties associated with any violation of law.” Citi’s current clawback policies do not require as a prerequisite to a clawback a “penalty” or a “violation of law.” Clawbacks under Citi’s existing policies may be imposed in instances of materially imprudent judgment that caused harm to any of Citi’s business operations or that resulted or could result in regulatory sanctions. In addition, implementing the proposal’s request to pay deferred compensation no sooner than 10 years after the absence of any monetary penalty and to permit the forfeiture of such compensation irrespective of the culpability of an executive officer would severely impair Citi’s ability to attract and retain talented executive officers as such terms and conditions are not currently in place at peer companies, are not required by applicable law or regulatory policy, and would make employment at Citigroup significantly less appealing relative to other institutions, both in our industry and outside of it. Adopting a proposal that inhibits Citi’s ability to attract and retain talented executive officers would be detrimental to Citi’s long-term business objectives and to its stockholders.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS115   

Important Points to Consider

Citi’s General Clawback provision provides that the unvested portion of a deferred cash award or a performance share unit award granted to an employee will be canceled if Citi’s Personnel and Compensation Committee (the Committee) determines that such employee:

engaged in behavior constituting misconduct or exercised materially imprudent judgment that caused harm to any of Citi’s business operations, or that resulted or could result in regulatory sanctions (whether or not formalized);

failed to supervise or monitor individuals engaging in, or failed to properly escalate behavior constituting, misconduct in accordance with Citi’s policies regarding the reporting of misconduct, or exercised materially imprudent judgment that caused harm to any of Citi’s business operations; or

failed to supervise or monitor individuals engaging in, or failed to properly escalate, behavior that resulted or could result in regulatory sanctions (whether or not formalized).

In addition, all of Citi’s deferred incentive compensation awards are subject to the “Citi Clawback,” which requires the forfeiture or cancellation of unvested awards when the Committee determines that an employee received an award based on materially inaccurate publicly reported financial statements, knowingly engaged in providing materially inaccurate information relating to publicly reported financial statements, materially violated any risk limits established or revised by senior management and/or risk management or engaged in gross misconduct.

Citi’s clawback policies are supported through other policies, such as Citi’s stock ownership commitment (SOC), which requires executive officers to retain at least 75% of the equity awarded to them as incentive compensation (other than cash equivalents and net of amounts required to pay taxes and exercise prices) as long as they are executive officers and to retain 50% of their equity subject to the SOC for one year after their status as executive officers ends. In addition, Citi’s anti-hedging policy also provides that executive officers may not enter into hedging transactions in respect of Citi’s common stock or other Citi securities. Citi’s clawback policies are part of a set of interrelated policies through which Citi ensures that officers are encouraged to focus on the long-term interests of stockholders and are discouraged from excessive risk-taking that could cause material harm to Citi.

Unlike the proposal’s request to defer compensation awarded to executive officers for a period “no sooner than 10 years after the absence of any monetary penalty,” the deferral period under Citi’s current incentive award structures, which provide for prorated vesting and payment over a three- or four-year period, is competitive with the practices at peer companies and is consistent with regulatory guidance. The proposal is also unworkable in practice. If the term “monetary penalty” in the proposal means any monetary penalty against the Company, notwithstanding its severity, adopting the proposal could result in executives not receiving their deferred compensation irrespective of their culpability for the imposition of such penalty and would result in their having to wait at least 10 years from the date of the award for that determination to be made. Adopting such a proposal would be detrimental to Citi’s long-term business objectives and to its stockholders as it would likely severely impair Citi’s ability to attract and retain talented executive officers. 


Board Recommendation

Because Citi’s current clawback provisions and accompanying policies serve the same objectives as the proposal, cover a broader range of potential employee misbehavior than those included in the proposal, and are better tailored to current regulatory and market conditions than the changes requested by the proposal, and because the deferral period proposed would put Citi at a significant competitive disadvantage when attracting and retaining talent, thus harming the Company, the Board recommends a voteAGAINST this Proposal 8.


Proposal 9

AFL–CIO Reserve Fund, 815 Sixteenth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20006, has submitted the following proposal for consideration at the 20172019 Annual Meeting:

RESOLVED: Shareholders of Citigroup Inc. (the “Company”) request that the Board of Directors adopt a policy prohibiting the vesting of equity-based awards for senior executives due to a voluntary resignation to enter government service (a “Government Service Golden Parachute”).

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

116STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

For purposes of this resolution, “equity-based awards” include stock options, restricted stock and other stock awards granted under an equity incentive plan. “Government service” includes employment with any U.S. federal, state or local government, any supranational or international organization, any self-regulatory organization, or any agency or instrumentality of any such government or organization, or any electoral campaign for public office.

This policy shall be implemented so as not to violate existing contractual obligations or the terms of any compensation or benefit plan currently in existence or approved by shareholders on the date this proposal is adopted, and it shall apply only to equity plans or plan amendments that shareholders approve after the date of the 20172019 annual meeting.

Supporting Statement:

Our Company provides its senior executives with vesting of equity-based awards after their voluntary resignation of employment from the Company to pursue a career in government service. In other words, our Company gives a “golden parachute“parachute” for entering government service. For example, Stephen Bird, CEOAlthough the Company’s current named executive officers may have attained the “rule of Global Consumer Banking, was entitled60” under which deferred stock awards continue to $10 million in unvested equity awards if he entered government servicevest on December 31, 2015.schedule, future named executive officers and other senior executives may be able to take advantage of this golden parachute.

At most companies, equity-based awards vest over a period of time to compensate executives for their labor during the commensurate period. If an executive voluntarily resigns before the vesting criteria are satisfied, unvested awards are usually forfeited. While government service is commendable, we question the practice of our Company providing continued vesting of equity-based awards to executives who voluntarily resign to enter government service.

The vesting of equity-based awards over a period of time is a powerful tool for companies to attract and retain talented employees. But contrary to this goal, our Company’s award agreements contain a “Voluntary Resignation to Pursue Alternative Career“Career” clause that provides for the continued vesting of restricted stock of executives who voluntarily resign to pursue a government service career.

Last year in its oppositionIn last year’s proxy statement, the Company responded to this resolution, the Company statedproposal by stating its desire to facilitate “some degree of parity between private and public sector employment” because “unvested awards are typically ‘bought out’replaced with new awards by a new private sector employer.” In our view, it is simply not appropriate for our Company’s employees who choose to enter government service to be “bought out.”out” in this way.

We believe that compensation plans should align the interests of senior executives with the long-term interests of the Company. We oppose compensation plans that provide windfalls to executives that are unrelated to their performance. For these reasons, we question how our Company benefits from providing Government Service Golden Parachutes. Surely our Company does not expect to receive favorable treatment from its former executives?

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

122STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Management Comment

Summary

Citi’s deferred compensation programs, like those of many other companies, include provisions that alter an award’s regular forfeiture conditions and provide for vesting in a range of circumstances (e.g., termination of employment on account of death, disability, involuntary termination not for cause, and upon meeting certain retirement-type age and service provisions). The alternative career provision, which is available to all employees who are eligible for deferred compensation awards (not just senior executives), is one of these exceptions. Under the alternative career provision, an employee who is not eligible for retirement may resign to work full-time in a paid career in government service, for a charitable institution, or as a teacher at an educational institution, and have his/her awards continue to vest on schedule. (A retirement-eligible employee may work for such employers and continue to vest regardless of the alternative career provision.) We believe that the alternative career provision, like other exceptions to the vesting conditions of our programs, helphelps us attract talented employees, which is a goal that furthers both our long-term business objectives and benefits stockholders at minimal cost.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS117   


Important Points to Consider

Adopting a policy that erodes the features of an incentive program intended to attract and retain talented employees would be detrimental to Citi’s long-term business objectives. The alternative career provision is necessary to remain competitive for talent in the financial services industry, as it is an element of our peers’ programs. It is not an executive perk; it is a component of our broader-based incentive programs covering about 8,300 employees globally.
The alternative career provision operates at minimal cost to Citi and its stockholders, despite broad eligibility. As of December 31, 2016, only 13 employees globally were vesting on schedule by reason of the alternative career provision, including charitable and educational as well as governmental employment.
The provision does not result in a “windfall” to employees as they have earned the awards for services already performed. Furthermore, Citi’s deferred incentive awards are subject to business-based performance conditions during the vesting period and to meaningful clawback provisions in the event of misconduct or other specified negative circumstances. Accordingly, awards that vest on schedule by reason of alternative career or other reasons are still subject to important conditions for receipt. These clawback provisions and business-based performance vesting conditions provide for alignment of stockholder and employee interests after termination of employment during the vesting period.
The alternative career provision helps maintain strong employee relations by facilitating some degree of parity between private and public sector employment following Citi service. Employees who are not eligible to retire and who leave to work in the private sector often do not face an economic penalty as a consequence of their decision to leave Citi as their unvested awards are typically “bought out” by a new private sector employer. Conversely, employees who are not eligible to retire are unlikely to have their unvested awards “bought out” by a new public, educational or non-profit sector employer and therefore would typically lose deferred awards if they entered those sectors. In contrast, employees who are eligible to retire under our incentive programs may leave to work in public, educational or non-profit service and continue to vest. The alternative career provision therefore promotes equitable treatment of employees seeking employment in public, educational and non-profit sectors by allowing employees who are not eligible to retire to continue to vest in their equity awards while employed in such sectors.

Adopting a policy that erodes the features of an incentive program intended to attract and retain talented employees would be detrimental to Citi’s long-term business objectives. The alternative career provision is necessary to remain competitive for talent in the financial services industry, as it is an element of our peers’ programs. It is not an executive perk; it is a component of our broader-based incentive programs covering about 8,300 employees globally.
The alternative career provision operates at minimal cost to Citi and its stockholders, despite broad eligibility. As of December 5, 2017, only eight participants globally, none of whom were executive officers, were vesting on schedule by reason of the provision.
The proponent asserts in the supporting statement of its Proposal that “Our Company provides its senior executives with vesting of equity-based awards after their voluntary resignation of employment from the Company to pursue a career in government service.” The provision is not relevant to most of Citi’s current executive officers (including the five executive officers who were named executive officers in Citi’s 2018 Proxy Statement). Due to their service to Citi, these executive officers will continue to vest on schedule after resignation as long as they do not work for a “significant competitor.” Consequently, even if these executive officers were to leave Citi for government service, the provision would not apply to them. Moreover, no executive officer has resigned and continued to vest in his or her awards by reason of the provision in the last 10 years.
The provision does not result in a “windfall” to employees as they have earned the awards for services already performed. Furthermore, Citi’s deferred incentive awards are subject to business-based performance conditions during the vesting period and to meaningful clawback provisions in the event of misconduct or other specified negative circumstances. Accordingly, awards that vest on schedule by reason of alternative career or other reasons are still subject to important conditions for receipt. These clawback provisions and business-based performance vesting conditions provide for alignment of stockholder and employee interests after termination of employment during the vesting period.
The proponent alludes to the proposition that the goal of the alternative career provision is to enable Citi to influence government policymakers. The purpose of the government service component of the provision is not to allow Citi executives to influence government–it is to encourage public service at all employment levels at Citi.

Board Recommendation

The alternative career provision advances stockholder interests by enabling Citi to attract and retain talented employees; adopting this proposalProposal would put Citi at a competitive disadvantage and could harm the Company;Company and its employees; therefore the Board recommends a voteAGAINSTthis Proposal 9.6.

   

www.citigroup.comCiti 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

     118STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS123

Proposal 7

Kenneth Steiner has submitted the following proposal for consideration at the 2019 Annual Meeting:

Proposal 7 – Special Shareholder Meetings

Resolved, Shareowners ask our board to take the steps necessary (unilaterally if possible) to amend our bylaws and each appropriate governing document to give holders in the aggregate of 15% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareowner meeting. This proposal does not impact our board’s current power to call a special meeting.

Special shareholder meetings allow shareholders to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors that can arise between annual meetings. This proposal topic won more than 70%-support at Edwards Lifesciences and SunEdison. This proposal topic, sponsored by William Steiner, also won 78% support at a Sprint annual meeting with 1.7 Billion yes-votes. Nuance Communications (NUAN) shareholders gave 94%-support in February 2018 to a rule 14a-8 proposal calling for 10% of shareholders to call a special meeting.

This proposal topic won majority support at the 2011 Citigroup annual meeting and also 49.9% support at the 2018 Citigroup annual meeting. Both these votes would have been higher if all shareholders had access to independent proxy voting advice.

Our current higher 25%-threshold for shareholders to call a special meeting may be unreachable due to time constraints and the detailed technical requirements that can easily trigger disqualifying errors by shareholders.

Any claim that a shareholder right to call a special meeting can be costly – may be moot. When shareholders have a good reason to call a special meeting – our board should be able to take positive responding action to make a special meeting unnecessary.

Shareholder proposals such as this have taken a leadership role to improve the corporate governance rules of our company. For instance Citigroup adopted shareholder proxy access after James McRitchie submitted a proxy access proposal in 2014 and 2015.

Please vote yes:

Special Shareholder Meetings – Proposal 7

Management Comment

Summary

Citi supports stockholders having the right to call a special meeting, which is why Citi’s By-laws already provided stockholders that own at least 25% of the outstanding shares of the company’s common stock the power to call a special meeting of stockholders. In response to the vote at the 2018 Annual Meeting on a proposal to lower the threshold to 15%, which did not pass but received significant shareholder support, the Board, taking into account the vote result, input from institutional investors and peer thresholds, has carefully considered the appropriate ownership threshold to call a special meeting and amended Citi’s By-laws to lower the threshold to 20%. The 20% threshold aligns Citi with many of its peers and strikes an appropriate balance between the right of shareholders to call a special meeting and the interests of Citi and our stockholders in promoting the appropriate use of Company resources. Given the number of outlets stockholders have to express their concerns, Citi believes that the adjustment to the 20% threshold properly addresses shareholder concerns, without providing undue power to a small minority of stockholders.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

124STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Important Points to Consider

Special meetings of stockholders should only be called if a reasonably large proportion of Citi’s stockholders determine that a meeting is necessary for extraordinary events that only occur when fiduciary obligations or strategic concerns require that matters be addressed on an accelerated basis rather than waiting until the next annual meeting. Citi amended the threshold to 20% and believes it is a reasonable threshold in order to prevent unnecessarily frequent special meetings. The 20% ownership threshold strikes the appropriate balance between the right of stockholders to call a special meeting in appropriate circumstances and the substantial administrative and financial burdens that special meetings can impose on our Company. The 20% threshold requires large and small stockholders to work together to bring an important matter to the general stockholder population through a special meeting.
Holding a special meeting of our stockholders would be a costly undertaking, involve substantial planning, and require us to commit significant resources and attention to the legal and logistical elements of such a meeting. Due to these costs, we believe that it is essential that this right be limited in the manner provided by the 20% threshold. The company’s stockholders should only have to bear such expenses and our Board and management should divert attention away from overseeing and running the business only when a significant percentage of stockholders agree that it is worth doing so. If fewer than 20% of our stockholders think a special stockholder meeting is required, we believe there is insufficient reason to hold one, particularly when there are other avenues for stockholders to express concerns regarding Citi.
The Proponent’s concern appears to be that the current minimum ownership threshold to call a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders unduly restricts or limits stockholders’ ability to call a special meeting of stockholders. The Board, taking into account peer thresholds, the 2018 vote of shareholders on this proposal, alternatives Citi’s shareholders have for expressing their concerns, and the input of institutional investors, lowered the ownership threshold to call a special meeting of stockholders to 20%.
The concerns of stockholders who might want to call a special meeting but who cannot garner the support of 20% of the Company’s stockholders have alternatives for expressing their concerns:
Stockholders of Citi have the ability to act by written consent;
Citi’s Board has adopted a proxy access by-law that enables stockholders to include up to two director candidates in Citi’s Proxy Statement;
Stockholders have ample opportunity to express their concerns at the Company’s Annual Meeting, or, alternatively, in writing, by following the instructions on page 42 of this Proxy Statement; and
Stockholders can communicate directly with our Board and management.

Board Recommendation

In response to the vote at Citi’s 2018 Shareholder meeting, Citi’s Board of Directors lowered the threshold to 20% to call a special meeting; this provides stockholders with assurance that a reasonable number of stockholders consider a matter important enough to merit a special meeting; therefore the Board recommends a voteAGAINSTthis Proposal 7.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS125

Submission of Future Stockholder Proposals

Under SEC Rule 14a-8, a stockholder who intends to present a proposal at the next Annual Meeting of stockholders and who wishes the proposal to be included in the Proxy Statement for that meeting must submit the proposal in writing to the Corporate Secretary of Citi, Rohan Weerasinghe, at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013. The proposal must be received no later than November 15, 2017.7, 2019. The proposal and its proponent must satisfy all applicable requirements of Rule 14a-8.

Citi’s By-laws permit a stockholder or group of stockholders (up to 20) who have owned at least 3% of Citi common stock for at least three years to submit directorDirector nominees (up to the greater of two nominees or 20% of the Board, as determined in accordance with the By-laws) for inclusion in Citi’s Proxy Statement if the nominating stockholder(s) satisfies the requirements specified in the By-laws. With respect to stockholder nominees for Director election submitted for inclusion in Citi’s Proxy Statement for the 20182020 Annual Meeting, written notice of nominations must be provided by the stockholder proponent(s) to Citi in accordance with Citi’s By-laws. The notice must be delivered to, or mailed and received by, Citi’s Corporate Secretary between October 16, 20178, 2019 and November 15, 2017.7, 2019. These deadlines are based on the 150th day and 120th day, respectively, before the one-year anniversary of the date that the Proxy Statement for this Annual Meeting was first sent to stockholders (which date, for purposes of Citi’s By-laws, is March 15, 2017)6, 2019). The ability to include a nominee in Citi’s Proxy Statement is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in Citi’s By-laws.

With respect to stockholder nominees for Director election at the next Annual Meeting (other than nominees submitted for inclusion in Citi’s proxy materials) and stockholder proposals for consideration at the next Annual Meeting that are not submitted for inclusion in Citi’s proxy materials under Rule 14a-8, written notice of nominations and proposals must be provided by the stockholder proponent to Citi in accordance with Citi’s By-laws. The notice must be delivered to, or mailed and received by, Citi’s Corporate Secretary, Rohan Weerasinghe, between December 26, 201718, 2019 and January 25, 201817, 2020 and must comply with all applicable provisions of Citi’s By-laws. You may obtain a copy of Citi’s By-laws on Citi’s website or by writing to the Corporate Secretary, Rohan Weerasinghe, at 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10013.

Cost of Annual Meeting and Proxy Solicitation

Citi pays the cost of the Annual Meeting and the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, Citi may solicit proxies by personal interview, telephone, and similar means. No Director, officer, or employee of Citi will be specially compensated for these activities. Citi also intends to request that brokers, banks, and other nominees solicit proxies from their principals and will pay the brokers, banks, and other nominees certain expenses they incur for such activities. Citi has retained Morrow Sodali LLC, 470 West Avenue, Stamford, CT 06902, a proxy soliciting firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies, for an estimated fee of $30,000 plus reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses.

Householding

Under SEC rules, a single set of Annual Reports and Proxy Statements may be sent to any household at which two or more stockholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. Each stockholder continues to receive a separate proxy card. This procedure, referred to as householding, reduces the volume of duplicate information stockholders receive and reduces mailing and printing expenses. In accordance with a notice sent to certain stockholders who shared a single address, only one Annual Report and Proxy Statement will be sent to that address unless any stockholder at that address requested multiple sets of documents be sent. However, if any stockholder who agreed to householding wishes to receive a separate Annual Report or Proxy Statement, for 2016 or in the future, he or she may telephone toll-free 1-866-540-7095 or write to Broadridge Financial Services, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. Stockholders sharing an address who wish to receive a single set of reports may do so by contacting their banks or brokers, if they are beneficial holders, or by contacting Broadridge at the address set forth above, if they are record holders.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents


126

Directions to 2019 Annual Meeting Location

Date and Time     April 16, 2019, 9:00 a.m.

Place  

Citi’s Headquarters

388 Greenwich Street (between North Moore and Beach Streets)
New York, New York 10013

Key Information for attending Citi’s 2019 Annual Meeting:

Please register for the Annual Meeting at www.proxyvote.com.
Print your ticket at home or call Shareholder Meeting Registration Phone Support (toll free) at 1-844-318-0137 or (international toll call) at 1-925-331-6070 for assistance.
Deadline date isApril 15, 2019.
Citi’s Headquarters at 388 Greenwich Street is accessible by public transportation. If you plan to visit by car, please allow extra time to navigate New York City traffic and to secure parking. There are multiple parking garages in Tribeca; however, it is recommended that you contact a parking garage ahead of time to ensure availability.

By Subway

train to Franklin Street, walk 2 blocks west to Greenwich Street and North Moore Street.
 trains to Canal Street, walk 3.5 blocks west to Greenwich Street and Beach Street.
For more information, please visit: www.mta.info.

By Car

From the East Side, use the FDR Drive to South Street Viaduct/West Street. Continue to Hubert Street, making a right turn on Hubert Street, proceed 2 blocks to Greenwich Street, make a right turn onto Greenwich Street and proceed 1 block to 388 Greenwich Street on your right.
From the Upper West Side, take the West Side Highway to Vestry Street (approximately 3 blocks after Canal Street). Turn left onto Vestry Street, turn right at the 2nd cross street onto Greenwich Street and proceed 3 blocks to 388 Greenwich Street on your right.
Please Note: Citi’s Headquarters at 388 Greenwich Street does not have designated visitor parking. Limited street parking is available, and there are nearby parking garages.

By Bus

Buses arrive at the Port Authority Bus Terminal at 42nd Street. Please take either the subway or an MTA bus downtown. Please visit: www.mta.info for further information.

By Railroad

Long distance trains (i.e., Amtrak, LIRR and NJT) generally arrive in Penn Station (at 34th Street and 7th Avenue). From Penn Station, either take a taxi to 388 Greenwich Street, or a downtown train or(follow subway directions above). For more information, please visit: www.mta.info.
Metro North Commuter trains (servicing Hudson, Harlem, and New Haven lines) arrive in Grand Central Terminal. From Grand Central, take a taxi to 388 Greenwich Street, or subway using the shuttle to Times Square and transfer to the downtown to the Franklin Street stop. Exit the Franklin subway station and walk 2 blocks west and turn right onto Greenwich Street. Citi’s headquarters is on the northwest corner of Greenwich and North Moore Streets.

Citi 20172019 Proxy Statement




Table of Contents

119    127

Directions to 2017 Annual Meeting Location

Date and Time    April 25, 2017, 9:00 a.m.
PlaceThe Great Hall of The Cooper Union
7 East 7th Street
New York, New York 10003

The Cooper Union is accessible by public transportation. If you plan to visit by car, please allow extra time to navigate New York City traffic and to secure parking. There are multiple parking garages near The Cooper Union; however, it is recommended that you contact a parking garage ahead of time to ensure availability.

By Subway

The Astor Place stop served by the #6 train is the closest New York City subway stop to The Cooper Union. The N and R trains have a stop at 8th Street and Broadway, about 2 blocks west of The Cooper Union. For more information, please visit: www.mta.info.

By Car


From the East Side, use the FDR Drive and take Exit 5 (Houston Street). Take Houston Street westbound to Lafayette Street. Turn right (north) on Lafayette, and drive to Astor Place. Turn right on Astor Place and drive one block to Cooper Square.
From the West Side, take the West Side Highway to the 14th Street exit. Turn left onto 14th Street to 3rd Avenue and make a right. Take 3rd Avenue to Cooper Square, which begins at 7th Street.
Please Note: The Cooper Union does not have designated visitor parking. Limited street parking is available, and there are several nearby parking garages.

By Bus


Buses arrive at the Port Authority Bus Terminal at 42nd Street. From the terminal, you may take a taxi, the subway (S train to Grand Central and then the #6 train downtown), or MTA buses (crosstown M42 to Lexington Avenue, ask for a transfer and switch to the downtown M101). For more information, please visit: www.mta.info.

By Railroad

Long distance trains generally arrive at Penn Station (32nd-33rd Street and 7th Avenue). From Penn Station, either take a taxi to The Cooper Union, or take the downtown N or R subway (at 34th Street and 6th Avenue). Metro North trains arrive at Grand Central Station where you may either take a taxi or the downtown #6 subway.For more information, please visit: www.mta.info.

www.citigroup.com



Table of Contents

      120

Annex A

Additional Information Regarding Proposal 3

Glossary

CCARrefers to the Federal Reserve Board’s annual Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review. CCAR is an important regulatory supervisory mechanism for assessing the capital adequacy of banks including, among other things, ensuring that banks have sufficient capital to continue to provide key financial services under adverse economic and financial market scenarios. Banks may not return capital to stockholders or take other capital actions unless the Federal Reserve Board indicates that it has “no objection” to a bank’s capital plan, including its requested capital actions.

Cumulative earnings per shareEarnings Per Sharefor our Performance Share Units is determined by adding the diluted earnings per share based on net income allocated to common shareholdersstockholders from our quarterly earnings reports for the 12 quarters ending in 2017 through 2019.of the applicable three-year performance period.

Deferred Tax AssetsorDTAsrepresent the accumulated tax benefits on Citi’s Consolidated Balance Sheet resulting from losses in prior years that Citi expects to use to offset tax liabilities on future profits. These assets are excluded to some extent from the calculation of a bank’s regulatory capital. This has the effect of limiting the amount of capital that a bank can deploy in its banking business or can return to stockholders. Large DTAs mean that a bank must retain higher amounts of capital, thereby making higher returns harder to achieve. Reductions in DTAs are therefore important because the reductions have the effect of making more capital usable either in Citi’s businesses or for return to Citi’s stockholders.

Efficiency Ratiois total operating expenses divided by total revenues (net of interest expense). This ratio generally compares the cost of generating revenue to the amount of revenue generated. A lower cost is preferable to a higher cost in generating the same amount of revenue, and therefore, a lower efficiency ratio is generally better than a higher one. This metric encourages management to consider the costs of generating additional revenue instead of simply maximizing revenue, and can be used on a relative basis to identify which businesses are managed better than others. We use the Citicorp Efficiency Ratio (and not Citigroup efficiency ratios) as a measure of Citi performance as Citicorp represents Citi’s ongoing businesses and thus focuses management on expense management and productivity initiatives within these businesses.

Income from Continuing Operations Before Taxesis revenues minus expenses and cost of credit, before taxes and discontinued operations.

Net Incomerepresents a company’s after-tax profits. Net Income is an element of the metrics that measure return on assets or capital.

Return on Assets (ROA)is Net Incomenet income divided by average assets as determined under U.S. GAAP.

Return on Tangible Common Equityis Net Incomenet income for a business or Citigroup (minus preferred dividends in the case of Citigroup) divided by average tangible common equity for the year. Management views this metric as an appropriate indication of the long-term potential of Citi’s operating businesses to deliver long-term value to stockholders.

Risk Appetite Ratiois the ratio between the earnings of a business unit, including expected losses (defined as revenues, net of interest expense, minus operating expenses, minus expected losses) (the numerator) and the stress losses (i.e., unexpected losses) of Citi or the applicable business segment under a 1-in-10 year stress scenario (the denominator). The applicable business unit should produce sufficient earnings each year, so that it does not lose money under a moderate stress event (i.e., a 1-in-10 year stress scenario). As long as the relationship is higher than 1-to-1, then the business unit “passes” the Risk Appetite Ratio test. The Risk Appetite Ratio is currently viewed as a baseline standard or a minimum goal.

Citi 2017 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

ANNEX A121     

Risk Appetite Surplus, for a business unit, is earnings (defined as revenues, net of interest expense, minus operating expenses) minus both expected losses and minus unexpected losses (i.e., the stress losses of the business unit under a 1-in-10 year stress scenario). The Risk Appetite Surplus metric is intended to measure the ability of a business unit to withstand a moderate stress event without incurring an annual loss. Risk Appetite Surplus is used as a more nuanced qualitative tool to evaluate the capital generation power of businesses that may “pass” the Risk Appetite Ratio test.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

128ANNEX A

Citigroup — Financial– Quantitative Scorecard Metric Details and Adjusted Results Detail and Reconciliations

(In millions of dollars, except ratios)ratios and earnings per share)

CitigroupCiticorpGCBICGCiticorp
Latin
America
Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes     $21,477           $7,820     $14,425     $3,157
 
Less: Provision for Income Taxes6,4442,7124,4971,006
Add: Income From Discontinued Operations(58)
Less: Noncontrolling Interests637584
Net Income For Return on Assets and Return on Tangible
       Common Equity$14,912$5,101$9,870$2,147
 
Average Assets$1,808,728$397,000$1,297,000$137,000
ROA (Net Income/Average Assets)0.82%1.28%0.76%1.57%
 
Revenues, net of Interest Expense$69,875$66,023$31,763$33,850$8,995
 
Total Operating Expenses$41,416$38,245$17,516$18,939$4,552
 
Efficiency Ratio (Operating Expenses/Revenues,
      net of Interest Expense)59.3%57.9%55.1%55.9%50.6%
 
Net Income (from above)$14,912$5,101$9,870$2,147
Preferred Stock Dividends1,077
Income Available to Common Shareholders$13,835
 
Total Common Equity at December 31, 2016$205,867
Less:
      Goodwill at December 31, 201621,659
      Intangible assets (other than Mortgage Servicing Rights)
             at December 31, 20165,114
      Goodwill and intangible assets (other than MSRs) related to
             assets held-for-sale at December 31, 201672
Tangible Common Equity at December 31, 2016$179,022
Average Tangible Common Equity during 2016$182,135$36,000$80,300$12,080
Return on Tangible Common Equity7.6%14.2%12.3%17.8%
 
Risk Appetite Ratio:
      Unexpected Losses$14,685$5,035$6,268$1,463
      Expected Losses$8,495$7,260$1,235$1,074
      Risk Appetite Ratio (RAR) = [Revenues - Operating Expenses -
             Expected Losses]/Unexpected Losses131%139%218%230%
      Risk Appetite Surplus (RAS) = [Revenues - Operating Expenses -
             Expected Losses - Unexpected Losses]$4,598$1,952$7,408$1,906

201820172018 vs. 2017
     Citigroup     GCB     ICG     Latin
America
     Citigroup     %
Increase
Reported Income from Continuing
       Operations before Income Taxes
$23,445$7,601$15,831$3,810$22,761
Less: Provision for Income Taxes5,3571,8393,63199429,388
Add: Income from Discontinued Operations(8)(111)
Less: Noncontrolling Interests3571760
Reported Net Income (Loss)$18,045$5,755$12,183$2,816$(6,798)
Less: Impact of Tax Reform(1)$(94)$22,594
Adjusted Net Income$17,951$15,79614%
Reported Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS)$6.68$(2.98)
       Impact of Tax Reform(1)0.03(8.31)
Adjusted Diluted EPS$6.65$5.3325%
Average Assets (in billions of dollars)$1,920,200$423,000$1,404,000$126,000$1,875,500
Reported ROA (Reported Net Income/
       Average Assets)
0.94%1.36%0.87%2.23%(0.36%)
Adjusted ROA (Adjusted Net Income/
       Average Assets)
0.93%0.84%
Revenues, Net of Interest Expense$72,854$33,777$36,994$10,264$72,444
Total Operating Expenses$41,841$18,590$20,979$5,068$42,232
Efficiency Ratio (Operating Expenses/Revenues,
       Net of Interest Expense)
57.4%55.0%56.7%49.4%58.3%
Adjusted Net Income (from above)$17,951$15,796
Preferred Stock Dividends1,1731,213
Adjusted Income Available to
       Common Shareholders
$16,778$14,583
Total Common Equity at December 31, 2018
       and 2017
$177,760$181,487
Less:
       Goodwill at December 31, 2018 and 201722,04622,256
       Intangible Assets (Other Than Mortgage
              Servicing Rights) at December 31, 2018
              and 2017
4,6364,588
Tangible Common Equity at December 31, 2018
       and 2017
$151,078$154,643
Average Tangible Common Equity during 2018
       and 2017
$153,343$35,000$85,000$12,100$180,458
Adjusted Return on Tangible Common Equity
       (Excluding the Impact of Tax Reform)
10.9%16.4%14.3%23.3%8.1%
Average Common Equity$179,497$207,413
Return on Common Equity ((Reported Net
       Income less Preferred Dividends)/
       Average Common Equity)
9.4%(3.9%)
Common Dividends$3,865$2,595
Common Stock Repurchases14,54514,533
Distributions to Common Shareholders
       (Total Payout)
$18,410$17,128
Reported Total Payout Ratio (Total Payout/
       (Net Income less Preferred Dividends))
109%(214%)
Adjusted Total Payout Ratio (Total
       Payout/(Adjusted Net Income less
       Preferred Dividends))
110%117%

www.citigroup.comCiti 2019 Proxy Statement



Table of Contents

ANNEX A129

201820172018 vs. 2017
     Citigroup     GCB     ICG     Latin
America
     Citigroup     %
Increase
Risk Appetite Ratio:
       Unexpected Losses$14,979$4,716$6,837$1,359
       Expected Losses$8,420$7,016$1,024$1,055
       Risk Appetite Ratio (RAR) = (Revenues -
              Operating Expenses - Expected Losses)/
              Unexpected Losses
151%173%219%305%
       Risk Appetite Surplus (RAS) = (Revenues -
              Operating Expenses - Expected Losses -
              Unexpected Losses)
$7,614$3,455$8,154$2,782
Reported Global Consumer Banking (GCB) 2017 GCB
       Revenues$33,777$32,838
       Less: Impact of Foreign Exchange Translation(132)
       Less: Gain on Sale of a Mexico Asset
              Management Business
250
Adjusted GCB Revenues$33,527$32,7063%
Reported Institutional Clients Group (ICG) 2017 ICG
       Revenues$36,994$36,474
       Less: Gain on Sale of a Fixed Income
              Analytics Business
580
Adjusted ICG Revenues$36,994$35,8943%

(1)Represents the 2017 one-time impact of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Reform), which was signed into law on December 22, 2017, as well as the 2018 one-time impact of the finalization of the provisional component of the impact based on Citi’s analysis as well as additional guidance received from the U.S. Treasury Department related to Tax Reform.

(Intentionally Left Blank)

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

130

Annex B

Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan

(effective April 16, 2019, subject to stockholder approval)

1. Purpose

The purposes of the Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended from time to time, the “Plan”) are to (i) align incentive compensation programs with the Company’s long-term business objectives and the interests of stockholders; (ii) attract and retain Employees by providing compensation opportunities that are competitive within the global financial services industry; and (iii) provide compensation opportunities that do not create incentives to take imprudent risks.

2. Effective Date and Term

The Plan will become effective on April 16, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company. Unless terminated earlier by the Committee, the Plan will expire on the date of the annual general meeting of stockholders to be held in 2024. The Plan replaces the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2014 SIP”) for Awards granted on or after the Effective Date. Awards may not be granted under the 2014 SIP beginning on the Effective Date, but the adoption and effectiveness of the Plan will not affect the terms or conditions of any outstanding awards granted under the Prior Plans or any other plan prior to the Effective Date.

3. Definitions

“Award”shall mean an Option, SAR, or Stock Award granted under the Plan.

“Award Agreement”shall mean one or more documents (in either paper or electronic form (including by posting on the Company’s intranet or other shared electronic medium controlled by the Company to which a Participant has access)) evidencing the terms and conditions of an Award.

“Board”shall mean the Board of Directors of the Company.

“Change of Control”shall have the meaning set forth in Section 11.

“Code”shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, including any rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

“Committee”shall mean the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board, or a sub-committee thereof, the members of which shall qualify as “Non-Employee Directors” under Rule 16b-3 of the 1934 Act; provided, however, that with respect to the application of the Plan to Directors, unless specifically provided otherwise herein, “Committee” shall mean the Board. Unless expressly provided otherwise herein or not permitted by applicable law, “Committee” includes any authorized delegate of the Committee, including each Plan Administrator. For avoidance of doubt, a failure of one or more members of the Committee to qualify as “Non-Employee Directors” under Rule 16b-3 of the 1934 Act shall not impair the validity of actions taken by the Committee, including the granting of any Award.

“Common Stock”shall mean the common stock of the Company, par value $.01 per share.

“Company”shall mean Citigroup Inc., a Delaware corporation.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

ANNEX B131

“Deferred Stock Award”shall mean an Award payable in shares of Common Stock at the end of a specified deferral period that is subject to the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions set forth in the Plan and an Award Agreement.

“Director”shall mean a member of the Board who is not also an active employee or officer of the Company or a Subsidiary.

“Employee”shall have the meaning set forth in General Instruction A to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in effect on the Effective Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, consultants and advisors (other than Directors) shall not be eligible to receive Awards under the Plan.

“Fair Market Value”shall mean, in the case of a grant of an Option or a SAR, the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange (or, if the Common Stock is not traded on the New York Stock Exchange, the principal national securities exchange upon which the Common Stock is traded or quoted) on the date on which the Option or the SAR is granted. For all other purposes of administering an Award (including Options and SARs granted as Substitute Awards), “Fair Market Value” shall be as determined pursuant to the valuation methodology approved for such purpose by the Committee.

“GAAP”shall mean U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

“Gross Misconduct”shall mean any conduct by a Participant (a) while employed by the Company or a Subsidiary that is competitive with the Company’s or any Subsidiary’s business operations, (b) that is in breach of any obligation that Participant owes to the Company or any Subsidiary or of that Participant’s duty of loyalty to the Company or any Subsidiary, (c) that is materially injurious to the Company or any Subsidiary, or (d) that otherwise constitutes “gross misconduct” as determined pursuant to guidelines adopted by the Committee or a Plan Administrator.

“Option”shall mean the right to purchase a specified number of shares of Common Stock at a stated exercise price for a specified period of time subject to the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions set forth in the Plan and an Award Agreement.

“Participant”shall mean an Employee or former Employee who holds an Award under the Plan (and the legal representative of the estate of a deceased Participant).

“Performance Condition”shall mean any condition to the vesting of an Award based on the performance of the Company (including one or more of its Subsidiaries), the performance of any branch, business unit of the Company (or of any Subsidiary), or the performance of an individual Participant (other than remaining employed by the Company or a Subsidiary), whether based on absolute or relative performance measures.

“Plan Administrator”shall mean any officer or employee of the Company or a Subsidiary performing a function related to administration of the Plan as part of his or her normal job duties, and any director, officer, or employee, whether acting alone or as part of a committee or other group, or non-employee agent, to whom any authority over any matter related to administration of the Plan or any Award has been directly or indirectly delegated by the Committee.

“Prior Plans”shall mean the 2014 SIP and the Citigroup 2009 Stock Incentive Plan.

“Repricing”shall mean (a) any action that constitutes a “repricing” under GAAP or the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (including any modification or amendment to an outstanding Option or SAR that has the effect of reducing its exercise price), (b) any cancellation of an Option or SAR when its exercise price exceeds Fair Market Value in exchange for cash, (c) any cancellation of an Option or SAR in exchange for a new Option or SAR with a lower exercise price, or (d) a substitution of a Stock Award for an Option or SAR when its exercise price exceeds Fair Market Value; in each case other than an adjustment to an outstanding Award that is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(d).

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

132ANNEX B

“Restricted Stock Award”shall mean an Award of Common Stock that is subject to the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions set forth in the Plan and an Award Agreement.

“SAR”shall mean “stock appreciation right,” which is a right to receive a payment, during a specified term, in cash, Common Stock, or a combination thereof, in an amount equal to the excess of the Fair Market Value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock at the time the SAR is exercised over the exercise price of such SAR, which right is subject to the terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions set forth in the Plan and an Award Agreement.

“Section 16(a) Officer”shall mean an Employee who is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the 1934 Act.

“Stock Award”shall mean a Deferred Stock Award, a Restricted Stock Award, a Stock Payment, or Other Stock-Based Award.

“Stock Payment”shall mean an immediately vested payment in shares of Common Stock that may or may not be in lieu of cash.

“Subsidiary”shall mean any of the consolidated subsidiaries of the Company.

“Substitute Award”shall mean an Award designated as such and granted in connection with a transaction between the Company or a Subsidiary and another entity or business in substitution or exchange for, or conversion, adjustment, assumption, or replacement of, awards previously granted by such other entity to any individuals who have become Employees of the Company or any Subsidiary as a result of such transaction or who were formerly employed by the acquired entity. An Award granted as an inducement to joining the Company or a Subsidiary in replacement of an award forfeited when leaving a previous employer to join the Company or a Subsidiary shall not be considered a Substitute Award.

“1934 Act”shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder and any successor thereto.

4. The Committee

(a)Committee Authority.The Committee shall have full and exclusive power to administer and interpret the Plan, to grant Awards and to adopt such administrative rules, regulations, procedures, and guidelines governing the Plan and Awards as it deems appropriate from time to time. The Committee’s authority shall include, but not be limited to, the authority to (i) determine the type of Awards to be granted under the Plan; (ii) select Award recipients and determine the extent of their participation; and (iii) establish all other terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions applicable to Awards, Award programs and the shares of Common Stock issued pursuant thereto. Subject to the limitations set forth in the Plan, the Committee may suspend, accelerate, or defer the vesting or payment of Awards, cancel or modify outstanding Awards, waive any conditions or restrictions imposed with respect to Awards or the Common Stock issued pursuant to Awards, and make any and all other determinations that it deems appropriate with respect to the administration of the Plan.
(b)Administration of the Plan.The administration of the Plan shall be managed by the Committee. The Committee shall have the power to prescribe and modify, as necessary, the form of Award Agreement, to correct any defect, supply any omission, or clarify any inconsistency in the Plan and/or in any Award Agreement and to take such actions and make such administrative determinations that the Committee deems appropriate. Any decision of the Committee in the administration of the Plan shall be final, binding, and conclusive on all parties concerned, including the Company, its stockholders and Subsidiaries, and all Participants.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

ANNEX B133

(c)Delegation of Authority.To the extent not inconsistent with applicable law, the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, or other provisions of the Plan, the Committee may at any time delegate to a Plan Administrator some or all of its authority over the administration of the Plan, with respect to persons who are not Section 16(a) Officers. Actions taken or determinations made by or ratified by a duly authorized Plan Administrator shall have the same force and effect as if undertaken or made by the Committee, and all references in the Plan to the Committee (except with respect to actions or determinations related exclusively to Section 16(a) Officers) shall be deemed to include a reference to a duly authorized Plan Administrator.
(d)Prohibition Against Repricing.Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, in no event shall any action be taken under the Plan that constitutes a Repricing of any Option or SAR granted under the Plan, or of any option or stock appreciation right granted under the Prior Plans or of an acquired company, except with approval of the stockholders of the Company.
(e)Indemnification.No member of the Committee or any Plan Administrator shall be personally liable for any action or determination made with respect to the Plan, except for his or her own willful misconduct or as expressly provided by statute. The members of the Committee and every Plan Administrator shall be entitled to indemnification and reimbursement from the Company, to the extent permitted by applicable law and the By-laws and policies of the Company. In the performance of its functions under the Plan, the Committee (and each member of the Committee and every Plan Administrator) shall be entitled to rely in good faith upon information and advice furnished by the Company’s officers, employees, accountants, counsel, and any other party they deem appropriate, and neither the Committee nor any Plan Administrator shall be liable for any action taken or not taken in reliance upon any such advice.

5. Participation

(a)Eligible Employees.The Committee shall determine which Employees shall be eligible to receive Awards under the Plan, provided that consultants and advisors (other than members of the Board in their roles as such) shall not be eligible to receive Awards under the Plan. Former Employees may be eligible to receive Awards under the Plan, but only if a Substitute Award or with respect to their last year of service. With respect to Employees subject to U.S. income tax, Options and SARs (unless Substitute Awards) shall only be granted to such Employees who provide direct services to the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company as of the date of grant of the Option or SAR.
(b)Participation by Employees of Subsidiaries.Employees of Subsidiaries may participate in the Plan upon approval of Awards to such Employees by the Committee. Awards to Employees of Subsidiaries may be conditioned upon the Subsidiary’s agreement to reimburse the Company for costs and expenses of such participation, as determined by the Committee.
(c)Participation Outside of the United States.In order to facilitate the granting of Awards to Employees who are foreign nationals or who are employed outside of the U.S., the Committee may provide for such special terms and conditions, including, without limitation, substitutes for Awards, as the Committee may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, tax policy, or custom. Any special terms or conditions adopted by the Committee in accordance with this Section 5(c) may be set forth in a sub-plan, which shall constitute a part of this Plan; provided that the terms and conditions of any such sub-plan shall not be inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Plan, as then in effect.
(d)Maximum Individual Awards
(i)Limits on Awards to Directors.The maximum number of shares of Common Stock subject to Awards granted during a single calendar year to any Director, taken together with any cash fees paid during the calendar year to the Director, in respect of the Director’s service as a member of the Board during such year (including service as a member or chair of any committees of the Board), shall not exceed $1,000,000 in total value (calculating the value of any such Awards based on the grant date fair value of

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

134ANNEX B

such Awards in accordance with GAAP). The independent members of the Board may make exceptions to this limit for a non-executive chair of the Board, provided that the Director receiving such additional compensation may not participate in the decision to award such compensation.

(ii)

Limits on Options and SARs.The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to all Options and SARs granted to an individual Employee (other than as a Director) in a calendar year may not exceed 1,000,000 shares (subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 6(d)).

(iii)

Limits on Stock Awards.The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to all Stock Awards granted to an individual Employee (other than as a Director) in a calendar year may not exceed 1,000,000 shares (subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 6(d)).

(iv)

Substitute Awards.Notwithstanding the foregoing, shares subject to an Award that is a Substitute Award shall not count against any individual Award limit in this Section 5(d).

6. Available Shares of Common Stock

(a)

Shares Subject to the Plan.Common Stock issued pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan may be shares that have been authorized but unissued, or have been previously issued and reacquired by the Company, or both. Reacquired shares may consist of shares purchased in open market transactions or otherwise. Pursuant to and subject to the other provisions of this Section 6, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall not exceed the sum of (i) thirty million (30,000,000) shares; and (ii) any additional number of shares that may be authorized for issuance pursuant to any amendments to the Plan approved by stockholders of the Company after the Effective Date.

(b)

Forfeited and Expired Awards.Awards granted under the Plan or the Prior Plans that, after the Effective Date, are forfeited, expire, or are cancelled or settled without issuance of shares shall not count against the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan as set forth in Section 6(a) and shall be available for future Awards under the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, all shares of Common Stock that are (i) withheld or tendered in payment of an Option exercise price or repurchased by the Company with Option exercise proceeds; (ii) withheld or tendered to satisfy any tax withholding obligation (in connection with any Option, SAR, Stock Award, or otherwise); (iii) covered by a SAR (to the extent that it is settled in shares of Common Stock, without regard to the number of shares of Common Stock that are actually issued to the Participant upon exercise); (iv) withheld by the Company to satisfy any debt or other obligation owed to the Company or any Subsidiary; and (v) fractional shares of Common Stock that are cancelled pursuant to Section 7(f), shall be considered issued pursuant to the Plan and shall not be added to the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan as set forth in Section 6(a).

(c)

Other Items not Included in Allocation.The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan as set forth in Section 6(a) shall not be affected by (i) the payment in cash of dividends or dividend equivalents in connection with outstanding Awards; or (ii) the grant of Substitute Awards. Any shares purchased by or on behalf of Participants in a dividend reinvestment program established under the Plan shall not count against the maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Plan as set forth in Section 6(a), provided that such shares are purchased in open-market transactions or are treasury shares purchased directly from the Company at Fair Market Value at the time of purchase.

(d)

Adjustments.In the event of any change in the Company’s capital structure, including but not limited to a change in the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding, on account of (i) any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, spinoff or any similar equity restructuring, or (ii) any combination or exchange of equity securities, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, reorganization, or divesture or any other similar event affecting the Company’s capital structure, to reflect such change in the Company’s capital structure, the Committee shall make appropriate equitable adjustments to (i) the maximum number of shares of

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

ANNEX B135

Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan as set forth in Section 6(a), and (ii) the maximum number of shares that may be granted to any single individual pursuant to the limits set forth in Section 5(d). In the event of any extraordinary dividend, divestiture, or other distribution (other than ordinary cash dividends) of assets to stockholders, or any transaction or event described above, to the extent necessary to prevent the enlargement or diminution of the rights of Participants, the Committee shall make appropriate equitable adjustments to the number or kind of shares subject to an outstanding Award, the exercise price applicable to an outstanding Award, and/or a Performance Condition. Any adjustments under this Section 6(d) shall be made in a manner that does not adversely affect the exemption provided pursuant to Rule 16b-3 under the 1934 Act, to the extent applicable. The Company shall give each Participant notice of an adjustment to an Award hereunder and, upon notice, such adjustment shall be conclusive and binding for all purposes. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall decline to adjust any Award made to a Participant if such adjustment would violate applicable law.

7. Awards Under the Plan

Awards under the Plan may be granted as Options, SARs, or Stock Awards, as described below. Awards may be granted singly, in combination, or in tandem as determined by the Committee. Subject to the terms of the Plan (including but not limited to the minimum vesting requirement of Section 7(d)), Awards shall have such terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions as may be determined by the Committee from time to time, and may include vesting, forfeiture, cancellation and clawback provisions.

(a)

Options.Options shall expire after such period, not to exceed 10 years, as may be determined by the Committee. If an Option is exercisable in installments, such installments or portions thereof that become exercisable shall remain exercisable until the Option expires or is otherwise cancelled pursuant to its terms or the terms of the Plan. In no event shall any Option issued under the Plan be a “reload” Option or carry any similar rights.

(i)

Exercise Price.The Committee shall determine the exercise price per share for each Option, which shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value on the grant date, unless the Option is a Substitute Award.

(ii)

Exercise of Options.Upon satisfaction of the applicable conditions relating to vesting and exercisability, as determined by the Committee, and upon provision for the payment in full of the exercise price and applicable taxes due, the Participant shall be entitled to exercise the Option and receive the number of shares of Common Stock issuable in connection with the Option exercise. The shares issued in connection with the Option exercise may be subject to such conditions and restrictions as the Committee may determine, from time to time. An Option may be exercised by any method as may be permitted by the Committee from time to time, including but not limited to any “net exercise” or other “cashless” exercise method.

(b)

Stock Appreciation Rights.SARs granted under the Plan shall expire after such term, not to exceed 10 years, as may be determined by the Committee. The exercise price per share of Common Stock subject to a SAR shall not be less than 100% of Fair Market Value on the grant date, unless the SAR is a Substitute Award.

(c)

Stock Awards

(i)

Stock Payment.Subject to the terms of the Plan, the Committee may grant vested shares of Common Stock as a Stock Payment. A Stock Payment may be in lieu of cash compensation, but may be subject to restrictions on sale or transfer, or cancellation and recoupment, as determined by the Committee. A Stock Payment under the Plan may be granted as, or in payment of, a bonus determined pursuant to any other plan. Any shares of Common Stock granted as a Stock Payment in lieu of cash compensation shall be valued at their Fair Market Value.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

136ANNEX B
(ii)

Restricted Stock.Unvested shares of Common Stock issued pursuant to a Restricted Stock Award shall be entitled to voting rights as provided in Section 9, unless determined otherwise by the Committee. Upon satisfaction of all conditions to vesting and any tax withholding obligations, and upon the lapse of any post-vesting restrictions on sale or transfer, shares of Common Stock subject to a Restricted Stock Award shall be delivered to a Participant free of restriction.

(iii)

Deferred Stock.A Deferred Stock Award represents only an unfunded, unsecured promise to deliver shares of Common Stock in the future and does not give a Participant any greater rights than those of an unsecured general creditor of the Company. Upon satisfaction of all conditions to vesting and any tax withholding obligations, shares of Common Stock subject to a vested Deferred Stock Award will be issued, and upon the lapse of any post-vesting restrictions on sale or transfer, such shares of Common Stock will be delivered to a Participant free of restriction.

(iv)

Other Stock-Based Awards.To the extent not prohibited by applicable law, the Committee may grant any other Award that is denominated in shares of Common Stock and that may be settled in cash and/ or by the delivery of shares of Common Stock (for the avoidance of doubt, an award that by its terms may be settled only in cash shall not be an Award under this Plan).

(d)

Minimum Vesting Requirement.Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, Awards granted under the Plan shall vest no earlier than the first anniversary of the date on which the Award is granted; provided, that the following Awards shall not be subject to the foregoing minimum vesting requirement: any (i) Substitute Awards, (ii) Awards to Directors that vest on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the date of grant and the next annual meeting of stockholders which is at least 50 weeks after the immediately preceding year’s annual meeting, and (iii) any additional Awards the Committee may grant, up to a maximum of five percent (5%) of the available share reserve authorized for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Section 6(a) (subject to adjustment under Section 6(d)); and, provided, further, that the foregoing restriction does not apply to the Committee’s discretion to provide for accelerated exercisability or vesting of any Award, including in cases of retirement, death, disability, leave of absence, termination of employment, Change in Control, upon the sale or other disposition of a Participant’s employer, or any other similar event, as specified in the Award Agreement.

(e)

Performance-Based Awards

(i)

The Committee may grant Awards that are subject to the achievement of one or more Performance Conditions related to a period of performance of not less than one year.

(ii)

Performance Conditions may be expressed in either, or a combination of, absolute or relative values or a percentage of: revenue, revenue or product growth, net income (pre- or after-tax), earnings, earnings per share, stockholders’ equity or return on stockholders’ equity, assets or return on assets, return on risk-adjusted assets, capital or return on capital, return on risk capital, book value or book value per share, economic value-added models or equivalent metrics, operating income, pre- or after-tax income, expenses or reengineering savings, margins, cash flow or cash flow per share, stock price, total shareholder return, market share, debt reduction, net promoter scores, operating efficiency ratios, expense ratios, liquidity ratios, regulatory achievements or any objective or subjective Performance Conditions selected by the Committee. In addition, such Performance Conditions may be used on an absolute or relative basis to measure the performance of the Company as a whole, any business unit(s) of the Company and its Subsidiaries and/or one or more of its branches or affiliates, or the performance of an individual Participant, and may be used in any combination as the Committee may deem appropriate. Such Performance Conditions may also be based on performance determined on a per share basis (either basic or fully diluted) and/or as compared to the performance of a group of peer or comparator companies, prior performance periods, a published or special index or indices that the Committee deems appropriate, or such other measures selected or defined by the Committee at the time such Performance Conditions are established.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

ANNEX B137
(iii)

The Committee may make objectively determinable adjustments, modifications, or amendments to any Performance Condition as the Committee deems appropriate, including (but not limited to) with respect to items determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence, or that are related to discontinued operations, the disposal of a business or assets, or a change in accounting principle under GAAP, or that are attributable to the business operations of any entity acquired by the Company or a Subsidiary during a relevant performance period.

(f)

Fractional Shares.The Company shall not be obligated to issue any fractional shares of Common Stock in settlement of Awards granted under the Plan. If an Award includes or results in an entitlement to a fractional share for any reason, the Award shall be settled in full by issuance of the maximum whole number of shares of Common Stock the Participant is entitled to receive pursuant to the terms of the Award (upon satisfaction of all applicable conditions to the issuance of shares) and the Company may cancel the fractional share without any compensation to the Participant.

8. Dividends and Dividend Equivalents

The Committee may provide that Stock Awards shall earn dividends or dividend equivalents. Such dividends or dividend equivalents may be paid currently or may be credited to an account maintained on the books of the Company. Any payment or crediting of dividends or dividend equivalents will be subject to such terms, conditions, limitations, and restrictions as the Committee may establish, from time to time, including, without limitation, reinvestment in additional shares of Common Stock or common share equivalents. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may not provide for the current payment of dividends or dividend equivalents with respect to any shares of Common Stock subject to an Award with a Performance Condition; for such Awards, the Committee may only provide for the accrual of dividends or dividend equivalents that will not be payable to a Participant unless and until, and only to the extent that, the shares of Common Stock subject to the Award vest upon satisfaction of the relevant Performance Condition and all other applicable conditions to vesting. Dividend or dividend equivalent rights shall be as specified in the Award Agreement, or pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Committee with respect to outstanding Awards. No dividends or dividend equivalents shall be paid on Options or SARs.

9. Voting

Unless the Committee has determined otherwise, a Participant shall have the right to direct the vote of shares of Common Stock subject to an unvested Restricted Stock Award. Unvested shares of Common Stock that are eligible to vote shall be voted by a Plan Administrator in accordance with instructions received from Participants (unless to do so would constitute a violation of any applicable exchange rules). Shares subject to unvested Restricted Stock Awards as to which no instructions are received shall be voted by the Plan Administrator proportionately in accordance with instructions received with respect to all other unvested Restricted Stock Awards (including, for these purposes, outstanding awards granted under the Prior Plans and any other “non-qualified” stock incentive plan of the Company) that are eligible to vote (unless to do so would constitute a violation of any applicable exchange rules).

10. Nontransferability

Awards granted under the Plan, and during any period of restriction on transferability, shares of Common Stock issued in connection with the exercise of an Option or a SAR, or vesting of a Stock Award, may not be sold, pledged, hypothecated, assigned, margined, or otherwise transferred by a Participant in any manner other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, unless and until the shares underlying such Award have been issued, and all restrictions applicable to such shares have lapsed or have been waived by the Committee. No Award or interest or right therein shall be subject to the debts, contracts, or engagements of a Participant or his or her successors in interest or shall be subject to disposition by transfer, alienation, anticipation, pledge, encumbrance, assignment, or any other means whether such disposition be voluntary or involuntary or by operation of law, by judgment, lien, levy, attachment, garnishment, or any other legal or equitable proceedings (including bankruptcy and divorce), and any attempted disposition thereof shall be null and void, of no effect, and not binding on the Company in any way.

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

138ANNEX B

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may permit Options and/or shares issued in connection with an Option or a SAR exercise that are subject to restrictions on transferability to be transferred one time and without payment or consideration to a member of a Participant’s immediate family or to a trust or similar vehicle for the benefit of a Participant’s immediate family members. During the lifetime of a Participant, all rights with respect to Awards shall be exercisable only by such Participant or, if applicable pursuant to the preceding sentence, a permitted transferee.

11. Change of Control of the Company

(a)

The Committee may, at the time an Award is made or at any time prior to, coincident with, or after the time of a Change of Control:

(i)

provide for the adjustment of any Performance Conditions as the Committee deems necessary or appropriate to reflect the Change of Control;

(ii)

provide for the cancellation of any Awards then outstanding if the surviving entity or acquiring entity (or the surviving or acquiring entity’s parent company) in the Change of Control replaces the Awards with new rights of substantially equivalent value, as determined by the Committee;

(iii)

provide that upon an involuntary termination of a Participant’s employment as a result of a Change of Control, any time periods shall accelerate, and any other conditions relating to the vesting, exercise, payment, or distribution of an Award shall be waived; or

(iv)

provide that Awards shall be purchased for an amount of cash equal to the amount that could have been obtained for the shares covered by a Stock Award if it had been vested or by an Option or SAR if it had been exercised at the time of the Change of Control.

(b)

Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan or an Award Agreement to the contrary, the vesting, payment, purchase, or distribution of an Award may not be accelerated by reason of a Change of Control for any Participant unless the Participant’s employment is involuntarily terminated as a result of the Change of Control. For purposes of this Section 11, a Participant’s employment will be deemed to have been involuntarily terminated as a result of a Change of Control if it is involuntarily terminated other than for Gross Misconduct at any time beginning on the date of the Change of Control up to and including the first anniversary of the Change of Control.

(c)

A “Change of Control” shall be deemed to occur if and when:

(i)

any person, including a “person” as such term is used in Section 14(d)(2) of the 1934 Act (a “Person”), is or becomes a beneficial owner (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the 1934 Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities;

(ii)

individuals who, as of the Effective Date, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to the Effective Date whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board, shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding for this purpose any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of either an actual or threatened election contest (as such terms are used in Rule 14a-11 of Regulation 14A promulgated under the 1934 Act) or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board;

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

ANNEX B139

(iii)all or substantially all of the assets of the Company are sold, transferred, or distributed, or the Company is dissolved or liquidated; or
(iv)a reorganization, merger, consolidation, or other corporate transaction involving the Company (a “Transaction”) is consummated, in each case, with respect to which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such Transaction do not, immediately after the Transaction, own more than 50% of the combined voting power of the Company or other corporation resulting from such Transaction in substantially the same respective proportions as such stockholders’ ownership of the voting power of the Company immediately before such Transaction.

12. Award Agreements

Each Award under the Plan shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement (as such may be amended from time to time) that sets forth the terms, conditions, restrictions, and limitations applicable to the Award, including, but not limited to, the provisions governing vesting, exercisability, payment, forfeiture, cancellation, and termination of employment, all or some of which may be incorporated by reference into one or more other documents delivered or otherwise made available to a Participant in connection with an Award. The Committee need not require the formal execution or acceptance of such document by the Participant, in which case acceptance of any benefit of the Award by the Participant shall constitute agreement by the Participant to the terms, conditions, restrictions, and limitations set forth in the Plan and the Award Agreement as well as the administrative guidelines and practices of the Company in effect from time to time. Any assertion by an Employee that any term, condition, limitation, or restriction of the Award as specified in the Award Agreement is invalid or not binding on such Employee because of his or her non-acceptance of the Award Agreement (or any portion thereof) shall be deemed a refusal of the Award and the Employee shall cease to be a Participant with respect to the Award, which shall be immediately cancelled. Each Award Agreement shall provide for forfeiture or cancellation of unvested Awards if it is determined that a Participant engaged in Gross Misconduct on or prior to a vesting date.

13. Tax Withholding

Participants shall be solely responsible for any applicable taxes (including without limitation income, payroll, and excise taxes) and penalties, and any interest that accrues thereon, which they incur under applicable law in connection with the receipt, vesting, or exercise of any Award. The Company and its Subsidiaries shall have the right to require payment of, or may deduct from any payment made under the Plan or otherwise to a Participant, or may permit or require shares to be tendered or sold (including shares of Common Stock delivered or vested in connection with an Award) in an amount sufficient to cover withholding of, any federal, state, local, foreign, or other governmental taxes or charges required by law, or hypothetical taxes required to be paid by a Participant pursuant to a tax-equalization policy for expatriate employees, and to take such other action as may be necessary to satisfy any such withholding or payment obligations. The value of any shares allowed to be withheld or tendered for tax withholding may not exceed the amount allowed consistent with fixed plan accounting in accordance with GAAP, to the extent applicable. To the extent that a number of shares of Common Stock sufficient to satisfy a tax withholding obligation of the Company may not be withheld (whether because the Award has not vested in full pursuant to its terms, administrative procedures in effect at such time, applicable accounting principles, or any other reason), it shall be a condition to the obligation of the Company to issue shares of Common Stock upon the exercise of an Option or a SAR, or in settlement of any vested Award, that a Participant pay to the Company, on demand, such amount as may be requested by the Company for the purpose of satisfying any actual tax withholding (or hypothetical tax) liability. If the amount is not timely paid to the Company in cash by such Participant, the Company may cancel the Award and refuse to issue such shares.

14. Repayment Obligations and Right of Set-Off

(a)If the Committee determines that all conditions to vesting and payment or distribution of an Award (or any portion thereof), or the vesting and exercisability of an Option or SAR (or any portion thereof), were not satisfied in full on the scheduled vesting date (including but not limited to, any Performance Condition), the Committee shall cancel such vesting and refuse to issue or distribute shares or cash and immediately

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

140ANNEX B

terminate the Participant’s rights with respect to such Award (or improperly vested portion thereof). If any such Award (or portion thereof) has already been paid, distributed, or exercised, the Participant shall be obligated, upon demand, to: (i) in the case of an improperly vested Stock Award, return the amount of any cash payment received in settlement of the Stock Award (or improperly vested portion thereof), or if settled in shares, the number of shares of Common Stock issued in settlement of the Stock Award (or improperly vested portion thereof), or make a cash payment in an amount equal to the Fair Market Value of such shares on their vesting date, if greater than their Fair Market Value on the date they are due to be returned to the Company; or (ii) in the case of an improperly exercised Option or SAR, make a cash payment in an amount equal to the gain realized upon exercise of such Option or SAR (or improperly vested or exercised portion thereof), in each case, without reduction for any shares of Common Stock or cash withheld or paid to satisfy withholding tax or hypothetical tax obligations in connection with such Awards or any other obligation of the Participant.
(b)To the extent not prohibited by applicable law, and consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, if applicable, the Company will have the right to offset against its obligation to deliver vested shares of Common Stock or make any vested cash payment pursuant to any Award granted under the Plan: (i) any amounts paid by the Company or a Subsidiary to a third party pursuant to any award, judgment, or settlement of a complaint, arbitration, or lawsuit of which a Participant was the subject; and (ii) any outstanding amounts (including, without limitation, travel and entertainment or advance account balances, loans, repayment obligations under any Awards granted under the Plan, or awards granted under any other plan, or any obligations pursuant to a tax-equalization or housing allowance policy or other expatriate benefit) that a Participant then owes to the Company or a Subsidiary.

15. Other Benefit and Compensation Programs

Awards granted under the Plan and amounts received upon vesting or exercise of an Award shall not be deemed a part of a Participant’s regular, recurring compensation for purposes of calculating payments or benefits under any Company benefit plan or severance program unless specifically provided for under the plan or program. Unless specifically set forth in an Award Agreement, Awards under the Plan are not intended as payment for compensation that otherwise would have been delivered in cash, and even if so intended, such Awards shall be subject to such vesting requirements and other terms, conditions, restrictions, and limitations as may be provided in the Award Agreement.

16. Unfunded Plan

Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the Plan shall be unfunded and shall not create (or be construed to create) a trust or a separate fund or funds. The Plan shall not establish any fiduciary relationship between the Company and any Participant or other person. To the extent that any Participant holds any rights by virtue of an Award granted under the Plan, such rights shall constitute general unsecured liabilities of the Company and shall not confer upon any Participant or any other person or entity any right, title, or interest in any assets of the Company.

17. Expenses of the Plan

The expenses of the administration of the Plan shall be borne by the Company and its Subsidiaries. The Company may require Subsidiaries to pay for the Common Stock issued under the Plan to Participants employed (or formerly employed) by such Subsidiaries.

18. Rights as a Stockholder

Unless the Committee determines otherwise, a Participant shall not have any rights as a stockholder with respect to shares of Common Stock covered by an Award until the date the Participant becomes the holder of record with respect to such shares. No adjustment will be made for dividends or other rights for which the record date is prior to such date, except as provided in Section 6(d) or Section 8.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

ANNEX B141

19. Future Rights

No Employee shall have any claim or right to be granted an Award under the Plan. There shall be no obligation of uniformity of treatment of Employees under the Plan. Further, the Company and its Subsidiaries may adopt other compensation programs, plans, or arrangements as they deem appropriate or necessary. The adoption of the Plan or the granting of any Award shall not confer upon any Employee any right to continued employment in any particular position or at any particular rate of compensation, nor shall it interfere in any way with the right of the Company or a Subsidiary to terminate the employment of its Employees at any time, free from any claim or liability under the Plan. Unless expressly provided otherwise elsewhere in the Plan or in an Award Agreement, Awards under the Plan shall be made in anticipation of future service and/or subject to other vesting conditions and will not be earned until all conditions to vesting have been satisfied.

20. Amendment and Termination

The Plan may be amended, suspended, or terminated at any time by the Committee, provided that no amendment shall be made without stockholder approval, if it would (a) materially increase the number of shares available under the Plan (other than pursuant to Section 6(d)), (b) materially expand the types of awards available under the Plan, (c) materially expand the class of persons eligible to participate in the Plan, (d) materially extend the term of the Plan, (e) materially change the method of determining the exercise price of an Award, (f) delete or limit the Plan’s prohibition against Repricing, or (g) otherwise require approval by the stockholders of the Company in order to comply with applicable law or the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (or, if the Common Stock is not traded on the New York Stock Exchange, the principal national securities exchange upon which the Common Stock is then traded or quoted). No such amendment referred to above shall be effective unless and until it has been approved by the stockholders of the Company. The Committee retains the right to modify an Award without a Participant’s prior consent if it determines that the modification is required to comply with applicable law, regulation, or regulatory guidance (including applicable tax law). Except as may be provided by Section 7(e), Section 11, and this Section 20, any other adverse modification shall not be effective without the Participant’s written consent. The Company shall furnish or make available to Participants a written notice of any modification through a brochure, prospectus supplement, or otherwise, which notice shall specify the effective date of such modification.

21. Successors and Assigns

The Plan and any applicable Award Agreement entered into under the Plan shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and permitted assigns of Participants, including, without limitation, the executors, administrators, or trustees of a Participant’s estate, or any receiver or trustee in bankruptcy or representative of a Participant’s creditors.

22. Governing Law

The Plan and all Award Agreements entered into under the Plan shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of New York, except that any principles or provisions of New York law that would apply the law of another jurisdiction (other than applicable provisions of U.S. federal law) shall be disregarded. Notwithstanding the foregoing, matters with respect to indemnification, delegation of authority under the Plan, and the legality of shares of Common Stock issued under the Plan, shall be governed by the Delaware General Corporation Law.

23. Tax Compliance

Awards granted hereunder shall comply with or be exempt from Section 409A of the Code, unless otherwise determined by the Committee. If, pursuant to any Award that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, a Participant is entitled to receive a payment on a specified date, such payment shall be deemed made as of such specified date if it is made (a) not earlier than 30 days before such specified date, and (b) not later than December 31 of the year in which such specified date occurs or, if later, the fifteenth day of the third month following such specified

www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents

142ANNEX B

date; provided that the Participant shall not be permitted, directly or indirectly, to designate the taxable year in which such payment is made. If, pursuant to any Award that is subject to Section 409A of the Code, a Participant is entitled to a series of installment payments, such Participant’s right to the series of installment payments shall be treated as a right to a series of separate payments and not as a right to a single payment. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term “series of installment payments” has the same meaning as provided in Section 1.409A-2(b)(2)(iii) of the regulations promulgated under the Code. Notwithstanding any provision of this Plan to the contrary, in no event shall the Company or any Subsidiary be liable to a Participant on account of an Award’s failure to (a) qualify for favorable U.S. or foreign tax treatment, or (b) avoid adverse tax treatment under U.S. or foreign law, including, without limitation, Sections 409A and 457A of the Code.

24. Severability

If any provision of this Plan is finally held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable (whether in whole or in part), such provision shall be deemed modified to the extent, but only to the extent, of such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability, and the remaining provisions shall not be affected thereby; provided that, if any such provision is finally held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable because it exceeds the maximum scope determined to be acceptable to permit such provision to be enforceable, such provision shall be deemed modified to the minimum extent necessary in order to make such provision enforceable.

Citi 2019 Proxy Statement


Table of Contents

Citigroup Inc.
388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 10013





































 





Table of Contents



CITIGROUP INC.

242 TRUMBULL STREET3800 CITIGROUP CENTER DRIVE
BLDG G, MAIL ZONE G3-23
TAMPA, FL 33610-9122

HARTFORD, CT 06103

SCAN TO
VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or from a mobile phone scan the QR code above
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of informationup until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 24, 2017.15, 2019. Have your proxy card in hand whenyou access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create anelectronic voting instruction form.

VOTE BY TELEPHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. EasternTime on April 24, 2017.15, 2019. Have this proxy card in hand when you call and then follow therecorded instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope so that it isreceived prior to the Annual Meeting on April 25, 2017.16, 2019.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Citigroup Inc. in mailing proxy materials, youcan consent to receive all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronicallyvia e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions aboveto vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or accessstockholder communications electronically in future years.

To view or print a copy of the Proxy Statement or Annual Report on Form 10-K, go to www.citigroup.com/citi/investor/corporate_governance.html.

SHAREHOLDER MEETING REGISTRATION:
Shareholder Meeting Registration permits shareholders to register for the Annual Meeting and print their admission tickets at their leisure. If you plan to attend the meeting, please obtain an admission ticket by registering no later than April 15, 2019. Click the "Register for Meeting"
link at www.proxyvote.com.


TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E19692-P86879-Z69415E59445-P17380-Z73893-Z73892KEEP THIS PORTIONTHISPORTION FOR YOUR RECORDSYOURRECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
  CITIGROUP INC.  

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR Proposals 1 through 3.4.

1. Proposal to elect 15 Directors:
1.     Proposal to elect 15 Directors:ForAgainstAbstain
1a.Michael L. Corbat
1b.
1b.Ellen M. Costello
1c.Barbara J. Desoer
1d.John C. Dugan
1e.Duncan P. Hennes
1d.
1f.Peter B. Henry
1e.Franz B. Humer
1f.
1g.S. Leslie Ireland
1h.Lew W. (Jay) Jacobs, IV
1i.Renée J. James
1g.
1j.Eugene M. McQuade
1h.Michael E. O'Neill
1i.
1k.Gary M. Reiner
1j.Anthony M. Santomero
1k.
1l.Diana L. Taylor
1l.William S. Thompson, Jr.
1m.
1m.James S. Turley
1n.ForAgainstAbstain
1n.     Deborah C. Wright
1o.Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon

ForAgainstAbstain
2.Proposal to ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as Citi's independent registered public accounting firm for 2017.2019.
3.Advisory Votevote to Approveapprove Citi's 2016 Executive Compensation.2018 executive compensation.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote1 YEAR on the following proposal:1 Year2 Years3 YearsAbstain
4.Advisory Vote to ApproveApproval of the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation.Citigroup 2019 Stock Incentive Plan.
 ForAgainstAbstain
The Board of Directors recommends a voteAGAINSTProposals 5 through 9.7.ForAgainstAbstain
 
5.     StockholderShareholder proposal requesting a report on the Company's policies and goalsShareholder Proxy Access Enhancement to reduce the gender pay gap.Citi's proxy access bylaw provisions.
6.Stockholder proposal requesting that the Board appoint a Stockholder Value Committee to address whether the divestiture of all non-core banking business segments would enhance shareholder value.
7.Stockholder proposal requesting a report on lobbying and grassroots lobbying contributions.
8.Stockholder proposal requesting an amendment to the General Clawback policy to provide that a substantial portion of annual total compensation of Executive Officers shall be deferred and forfeited, in part or whole, at the discretion of the Board, to help satisfy any monetary penalty associated with a violation of law.
9.StockholderShareholder proposal requesting that the Board adopt a policy prohibiting the vesting of equity-based awards for senior executives due to a voluntary resignation to enter government service.
7.Shareholder proposal requesting that the Board amend Citi's bylaws to give holders in the aggregate of 15% of Citi's outstanding common stock the power to call a special meeting.

YesNo
Please indicate if you would like to keep your vote confidential under the current policy.


                          
YesNo


     
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]    DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date





Table of Contents




ADMISSION TICKETMeeting Information


20172019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
April 25, 201716, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. at Citi's
Headquarters
The Great Hall of The Cooper Union
7 East 7th388 Greenwich Street
New York, New York 1000310013

You should present this admission ticket in order to gain admittance to the meeting. This ticket admits only the stockholder(s) listed on the reverse side and is not transferable. Each stockholder may be asked to present valid picture identification, such as a driver's license. Cameras, recording devices and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the meeting.

If you submit your proxy by telephone or Internet, do not return your proxy card.

Thank you for your proxy submission.

Shareholder Meeting Registration permits shareholders to register for the Annual Meeting and print their admission tickets at their leisure.
If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please click the "Register for Meeting" link at www.proxyvote.com.



Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:The Notice
and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at
www.citigroup.com/citi/investor/corporate_governance.html.




E19693-P86879-Z69415E59446-P17380-Z73893-Z73892

CITIGROUP INC.

Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
of Citigroup Inc. for the Annual Meeting, April 25, 201716, 2019

The undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Michael E. O'Neill,John C. Dugan, Michael L. Corbat and Rohan Weerasinghe, and each of them his or her true and lawful agents and proxies with full power of substitution in each, to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Citigroup Inc. ("Citigroup") to be held at The Great Hall of The Cooper Union, 7 East 7thCiti's Headquarters, 388 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10003,NY 10013, on Tuesday, April 25, 2017,16, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. local time and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, on all matters properly coming before the Annual Meeting, including but not limited to the matters set forth on the reverse side.

You are encouraged to specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes (SEE REVERSE SIDE) but you need not mark any boxes if you wish to vote in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations. Your proxy cannot be voted unless you sign, date and return this card or follow the instructions for telephone or Internet voting set forth on the reverse side.

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no direction is made, this proxy will be votedFOR Proposals 1-3, for1-4, and1 YEARAGAINST for Proposal 4 andAGAINST Proposals 5-95-7 and will be voted in the discretion of the proxies (or, in the case of a Voting Plan, will be voted in the discretion of the plan trustee or administrator) upon such other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.Meeting.

The signer(s) hereby acknowledge(s) receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and accompanying Proxy Statement. The signer(s) hereby revoke(s) all proxies heretofore given by the signer(s) to vote at said Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof. NOTE: Please sign exactly as name appears herein. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such.

Attention employee benefit plan participants:If you hold shares of Citigroup Common Stockcommon stock through an employee benefit plan, you should complete, sign and return this proxy card to instruct the trustee of the plan how to vote these shares. Your proxy must be received no later than 8:00 a.m., Eastern Time, on April 21, 201711, 2019 so that the trustee of the plan (who votes the shares on behalf of plan participants) has adequate time to tabulate the voting instructions. Your voting instructions will be kept confidential.

If shares of Citigroup common stock are issued to or held for the account of the undersigned under employee plans and voting rights attached to such shares (any of such plans, a "Voting Plan"), then the undersigned hereby directs the respective fiduciary of each applicable Voting Plan to vote all shares of Citigroup common stock in the undersigned's name and/or account under such Plan in accordance with the instructions given herein and the terms of the applicable Voting Plan, at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, on all matters properly coming before the Annual Meeting, including but not limited to, the matters set forth on the reverse side.


IF NO BOXES ARE MARKED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DESCRIBED ABOVE.

CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE